What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

[Open Window Maniac]

7/11 was a part time job.

 

[topsikrets]

Manson Family wasn't real and neither were the Tate murders. It was all just an anti-hippy psyop, or better yet it was all Hollywood baby!

 

[Ruin]

Social justice is a psy op designed to distract people from the controlled demolition of the global economy

TikTok is a Chinese psy op to degrade the culture and make American youth more susceptible to brainwashing and propaganda

Financial literacy is deliberately not taught in schools because the globalist order wants you in huge amounts of debt and in bondage to massive banks and financial conglomerates.

 

[TurdFondler]

TikTok is a Chinese psy op to degrade the culture and make American youth more susceptible to brainwashing and propaganda

TikTok is setting some dangerous precedents with regards to media. I know it's a boomer pearl clutching thing to say, but it cannot be healthy.

Sesame street pioneered "hits per second" in television programming for children, making scene changes very frequently to keep a child's limited attention over long periods. TikTok is ramping this up to 11. Infinite content with sound and video in minuscule chunks. A kid raised on Tiktok by neglectful parents is going to have a totally fucked attention span.

 

[Screamer]

I don't have a clear framework or even full understanding, but was Russiagate mainly about getting Trump to not derail the current war in Ukraine?

Under Obama, we saw the starting of the neocon's endgame with Ukraine and Russia. They organised a coup and civil war started a proxy war between the US and Russia. Obama got cold feet and pulled it back, stopping weapons to Ukraine. So it stalled.

The plan was for Hillary to get in, start the flow of weapons and ramp up the proxy war.

Then Trump got it, he was saying the US should have better relations with Russia. Which would get in the way of their plan to collapse Russia. Or some goal like that.

The big aim of Russiagate was to sabotage the Trump presidency, fear-monger against Russia as well as make it politically damaging for anyone to not be anti-Russian in US politics. Probably also an attempt to ensure Trump would be hawkish towards Russia if the time came for it.

All of a sudden, anything Trump could do or say that would be against pushing for this inevitable war, is because he's "Putin's puppet."

That's what it was about.

It's no coincidence that Biden was getting bribes from Ukraine through his son. It's no coincidence why this story is apparently not worth looking into. It's because it highlights the shady dealings the US does with Ukraine which would jeopardise their plans.

Trump ended up giving in to the neocons and started the flow of weapons back to Ukraine.

It is no coincidence that Trump then got impeached for potentially stopping the flow of weapons to Ukraine. As well as wanting to know what exactly Biden's corruption in Ukraine was about.

Zelensky got elected in mid-2019 and is literally an actor. He got elected stating he was pro-peace, but the war soon starts ramping up from a lull. As far as I can see from timelines.

The pandemic possibly got in the way of getting this rolling in 2020. From what I can gather, the conflict in Ukraine started ramping up in 2019/2020.

If you were planning this, wouldn't they have loved to get it going under Trump? An ultimate humiliation? Just look now how quickly people are still wanting to blame it on Trump. With a strong element of that accusing him of causing it by not escalating the conflict more.

Now they've got Biden in. Who brings back everyone who was there under Obama, and they can get the plan back on track. Start training Ukrainians on how to fight an insurgent war.

Fresh with the knowledge they learned studying the Russian military tactics of dealing with an insurgency in Syria. Another war pushed by American Neocons.

They can move Zalensky to be more aggressive. Putin is in a position of backing down, which is a win for the west. Or he can invade. Which is the proxy war they've been wanting all along. Putin is bumped into a damned if he does, damned if he doesn't situation.

So yeah, looking back on the Trump hysteria, you can really see how much of it was probably related to what is going on right now.

 

[Screamer]

Let's just add to that, isn't it strange that now that the war has started, Hunter Biden's laptop is now confirmed in the media. No benefit to covering it up.

The question is, why is it now being talked about? To put pressure on Biden to escalate? For fear it's discussed more. Or is it a move to get Biden out because he won't? Or is it to get deescalation because everyone is freaked out that the reaction has been, World war three, fire those nukes!!!!

 

[Nate Higgers]

Don’t know if it’s been posted yet ITT but

Spoiler

The Octopus/Inslaw

ETA: after seeing the vax discussion ITT, I’m also genuinely concerned about the long term effects of the vax. I skated through the last 2-ish years and I never got Covid (as far as I know; I did spend a three day weekend last year basically just sleeping in an Airbnb for like 10-16 hours a day but I was still able to have sex and taste BBQ)- - and I never got the vaccine. I barely wore a mask..I worked the whole time and went out in public on service calls and interacted with clients and coworkers (some of those coworkers had Covid and I never caught it from them) and whatnot. On the other hand, my gf works in a career field where she’s exposed to dozens of people per day and she had to get the vaccine to continue working where she’s been at.

I say all that to say this: I’m genuinely concerned about the possibility, however remote, that my gf and I might not be able to have kids if there’s even the slightest risk that she might have had some adverse effects to her reproductive system from the vaccine. I know that some of the orthodox j’s who monitor the menstrual cycles of the women in their communities have reported some strange changes to the lady j’s menses after having received the vax. I always have the option to trade my gf in for a 20 year old but I’m genuinely concerned that I might not be able to have a kid now if the vax messes with womens reproductive system and there’s so many who have been vaccinated (20 year olds or otherwise).

tl;dr: computer fuckery being involved in Iran-Contra (and secret government computer surveillance being older/more widespread than we think) but also the vax possibly sterilizing women

 

[Bonesjones]

The thing is the people at the top of globohomo have a lot of money and their plans are long. They can take a decade setback or a lost election before they try again, but they always try again. Soros found a week spot in the district attorneys, so he's focused on interruption of the legal system using well placed DAs to both break and disrupt the system but also remove faith from it entirely. It's a long game of putting people in lose/lose situations so they are either wasting money or time until you win. That's the frustrating thing. Remove a cog in the system and they find another cog or revamp the system so it's not needed any more.

 

[Frail Snail]

The thing is the people at the top of globohomo have a lot of money and their plans are long. They can take a decade setback or a lost election before they try again, but they always try again. Soros found a week spot in the district attorneys, so he's focused on interruption of the legal system using well placed DAs to both break and disrupt the system but also remove faith from it entirely. It's a long game of putting people in lose/lose situations so they are either wasting money or time until you win. That's the frustrating thing. Remove a cog in the system and they find another cog or revamp the system so it's not needed any more.

This is the reason I don't subscribe to conspiracy theories involving worldwide depopulation. Why would any ruling elite want less people on Earth? If there are less people alive, an individual's life has more value. He's harder to replace and therefore has more agency. Now imagine that there are 14 billion of us instead of the 7.* we have now. It would be so much easier to pick loyal people as there are billions trying to climb to a decent living standard and they will do anything to reach their goal. Justifying more power for control is easier, as larger numbers of people produce more waste and pollution. Losing millions of people to revolt or famine isn't a big deal either when it's fractions of a percent of a percent of the total population.

I guess I'm in the camp of believing the conspiracy of overpopulation, pitting the herd against itself. With some regional depopulations on the way there, i.e. Great Replacement.

 

[Bonesjones]

This is the reason I don't subscribe to conspiracy theories involving worldwide depopulation. Why would any ruling elite want less people on Earth? If there are less people alive, an individual's life has more value. He's harder to replace and therefore has more agency. Now imagine that there are 14 billion of us instead of the 7.* we have now. It would be so much easier to pick loyal people as there are billions trying to climb to a decent living standard and they will do anything to reach their goal. Justifying more power for control is easier, as larger numbers of people produce more waste and pollution. Losing millions of people to revolt or famine isn't a big deal either when it's fractions of a percent of a percent of the total population.

I guess I'm in the camp of believing the conspiracy of overpopulation, pitting the herd against itself. With some regional depopulations on the way there, i.e. Great Replacement.

If you have 5 people, it only takes one person at the top paying the strongest to oppress the other 3, or you can have 2 pit the other 3 against each other to remain in power. The logistics of doing this with 10 or 100 or 10 billion becomes excessively harder. It's not exactly complicated.

The elite want a system of them at the top with a docile slave class providing for their every need without worry of disruption or revolution. It's why they want to pump third worlders into the first world to disrupt the middle class and remove them as a growing threat to their way of life.

 

[Open Window Maniac]

The USS Maine was an inside job. Spanish mines can't melt American battleships.

 

[Aldeland]

I think Randall Carlson is on to something in that there were many bronze age civilizations that got wiped out by floods/volcanism before we got the official bronze age that we all know about now. Plato talks about the Egyptian Priest that was educating his ancestor in his two talks about Atlantis. Something really interesting that the Priest mentions is that many civilizations came before and they survived the floods by by living on the mountains and fires by hiding in the valleys/caves. I think this is really supported by the shared culture of giant floods in pretty much every cultures founding mythology.

Carlson makes an excellent point in that Atlantis could very much been real, but not some hyper advanced meme civ, just about the same level as the Phoenicians.

 

[Hallucinogenic Penguin]

I think Randall Carlson is on to something in that there were many bronze age civilizations that got wiped out by floods/volcanism before we got the official bronze age that we all know about now. Plato talks about the Egyptian Priest that was educating his ancestor in his two talks about Atlantis. Something really interesting that the Priest mentions is that many civilizations came before and they survived the floods by by living on the mountains and fires by hiding in the valleys/caves. I think this is really supported by the shared culture of giant floods in pretty much every cultures founding mythology.

Carlson makes an excellent point in that Atlantis could very much been real, but not some hyper advanced meme civ, just about the same level as the Phoenicians.

I partially subscribe to this as well. Modern humans have been around for 250,000 years. Were we just sitting on our asses in caves clanking rocks together and nothing more until 10,000 years ago?
I think not. Of course the scientific dogmatics would never admit it/reveal anything.

 

[Aldeland]

I partially subscribe to this as well. Modern humans have been around for 250,000 years. Were we just sitting on our asses in caves clanking rocks together and nothing more until 10,000 years ago?
I think not. Of course the scientific dogmatics would never admit it/reveal anything.

It's really depressing how dogmatic some of the sciences are, specifically geology and archaeology. As an example geologists refused to acknowledge the existence of the scablands in Eastern Washington where evidence of huge fuckoff floods happening multiple times to the point where the geologist who discovered them was considered a quack and a laughingstock for decades until they went out and saw it with their own eyes.

 

[Hallucinogenic Penguin]

It's really depressing how dogmatic some of the sciences are, specifically geology and archaeology. As an example geologists refused to acknowledge the existence of the scablands in Eastern Washington where evidence of huge fuckoff floods happening multiple times to the point where the geologist who discovered them was considered a quack and a laughingstock for decades until they went out and saw it with their own eyes.

Something is also very fishy with the whole Pleistocene megafaunal extinction. Basically scientific dogmatism has deduced that humans at the time armed with nothing more then sharp sticks killed off most of the worlds large animals within a thousand or so years.

Yet drip fed information has shown much to their chagrin that humans have lived in the Americas for possibly tens of thousands of years before the common accepted date of 15-14,500 years ago and henceforth would have coexisted with megafauna much much longer then predicted without going Mammoth Holocaust the moment they set foot in modern day Alaska. Even then, remains of mammoths, giant deer, ground sloths etc are being found well into the mid-Holocene; smearing shit on the face of the dogmatists who before basically said the moment the Holocene started not a single one was around.

A bit tin foil-y; but I kind of entertain the idea that around 13-12,000 years ago....something VERY horrible and apocalyptic happened that we will never get the full story of.

 

[KID NAMED SCHWARMAPUNK]

Okay, I want to preface this by saying I love Israel, especially Mossad, and I am not an anti-semite. I was going to ask @snailslime 's thoughts before taking a stance on this but she is busy touring a dreidel factory or something. Anyway: The legend of vampires comes from (some) jews:
View attachment 3073088
From reddit (rare occasion, /r/conspiracy is one of the few subreddits I miss) archive but was quickly reposted to both /bant/ and /pol/. Normally I would write this off as /x/-types being exceptional but the blood replacement thing checks out. I also have personal connections with people that work in the umbilical/stem-cell field and nothing above really contradicts anything I've heard. It's not exactly a secret where the (((deep))) pockets are in that market niche. Finally, my most compelling argument, an eldritch narcissistic that apparently made a deal with the devil, moloch, and several plastic surgeons. She's also a prominent adherent/believer in Kabbalah, literally Jewish mysticism. You cannot tell me this woman does not consume the blood/life-force of innocents:
View attachment 3073127

Wrong

 

[Jewish Porn Hoe]

Were we just sitting on our asses in caves clanking rocks together and nothing more until 10,000 years ago?

They've actually pushed back the timeline on stuff like proto-agriculture and stationary hunter-gatherer societies quite a bit. Cultivation of grains in the Near East/Levant seems to have started around 20000 BC already for example.
Likewise I remember reading about aDNA studies proving that some natives from South America have some sort of ancestry from much older lineages which aren't found in the Paleo-Siberians who are thought to be the forefathers of all American Indians. Of course this just leads to new questions, namely why these people didn't never took over the Americas and left more traces in the form of genetics and artifacts. Something must've kept their population numbers very, very low.

 

[SilkGnut]

I should have done more archiving, I have foolishly forgotten rule #1 of Kiwifarms, bookmarking websites does not mean the information is saved. Still, I should have a few fun examples for you.

Attached are a couple maps that lay out Northern Lands, while seeming shockingly ignorant of Africa.

Here's a map that depicts the residents of the nations of the earth, including those of Antarctica (at the time known as Magallanica) which apparently had elephants at the time?

Here's one that shows that Antarctica and South America were nearly touching, and that Terra Del Fuego was once part of Antarctica.

Here's a zoomable map that displays a large amount of wildlife in the Antarctic, Terra Del Fuego as part of Antarctica, water where the Sahara should be, as well as a bunch of other oddities.

I will edit a few more examples in if I can figure out the names of some of these maps I have in my PC room.

Months later now that nobody cares any more I have found a digital version of one of my favorite maps.

Here's a stupidly in depth map with all sorts of oddities. Mythical animals and giants all over the world, cities where they shouldn't be (including the Sahara and Siberia) one of the wackier interpretations of Antartica I have ever seen (though it lines up strangely well with other reports from the era) along with the 4 islands of the North Pole and a seemingly endless number of other minor details that make no sense given the current mainstream understanding of the world.

All I am saying is that cartographers of the day killed a LOT of people with their creativity, or the world was more different than people realize in centuries past.

 

[teriyakiburns]

Something is also very fishy with the whole Pleistocene megafaunal extinction. Basically scientific dogmatism has deduced that humans at the time armed with nothing more then sharp sticks killed off most of the worlds large animals within a thousand or so years.

Yet drip fed information has shown much to their chagrin that humans have lived in the Americas for possibly tens of thousands of years before the common accepted date of 15-14,500 years ago and henceforth would have coexisted with megafauna much much longer then predicted without going Mammoth Holocaust the moment they set foot in modern day Alaska. Even then, remains of mammoths, giant deer, ground sloths etc are being found well into the mid-Holocene; smearing shit on the face of the dogmatists who before basically said the moment the Holocene started not a single one was around.

A bit tin foil-y; but I kind of entertain the idea that around 13-12,000 years ago....something VERY horrible and apocalyptic happened that we will never get the full story of.

There is a fairly prominent soot layer all over north-eastern north america, dated to around that period, which is indicative of a large impact or something else similarly catastrophic. Clovis culture tools are found in abundance below that layer, then above it there's nearly nothing for a good few thousand years. The layer appears to be fairly closely associated with the Carolina Bays, oval-shaped impact craters that seem to be oriented toward the great lakes. The whole thing tends to get mixed up in discussions of something called the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis, which was an attempt to explain a sudden cooling event around 12k BP, but that's largely discredited in itself as the various dates don't line up properly. Nevertheless, something did happen.

Humans are blamed for megafauna extinction in the Americas in order to created foundations for the climate change narrative, and the greater anti-human ecological narrative encompassing it. The logic goes, if small bands of humans were able to wipe out megafauna with just stone-age spears, then any human presence is by its nature destructive and we should be confined and restricted as much as possible.

 

[Hallucinogenic Penguin]

There is a fairly prominent soot layer all over north-eastern north america, dated to around that period, which is indicative of a large impact or something else similarly catastrophic. Clovis culture tools are found in abundance below that layer, then above it there's nearly nothing for a good few thousand years. The layer appears to be fairly closely associated with the Carolina Bays, oval-shaped impact craters that seem to be oriented toward the great lakes. The whole thing tends to get mixed up in discussions of something called the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis, which was an attempt to explain a sudden cooling event around 12k BP, but that's largely discredited in itself as the various dates don't line up properly. Nevertheless, something did happen.

Humans are blamed for megafauna extinction in the Americas in order to created foundations for the climate change narrative, and the greater anti-human ecological narrative encompassing it. The logic goes, if small bands of humans were able to wipe out megafauna with just stone-age spears, then any human presence is by its nature destructive and we should be confined and restricted as much as possible.

I can’t tell you the how strong the correlation between dogmatics who take the Hunting Overkill Theory to heart and lefties who are against hunting and support Pleistocene “Rewilding”. Basically they want tigers and lions air dropped into suburban America because they can’t bear to see those “poor deer killed by those mean mean hunters.” They also have a strong correlation with destabilizing occupations they deem “problematic”, and some even hint to supporting genocide of farmers, ranchers, lower classes of people, etc who would interfere with their plans.