Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread

How well is the war this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 249 10.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ I ain't afraid of no Ghost of Kiev

    Votes: 278 11.8%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 796 33.7%
  • ⭐⭐ Stalemate

    Votes: 659 27.9%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 378 16.0%

  • Total voters
    2,360
Status
Not open for further replies.
102BF211-E110-43D1-A843-8895A0735EC7.jpeg
Bug-people make me sick, but shit like this tells me they won’t last long without shit I never use or partake in.
 
current stage of manufacturing consent:
View attachment 3097184
"Less destructive Nuclear bombs"
Yeah, they're called conventional high explosives, you journoscum retards. Do they honestly believe the global powers were ever like "Dang, these nukes are too powerful! I wish we could make them weaker!".

Do they believe that nuclear fallout is a desired outcome, rather than an unfortunate side-effect? We have nuclear weapons because they are that powerful. If not for fallout rendering your newly atomized rubble uninhabitable, we would have likely started nuking and not stopped at the end of WW2. Soviet Union and China would have been completely levelled in the run-up after WW2. It wasn't because "The boom on these babies is too big!". In fact, we spent 40 years making bombs with bigger and bigger booms.

99% of the reason the big bad WMDs aren't used isn't because the world is such a moral place, but because their use makes regions potentially uninhabitable.
 
Plebbit got another Ukrainian squad killed.

View attachment 3097211

Having reddittards on your side is worse than engaging with the actual enemy

View attachment 3097205
I wonder how long before this one is proven to be a hoax.
"Less destructive Nuclear bombs"
Yeah, they're called conventional high explosives, you journoscum retards. Do they honestly believe the global powers were ever like "Dang, these nukes are too powerful! I wish we could make them weaker!".
Yes actually, low yield nuclear bombs have longer lasting radiation & are worse for the environment in the long run than the high yield bombs.

But that's if you want to be a huge dick instead of a large dick.
 
I broke my neck today trying to do mental gymnastics. The Western press and its doublethink are impossible to understand.

View attachment 3097200
Azov has been described as little more than "discount" Not-Sees who really know nothing whatsoever about the actual NSDAP and really just don't like the Juice.

That begs the question why they're following the buffoonish, cross-dressing song and dance man, who - it should be obvious even to brain trusts like your average one-or-two-IQ-points-beyond-a-nigger Ukranian - doesn't even pretend to have their best interests at heart.
 
Wth...what is the point of having "less destructive" nuclear weapons? What exactly does that even mean? No fall out?
They're probably talking about tactical nukes

A tactical nuclear weapon (TNW) or non-strategic nuclear weapon[1] is a nuclear weapon which is designed to be used on a battlefield in military situations mostly with friendly forces in proximity and perhaps even on contested friendly territory. Generally smaller in explosive power, they are defined in contrast to strategic nuclear weapons, which are designed mostly to be targeted at the enemy interior away from the war front against military bases, cities, towns, arms industries, and other hardened or larger-area targets to damage the enemy's ability to wage war.

Tactical nuclear weapon -- Wikipedia​

Basically, strategic nukes are your city killers, tactical nukes are designed to be used against ground troops, armor, forward bases and things like that. They are "less destructive" because you have your own troops operating on the same battlefield, so you want to be somewhat more accurate in controlling their destructive power than you would be if you are throwing strategic nukes around.

Your guys might die of cancer later, but hopefully after they've done their duty for Mother Russia (I doubt Z-man has any tactical nukes).
 
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare (2019) had its plot largely centered around Not!Syria and how the Russians were evil and gassing all the babies. Call of Duty Modern Warfare III (2023-2025) will probably have its campaign set in Not!Ukraine where the Russians are Evil and incinerate all the babies with EVIL Thermobaric weapons.
Glory to the hero of great Russia, glory to General Markov!
2fy0F1JX0MY.jpg
 
"But nooooooooo, that man is a very bad bad bad dictator who oppresses his people."

Which is a hundred percent true but doesn't negate that statement.

I bring up that meme because look at the comments to Assad in this reddit sub lol where some are like its propaganda by Assad and blah blah blah.

No doubt Assad and this fellow are dictators but they don't pretend to hide over what they are unlike Trudeau recently.

 
Haven't you heard? It's when Russia runs out of fuel, food, ammunition, and man power due to their poor planning, terrible logistics, and catastrophic man power losses for this entire thing!

I've been reliably informed a week ago that Russia would run out of everything in two weeks and lose the war because of it. I'm counting down the days since there isn't an official countdown clock for the thread.
but the Ukrainians are sitting pretty!
Screen Shot 2022-03-22 at 23.27.53.png
 
This ought to be a troll. It must be.

Sadly no, these folks do exist in real life.

However you don't notice them till they start talking politics.


Its all connected to these kind of values, the major shot callers and funders for the current administration and his party all come from this part of the country, which is usually San Francisco and some parts of Los Angeles and New York. Also include Big Tech as well since they come from that part of the country as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back