War Invasion of Ukraine News Megathread - Thread is only for articles and discussion of articles, general discussion thread is still in Happenings.

Status
Not open for further replies.
President Joe Biden on Tuesday said that the United States will impose sanctions “far beyond” the ones that the United States imposed in 2014 following the annexation of the Crimean peninsula.

“This is the beginning of a Russian invasion of Ukraine,” Biden said in a White House speech, signaling a shift in his administration’s position. “We will continue to escalate sanctions if Russia escalates,” he added.

Russian elites and their family members will also soon face sanctions, Biden said, adding that “Russia will pay an even steeper price” if Moscow decides to push forward into Ukraine. Two Russian banks and Russian sovereign debt will also be sanctioned, he said.

Also in his speech, Biden said he would send more U.S. troops to the Baltic states as a defensive measure to strengthen NATO’s position in the area.

Russia shares a border with Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.

A day earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered troops to go into the separatist Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine after a lengthy speech in which he recognized the two regions’ independence.

Western powers decried the move and began to slap sanctions on certain Russian individuals, while Germany announced it would halt plans to go ahead with the Russia-to-Germany Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

At home, Biden is facing bipartisan pressure to take more extensive actions against Russia following Putin’s decision. However, a recent poll showed that a majority of Americans believe that sending troops to Ukraine is a “bad idea,” and a slim minority believes it’s a good one.

All 27 European Union countries unanimously agreed on an initial list of sanctions targeting Russian authorities, said French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, and EU foreign affairs head Josep Borell claimed the package “will hurt Russia … a lot.”

Earlier Tuesday, Borell asserted that Russian troops have already entered the Donbas region, which comprises Donetsk and Lugansk, which are under the control of pro-Russia groups since 2014.

And on Tuesday, the Russian Parliament approved a Putin-back plan to use military force outside of Russia’s borders as Putin further said that Russia confirmed it would recognize the expanded borders of Lugansk and Donetsk.

“We recognized the states,” the Russian president said. “That means we recognized all of their fundamental documents, including the constitution, where it is written that their [borders] are the territories at the time the two regions were part of Ukraine.”

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Putin said that Ukraine is “not interested in peaceful solutions” and that “every day, they are amassing troops in the Donbas.”

Meanwhile, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday morning again downplayed the prospect of a Russian invasion and proclaimed: “There will be no war.”

“There will not be an all-out war against Ukraine, and there will not be a broad escalation from Russia. If there is, then we will put Ukraine on a war footing,” he said in a televised address.

The White House began to signal that they would shift their own position on whether it’s the start of an invasion.

“We think this is, yes, the beginning of an invasion, Russia’s latest invasion into Ukraine,” said Jon Finer, the White House deputy national security adviser in public remarks. “An invasion is an invasion and that is what is underway.”

For weeks, Western governments have been claiming Moscow would invade its neighbor after Russia gathered some 150,000 troops along the countries’ borders. They alleged that the Kremlin would attempt to come up with a pretext to attack, while some officials on Monday said Putin’s speech recognizing the two regions was just that.

But Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters Tuesday that Russia’s “latest invasion” of Ukraine is threatening stability in the region, but he asserted that Putin can “still avoid a full blown, tragic war of choice.”

Article
 
You mean to tell me this huge slice of land only has half the population of the United States?

That is both disturbing and intriguing.

Have you ever played either the STALKER games or the Metro games?

Either one is a fairly accurate depiction of Russia. And I don't mean a post-apocalyptic Russia, I mean Russia right now. Alternately, Russia right now is basically a post apocalyptic wasteland, whichever you prefer to see it as. I watch a few Youtube channels of people exploring Russia away from the major cities. There are whole cities that are basically run down abandoned shells. Maybe a few people living in one or two soviet apartment blocks that have some working utilities, who have nowhere to go, no prospects, no hope. War monuments listing the dozens of people who died from that city, maybe a single store, a bus stop, maybe a post office if they're lucky. Old grannies and grandpas living on their own in ramshackle old houses that look like they probably have every type of mold imaginable, miles from any train stop or bus stop.

It's very hard for most westerners to really comprehend how bad it is once you get away from the few borderline modern, prosperous areas of Russia.
 
I see, they're going the scorched Earth route without hitting the nuke button.

Sounds like an idiot strategy, let's see how that works out for them.

You mean to tell me this huge slice of land only has half the population of the United States?

That is both disturbing and intriguing.

Have you ever played either the STALKER games or the Metro games?

Either one is a fairly accurate depiction of Russia. And I don't mean a post-apocalyptic Russia, I mean Russia right now. Alternately, Russia right now is basically a post apocalyptic wasteland, whichever you prefer to see it as. I watch a few Youtube channels of people exploring Russia away from the major cities. There are whole cities that are basically run down abandoned shells. Maybe a few people living in one or two soviet apartment blocks that have some working utilities, who have nowhere to go, no prospects, no hope. War monuments listing the dozens of people who died from that city, maybe a single store, a bus stop, maybe a post office if they're lucky. Old grannies and grandpas living on their own in ramshackle old houses that look like they probably have every type of mold imaginable, miles from any train stop or bus stop.

It's very hard for most westerners to really comprehend how bad it is once you get away from the few borderline modern, prosperous areas of Russia.
There's also parts of Russia that are uninhabitable. So despite it being a big country you got both alot of uninhabitable places and alot of poor towns. The only thing it has going for it is the major cities and that's it. And even the major cities are more for the rich in Russia.
 
There's also parts of Russia that are uninhabitable. So despite it being a big country you got both alot of uninhabitable places and alot of poor towns. The only thing it has going for it is the major cities and that's it. And even the major cities are more for the rich in Russia.
Nothing is uninhabitable if you're determined enough
 
Screenshot_20220330-143510__01.jpg
As previously mentioned, the Ukraine wants at minimum guarantees from Western powers, such as the UK, the USA - I.E. NATO members.

Such guarantees are not forthcoming, and won't be.

Putin is kinda retarded. He's invaded a country that is capable of defending itself, and convincing all its inhabitants beyond doubt it needs to both escape once and for all from the Russian sphere of influence and get security agreements from larger powers.

The only option is NATO, which is a few years off minimum.

Smart move prior to any agreement for Ukraine is to wear down Russia so their offensive capabilities are depleted for the next decade.
 
Kuleba did specify and mean display of "Z" as support for the invasion, like 80% Russians are in favor and many stick that shit on their cars and places of business. Btw. within Russia a lot of people are violently anti-Z ... as in you can find your car wrecked and tires slashed. Outside of 80% there are some people who watch unfiltered news.

Nazi and Communist symbols are outlawed in both Ukraine and Poland and probably few other countries.

The reason why this is such a sore spot, in Poland/Ukraine/Belarus, some parts of Russia population losses were 50% or more due to those regimes. Of course commies blamed a lot of things they did themselves (during scorched earth retreats, Katyn etc) on Nazis, so Nazis def got it twice as rough in the minds of the people.
The difference between US and say Ukraine, you can walk through any town and talk to anyone, and every single person has a family tree that was trimmed way the fuck down to a few or a single branch because of two megalomaniacal assholes. The stories are well alive, it is something that even younger generation somewhat remembers well.

I appreciate that US is a tolerant place. But even in US, I can see a dude with an AlQaeda flag walking into 9/11 survivors group and getting the living shit beat out of him, and passers by only cheering them on.

Russia with its FSB derived KGB in all elements of power and commie simps, tries to preserve Soviet righteousness, denying that Soviet union allied with Nazis in 1939 (WWII legally started in 1941, and saying otherwise will get you in jail), that many communist leaders were sadistic murderers. They equate this to "Russophobia" which in reality is commie hate, and a well deserved one at that. This is because admitting to all the commie crimes would bring into doubt the legitimacy of the Russian government itself. Soviet Union never fell in Russia or Belarus, at least in Russia it mutated, but was never rooted out.
I forget who once told me this "The Problem with Russia is Russia never ever forgets History, but never ever Learns from it."
 
View attachment 3124982
As previously mentioned, the Ukraine wants at minimum guarantees from Western powers, such as the UK, the USA - I.E. NATO members.

Such guarantees are not forthcoming, and won't be.

Putin is kinda retarded. He's invaded a country that is capable of defending itself, and convincing all its inhabitants beyond doubt it needs to both escape once and for all from the Russian sphere of influence and get security agreements from larger powers.

The only option is NATO, which is a few years off minimum.

Smart move prior to any agreement for Ukraine is to wear down Russia so their offensive capabilities are depleted for the next decade.
I didn't find this reply encouraging, first instinct is feeling of being backstabbed
They're willing to provide weapons for Ukrainians to fight Russians, which just means more deaths as it drags out, but they're not ready to do one thing that could bring end of this conflict closer.

I don't see how this is good news for Ukraine. And it would just give more ammo to Russian propaganda, they'll be saying that Ukraine doesn't really have allies and that they're on their own, making Zelensky's proposal impossible to implement.
Makes me wonder if it's their independent decision or if it was helped by that Russian money.
 
I don't see how this is good news for Ukraine. And it would just give more ammo to Russian propaganda, they'll be saying that Ukraine doesn't really have allies and that they're on their own.
Makes me wonder if it's their independent decision or if it was helped by that Russian money.
If they give assurances, then when Russia inevitably breaks the agreement and starts shit again, they'll be bound to respond with military force, now two nuclear powers are duking it out, and the UK certainly won't want that on their lonesome.

Twittertards and R*dditors like to talk up big shit, but when the glove's thrown down, dead servicemen are being listed in their dozens every day on the news, and the economy slows down as investors lose confidence and it impacts their standard of living; they'll be crying for the guns to be dropped and peace to return.

The West, and much of its population have been insulated from the impact of war, the 'policing' and 'anti-insurgency' operations in Afghanistan and Iraq haven't demonstrably affected their standard of living; so they've gotten into their heads a socially-acceptable strain of jingoism that doesn't weigh the cost of war.

After all, it won't be their kids who get sent off to die in the Baltics, it'll be the sons of the lower class.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Le Pew
You guys might've seen the first clip of the Russian soldier, but there's also one with the same guy later:
In the first one he and his pals rob someone's house and eat their food, all the while cursing and referring to Ukrainians with slurs.
Then he's hiding somewhere and crying about their losses, both dead and wounded ("200's" and "300's"), and how he barely avoided death.
From what I know, Ukrainians got a hold of him, as well as his phone, which is how these videos ended up on the internet. I hope this smug motherfucker got what he deserves.

If they give assurances, then when Russia inevitably breaks the agreement and starts shit again, they'll be bound to respond with military force, now two nuclear powers are duking it out, and the UK certainly won't want that on their lonesome.

Twittertards and R*dditors like to talk up big shit, but when the glove's thrown down, dead servicemen are being listed in their dozens every day on the news, and the economy slows down as investors lose confidence and it impacts their standard of living; they'll be crying for the guns to be dropped and peace to return.

The West, and much of its population have been insulated from the impact of war, the 'policing' and 'anti-insurgency' operations in Afghanistan and Iraq haven't demonstrably affected their standard of living; so they've gotten into their heads a socially-acceptable strain of jingoism that doesn't weigh the cost of war.

After all, it won't be their kids who get sent off to die in the Baltics, it'll be the sons of the lower class.
I'm just saying there's a lot of Russian money in UK.
It's not like UK would be alone here. And after seeing how inept Russian army is, there shouldn't be any reservations about this. Concern about the use of nuclear weapons is baseless to me, everyone understands that you won't be able to put that genie back in the bottle, so I'm tired of hearing about it.
 
Last edited:

Kremlin buckles in ruble dispute​

Slight ruble retreat by Kremlin ruler Vladimir Putin (69)!


According to the Kremlin, the conversion of payments for Russian gas supplies to Europe from euros and dollars to rubles will not come into effect on Thursday. Gas delivery and payment are separate processes, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Wednesday.


President Vladimir Putin's instruction to switch to ruble payments is not yet valid for this Thursday. Putin wants to meet with representatives of the Russian gas giant Gazprom and the central bank on the day to be informed about the current state of affairs.

The announced meeting and the refusal of Western countries to switch to the ruble had sparked fears in Europe that Russia could quickly shut down gas supplies. Peskow had also said that if you didn't pay, there would be no gas; Russia is not a charity.

Russia wants to switch to ruble payments because of Western sanctions in the wake of the war in Ukraine because, according to Putin, the country can no longer do anything with euros and dollars.

Because of the tensions between the West and Russia, Federal Minister of Economics Robert Habeck (Greens) activated the early warning level of the gas emergency plan on Wednesday. He reassured: "There are currently no supply bottlenecks", but also raised awareness of a possible deterioration in the supply situation: "Nevertheless, we have to increase the precautionary measures in order to be prepared for an escalation by Russia."


This first of three crisis levels does not yet provide for any state supply restrictions. But Germany is preparing for a possible delivery stop by Russia. Putin had announced that he would only accept payment for gas imports in rubles in order to support his currency - the contracts, however, are in dollars and euros.

The final stage in the federal government's plan is the emergency stage. It comes into force when there is an exceptionally high demand for gas or there is a significant disruption in the gas supply or another significant deterioration in the supply situation.


Then "non-market-based measures must be taken" in order to secure the gas supply of the protected customers - such as households, hospitals or gas-fired power plants. This is regulated by the Federal Network Agency.

Kremlin dictator Putin has BILD.de blocked in Russia​


The propaganda war by Kremlin dictator Vladimir Putin (69) against the free press continues outside the country's borders: Russia blocks BILD.de.


Background: Since the start of Putin's bloody war against Ukraine, BILD has also been reporting in Russian on Putin's war crimes and his country's transformation from an autocracy to a totalitarian dictatorship. Translated texts from the BILD editorial team are posted on the website, parts of the BILD live programs are shown with Russian subtitles. In addition, there is now a dedicated Russian-language Telegram channel.


In the Kremlin-typical justification of the communication supervisor Roskomnadzor it said on Sunday: Follow the request of the general public prosecutor's office. A reason for the restrictions on the online presence was not given.


BILD boss Johannes Boie: "BILD reports around the clock on Putin's war of aggression in Ukraine, also in Russian. The blocking of BILD.de by the Russian censor confirms our journalistic work for democracy, freedom and human rights. And it encourages us to give Russian citizens even more opportunities to find out about news and facts that go beyond the Russian government propaganda.”

Russia Proposes SWIFT Alternative to India for Ruble Payments​

  • Suggests India use SPFS system to settle rupee-ruble payments
  • Russian Foreign Minister said to visit New Delhi Thursday

India’s government is considering a proposal from Russia to use a system developed by the Russian central bank for bilateral payments, according to people with knowledge of the matter, as the Asian nation seeks to buy oil and weapons from the sanctions-hit country.
The plan involves rupee-ruble-denominated payments using Russia’s messaging system SPFS, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing confidential deliberations. No final decision has been taken and the matter will probably be discussed when Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov arrives in India for a two-day visit Thursday.

A finance ministry spokesman wasn’t immediately available for a comment.

India is keen to continue bilateral trade due to its dependency on Russian weapons and the prospect of buying cheaper oil as global prices surge. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government has been pushing back against pressure from Western nations by arguing that arms purchases from Russia are needed to counter China’s growing military assertiveness.

Under the proposal, rubles will be deposited into an Indian bank and converted into rupees and the same system will work in reverse, one of the people said. Undecided elements include whether the exchange rate will be fixed or floating.

Russia also wants India to link its Unified Payments Interface with their MIR payments system for seamless use of cards issued by Indian and Russian banks after Visa Inc. and Mastercard Inc. suspended operations, one of the people said.
The U.S., along with the European Union, cut off seven Russian banks from SWIFT -- the Belgium-based cross-border payment system operator -- including state-controlled VTB, Bank Rossiya and Bank Otkritie. Following the sweeping sanctions, Russia has been looking for alternate mechanisms to continue its trade hit by its war in Ukraine.
India has not outright condemned Moscow’s attack on its neighbor, saying only that Russia and Ukraine should end hostilities and seek a diplomatic solution through dialog. However, New Delhi is under pressure from fellow members of the Quad grouping, which includes the U.S., Australia and Japan, to take a stronger stand against Russia as the U.S. and its allies try to isolate Moscow.

 
I didn't find this reply encouraging, first instinct is feeling of being backstabbed
They're willing to provide weapons for Ukrainians to fight Russians, which just means more deaths as it drags out, but they're not ready to do one thing that could bring end of this conflict closer.

I don't see how this is good news for Ukraine. And it would just give more ammo to Russian propaganda, they'll be saying that Ukraine doesn't really have allies and that they're on their own, making Zelensky's proposal impossible to implement.
Makes me wonder if it's their independent decision or if it was helped by that Russian money.
I fail to see how it is backstabbing, this is the same stance that the UK and most Western Allies had before the war, it's the same stance they have during it and it will be the same stance after it. Surely, a promise of a future guarantee would highlight the question of why not intervene now?

Those sorts of security guarantees as a solution are simply untenable, Ukraine should join NATO. Unfortunately, Russia by fighting these proxy wars was able to in effect have a say over Ukrainian membership.
 
I fail to see how it is backstabbing, this is the same stance that the UK and most Western Allies had before the war, it's the same stance they have during it and it will be the same stance after it. Surely, a promise of a future guarantee would highlight the question of why not intervene now?

Those sorts of security guarantees as a solution are simply untenable, Ukraine should join NATO. Unfortunately, Russia by fighting these proxy wars was able to in effect have a say over Ukrainian membership.
Are you familiar with the conditions of this agreement? Ukraine effectively gets the same security guarantees as members of NATO, while remaining neutral on paper.
That way Putin could say that he achieved his objective and fuck off.
 
I didn't find this reply encouraging, first instinct is feeling of being backstabbed
They're willing to provide weapons for Ukrainians to fight Russians, which just means more deaths as it drags out, but they're not ready to do one thing that could bring end of this conflict closer.

I don't see how this is good news for Ukraine. And it would just give more ammo to Russian propaganda, they'll be saying that Ukraine doesn't really have allies and that they're on their own, making Zelensky's proposal impossible to implement.
Makes me wonder if it's their independent decision or if it was helped by that Russian money.

Fun fact: The UK has started two world wars over honouring neutrality/independance of other states.

We did it for Belgian Neutrality in 1914 (the treaty was 150 years old and the germans thought we, the people who basically wrote global contract law wouldn't honour it)

We did it for Polish garuntees of independance also.

Both times a million of our people died to restore the world back to a rough balance.

I think we've done our bit for now. Ukies increasingly seem like they can boot the Russians out and I'm sure we can let them join NATO then.

Same with Georgia, who could probably retake the bits the russians stole in 2008.
 
Fun fact: The UK has started two world wars over honouring neutrality/independance of other states.

We did it for Belgian Neutrality in 1914 (the treaty was 150 years old and the germans thought we, the people who basically wrote global contract law wouldn't honour it)

We did it for Polish garuntees of independance also.

Both times a million of our people died to restore the world back to a rough balance.

I think we've done our bit for now. Ukies increasingly seem like they can boot the Russians out and I'm sure we can let them join NATO then.

Same with Georgia, who could probably retake the bits the russians stole in 2008.
I suppose it's unreasonable to expect someone to implicate themselves like that. I hope they at least make sure Ukraine gets enough weapons and ammunition to bury Putin's ambitions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Le Pew and Tovarisz
Are you familiar with the conditions of this agreement? Ukraine effectively gets the same security guarantees as members of NATO, while remaining neutral on paper.
That way Putin could say that he achieved his objective and fuck off.
Yes, but what's the quid pro quo on this?

NATO protects the UK, NATO protects all of its members. Therefore, there is mutual benefit for all involved.

This security guarantee promises that the UK will step in for the Ukraine, not the other way around.

NATO underpins the security of Europe, therefore the knock on effects with it being undermined are huge. The knock on effects for undermining a security guarantee for Ukraine, not so much. Greater than allowing 10s of thousands of our soldiers to die in a war thousands of miles away?

Not worth the paper it's written on.
Fun fact: The UK has started two world wars over honouring neutrality/independance of other states.

We did it for Belgian Neutrality in 1914 (the treaty was 150 years old and the germans thought we, the people who basically wrote global contract law wouldn't honour it)

We did it for Polish garuntees of independance also.

Both times a million of our people died to restore the world back to a rough balance.

I think we've done our bit for now. Ukies increasingly seem like they can boot the Russians out and I'm sure we can let them join NATO then.

Same with Georgia, who could probably retake the bits the russians stole in 2008.
This was also done prior to the current conception of the world order, and crucially - when Great Britain was a super power. We simply could not commit to this alone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: secret watcher
Are you familiar with the conditions of this agreement? Ukraine effectively gets the same security guarantees as members of NATO, while remaining neutral on paper.
That way Putin could say that he achieved his objective and fuck off.
Doing so looks and smells remarkably like Chamberlain’s “Peace in our time” agreements. What happens when Putin doesn’t stay fucked off?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Exterminatus
I suppose it's unreasonable to expect someone to implicate themselves like that. I hope they at least make sure Ukraine gets enough weapons and ammunition to bury Putin's ambitions.

Every single NLAW in the UK arsenal has now been committed to Ukraine.

Not everything we've had out back.

Not everything we've got left over waiting for godot or a defense review to dispose of them.

UK arsenal had 10,000 of the damn things, and 10,000 have now been commited to the Ukranians.

Which is no doubt making Thales happy as it means some extra pocket money for them to make all the replacements.

Same as Thales other great product, the Star Streak is now being sent out there. We've got 7,000 of those hanging about so god knows how many of them will be sent out so we can order replacements also.
 
Germany gets ready to activate their Emergency Gas Plan.
Oh no. I've seen that one before...

Sorta related:

ger.jpg

Anyway, back to news:

First on CNN: Mariupol Red Cross warehouse hit by military strikes, satellite imagery confirms​


The Red Cross warehouse in central Mariupol was hit by at least two military strikes, new satellite images from Maxar Technologies confirm.

On Wednesday, the Azov Battalion — a unit that began as an ultra-nationalist militia but has since integrated into the Ukrainian Armed Forces — claimed on their Telegram channel that the warehouse had been hit by Russian military strikes, posting an image of the larger complex as evidence.

CNN has obtained a satellite image from Maxar Technologies that confirms the allegation.

Citing additional imagery it captured, Maxar said the northern end of the warehouse was hit sometime between March 19-22. A second military strike, on the southern end of the building, occurred sometime between March 23-26.

Sensory satellite data from NASA's Fire Information for Resource Management System also confirmed that a number of explosions were detected in the vicinity on March 20 and every day between March 22-25.

International Committee of the Red Cross spokesperson Jason Straziuso told CNN that it is a Red Cross warehouse.

“We do not have a team on the ground, so we have no other information, including on potential casualties or the extent of the damage," Straziuso said. "We can say that we had already distributed all aid supplies in the warehouse.”
Liudmyla Denisova, the Ukrainian Parliament commissioner for human rights, called for the “world community to condemn” the shelling of the building. “This is another war crime of the Russian army in accordance with the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and a gross violation of the 1949 Geneva Conventions,” she said.

There was no information on victims, Denisova added.

CNN has reached out to the Russian Ministry of Defence for comment.

Biden and Ukrainian President Zelensky are holding a call​


US President Joe Biden is speaking with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky now, according to a White House official.

The call was scheduled for 10:45 a.m. ET (5:45 p.m. in Kyiv) “to discuss our continued support for Ukraine in the face of Russian aggression.” It began at 11:08 a.m. ET.

The call comes a day after Biden and other US officials voiced extreme caution at signals Russia is scaling back its military operations near Kyiv, suggesting they were waiting to see stronger signs of de-escalation before making an assessment of Moscow's intentions.

"We'll see. I don't read anything into it until I see what their actions are. We'll see if they follow through what they're suggesting," Biden said at the White House Tuesday.

Biden noted that in the meantime, the US will continue to "keep strong the sanctions" and "provide the Ukrainian military with their capacity to defend themselves."

US official: "We believe that Putin is being misinformed" about Russian military performance​


The US believes that Russian President Vladimir Putin is being "misinformed" by his advisers about how badly the Russian military is performing in Ukraine and the impact of sanctions on Russia's economy, a US official tells CNN.

"We believe that Putin is being misinformed by his advisers about how badly the Russian military is performing and how the Russian economy is being crippled by sanctions, because his senior advisers are too afraid to tell him the truth," a US official said.

The official said the assessment is based on declassified US intelligence findings.
The official added that the US has information indicating that Putin has become aware of the misinformation, leading to a rift between Putin and his top defense officials.

“We have information that Putin felt misled by the Russian military. There is now persistent tension between Putin and the (Ministry of Defence), stemming from Putin’s mistrust in MOD leadership," the US official said.
The official said Putin did not know his military was "using and losing conscripts in Ukraine, showing a clear breakdown in the flow of accurate information to the Russian president."

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back