- Joined
- Sep 10, 2021
I just thought they were stupid, horny, and rebellious.I thought it was obvious that twitter coomers are fatherless.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I just thought they were stupid, horny, and rebellious.I thought it was obvious that twitter coomers are fatherless.
Also I’m pretty sure Green ISNT the only minor Puppy follows and there are plenty of dumbass minors who essentially draw nsfw for her, which is also groomingDrugs and sex are uhhh totally different things. What are you even suggesting Green gets charged with? Enticing an adult by being an oh so horny 15 year old online? The only thing that could make your analogy kind of apply to this situation is if Green was doing something like sharing nudes. We don't know what happened, but the flaw in your analogy is drugs are something physical you can be caught with, while grooming and pedophilia isn't really something you can tangibly "possess" unless CP comes into the mix.
Saying a kid isn't mentally mature enough to understand the repercussions of sex is not "emotions", it's fact. Green is fucking 15, Green was probably raised on the internet where sex is extremely normalized and, unfortunately, exposed to literal kids. Green hasn't commit a crime by being horny online and getting everyone's favorite landwhale-pup in his Discord DMs. Unless Green was taking nudes of himself for Puppy, and can be tried for that in his state for possessing CP.
You don't have to like Green or think he's solely in the right. No one here thinks he's in the right 100%. There's no denying he did approach Puppy and instigate things, but as many people have said, Puppy is an adult who should know better than to humour the desires of a horny minor.
I’m not reading all that but you’re wrong. Blaming the kid for the situation and saying they wanted to/initiated it is literally what the resident farms pedophile Tommy Tooter did.So I get the whole backlash of victim blaming but you have to remove emotions and look at the facts. For example:
Minor smokes tobacco. Dealer goes to a minor and offers him weed. Peers around him say not to do it, but minor does it anyways. Minor and Dealer both get caught. Minor gets charged with possession and use of controlled substances.
Do you think the Minor should be charged for his actions? Otherwise, the defense of coercion would be used more often and people would get away with evil shit. The Nazi's did this too claiming peer pressure and coercion made them do the terrible acts. You think they should be able to walk free from the Nuremberg trials? Spoiler, the defense failed and they were convicted. That's why the law is written the way it is because yes. We all were stupid horny teens, but we still can make choices between right and wrong. To the point were in some instances minors can be tried as adults. Being an idiot doesn't excuse you for crimes otherwise we'd have more retards walking around freely doing crimes and not being punished.
Now in an optimistic world full of rainbows and sunshine it would be nice to say that Green was being solely groomed and pups is an evil pedofork. Except, I've given two examples of minors using sexting as a means for manipulation and clout. Bluespike was around 13 during the Julie Saga. He had explicit sexually roleplay with Chris. You're telling me the trolling group coerced a 13 year old to do sexual roleplay? They kicked him out when he forced Chris to shove a medallion up his ass because he's gone too far. I don't know how much they knew about the sexual roleplay, but Bluespike had thoroughly thought out this idea and had clear intentions, acted on it, and had emotional responses to his actions.
Again, Stories was about 16 during the Spoctor-Stories-Pentagrin drama. Spoctor, at the time was 17 who turned 18. Meaning he was sending a minor nudes and sexual content. However, Spoctor isn't in jail and he isn't cancelled. In fact it was the minor, Stories, who was cancelled and kicked off of social media. Stories had thoroughly thought out the idea and had clear intentions, acted on it, and had emotional responses to her actions.
Now this is why I think Green is actually not being groomed, but complacent. I've seen outed groomers in the art community often enough. I've gotten a rough understanding of a lot of the reactions, planning, and investigations. I'll say it again, yes Green is horny. It's really easy to use that against Green. Imagine a drug addict claiming a dealer coerced him into buying. Another issue I have, though I'm not well caught up, is that the groomed have a really strong knee jerk reaction when they realize what's happening. It's really emotional and from my understanding. Green kept going; pups brought up that it felt wrong and Green went "okay, so anyways". Not to mention there are a lot of people calling out and telling both Green and pups not to do this. Seriously why tf would you keep this up Green when you have the whole world telling you that it's bad. Both he and pups are getting backlash, but it took quite awhile for him to turn around and now he's going to call her out. Where have I seen this before? Surely doesn't remind me of someone else in the art community. . .
I'm going to reiterate once again. A lot is speculation. I'm not saying Green is complacent, but he sure damn is sus. I'd like to believe pups groomed him and that Green didn't enjoy it and wasn't complacent. However, lady justice is blind. He can still face consequences, however if proven that he was groomed and coerced it would be mitigated and might not serve jail time or be on record. That's of course if it even gets that far which it probably will never. Since public callouts 99.99% end in nothing unless they actual touched the child all that will happen is pups gets cancelled and hopefully stays that way. It's probably better for her to be off the internet too for the time being.
There could be more to it, though, in one of the screenshots, he was asking her to help him with his follower count. They're both attention whoring cows from what I can gather, so it'd be funny if it were the other way around - he groomed her.I’m reserving my judgement until Green posts his screenshots. I don’t see why he would threaten to expose her for grooming if that’s all the conversations they’ve ever had.
She'll make herself into a victim, even when the fallout from the call out happens. She also hit the jackpot with a fan that shared her Mommy Kink and both shouldn't have shared Discord tags.Autumn is being a little ridiculous. It seems that Green may have lied (we don’t know for sure yet, he hasn’t posted his own side of the story), but as of right now, Autumn is trying her hardest to seem totally innocent, and she hasn’t taken even an ounce of accountability.
I was on her account to see if there were new comments until I realized it's been deleted. Making sure I wasn't retarded.She deleted the thread.