US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
New Soyjak dropped.

View attachment 3072917

We're sending Putin a bill? No, WE are fronting the bill while you are deflecting for the people who handed us the check, retard.
Every time I think to myself "The bugmen couldn't possibly be that ignorant, right?", they just come out and slap their retardation on the table as if they're proud of it. I've tried to word my complete lack of ability to process their stupidity like four times, but it all comes back to "Fucking bugmen".

I knew the US was appeasing to the lowest common denominator of intelligence in their niggers, but it didn't occur to me that it would drive the whites to regress to that level and join the party. But its all I got left to explain bugmen. Return to Monke was a warning.
 
Yeah, I think the main issue is that there is no lightning rod like Trump, and thus no Voldemort/Darth Vader/Hitler 2.0 to latch onto.
I think Trump does not work as a lightning rod any more. Maybe people are tired about hearing about OrangeManBad or they have more pressing needs right now to focus on? Maybe it turns out OrangeManBad was just a luxury distraction that you could entertain while life was so good you had nothing more serious to worry or get upset about?

They tried to pin inflation and gas prices on Trump but it got no traction (so they switched to pinning it on Putin which did not get traction either).
They tried to "Trump admires Putin" but no one cared and it fell off the news within hours.

It seems that Orange-news just does not pull the audience or outrage any more.
If Orange-news is now completely impotent and no one listens to it anymore what platform will they run on in the midterms?
 
I think Trump does not work as a lightning rod any more. Maybe people are tired about hearing about OrangeManBad or they have more pressing needs right now to focus on? Maybe it turns out OrangeManBad was just a luxury distraction that you could entertain while life was so good you had nothing more serious to worry or get upset about?

They tried to pin inflation and gas prices on Trump but it got no traction (so they switched to pinning it on Putin which did not get traction either).
They tried to "Trump admires Putin" but no one cared and it fell off the news within hours.

It seems that Orange-news just does not pull the audience or outrage any more.
If Orange-news is now completely impotent and no one listens to it anymore what platform will they run on in the midterms?
Trump getting kicked off Twitter was basically the best thing that ever happened to him. While he was on Twitter he'd post something dumb that media faggots and npcs could point to and screech at but now that he's not as visible people just roll their eyes and ignore screeching npcs.
 
Something is going on with Biden and his standing in the Democratic party. A lot of his truest supporters including those with severe TDS are now breaking ranks.

Trevor Noah openly mocking Biden as well as some comedians before him.
Now most recently Bill Maher actually asking publicly what is on everyones mind: if Putin was so friendly with Trump... then why didn't he invade Ukraine when Trump was President?

Are they about to throw him under the bus and 25 him thus making Kamala president? That would be suicidal for the democrats at this point. It is just over half a year until the midterms. Surely that will not happen but it is bizarre to see the funny-man-on-tv after so many years now suddenly turn against Biden. Surely some shit is going on in the background within the administration.
 
if they could make inroads into drug and alcohol abuse Russia might come out ok
Not happening. The Russian tax base is built upon excise taxes on booze and cigs. The minute the Russians sober up and stop dying of lung cancer is the minute their government runs out of revenue. And its been that way for centuries.
you can see it clearly in the courts of law.
Is this a joke?
I'm hoping it's a bloodbath because a) wonderful salt will be mined, and b) losing Congress will bring the knives out in the intra-party civil war and force them to find new leadership in a move that's been desperately needed since they got rocked back in 2010.
Uh... pretty sure the current leadership has been in power a hell of a lot longer than just 12 years. They've needed a shakeup ever since the early 2000's.
 
Something is going on with Biden and his standing in the Democratic party. A lot of his truest supporters including those with severe TDS are now breaking ranks.

Trevor Noah openly mocking Biden as well as some comedians before him.
Now most recently Bill Maher actually asking publicly what is on everyones mind: if Putin was so friendly with Trump... then why didn't he invade Ukraine when Trump was President?

Are they about to throw him under the bus and 25 him thus making Kamala president? That would be suicidal for the democrats at this point. It is just over half a year until the midterms. Surely that will not happen but it is bizarre to see the funny-man-on-tv after so many years now suddenly turn against Biden. Surely some shit is going on in the background within the administration.
The theorycrafted plan was that they'd 25 him 2 years + 1 day into his term. That would give Kamala 2 terms + 2 years - 1 day, effectively 10 years, of rule.

The problems of course include the fact that Biden isn't going to last that long, that they're going to lose congress, that Kamala's the least likable politician in American history, and that Kamala is, from all apparent evidence, a complete and utter fucking idiot. Her recent public statements -- and the media picking up on them instead of burying them -- are evidence she's no longer plan B.

I don't know what plan B is. Clinton has restarted her Clinton Foundation, which is her money laundering scheme, so I'm guessing Clinton in 2024. Trump's been working out for the past year and looks great, last I saw Clinton she looked like badly done rule 63 fanart of Palpatine.

If not Clinton, Kamala, or Biden... then who?
 
I think Trump does not work as a lightning rod any more. Maybe people are tired about hearing about OrangeManBad or they have more pressing needs right now to focus on? Maybe it turns out OrangeManBad was just a luxury distraction that you could entertain while life was so good you had nothing more serious to worry or get upset about?
No, they shifted gears from "OrangeManBad" to "PutinManBad."
 
The theorycrafted plan was that they'd 25 him 2 years + 1 day into his term. That would give Kamala 2 terms + 2 years - 1 day, effectively 10 years, of rule.

The problems of course include the fact that Biden isn't going to last that long, that they're going to lose congress, that Kamala's the least likable politician in American history, and that Kamala is, from all apparent evidence, a complete and utter fucking idiot. Her recent public statements -- and the media picking up on them instead of burying them -- are evidence she's no longer plan B.

I don't know what plan B is. Clinton has restarted her Clinton Foundation, which is her money laundering scheme, so I'm guessing Clinton in 2024. Trump's been working out for the past year and looks great, last I saw Clinton she looked like badly done rule 63 fanart of Palpatine.

If not Clinton, Kamala, or Biden... then who?
Actually a really good question. That weirdo from New York got outed as a pervert and #metooed. Beta O Rourke recently came out against CRT so I doubt they'd pick him and they just called Tulsi Gabbard a traitor and Russian spy.

Do the Democrats have anyone that's not 80+ years old and on the brink of death to be president?
 
Something is going on with Biden and his standing in the Democratic party. A lot of his truest supporters including those with severe TDS are now breaking ranks.

Trevor Noah openly mocking Biden as well as some comedians before him.
Now most recently Bill Maher actually asking publicly what is on everyones mind: if Putin was so friendly with Trump... then why didn't he invade Ukraine when Trump was President?

Are they about to throw him under the bus and 25 him thus making Kamala president? That would be suicidal for the democrats at this point. It is just over half a year until the midterms. Surely that will not happen but it is bizarre to see the funny-man-on-tv after so many years now suddenly turn against Biden. Surely some shit is going on in the background within the administration.
Yes I was surprised seeing Biden getting mocked by Trevor Noah of all people. That is not a good sign when your a Democrat president and some hollywood types are taking shots at you.
 
I think Trump does not work as a lightning rod any more. Maybe people are tired about hearing about OrangeManBad or they have more pressing needs right now to focus on? Maybe it turns out OrangeManBad was just a luxury distraction that you could entertain while life was so good you had nothing more serious to worry or get upset about?

They tried to pin inflation and gas prices on Trump but it got no traction (so they switched to pinning it on Putin which did not get traction either).
They tried to "Trump admires Putin" but no one cared and it fell off the news within hours.

It seems that Orange-news just does not pull the audience or outrage any more.
If Orange-news is now completely impotent and no one listens to it anymore what platform will they run on in the midterms?
Bad times don’t really change their natures though. If anything time has made them crazier, and more audacious if they try to claim we’re energy independant.
 
The theorycrafted plan was that they'd 25 him 2 years + 1 day into his term. That would give Kamala 2 terms + 2 years - 1 day, effectively 10 years, of rule.

The problems of course include the fact that Biden isn't going to last that long, that they're going to lose congress, that Kamala's the least likable politician in American history, and that Kamala is, from all apparent evidence, a complete and utter fucking idiot. Her recent public statements -- and the media picking up on them instead of burying them -- are evidence she's no longer plan B.

I don't know what plan B is. Clinton has restarted her Clinton Foundation, which is her money laundering scheme, so I'm guessing Clinton in 2024. Trump's been working out for the past year and looks great, last I saw Clinton she looked like badly done rule 63 fanart of Palpatine.

If not Clinton, Kamala, or Biden... then who?
Definitely not Joe Biden in 2024. He will not last until then.
Just remember the infamous meeting he had with some workers during the campaigning and he went "listen fat, wanna do pushup challenge?" that was just 18 months ago but he was still mostly coherent. He had some gaffes and could not remember names but he was mostly coherent. Nowadays he mumbles, whispers then talks loudly and is angry, he gets confused and disoriented, he can not find how to walk off the stage.
The decline is very rapid when you compare it to the different person just 18 months ago. I am not sure he will last until the end of this year.

For 2024. Nightmare fuel but what about the ticket Hillary Clinton/Jill Biden 2024. I am kidding but also not. As you say, who else do they have when Joe can not run in 2024.
(Is there anyone that thinks Joe running in 2024 as he says he wants is realistic?)
 
Actually a really good question. That weirdo from New York got outed as a pervert and #metooed. Beta O Rourke recently came out against CRT so I doubt they'd pick him and they just called Tulsi Gabbard a traitor and Russian spy.

Do the Democrats have anyone that's not 80+ years old and on the brink of death to be president?
They don't.

@Jaimas has said it many times, but Hillary gutted the DNC for the better part of 16 years of anything resembling sanity so she could have her shot. All that's left is people that got in before her that toed the line and hyperpozzed types in ultrablue hellholes. It would have worked for her in 2008, but the Democratic voters picked a charming nobody over her and she never really let go of the reins even though Obama really wanted her to. It's a huge part of why Obama was so happy to fuck off after a year of trying to be puppetmaster; he saw that there was little chance of really getting Hillary off her iron throne.

EDIT:
Yes I was surprised seeing Biden getting mocked by Trevor Noah of all people. That is not a good sign when your a Democrat president and some hollywood types are taking shots at you.
The marching orders are already coming down from the Clinton faction to try and take Biden out, that's the only thing that makes sense to me. The DNC is fucking broke and without the desperately needed money shot that was BBB pulling through Hollywood is looking elsewhere for their bribes. When the Clinton Foundation's money has proven good in the past, why not go for them? They're getting ahead of Biden's handlers subtly getting him to cede ground to Hillary in 2024 via a narrative that doesn't support him.
 
So. What happens when "one of the two parties in the US" -- remembering of course that the founding fathers hated the very idea of political parties -- collapses, leaving the Republicans and... nothing.

I mean you'll immediately see a new left party or the Democrats reforming, but it'd take several cycles to fix the mess.

Would the Republicans immediately shift into "we have to hobble ourselves to make sure the left doesn't lose too much, it's the only fair thing to do" style cuckoldry? Maybe you'd see the right shatter into two parties since they'd be able to afford the split at that point.

I mean barring some accident we are all going to see an end to the major figures in the Dems in our lifetimes, and they have absolutely no rising stars to replace them. Pelosi goes and who replaces her? AOC?
 
Last edited:
So. What happens when "one of the two parties in the US" -- remembering of course that the founding fathers hated the very idea of political parties -- collapses, leaving the Republicans and... nothing.

I mean you'll immediately see a new left party or the Democrats reforming, but it'd take several cycles to fix the mess.

Would the Republicans immediately shift into "we have to hobble ourselves to make sure the left doesn't lose too much, it's the only fair thing to do" style cuckoldry? Maybe you'd see the right shatter into two parties since they'd be able to afford the split at that point.

I mean barring some accident we are all going to see an end to the major figures in the Dems in our lifetypes, and they have absolutely no rising stars to replace them. Pelosi goes and who replaces her? AOC?
Uniparty section of the GOP would 100% prevent that collapse if they were able.

If.

Midterms and 2024 will show how much power they still have.
 
Uh... pretty sure the current leadership has been in power a hell of a lot longer than just 12 years. They've needed a shakeup ever since the early 2000's.
Pelosi's time as the House Democrat leader goes back to 2005 and she got the Speaker job, with Hoyer as Majority Leader and Clyburn as Majority Whip in 2007. What I was getting at was that instead of looking at the licking they took in 2010 and making changes, the party brought all three back to head the 2019 Congress, because until the "unironically too old to be Baby Boomers, for chrissakes" leadership dies in office they refuse to relinquish control of their party.
 
So. What happens when "one of the two parties in the US" -- remembering of course that the founding fathers hated the very idea of political parties -- collapses, leaving the Republicans and... nothing.

I mean you'll immediately see a new left party or the Democrats reforming, but it'd take several cycles to fix the mess.

Would the Republicans immediately shift into "we have to hobble ourselves to make sure the left doesn't lose too much, it's the only fair thing to do" style cuckoldry? Maybe you'd see the right shatter into two parties since they'd be able to afford the split at that point.

I mean barring some accident we are all going to see an end to the major figures in the Dems in our lifetypes, and they have absolutely no rising stars to replace them. Pelosi goes and who replaces her? AOC?
As I understand it, the GOP would shatter into their own civil war - once the playing field becomes "Uniparty losers" vs "Trumpian Populists" there'd be nothing left to do but fight that out. The uniparty would see itself as trying to slow things down and stabilize what would likely be a very pained country with the collapse of an organized left, and the populists would see it as an opportunity to push radical change.

It likely wouldn't be a good time for anyone involved. Political destabilizations like that never are, even if the collapsing group is objectively awful in its own rights.
 
Pelosi's time as the House Democrat leader goes back to 2005 and she got the Speaker job, with Hoyer as Majority Leader and Clyburn as Majority Whip in 2007. What I was getting at was that instead of looking at the licking they took in 2010 and making changes, the party brought all three back to head the 2019 Congress, because until the "unironically too old to be Baby Boomers, for chrissakes" leadership dies in office they refuse to relinquish control of their party.
I don't think we're in disagreement. I just think that in hindsight Pelosi and co. should have stepped back a lot sooner than 2010/2019 when they had a chance to let new blood in without too many upsets to the power structure. Now? Those same oldfags have done such a great job crushing any threats to their power that the minute they start leaving office feet-first its going to be total anarchy as a bunch of political incompetents start going knives out for the chances to take their jobs.

EDIT: @Mr Bunny I can't disagree with you in theory, but it seems like any political system that relies upon the judiciary as a check will eventually descend into judicial tyranny.
 
I don't think we're in disagreement. I just think that in hindsight Pelosi and co. should have stepped back a lot sooner than 2010/2019 when they had a chance to let new blood in without too many upsets to the power structure. Now? Those same oldfags have done such a great job crushing any threats to their power that the minute they start leaving office feet-first its going to be total anarchy as a bunch of political incompetents start going knives out for the chances to take their jobs.
Agreed, we're on the same page.
It's fucking wild to me that the GOP leadership is entirely GenX kids in the House and Boomers in the Senate, but Schumer is unironically the youngest Democrat in a prominent Congressional leadership role. And he was born in 1950!!! He's literally the only one born after WWII ended! Several predate the war, not just our involvement in it!

Fuck I hate the Antichrist, I hate the Gerontocracy! I hate the Gerontocracy
 
I don't think we're in disagreement. I just think that in hindsight Pelosi and co. should have stepped back a lot sooner than 2010/2019 when they had a chance to let new blood in without too many upsets to the power structure. Now? Those same oldfags have done such a great job crushing any threats to their power that the minute they start leaving office feet-first its going to be total anarchy as a bunch of political incompetents start going knives out for the chances to take their jobs.

EDIT: @Mr Bunny I can't disagree with you in theory, but it seems like any political system that relies upon the judiciary as a check will eventually descend into judicial tyranny.
Well in all fairness Pelosi had a successor but AOC primary him out of his seat.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back