Russian Invasion of Ukraine (2022): Thread 1 - Ukrainian Liars vs Russian Liars with Air and Artillery Superiority

How well is the combat this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 46 6.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ A well planned strike with few faults

    Votes: 45 6.5%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 292 42.1%
  • ⭐⭐ Worse than expected

    Votes: 269 38.8%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 42 6.1%

  • Total voters
    694
Status
Not open for further replies.
Did they try to strap explosives to dogs yet? Because their strategy seems to be an even mix of Third Reich, Spanish Republic and Soviet lunacy.

"This cute little Pomeranian is the Pupper of Kiev and destroyed 192 tanks and received 338 pets so far. Boris Johnson in talks to award him the Dickin Medal for dickin' the Russian Army."

Need to get a bit of Imperial Japan flavour and train civilian volunteers to charge tanks with an anti-tank mine stuck on the end of a long wooden stick
 
Russia's top military command has ordered heavy strategic bomber flights in effort to block US and European military aid from getting to Ukraine, per a defense ministry statement

Shit is going down, guys.
1523068446546.jpg


Between the confirmed ELINT stuff reported earlier, control of the air, artillery being loosed directly in a city, shooting down a Uke drone, and this (assuming true)...
The violence is escalating.
 


fyi - pro-Russian tiktok account:

Seems like he passes one of those infamous Russian mobile crematorium trucks. You know the ones that incinerate everything in a radius of half a mile.
 
It would be the dumbest thing to give USAF in Europe an excuse to enter combat. F35 memes aside the Russian AF cannot compete with USAF SEAD and BVR AA capabilities nor can they afford losses from a peer to peer skirmish.
Memes aside the Russians know that and if the US gets involved the nuclear missiles fly soon after. Small ones at first to demonstrate intent at least.
 
Bots from before are back
View attachment 3027217
But at least they've learned that "exclude" and "include" are not interchangeable in English
View attachment 3027218
Excluding Russia from the UN security council would be the ultimate retarded idea and utterly misses the point of the council. Its not there to make sure tinpot Middle Eastern/African dictator doesn't panty raid his neighbours. Its there to prevent that shit spiralling into nuclear war, its not an accident that the permanent members who have vetos are the 5 (legitimately) nuclear armed nations.
 
Yeah, and the moment ZOG nations do get involved, Taiwan becomes China.
I don't know why you think the Chinese are interested in taking Taiwan by force. Time is on their side and like Russia they would take decent losses in attempt but unlike Russia they have an example to why not to do it. Taiwan militarily is to China as Switzerland was to Nazi Germany.
 
Excluding Russia from the UN security council would be the ultimate retarded idea and utterly missed the point of the council. Its not there to make sure tinpot Middle Eastern/African dictator doesn't panty raid his neighbours. Its there to prevent that shit spiralling into nuclear war, its not an accident that the permanent members who have vetos are the 5 (legitimately) nuclear armed nations.

How do you even do it? Is there a mechanism to remove a security council member?
 
Georgia 2008 the Russia and the two republics are based on the original borders, Ossetia's borders were drawn in 1922, meanwhile Abkhazia's borders date back to 1883 and was initially independent of Georgia in 1921 and originally petitioned to join the RSFSR

The CCP has a map from 408 BC that says they own Taiwan & Vietnam, doesn't mean any attempts to enforce that shit would be unending the current accepted reality, so Soviet-based claims can go fuck themselves.

But irrelevant, because Russia pulled troops from both areas and made no effort change the borders.
 
And the world descends into an absolute clusterfuck because Taiwan isn't going down alone.
I think it would be a fairly one-sided war if it doesn't go nuke. It would be basically China and Russia vs the US, which is not a war the US can win, though granted, even without nukes, both China and Russia would also be fucked.
 
Memes aside the Russians know that and if the US gets involved the nuclear missiles fly soon after. Small ones at first to demonstrate intent at least.
No one is throwing nuclear weapons unless Russia or NATO proper is invaded. What we're seeing is the US taking the Russians role in the Vietnam conflict and the Russians theirs. The Russians can't shoot at NATOFOR without worsening the situation for themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: make_it_so
"We fight for the new world order"
She didn't get the memo that this has a negative connotation among many Fox viewers.
I don't think this was just a bad turn of phrase, especially with that "shield of the Euro" crap she followed it up with. She is parroting talking points. Which they aren't even new talking points among people who believe in the EU/UN/shit like that. It is just kind of surreal to see someone overtly knowing they are fighting for it proudly and yeah she probabaly lost 90 percent of Fox viewers with that, which good the boomer warhawks need to wake the fuck up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back