Russian Invasion of Ukraine (2022): Thread 1 - Ukrainian Liars vs Russian Liars with Air and Artillery Superiority

How well is the combat this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 46 6.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ A well planned strike with few faults

    Votes: 45 6.5%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 292 42.1%
  • ⭐⭐ Worse than expected

    Votes: 269 38.8%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 42 6.1%

  • Total voters
    694
Status
Not open for further replies.
What threat were Libya and Syria (though to be fair America never actually "invaded" those countries, they only funded, trained, supplied antigovernment forces, much like Russia is accused of doing with the Donbass separatists)?
Technically we did invade Syria. There are still maybe a 1,000 US soldiers deployed inside Syria today.

Libya is more complicated. We organized a "no-fly" zone which turned into both a naval blockade and a "no drive" zone over large parts of the country.
Then we sent in drones to specifically assassinate the leader of Libya in a military operation. But technically there was never quite a ground war.

But there is still a chance. In 2021, the US congress passed the "“Libya Stabilisation Act” which was intended to establish a legal framework for
a new intervention by the US into Libya to bring "peace" and "stability". Biden has been distracted with other things since it passed, but I'm sure
they will come back to it..
 
You see, "might makes right". There is no such thing as "wrong is wrong". All your moralizing faggotry is just that, a smokescreen for the truth, and that truth is "Russia is wrong because we all agreed they were". There's no inherent moral difference between the actions of the two countries, it's all about who's part of the cool kids club and who isn't.

You could have just gone out and said it outright from the beginning without pretending you cared about "right" and "wrong".
No, as stated earlier in the threat, you're not just wrong - you're a hypocrite.
What you and Russia want to do is not do away with international laws, you want to establish your own. And when your regime is old and in danger of collapse, you'll start whimpering about the morality and justice of your system. Where will "might makes right" be then, when your head is in the guillotine? Are you going to stoically say "yes, this is the way it is, I deserve to die and you deserve to rule"? No, you will not, you will beg for your life and accuse your oppressor. Because we do not exist in a state of nature, free of all rules and morality, we live in a fucking civilization where we hold each other to basic standards and expectations. If the group does not like what you are doing, you are shunned. You cannot force people to be your friends, you have to work within the system and appeal to more universal truths than "me have rock, me crush your head with rock if you no give me thing."
 
Fuck off with that "and you are lynching negros" bullshit. A is A. Wrong is wrong.

Just because other countries had bad wars does not mean Russia can do whatever it wants.

Lol, this was going to happen anyways at some point.

Logical insanity trumps desire for peace in hard times.

Putin sees that his country will be fucked in the future and he wants to prevent it.

Not saying it's right but Germany before WW1 saw that it's situation would be hopeless by 1918 and that Russia and France would buttfuck Germany into oblivion if they did nothing.
 
No, this shit doesn’t fly. You don’t get to invade other countries because they MIGHT be a threat, you only get to use this excuse if they ARE a threat.

If Finland tomorrow announced it was joining NATO, does Russia automatically get to invade? Who has the greater right here - NATO expanding eastward by treaty, or Russia expanding westward by force?
Now apply this logic to the Saudis currently engaging in a war against Yemen, who is not at all a threat as the poorest country in the ME, with US support.
 
FMsNkoXXIAcfdt6.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
5 million rubles is good for a gun, but not good for a tank.
Not enough of Kyketardium in ruskie viens, sorry. Also any tank brought in would be charger for significantly more price, which ukies would not be able to afford any way. :story:
 
AHAHAHA, THEIR MINISTRY OF DEFENSE TOLD THOSE ARMED CIVILIAN FUCKTARDS, THAT THE VEHICLES WITHOUT "Z" AND WITH UKRAINIAN FLAG MAY BE SABOTEURS, EXPECT EVEN MORE FRIENDLY FIRE.
View attachment 3028412
@дядя Боря :story: Потом будешь рассказывать про стотыщубитыхтанкованей опять, да?
Uabros, maybe you should check out your govt? I'd question their sanity at this very moment, perhaps they want you all dead? On purpose?
Give up. Give in. Drop Zelensky to DPR\LPR door.
 
How about this, lets have the whole world put the same sanctions on the US that Russia is currently facing. I wouldn't mind if it's just 1 for 1, despite the US having committed far more fuckery over the course of the past 3 decades.

Would that be OK? Wrong is wrong, after all. Wouldn't it make sense for both wrongdoers to suffer the same consequences?
The casus belli for most US engagements was better than that of the Russian Federation invading Ukraine. Granted, it wasn't significantly better but it still is better.

Additionally, most of Europe and the EU countries have come to rely on the US as the enforcement of it's will that would not fly if done by their respective armed forces. As such, no nation wants censure as it would affect them.

Of course, we also contribute about 40% to the economic engine of the world.
 
Yeah and Ukraine is gonna be turned into a launch pad invasion springboard to destroy holy mother Russia the second it joins NATO is a paranoid delusion of lolcow proportions
Why in God's name would the West want Ukraine in NATO other to take down Russia? They want to put nukes in the Ukraine so they can use it as leverage over Russia, you'd have to be a retard to not understand how this would be an existential threat to Russia which you are.
 
Sorry if it's been posted already, I'm like 40 pages behind.

From vatnik telegram channels: "Montenegrins march under the Katyusha with a banner "Serbs in Montenegro - Russians in Ukraine" and chant Fuck NATO!"

View attachment 3028628
I can't tell for sure but that looks like 20 people carrying some flags in the dead of night.
 
Haven't you heard? This makes you a globalist now according to all the Putinfags.
What tankies don't realize that, for as much ill advised interventionism the US engages in, the United States still preforms a universal service to everyone by ensuring global trade and finance is always up and running. That's why the EU and NATO always put up with it, and why the West is a functioning whole. Somali pirates harassing cargo ships? Who is on the scene? Why, it's the US Navy - with China along for the ride. Where are the Russians? Oh, right, they're in Georgia. Because... ummm... well... you see... it's funny...
Hey look over there. The US did something bad again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back