Dramacow Ryulong / Michael Cohen - Fanatic Wikisperg, Anti-Gamergater and All Around Asshole

[Francis York Morgan]

We have his spergery on RW cataloged for us to marvel at, but do we have any information about his offline dealings? I'm curious as to what this asshole does for money. I'm also curious how he acts when he's not in a position of authority.

The most I know about his offline activities is that he has some sort of marine biology degree and that I think he's currently unemployed. I do recall that he had an office job for awhile before getting fired for (surprise, surprise) spending all his time tardraging on Wikipedia.

 

[Hellfire]

Cohen has divaquit and been vandal binned to prevent any edit warring in case he returns, as well as blocked for 3.6 days; aftershocks of drama continue.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&oldid=1584746

Last time I looked at this mess, the manchild Hipocrite was shitting up the place while he threw a tantrum in defense of Ryulong. They started voting on whether they should vote, then had a list of options to vote for on how to fix the Ryulong issue. AgingHippie had voted for no action because he knew David Gerard wouldn't let anything happen to Ryulong. Gerard got butthurt about that while - you guessed it - voting for no action. Gerard then went and voted to delete the MLP article.

During the coop, Cohen continued edit warring and crying over some Japan-related article he had created. He was upset it was getting information about ufology added to it.

I wrote this fucking page and I don't want it to go to shit because one person thinks mocking this total nobody of a woo peddler is worth doing on this particular topic.—Ryulong (talk) 20:36, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Cohen eventually showed back up at the coop and made a new section called 'Bye' and claimed that he was clearing his browser history on his desktop and tablet in another attempt to Leave and Never Come Back (LANCB). This was seen as an attempt to evade any sanctions.

More people were voting for no action because they believed nothing would happen, which pissed off moderator Paravant that they all knew there was a problem and were just going to let it keep festering. Paravant removed his moderator status and planned to LANCB, but was convinced to return. Every moderator but David Gerard eventually decided to get something done as this dramafest continued boiling over, mainly thanks to Cohen's buttbuddies. Three out of the four moderators ended up deciding to Vandal Bin Cohen to stop him from edit warring if he returned from his LANCB.

Deleted browser history from desktop. Deleting from tablet. Have fun with that Azerbaijani dude's quotes. And I've only done it once but this time I'll let it stick for more than a day.—Ryulong (talk) 21:12, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Well, look at that. The problem has resolved itself. Still, Ryu has a long and storied history of a pathological obsession with wikis. Let's work under the assumption that they are going to return the second someone touches GG or MLP. Tielec01 (talk) 21:20, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

The mods started a new section on the coop after archiving the BS from earlier to explain what had happened and what they had done in response.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&oldid=1584833#A_notice

Hipocrite continued to be butthurt because some of his tantrum comments had been removed, and this may result in continued antics if/when he tries to get revenge for Cohen and himself.

With that, though, I'm pissed as hell so I'm leaving again. I hope when I get back someone will have actually told people to stop removing other peoples comments that hurt their delicate feelings, and told people who feel that they can block people they disagree with that they can't do that - and they definitely can't toolwar to do it. Hipocrite (talk) 07:33, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Highlights from this latest Michael Cohen shitstorm:

Adam claiming misogyny for someone arguing with him:

That's still not a source for me having said anything you claim I said, you lying sack of shit.--Arisboch ☞✍☜☞✉☜ ∈)☼(∋ 14:07, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

"I repeat. I DID NOT say any of those things to you! Why do you hate me so much, you dirty female?" - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 14:09, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

And now accusations of misogyny? Siriusly? You proceeding to sink any lower or did you hit rock bottom already? Ah, whom I kidding, there's always a way.--Arisboch ☞✍☜☞✉☜ ∈)☼(∋ 14:14, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Adam saying he doesn't have any grudges, except for the ones he does have:

Eh, we've seemed to agree pretty often. I don't have a personal beef with anyone in this site, and those I do, I'm trying to work with. - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 03:00, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Hipocrite's angst:

Oh boo hoo, the gators are mad that they can't run Ryulong off on a rail. Go fuck yourselves, really. Hipocrite (talk) 17:39, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

-

OK, here's a counter proposal:

Ban on sight for anyone who shows up here just to piss of Ryulong and also ban all Gators. Same effect, and we'll lose only such leading lights as Aneris. Hipocrite (talk) 17:56, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

-

I wouldn't constantly act in a way which feeds them and makes me even more of a target, thats for sure. Reading their comments on him, half the reason they even go after him is solely because his personality makes him the perfect targetwho won't stop feeding them. And his history of being a bad community member extends far before GG ever started --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 18:19, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Is that "talk shit get hit," or "he harassed himself," or "it's the internet, deal with it" or "it's not really harassment?" I can't keep up with my Gator catchphrases. Hipocrite (talk) 18:22, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

I wouldn't know as I'm not a gator, but try again someday--"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 18:26, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

-

Are we voting here? Why are the options to ban Mona and Aneris being prevented from consideration? Hipocrite (talk) 18:24, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Because that is an idiotic Tu quoque. The discussion here is about Ryulong. Stop pulling from the playbook of everyone who ever harassed Ryulong on wikipedia.KrytenKoro (talk) 18:28, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Adam getting destroyed after trying to grave dance at Paravant's talk page: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Paravant&oldid=1584831

Tensions were never going to cool down between me and Ryu because Ryu is incapable of the concept of doing so. He is ruining this site with his attempt to turn it from a collaborative wiki into his personal fiefdom, where only what he wants can stay. Now go away, I'm done talking to a puppet who lies about why they are here or how they know Ryulong. --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 02:11, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Ryu isn't a mod, and so the problems with the two of you are not balanced in the slightest. "He's a dick!" isn't an excuse for mod abuse. What I was hoping for was that you would be able to bring your issues towards Ryulong forward in such a way as you didn't rely on your mod powers to shut him down for little to no justifiable reason, but as this appears to not be the case, I agree with your decision to unmod yourself. And what on earth kind of conspiracy theory do you hold towards me? - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 02:14, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

As a Habitual embellisher, It's not hard to spot a obvious liar, you are an obvious liar. --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 02:17, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

(Huh, who would have thought someone who spent 20+ years of their life as a male named Adam that is now pretending to be a a 'foxgirl' named Elaine would be an obvious liar)

SolPyre called Adam a 'bastard' - which is probably true since I never saw Adam talk about his dad - and Adam tried to revert him and got salty when SolPyre reverted it back.

Paravant, let the bastard have the last word. She's not going to let you go on your way in peace without her having the last word. SolPyre (talk) 02:20, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Seriously? Restoring yourself calling me a "bastard"? - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 02:22, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Okay Kitsunelaine, so you claim that empathy, whatever that means in practice, is going to fix the problem. Great, could you give a few hypothetical examples of such an empathetic approach likely to get Ruylong to actually change his behaviour while also pointing out that his behaviour so far has been unacceptable and is pissing off a large section of the other editors? Because so far, I'm simply getting the impression that other editors are being asked to accommodate bad behaviour from Ryulong on a quite larger scale than from anyone else. Again, the sheer number of coop cases and complaints from a wide spectrum of other editors and the fact that Ryulong lost his mop is an indication that this is probably not mainly a problem with everyone but Ryulong. ScepticWombat (talk) 04:16, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Adam begins crying at Mona's talk page about the "bastard" comment and blames her for Cohen getting vandal binned. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User_t..._trolling_from_user_pages_is_a_good_thing._._.

I hope you enjoy your victory lap, Mona. You vandal binned someone who wasn't a vandal. Just someone you disagreed with, and intentionally made feuds with. - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 05:17, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

I VBed no one. The mods did. And "enjoy" is not the right word. That would be: "relieved."---Mona- (talk) 05:28, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

You were a member of the group that called for it, erego you are partly responsible. - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 05:30, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Oh, yes, I absolutely was. And I am entirely satisfied that I was. Very.---Mona- (talk) 05:36, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

But transpbobia should be allowed in universities. - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 05:38, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

"You were a member of the group that called for it, erego you are partly responsible." And Mona should feel contrite because...? Also, the vandal bin is not solely used for "classic" vandals (or wandals) but also, on occasion, for users who are considered to deliver some good edits but where these have a tendency to drown in a sea of edit wars, conflicts and unnecessary squabbling with all and sundry. And could you please, please, please, please try to stay on topic instead of raising entirely new threads in the middle of existing ones? ScepticWombat (talk) 05:43, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Because she, as an apparently staunch free speech extremist (the "transphobia should be allowed in universities" alluding to that), has sought to shut down a person because she disagrees with him and is unable to discuss it in a civil manner. - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 05:46, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Double sigh. Dear Foxy, it was FCP who, as a mod, stepped in and implemented a sanction and not even the one suggested by Mona (though possibly one suggested by Yours Truly...). And no matter how often you keep repeating it Ryulong hasn't been shut down, merely received a whopping 3.6 day ban and a trip to the vandal bin and most emphatically not because of disagreements over trans-identity or criticism of same, but based on 10 months of systematically bad behaviour towards an extremely wide selection of other contributors. The allegation that the sanctions were due to Mona being "unable to discuss it in a civil manner" is a clear case of the pot calling the kettle black when referring to Ryulong (you have generally been civil, though, as I've explained elsewhere, I find your willingness to defend Ryulong and whataboutery when faced with clear evidence of his bad behaviour quickly turning from the merely persistent to the outright obnoxious). ScepticWombat (talk) 06:01, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

The reason I subscribe to "whataboutism" is that the only root cause for Ryulong's behavior I've found is other members of this site's attitude towards him. And the ban that I'd personally saw was indefinite (LNACB), though that has since been rescinded. The sanctions being Mona's fault (Which I did, correctly, emphasize was only in part) are something that I am bringing up to call her out on her own hypocrisy in this matter. Thank you for noting that I have generally been civil, though. As it's something that I have been preaching, it is something that I am trying to practice, though I must admit it is hard to hide my frustration towards the whole situation. - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 06:04, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Nobody but yourself believes you. --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 06:07, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

If you are unwilling to contribute to the discussion, please leave. - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 06:08, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

I am contributing to the discussion. You have made various statements to the effect of "I'm not here because of Ryulong, and it's coincidence we ally with oneanother1" but I don't think anybody here who has not just arrived (FTS) believes you. Stop trying to lie, it's transparent. --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 06:11, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Your conspiracy theory is wrong. - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 06:13, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Conspiracy theory, huh? funny, but I independently concocted the same conspiracy theory a few weeks ago. You denied it then, too. As Paravant says, no one believes you.---Mona- (talk) 06:22, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

"I am friends with Ryulong but I am here of my own accord" is a statement I have made many times, both to you and Paravant. Nothing in there is a lie. This site has disappointed me greatly. - Kitsunelaine 「Beware. The foxgirls are coming.」 06:24, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

I have a bit of a hard time taking your allegations of Paravant being a conspiracy theorists seriously when you dismiss out of hand the lengthy record of systematic bad behaviour of Ryulong as being mainly due to him being misunderstood and/or rubbed the wrong way and that criticism of his behaviour, which has come from quite a wide selection of editors is simply due to a cabal of uncivil editors with a grudge against Ryulong. This is a bit too much of the pot calling the kettle black.

I and others have already explained why you tend to be called a Ryulong supporter and I've highlighted several times that the fact that you think other editors behave badly is immaterial to the question of whether Ryulong's behaviour is acceptable. If you think other editors should be cooped, coop them, make your case and document their bad behaviour so we can have a discussion and vote on them, but quit using the allegations as mere whataboutery, because it sure comes off as if you're trying to deflect blame from Ryulong by deflecting attention, not by actually grappling with his documented problematic behaviour. ScepticWombat (talk) 06:41, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

I can't see Ryulong staying away, he'll be back when his block is up or sooner when one of his meat puppets unblocks him per request.

 

[Cynical]

Watching Ryulong rip apart an even bigger community of lolcows who are too stupid and stubborn to toss him out is really nice.

No kidding, the lulz we've gotten from their insanity is a wonderful present he gave us for the holidays.

 

[Peace and Harmony]

Ryulong is stupid to be sure but the maelstrom of autism that surrounds him is ten times funnier.

 

[chimpburgers]

I'm enjoying this insane shitstorm all these fucking retards are having with each other. It really is a marvel to see spergs left and right eat other alive.

I wanted to say that it would be nice if this thread had a Dramacow tag to it.

 

[Yellow Yam Scam]

Cohen has divaquit and been vandal binned to prevent any edit warring in case he returns, as well as blocked for 3.6 days; aftershocks of drama continue.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&oldid=1584746

Last time I looked at this mess, the manchild Hipocrite was shitting up the place while he threw a tantrum in defense of Ryulong. They started voting on whether they should vote, then had a list of options to vote for on how to fix the Ryulong issue. AgingHippie had voted for no action because he knew David Gerard wouldn't let anything happen to Ryulong. Gerard got butthurt about that while - you guessed it - voting for no action. Gerard then went and voted to delete the MLP article.

During the coop, Cohen continued edit warring and crying over some Japan-related article he had created. He was upset it was getting information about ufology added to it.



Cohen eventually showed back up at the coop and made a new section called 'Bye' and claimed that he was clearing his browser history on his desktop and tablet in another attempt to Leave and Never Come Back (LANCB). This was seen as an attempt to evade any sanctions.

More people were voting for no action because they believed nothing would happen, which pissed off moderator Paravant that they all knew there was a problem and were just going to let it keep festering. Paravant removed his moderator status and planned to LANCB, but was convinced to return. Every moderator but David Gerard eventually decided to get something done as this dramafest continued boiling over, mainly thanks to Cohen's buttbuddies. Three out of the four moderators ended up deciding to Vandal Bin Cohen to stop him from edit warring if he returned from his LANCB.



The mods started a new section on the coop after archiving the BS from earlier to explain what had happened and what they had done in response.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&oldid=1584833#A_notice

Hipocrite continued to be butthurt because some of his tantrum comments had been removed, and this may result in continued antics if/when he tries to get revenge for Cohen and himself.



Highlights from this latest Michael Cohen shitstorm:

Adam claiming misogyny for someone arguing with him:



Adam saying he doesn't have any grudges, except for the ones he does have:



Hipocrite's angst:



Adam getting destroyed after trying to grave dance at Paravant's talk page: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Paravant&oldid=1584831



(Huh, who would have thought someone who spent 20+ years of their life as a male named Adam that is now pretending to be a a 'foxgirl' named Elaine would be an obvious liar)

SolPyre called Adam a 'bastard' - which is probably true since I never saw Adam talk about his dad - and Adam tried to revert him and got salty when SolPyre reverted it back.





Adam begins crying at Mona's talk page about the "bastard" comment and blames her for Cohen getting vandal binned. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User_t..._trolling_from_user_pages_is_a_good_thing._._.





I can't see Ryulong staying away, he'll be back when his block is up or sooner when one of his meat puppets unblocks him per request.

Just wanted to say that I really appreciate all this info because there's no way I'd actually read through their sperging myself. Thanks mang.

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

Too bad we're getting a three day break from the hilarity.

 

[kcbbq]

Watching Ryulong rip apart an even bigger community of lolcows who are too stupid and stubborn to toss him out is really nice.

No kidding, the lulz we've gotten from their insanity is a wonderful present he gave us for the holidays.

Yeah, this is certainly more amusing than him shitting up wikipedia, which while a spergy mess under the hood it is at least useful.

ROR, DragonDragon. ROR.

 

[XYZpdq]

Lou Wrong

 

[Optimus Prime]

Too bad we're getting a three day break from the hilarity.

I see this as a good thing.

By the time we're done laughing at this recent stupidity three days from now, new salt will come pouring in.

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

I see this as a good thing.

By the time we're done laughing at this recent stupidity three days from now, new salt will come pouring in.

New salt could already be pouring in. Has anyone checked to see if he's making any edits to that digimon wikia since that admin commented about banning and unbanning him on the coup page?

 

[A Random]

Lou Wrong

Youwrong.

 

[Hellfire]

New salt could already be pouring in. Has anyone checked to see if he's making any edits to that digimon wikia since that admin commented about banning and unbanning him on the coup page?

He hasn't gone back there, yet. He was also active on other wikias such as Kamen Rider, Bleach, and JoJo's Bizarre Adventure in the past few days.

Some salt was spilled on Twitter. Gamergate progenitor "Literally who?" may have replied to some earlier salt tweeted during the coop case.

An ex-GamerGhazi mod seemed to be the only one responding to the big salt dump after they vandal binned Cohen. Cohen appeared to be spinning a yarn that he was "removing bunk" on RW and people got mad at him for no reason.

https://archive.is/6XiUX
https://archive.is/fBj4R

Lorenzo Ripley ‏@Sandflapjack
@Ryulong holy shit i need more details this is fucked up

Lorenzo Ripley ‏@Sandflapjack
@Ryulong its not every day that someone gets daddy ryulong's attention

Lorenzo Ripley ‏@Sandflapjack
@Ryulong that really is their own damn fault. you cant really whine about someone removing bunk from a wiki.

Lorenzo Ripley ‏@Sandflapjack
@Ryulong what the fuck does that even mean wikis aint no damn court

Lorenzo Ripley ‏@Sandflapjack
@Ryulong i dont blame you for leavign though, as a ghazi mod they restricted me and i left beacuse i couldnt properly mod

Lorenzo Ripley ‏@Sandflapjack
@Ryulong at least you arent outright banned, its bullshit, but at least they arent like reddit

Lorenzo Ripley ‏@Sandflapjack
@Ryulong kissu youre too good for them

You'll note that this person says "it's [RationalWiki's] own damn fault" for what happened; yet again someone white knighting Cohen and believing that all of the drama and bullshit he is involved with is not caused by him.

EDIT: It was almost assured that it would happen, but as many could predict the manchild Hipocrite returned this morning to continue being butthurt, his diapers still in a knot over his worthless salt being removed from the coop.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...did=1584948#Reminding_editors_about_the_rules

It's hilarious that this douchecanoe was calling a woman editor "garbage" and making sure to type out 'cunt' as much as he could without directing it to her, and then was asking for someone else to apologize for removing abusive remarks he had made during the Ryulong coop.

• boo hoo, the gators are mad that they can't run Ryulong off on a rail. Go fuck yourselves, really.
• Go fuck yourself, Mona, really. Is there a timeframe to your upcoming flounce off? PS: You're misrepresenting me because you're too stupid to understand what I wrote - get on my level.
• Ban on sight for anyone who shows up here just to piss of Ryulong and all Gators. Same effect, and we'll lose only such leading lights as Aneris.
• No, you halfwit, your senses have taken leave of you again. Apologize, now. (Here's not-me calling you a cunt, you stupid piece of garbage

These are the first few "contributions"; NOT cherry picked. At some point I had enough of this. A block seemed like the obvious thing, but as I stated on my talk page to AH, I'm open to other solutions. "Sucking it up" is NOT a solution, though. And yes, I'll stick by that. You don't go around calling people cunts and then turn around say you were "just disagreeing". Carpetsmoker (talk) 14:40, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

I never called anyone a cunt. Please retract and apologize. Hipocrite (talk) 14:42, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Comedy gold. FedoraTippingSkeptic (talk) 14:44, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Mmmmmh, the "here's not me calling you a cunt" one comes close enough to calling someone a cunt so that there's not much difference. SolPyre (talk) 14:53, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Fuck that. She said "Aren't you the one who called me a cunt?" and I pointed her to not-me calling her a cunt. Hipocrite (talk) 14:54, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

This is great. FedoraTippingSkeptic (talk) 14:56, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

I just ran to the fridge and got an ice cream.--TheroadtoWiganPier (talk) 14:57, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

+1 FedoraTippingSkeptic (talk) 14:58, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Here are the first four comments by Hipocrite in full: "boo hoo, the gators are mad that they can't run Ryulong off on a rail. Go fuck yourselves, really.", "Go fuck yourself, Mona, really. Is there a timeframe to your upcoming flounce off? PS: You're misrepresenting me because you're too stupid to understand what I wrote - get on my level.", "Ban on sight for anyone who shows up here just to piss of Ryulong and all Gators. Same effect, and we'll lose only such leading lights as Aneris.", "No, you halfwit, your senses have taken leave of you again. Apologize, now. (Here's not-me calling you a cunt, you stupid piece of garbage"... It goes on for a bit more. Calling people cunts has no place in any reasonable and civil discourse. Apparently putting a stop to this is considered an offence now? This is a sort of abuse beyond anything I've seen on RW so far; and I'm not going to just "let it be". There are limits. Carpetsmoker (talk) 14:46, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

I never called anyone a cunt. Hipocrite (talk) 14:47, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Oh, you put a link there to someone else calling Mona a cunt. Really, it makes very little difference. I hope Mona doesn't mind me saying so with brutal honesty: but yeah. sure, Mona can be combative and go into overdrive and be something of a pain to deal with (I've experienced this first-hand). But never, ever, ever, ever will I even consider calling her a cunt, garbage, or anything even close to that. Should I, in a fit of anger, do it anyway (not completely impossible), then I would be deeply ashamed, disappointed in myself, and quite literally beg for an apology. The same, by the way, applies to you, Ryulong, Kitseluaine, or anyone else.

You now try to weasel your way out of calling Mona a cunt (and never mind calling her "garbage" and all the other comments). Had you apologized, said "sorry, I went into overdrive", I would have apologized like-wise for th ban, we would have had the proverbial beer together and could continue as friends. But no, you stick to your guns, defend your insults, and bring me to the coop over it. This, more than anything else, shows that we have a problem in this community by being to tolerating to behaviour that amounts to nothing more than simple abuse. Carpetsmoker (talk) 15:04, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

She accused me of calling her a cunt. I never did so, and never would do so. I pointed out the person that she had confused me with. You are doubling down on me calling her a cunt. This is why we're never going to have a beer. That, and your unwillingness to abide by the decision of the mob. Hipocrite (talk) 15:12, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Hipocrite's sperg out continued after the mods woke up and threw out his coop case and protected the coop.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Paravant&oldid=1584968#So

(ec) Isn't a discussion on this topic useful? IMHO, an editor who goes around calling people "garbage", "useless", "gators", "go fuck yourselves", "cunt" (disputed), etc. is something that should not be tolerated. This is the deeper issue here. Carpetsmoker (talk) 15:20, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Stop following me around. If I did this to you, you'd desysop and block me for 2 months with IP block on. Hipocrite (talk) 15:21, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

i would be more inclined to worry about your posts being removed if your consistent argument wasn't "the other side are a bunch of fucking idiots!" and "You're Garbage", we don't need to be that wiki. Now don't turn my talk page into another dramafest. I had enough of that from the puppet above.--"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 15:23, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I know you only support freedom of speech for people who agree with you about the topic at hand. Hipocrite (talk) 15:24, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Paravant removed the discussion from his page and protected it. Hipocrite, no doubt quivering with rage and REEEEEEEEEEEEEEing, went to another moderator's talk page to cry about Paravant. He also got upset that Paravant was "following him around."

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Gooniepunk#Right

Explain to me how what Paravent is doing right now is remotely acceptable, please? Hipocrite (talk) 15:25, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Opens coop case, coop case turns into dramafest and is ended. Begins argument on talk page, talk page turns into dramafest and is ended. Perhaps rethink your arguing strategy to include less drama. --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 15:27, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Stop following me around. I'm asking someone how to deal with what's going on - remember when you told me to act like a human adult? That's what I'm doing. I could just flail out everywhere, if you'd prefer. Hipocrite (talk) 15:29, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Hey, Hipocrite, you may want to take a breather. FedoraTippingSkeptic (talk) 15:31, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Fine. I'll take another 8 hours off, but when I come back, I hope something is being done to prevent people who are VERY ANGRY from banning people who piss them off and deleting their comments without some sort of community review/involvement. Hipocrite (talk) 15:32, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Sure, if you say so. FedoraTippingSkeptic (talk) 15:34, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Hipocrite then blocked himself: . Hipocrite (Talk | contribs) blocked Hipocrite (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 31416 seconds (about 9 hours) (autoblock disabled) ‎(Perhaps someone else will take up the torch of "don't ban your opposition for disagreeing" while I get some work done)

FuzzyCatPotato, another moderator, saw Hipocrite's tantrum and went to go scold him for having done the same thing he was crying about.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Hipocrite#Whining_about_banning_those_who_disagree

Whining about banning those who disagree
It'd have more weight if you weren't doing it yourself. oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 16:00, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

What the fuck are you on about? Here's my log of blocks made: [4]. Where do you see this banning disagreers part? Years ago? Hipocrite (talk) 16:02, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

(change visibility) 15:05, 7 December 2015 Hipocrite (Talk | contribs | block) blocked Carpetsmoker (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 3141 seconds (about 1 hour) (autoblock disabled) (Removing other peoples comments) (unblock | change block) 32℉uzzy, 0℃atPotato (talk/stalk) 16:16, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

I didn't desysop him. He could have unblocked himself at any moment. That's the defining difference between using blocks to send messages and blocks to ban people, don't you agree? Hipocrite (talk) 16:17, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

(ec) Regardless, let me profess my sincerest apologies if Carpetsmoker felt that my block was anything more that an attempt to send an urgent message, and pledge that I will no longer block even sysops for 1 hour (absent the determination that the block is in the serious best-interests of whatever), even though it literally does nothing. Hipocrite (talk) 16:21, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

We have a series of short joke block lengths for that. --"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 16:19, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

My understanding was that people were not notified of the short block lengths, but see my pledge above to not violate, even in totally transitory ways, anyone's ability to edit. Perhaps you could have some other people make that selfsame pledge and apology! Hipocrite (talk) 16:21, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

 

[autisticdragonkin]

Is the name ryulong supposed to be a combination of a japanese and chinese name or is lulong just autistic

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

Is the name ryulong supposed to be a combination of a japanese and chinese name or is lulong just autistic

Both!

 

[Hellfire]

Is the name ryulong supposed to be a combination of a japanese and chinese name or is lulong just autistic

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Ryulong&oldid=96175831

My user name comes from the Japanese and Chinese words for dragon, because for some time I had an interest in dragons.

 

[kcbbq]

Is the name ryulong supposed to be a combination of a japanese and chinese name or is lulong just autistic

The characters he used on wikipedia meant "gem dragon", mixing languages together. Not sure what he was going for if he was trying for dragon-dragon. At least unless there's an additional meaning in Chinese for the first character. Chinese isn't my thing.

 

[Optimus Prime]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Ryulong&oldid=96175831

Given how important Puzzle and Dragons is to him and at least one crony, I'd say he still has an interest in dragons. Hell, I'd love to see if he tries running an all dragon team in the game just to pick it apart.

 

[AnOminous]

Last time I looked at this mess, the manchild Hipocrite was shitting up the place while he threw a tantrum in defense of Ryulong. They started voting on whether they should vote, then had a list of options to vote for on how to fix the Ryulong issue. AgingHippie had voted for no action because he knew David Gerard wouldn't let anything happen to Ryulong. Gerard got butthurt about that while - you guessed it - voting for no action. Gerard then went and voted to delete the MLP article.

This is funny because why is there even a fucking MLP article there anyway?

Some got assblasted that there was magic in an episode about magic ponies, basically. So far as I can tell that is the only reason it is there at all, that and SJWs hate bronies and vice versa.

 

[Sczylak Madgar]

After a massive clusterfuck that metastasized to 10(?) talk pages, action against Ryulong was taken. And nothing of value was lost.