Chantal Sarault / Chantal Al-Refae / Foodie Beauty - Delusional drug fiend hamplanet mukbanger from Canada trying to be a glamorous online influencer. Pathological liar, huge bitch, narcissist, animal abuser

New community post:

Screenshot 2022-03-06 at 09-33-47 Foodie Beauty - YouTube.png
 
Her recent late night "look I'm at home you guise!" stream was particularly gross.

She comes on with her Gatineau Glitter a mess, eyelashes off to prove she was at home the "whole time". Mkay.

But to the gross stuff. Got a shot of some blood on her pillow and unshaven pit..edited to add, aren't those sheets and pillow cases practically new?

View attachment 3044533

View attachment 3044535
Not to mention Chinny’s freshly & well shaved head (even in places T-Rex arms can’t easily reach) PLUS, in McStabby‘s video from that morning (Saturday; March 5th) there are some SUSPICIOUSLY FAMILIAR looking boots by the back door that are not seen in any of his other recent videos.
(example screenshots Feb. 27th - March 4th)
If it waddles like a Gunt & screeches like a Gunt….. 🤷
12EAD2A0-60CC-4AE9-B050-5BD9A1C8CD13.jpeg45F1E6A7-6800-4323-886D-0218ABA16D51.jpegE93F8A45-014B-4275-9F94-13ADB0198174.jpeg72DF370D-DE3A-42C8-B772-67D2F32ECA68.jpeg1137BCB7-526E-46F2-9715-C1FB62DB5332.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Love how “The Glow Up” is going for our favorite skinny minnie aka the Gunt is going
View attachment 3047527
She’s definitely looking very glamorous here wearing trendy only 2x sized yoga pants and a stylish hoodie, tastefully decorated all over with various stains of unknown origin :hah:
Ah yes. A butt lift and some lip fillers are all it'll take.
 
She's really triggered by that Brooke girl giving her the finger in that reply video. It's actually pretty fucking hilarious.

"Being skinny doesn't make you pretty! It doesn't make you nice! So there! Charles Manson was a skinny piece of shit!"

You really got here with that one, Gunt! Her insults/come backs are so painfully embarrassing.
 
I woke up out of my sleep just to see that this cunt is still certified looney, but we already knew that. She literally emailed a detective to tell them that she changed her mind?

And did she really email a law enforcement officer from her Foodie Beauty email account? Yeah, she definitely wasn't serious. Let's see how that plays out for her since she believes that all it takes is a simple email before all is well again. What a fucking clown.

And Chantal isn't going to glow up and Euro-beeze. The bitch is, however, going to blow up and cough and wheeze.

FYI: I would rather not have this stupid Nader arc continue.
 
Last edited:
I haven't seen anyone else post this yet, so here is her supposed email to the detective, retracting her report. Her comments section is rightfully ripping her apart. This bitch admitted to filing a police report because her feelings were hurt and that DeeDee's presence was mentally tormenting her.

371119.jpg
 
Not to mention Chinny’s freshly & well shaved head (even in places T-Rex arms can’t easily reach)
She crowed about having shaved her foopa which, though X., would only happen if she saw/was planning to see Nugly.

You really got here with that one, Gunt!
She's one step below properly Godwinning this woman. "Even Hitler didn't flip off people he didn't like!"

is her supposed email to the detective, retracting her report.
And she's still trying to argue that she isn't seeing him? Seriously?

I think the only surprise here is that she took this long to retract her statement. ETA: FOUR DAYS IS A LONG TIME. Oh, and that she changed her icon to virtue-signal just how much Chins SITS STANDS WITH UKRAINE. What with her mental health and all, I'm surprised any tidbit of information about the outside world made it past her fat thick skull. Unless one of her VIB changed it for her in the hopes that she won't look quite so much like an ignorant, self-centered goblin...

She writes like a 13-year-old.
 
Last edited:
Archive of AM I DROPPING THE CHARGES, posted March 6, 2022 at 5:16 AM:
View attachment 3047612

That's super cute that she thinks she can "drop the charges"...

She claims to still have weekly therapy (therapy? That isn't a qualified psych which is what she desperately needs - someone to diagnose whatever the fuck is pathologically wrong and medicate accordingly, not ass pats from a therapist). She's addicted to Nader.

At the beginning she wasn't going to drop the case, but then you beezers had to go turn it into a joke! All the reaction channels and comments made "her case™" into a joke. She said personal things but they were true and they happened. She shouldn't have been so personal with the drug use and sex.

For her it was just supposed to be a tinder hook-up. But then she already said some things and people found out who he was and then the abuse happened again and again... and the cycle! There's something called trauma bonding and she thinks that explains it (I want to beat every VIB feeding her this pop-psych bs over the head with a brick - give me tophats). It's his fault he got her hooked on him (and apparently people doxing him?).

This will really piss him off but she's trying to be respectful, respectful to the case™ and it isn't supposed to be malicious. She wants to tell her story™. She knows this doesn't look good on her or Nader.

On February 27 she sent an email (she sent a couple of emails apparently) to the detective with proof! Well actually it's not proof... but uhh. With some information. Then she sent another email and shared a screenshot:

0004CF96-B17D-4F92-A410-70BB25935765.jpeg

She doesn't know if she sent that email before or after she visited Nader, but when she claims to have gone over they were talking and things were fine! Deedee was upstairs and working while Chantal was alone downstairs with Nader (if someone could please reply with clips of her saying Deedee turned her away at the door and didn't let Nads out to play that'd be great)... she thought they could just make up then and there and everything could be great! She's clever though and researched domestic cases and this is all very common - so she didn't fall for the trap.

So she wants to retract the charges™ because her mentals and he's conniving and smart and she's not. So she won't be talking about it all going forward. Muh trauma. She won't be watching anything to do with him.

She concedes that it isn't in her hands anymore and she can't actually drop the case (as it's now in the Crown's hands) but it's complicated™. She went on an Ontario lawyer website (lol) and found this information she shares:

2DD8CAFB-CE56-4261-B47D-2FEE13A2DA56.jpeg

So she's changed her mind a lot. Right now she apparently doesn't want to drop the charges?! Nader has her feeling guilty because all the domestic abuse was made out to be Chantal's fault. She feels good about her decision (while saying she's guilty and wants to drop the charges but also doesn't).

Her anxiety is through the roof and her mental health is declining (couldn't possibly have any correlation with the stimulant abuse we've witnessed in the past few days). Oh and she's also quit weed and is going through withdrawals!

So she asked for the charges to be dropped but doesn't know if she'll go report and press the charges again (?) and she's scared he'll do something if she "goes through with the charges™.

She feels like she's being laughed at. She knows she is. It's been hard. That's it!

Didn't intend to re-cap but there we go. No stops on gunts wild ride, we're currently in the "not talking about it publicly and wanting to keep it off YouTubey" phase.
 
She is not making enough money for Youtube to care, she has fewer than 100k followers.

View attachment 3044350

It's important to know Social Blade stats are estimated and is before Youtube takes their cut, taxes, etc. If we are generous Chantal makes Youtube about $55k a year on the high end of the chart. Google is worth 1.7 Billion. If she loses her channel it won't be because Youtube is losing money because of her, it'll be because of the uncensored dicks. But you're right, she dirty deletes. If there is nothing there for them to find they won't do anything.

She because TeamYoutube on Twitter noticed this doesn't mean anything either. Youtube on Twitter is pretty much the only way creators can contact Youtube if they have problems, and a lot of the time it's just canned responses and lies. See my previous post about consistency earlier. Youtube Twitter is even less consistent than regular Youtube. Most of the time they just tell people to read articles.

The reason it has been easy for Haydur Nation to go after Hussy he because he's a dirty ban evader and Youtube hates that. They kick you out, they don't want you back.

(LOL I just noticed before posting Social Blade has Chantal's channel listed as a tech channel.)
Social blade income estimates are far from accurate. However, the views can be used to guesstimate actual income.
A million views grosses approx $4,000 USD (and often much more, depending on number of ad breaks- keep in mind Chantal's views come from replays of very long lives with numerous ad breaks) that's $5,100 Canadian so at least $10,000 based on the 1.966 million views over 30 days cited in the example above.

I got the $4,000 per million figure from a YouTuber I know personally whose channel consistently gets 2+ million views a month

Add to that her superchats (isn't there a bot tracking her superchats?) AND her memberships. Recently she claimed to have 800 members- which I totally believe. She more likely has 300-400 actual members and the rest are VIB's who got booted and bought 2nd or 3rd memberships to keep playing in her chats.

I absolutely do believe that she's been grossing $20k for the past couple of months, 10k+ for several months before that. Before the Nader drama started she was still making $5,000- $8,000 a month based on her spending and lack of credit. Keep in mind that she's paid as self-employed with zero taxes or withholdings of any kind. Her channel is making Google a lot of money for such a small channel.
 
“There were questions to whether I had dropped the charges, at the beginning I wasn’t going to”

The beginning of what? Nader sweet talking her round again? Was she holding her ground, but he’s been nice enough to her the past week in secret that she’s dropping it for good?

“I don’t know if I sent the email before or after I went over there. That one time I told you I went over there”.

That one time we were told about, as if there have been other times we haven’t been told about.

This video gives me slight hostage video #02 vibes.
It’s like she’s been told, as Nader always says, “Fix it. Make it right”.
To make sure her audience know she has dropped the charges, or he will reconsider spending time with her.

The only reason she is saying things like, “but the things did happen” is because he isn’t there looming over her while she’s recording it, and to try to maintain a shred of dignity.
 
This is the first summary I've ever written, so pls be gentle. I hope it's not too wordy.
Chins is trying to switch to chamomile tea. Processing emotions and trauma, realizing everything she's gone through and is sure we will be "processing" for years. She includes a domestic violence trigger warning and a "legal battle" trigger warning. She was not told that she can't talk about what happened, but was advised not to talk about "certain things." She understands cases like these can drag on forever and wants to answer some questions that must be weighing so heavily upon us about what he's done to her. She doesn't think she's handled it properly in the past because she was "out of her mind on drugs most of the time" and just generally out of her mind because of how traumatic her Nader experience was. Wouldn't have been able to get through it without numbing herself. It's just so hard for her to look at herself in those streams . She woke up with a new lease on life [manic]. Needs to work through the trauma in therapy because it was just so traumatic, guys. Says she didn't handle the situation the best but only because she's never experienced anything like DV before. Chins truly believes you can be addicted to a person for all the wrong reasons. Needs to speak her truth, in spite of the backlash she expects. At the beginning she wasn't going to drop the charges, but the way they've made fools of themselves online has made this whole situation seem like a joke. She felt motivated the day of the report due to a variety of factors, including the "emotional torment" of "DeeDee being there." All of the things she said were true, and did happen, but when she first met him she probably shouldn't have been so public about her involvement with him. Why would she keep going back? She loved him. She thought she loved him. She doesn't fully understand it, but there's something called trauma bonding and she thinks it makes sense. He slowly got her hooked on him, and she didn't see this abusive side of him initially. Well, she saw some red flags, but she liked the attention. But she really really believed his lies ("which were plentiful"). The intention of this video is just to tell her story, but he won't understand that, which makes things so much harder for her. On February 27th, she sent an email to the detective with the screenshot shared by faster kiwis than I in which she retracts her statement. She doesn't remember if she sent the email before or after going over to the traphouse to grovel some days ago. It seemed to her like they were going to get back together. She's been doing a lot of research on what domestic violence can look like and it's just so, like, messy. She can't handle a court case now, especially with someone as calculating and conniving as Nader. She's not gonna talk about this or consume any content related to him. She wanted to get back together at one point. She's changed her mind since sending the email, as of recording she doesn't really want to drop the charges. She blames herself constantly, because that's how he made her feel for 10 months. "Anything abusive, it was always my fault." The case will more than likely be investigated because he has a criminal history. She feels good in her decision to report him, for now. Even someone threatening you with a remote controller is abusive, even if you don't realize it. Her anxiety has been through the roof. Her mental and physical health are declining, and she really really needs our help. She needs not to share about it, but she needed to let us know what's going on, but she's not going to share more. He acts like she was zero for the whole ten months, but that's laughable. How could Chantal be zero? Her stuff is there. She's not sure how she's ultimately going to handle it. There's also the factor of whether or not he will retaliate against her. She just wants to be done away with him. But then, he gets away scott free, and she gets no justice at all. She doesn't feel like she deserves justice. She feels like she's being judged by the police and everyone around her (even though it's probably just in her head) and she knows she is [?]. This is the last she's going to say, even though she should be allowed to say things, but she has to be careful.
 
I absolutely do believe that she's been grossing $20k for the past couple of months, 10k+ for several months before that. Before the Nader drama started she was still making $5,000- $8,000 a month based on her spending and lack of credit. Keep in mind that she's paid as self-employed with zero taxes or withholdings of any kind. Her channel is making Google a lot of money for such a small channel.

And yet she claims having 7$ in her bank account and her credit card(s?) is maxed out. If anyone needs yet another proof she's an utter moron, you have it right here.

May the gods of Canada Revenue Agency decent upon her and claim the taxes she owns since 2017. It would be a nice financial arc.
 
A little reaction, coupled with some amateur behavioral analysis.

1. So much for being a champion of all women. This guy is bad, just bad bad bad bad bad, so bad, you guise, that Chinny had to be cracked out just to deal with it. But fuck it, she can't find the time in between sourcing her next dinner energy necessary to take a dangerous criminal off the streets to prevent him from victimizing another helpless female. You're on your own, bitches. It ain't Chinny's job to take care of you--it's hard enough just trying to feed and bathe take care of herself.

2. Yes, it's been said, but you aren't "in it" on the first date hookup (edited per @Whizzbang Wallop), and if you are, you're the one with the problem, not him. She looks up and around the room a lot here as she discusses this particular topic, rather than down and to the left, where she accesses emotions. I think she's trying to recall what she's read or heard people say about their own experiences, and she's just regurgitating bullet points.

3. There's no such thing as being addicted to someone "for the right reasons." Addictions in general are bad, whether it's a drug addiction, a sex addiction, or an addiction to buying random shit off QVC.

4. @Rotogravure mentioned the reflection of the ring light in her teeth, and now I can't look at anything else.

Will add more later--working.

5. Huge eye block when she mentions therapy, and lots of single shoulder-shrugging. We already know she's lying--this is just further evidence.

6. FYI--she's not detoxing from THC, she's coming down from cocaine.

7. Massive eye block again when she says she wasn't legally allowed to talk about the case. I still believe she was reported, and the cops called her and warned her that if she didn't shut up about it, and essentially leave Nugly and Deeds alone, she would be prosecuted for harassment.

8. Eye block around "what he's done to me." Lie. Later on, eye block around using drugs to cope with "what he's done to me." She isn't lying about the drug use, she's lying about the reason for using the drugs, and what he did to her.

9. Admits she was out of her mind on drugs most of the time when she was dealing with Nugly's "abuse." Not all of the bad bad bad bad stuff happened before she purportedly quit using, Furthermore, she doesn't say "coke," she says "drugs." I think she just admitted (albeit by accident) to using more drugs than cocaine, and after the day she supposedly quit. Not that we had a shed of doubt before this.

10. It's hard to look at herself, actually, when she was so high in all those streams? Huge eye block. And for good reason. Chinny a) doesn't watch her old streams, and b) doesn't feel shame. X.

11. She's got a whole new lease on life, guise, and she's gonna start off by making a recorded video (👍🏻) about her ex (👎🏼) to discuss dropping the false charges (👍🏼) because her mental health is just so bad (um...🤞🏼?). So she feels great and things are gonna turn around, but she's giving up because she's just so weak and helpless. This "whole new lease on life" just sounds like a comedown to me.

12. She's never been in this situation before--several eye blocks. Again, that one makes sense--we know she's been in this situation before with a previous aggressive partner, unless of course she was lying about that as well.

13. When she starts talking about the case (from filing it up until it started to "feel like a joke"), she suddenly begins to gesticulate. This is the first time in this video. I don't know what it means--is she story telling? This is a baseline behavior, but is it a baseline when she's lying, or just when she's upset about something?

14. She eye blocks through the entire phrase "I don't know what my motivation to go to the police was" and again at "a perfect storm of things." She knows why she went, 100%. And so do we!

15. I don't know why I'm surprised to hear her characterize Deeds being at the trap as "emotional torment" or that she finds it sufficient justification to file a police report. This is the same woman who had an actual meltdown over a night out, and considers a raised voice "abusive."

16. When she talks about Nugly making fun of her online, the hand starts to go again, but it does something different this time. She makes a superficial adjustment to her headscarf, touches her face, touches her chin, touches her sternal notch (or close to it--she probably can't find it under the fat). I believe this--I think she really did feel bad about what he was saying and doing.

17. Eye blocking at "drug use" and "sex", which might indicate shame (however subverted) over these topics. Also at "meant to be a Tinder hookup," which could be shame (X.) or a lie.

18. Big eye block at "abuse." Accessing memory (or imagination), not emotion, as you would expect. Upward intonation, rather than emphatic downward inflection. Time hiding (went from "didn't expect him to get doxxed" to "the abuse kept happening"? Durr, you never indicated when it started).

19. Big eye block and self-soothing head touch before "Ugh, it's just a mess." That's a weird way to characterize the cycle of abuse. "Yeah guise, it was really complicated, yannnow? Anyways! What should I have for lunch?"

20. Eye blocking, gesticulating (with pointer finger, not to self-soothe), and taffy-pulling, but she's pulling us up, not down, which is weird. Her eyes are practically rolling around in her head. So she wants us to believe this next part, guys, but even she can't corral her face into selling it to us.

21. Around the idea of "trauma bonding," there's the head bobble (which she does from time to time--not sure what it means, might indicate something she doesn't know or isn't familiar or comfortable with but is going to spout off on anyway), as well as eye blocking and a deliberate eye roll. She doesn't believe this shit herself, but she's gonna try to sell you on it. TraumaBond! Try it today with your failing non-relationship! Buy now.

22. When she talks about the second night they met, she looks down to her left for emotional access and then looks directly at the camera as she tells us she was hooked. I believe her here. But then she says she didn't see this side of him, and she can't look at the camera. She touches her nose, then stares off-camera for a moment. She's accessing an emotional memory, and it's interrupting the lie. Then she comes out of her brief reverie and corrects herself: "Well, I did see some red flags." Well that's nice, Chins. Glad you saw them well enough to push them out of your way in your attempt to hurple full-tilt into a swimming pool of red flags.

23. Single shoulder shrug at "liking the attention" and head shaking at "need for validation." Odd, because we know these things to be true beyond a shred of doubt. Maybe these are signs of embarrassment, or a bid for pity? Look, I'm on two hours of sleep, and I did say I was an amateur. This is followed by a face stroke to self-soothe. I wonder if she isn't as comfortable with being an absolutely desperate, pathetic attention whore as we thought.

24. I believe her when she talks about his lies. There's a single shoulder shrug, which I think is a bid for pity, and a lot of emotional accessing and a massively increased blink rate. I think she really does perceive, at least in this moment, that he's a liar and she can't trust him.

25. Self-soothe when she mentions how pissed he'll be that she's talking about this, followed with a hard eye block at "respecting the case." She's not really revealing anything at all here that she hasn't already said, so I'm going out on a limb and suggest that her concern isn't how pissed he will be, but how pissed he already is and has been. Also, she isn't trying to respect the case, but rather trying to assuage Nugly's hurt feelings.

26. Emotional accessing at "tell my story" and "he won't admit [to doing anything wrong]." Lots of taffy pulling here--lots of taffy pulling throughout this video, actually, I would argue. She wants us to believe what she's selling. When her eyes aren't enough, she uses her hands. She's definitely trying to get us to believe a) that all of this was true, and b) that's this is the real reason she's dropping the charges. I think an appeal to Nugly, however, may be in the cards, but I haven't seen it just yet. The truth will lie (heh) in whether or not there's a story to tell, or whether she continues with the same innuendo and ambiguities she's been using for the last 11 months.

27. Lots of self-soothing around "it doesn't look good on me either." A) She's very concerned with her image, and b) bitch, nothing looks good on you.

Back to work. More later.

28. Holy fuck, she sent that email seven days ago. She walked that back her claim seven days ago. I'm uncertain of the time frame--did she even last a day? This deceitful bitch.

29. We been knew, but her "bringing him things" is the only thing that suggested to her that they might get back together. Her lolcow logic won't allow for her to understand that he might accept a gift without acknowledging or honoring the attached strings. I haven't seen the rest of the video yet, but I'm calling it now--she reached out repeatedly to the cops the way she turns the phone off and on. She did say she sent several emails, so I'd bet that's where we're at.

30. She has been studying domestic violence cases so she can have a believable excuse for her poor choices and better LARP as an actual DV survivor understand why she does what she does. She actually says "studied domestic violence cases." Why? To what legitimate end? You need therapy, not fodder. She does a hard eye block at "it's complicated" and again at "it's a mess," then looks back up at the camera for approval and even briefly purses her lips like a petulant child.

31. At "anxiety," we have a left shoulder shrug (everything else so far has been on her right), and an eye block. Afterwards she hard eye blocks (the most extreme example to this point) and self-soothes. Anxiety indeed.

32. Just out of interest, if it was so messy and complicated and abusive, oh my god, you guise, why did she retract her statement? Oh, that's right--because she thought he'd take her back. Love that mess and complication and abuse, don't we? Good thing those convenient little DV survivors are leading by example!

33. She closes her eyes through the entire statement, "I asked to retract my statement/claims." She's either ashamed, embarrassed, or lying. I just want to mention here that we have no evidence of who the recipient of that email was. Maybe I'm giving her too much credit, but it wouldn't hurt to have a receipt ready to prove to old Nugs that she retracted her statement when she really hadn't.

34. 13:14 out of 20:00, and we still haven't heard anything new yet. Which suggests that her tell-my-story bullshit is for her audience, the look-what-I-did-for-you is for Nugs.

35. The whole time she discusses how awful it is for her, and even how bad he is, her eyes stay up and dart around constantly. We know that's habitual, but we also know she lies constantly. Plus, we know she can access emotion (or whatever) when she's feeling it. So this isn't emotional recall, this is something she's told herself again and again, and is regurgitating from memory.

36. Eye block at "I'm just really scared." Why is she scared? If she's afraid, she should maybe a) stay away from him and b) not retract her statement about how dangerous this man is. Shoulder shrug, appeal for approval.

37. Weird right and left head movements when she says she doesn't know what's going to happen after this video. Weird shifty head rolling and incongruous shoulder shrugs when she says no contact and that she won't be watching any of her videos.

VIDEO EDIT

38. "It's up to the crown now"--single shoulder shrug. "It's not my fault, Naddy. I tried to fix it but I can't! I'm so sowwy uwu."

39. She vacillates on dropping the charges based on whether or not Deeds is in the picture how she's feeling, you guys. At "I feel...," she appeals for emotion, but then after a moment, her eyes spring up to memory accessing and she says, "...guilty." Then an eye block, single shoulder shrug, eye roll with, "That's how he made me feel." X. She definitely feels something, but it's more likely jealousy and desperation than guilt.

40. "He made me feel like it was all my fault every time he was abusive": five shoulder shrugs and a "So it's just like, you know?"

41. "It's out of my hands; you have a criminal history, so they're gunnooo investigate it, more than likely." The charges aren't her fault; it's your fault for being a criminal and messing with a famous YouTuber she's not as stupid as you think and it's the Canadian justice's fault for believing victims and following up on what they believe to be good-faith claims because she should be able to change her mind if she wants to. It's not lying--God, get a life, Canada.

42. Eye blocking at "feel good" and "good decision." But she does believe it was the right thing to do. Good eye contact, no shrugging or eye blocking or rolling.

43. "Threatening you with a remote control--that's vi--that's abusive!" Eye block, shoulder shrug. "These things haunt me; my anxiety." Shoulder shrug, eye block. "My mental health has been declining; my health in general." Eye block, head shake.

44. She's not going to focus on it YouTube (X.) and she really needs your love and support, guise. Long eye block through "you guys have been"--she's got a point there. Apart from a few select VIB, most aren't falling for her shit anymore. Then again, we've been saying that for months now, so who fucking knows how they'll respond to this.

45. She needs to not talk about it right now, although her gaze is up, not down, so this is something she's reciting, not feeling. Eye block through "wanted to let you know what's going on"--again, she's about seven days too late for that, so :gunt:.

46. No full details, guise, with a lengthy shoulder shrug for approval. You already know what he was like (so why make the video?), acting like she's a "zero" for the last 10 months, with a tongue jut to show disapproval or contempt. Chins, you've never been a zero. And if we're speaking of the last 10 months, I'd wager that if you dropped below a 5X, it was a brief, happy accident fueled by drugs that you've more than overcorrected in the last month or so.

47. Little smile of what I suspect is contempt while she insists that she was more than nothing to him, with a little cough of a contemptuous laugh and lots of eye darting.

48. Speaking of eye darting, I know she does this when she's out in public, but in this context, at home in her safe space, in a recorded video looking glam with her filters and headdress, it's not her usual nervousness, but rather a sign of her jumbled, disorganized thoughts and the internal struggle to concentrate. Coke comedown. I'm calling it.

49. A moment of emotional introspection, which she leaves behind when she shrugs and looks up at the camera with a shrug and an "So I dunno." We may never know what she was thinking but my guess is she's hoping this video will turn everything around and Nugs will see her as his ride-or-die instead of that dumbfuck DeeDeeDoodoo.

50. She did ask for her statement to be retracted (eye block), she hasn't yet asked to have it reinstated (also eye block), she doesn't know what's going to happen but she's going to leave it alone (eye block, gesticulation).

51. She almost wants to just leave it like this, you guys, (as opposed to what? Calling the cops and asking them to turn the case back on again?), and she will if you take her back, Nugs, but just in case she'll blame her decision and subsequent inaction on her mental health, just in case you're a little slow to open that trap door. Lots of grooming here.

52. Quick, emphatic head shake at "afraid he'll do something to me" with upward inflection (for appeal), massively increased blink rate and zero emotional accessing. She's not afraid. I suspect she wants him to do something to her, because that would be better than nothing.


53. Full shoulder shrug and eye block at "just want to be done with him," followed by a single shoulder shrug at "because of this I have to [think about him]." Bitch, you dropped the charges seven days ago. You don't have to think of him any more than you have to eat that third Nashie, but you do, and you would, court case or no.

54. She actually says "done away with him." 🤔 My money's still on arson. Overuse of "honestly" here, which is a pretty big tell.

55. "He gets away scott free": asymmetrical shoulder shrug. Call it justice all you want, Chin-Chin(-Chin), but what you're after is revenge. Smirk. Big sigh.

56. After whining that she won't get any justice (if she drops the case), she says she doesn't think she deserves justice, she doesn't deserve help, with another asymmetrical shoulder shrug, a kind of aggressive appeal for approval as her face gets closer to the camera, and lots of taffy pulling. This is all for show. She wants our sympathy. She wants to be told that she deserves justice. Hard long eye block at "it's all in my head"--she doesn't believe it's all in her head--and again at "That's just how I feel" along with a single shoulder shrug.

57. Emotional accessing around being made fun of and how hard it's been. She really feels sorry for herself. Poor Chinny.

58. When the things you're "slowly realizing" are the same things you've been pointing out to your audience for months (months after they pointed them out to you), is it a slow realization? Or are you introducing utterly implausible deniability so you can choose when and in what capacity to conveniently NOT HAVE KNOWN ABOUT THIS AT ALL YOU GUISE, I SWEAR whenever you feel like it?

59. Eye narrowing at the mention of Peetz--contempt and disdain, though in this case probably for Nugs instead of Peetz. Save that for the few occasions when he graces her livestreams with his political sperging.

60. Emotional accessing at "wanting to control me," followed by a big swallow. She either feels bad about being duped, or misses being controlled. There's a pause, so she's thinking something she doesn't say. My money is on the latter.

61. Eyebrow raise, eye roll, dismissive, "Anyway..." Back to the unspoken thoughts she doesn't want to discuss: she misses him and wants him back. Single shoulder shrug: that's about it, guys (that's not it, that's just all she's going to share with us).

62. "I have to be careful [what I take about] for now." Deliberate look into the camera, slow blink. This is her telling Nugs she will be careful about what she tells her audience, so it's okay if you call her and invite her back--she'll be a good girl and won't tell anyone.

It's worth noting that she edited this video. The stuff she left in is intentional. Then again, she may be conniving, but she's far from clever, so I think there are a lot of tells here of which she's ignorant.
 
Last edited:
I absolutely do believe that she's been grossing $20k for the past couple of months, 10k+ for several months before that. Before the Nader drama started she was still making $5,000- $8,000 a month based on her spending and lack of credit. Keep in mind that she's paid as self-employed with zero taxes or withholdings of any kind. Her channel is making Google a lot of money for such a small channel.
It's not a matter of how much she makes. I was using Social Blade to show how little she makes because I have seen this argument come up about many a cow. "Oh they will never get rid of them, creator makes them too much money."

Usually, those creators have fewer than 100k followers. With PewDiePie up over what 50 Billion followers now? 100k is still a small channel nowadays. Hell, even Eugenia Cooney has a couple of million followers right? The last time I was looking at her Social Blade she made less than Chantal, yet people think "Oh Youtube will never get rid of her, she makes them too much money."

So if Chantal made $20k that means that Google made roughly $20k. (I know it's not exactly 50/50 but these small amounts of money (for Google and extra 1 or 2 k isn't going to matter) Google is a 1.7 Billion dollar company. They probably easily charge advertisers that much to run ads depending on the creator. What they get annually from Chantal is nothing to them and they don't care.

Chantal is making a lot of money for a small channel for herself.
Chantal is not making a lot of money for Google.

Chantal does not make enough money that if her channel was deleted no one at Google would care. No one in a billion-dollar company is going to think "Oh wait, she made us $20 thousand last year! We need to keep her around even though she broke TOS. "

---

Edit so as not to double post. First thing I noticed on the email she sent out was sent 7 days ago.
Secondly,
Comments have been turned off!
View attachment 3047650
Am I dropping the charges.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back