Breitbart didn't factually report anything. Yiannopoulos pulled the rumors and allegations about Sarah from the Gamergate scrublords and presented whatever he could legally present as fact, prompting the resoponse from her in that Medium.com blog entry. We don't need to add anything locally that gives any actual context to libelous attacks in tabloids that are in a gray area that Yiannopoulos and his editors at Breitbart (even though he is now head editor of the "tech" section so he's in charge of what gets posted now) got vetted through their legal team.—Ryulong (
talk) 01:46, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
You just admitted it IS legal, so will you at least do the honor of unrevdelling it?
WalkerWalkerWalker 01:50, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Just because a reactionary tabloid has the legal leeway to post completely false attacks on someone does not mean that there's a loophole for anyone else. And Gooniepunk oversighted it all apparently.—Ryulong (
talk) 01:52, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
And just because she goes "Yeah, those are my chat logs" doesn't mean there's any point to providing context to something that is libelous at best.—Ryulong (
talk) 01:55, 20 November 2015 (UTC)