The Sacred Cow of Homosexuality - lmao i'm gonna get so much shit for this

@Kiwi & Cow Can't reply to you due to Null being buck broken. But let me try to point out where I stand now, and how I got there from where you are now.

I used to be very live and let live about this kind of thing, because it's logical. Who cares what they do behind closed doors? And you know what? If they had kept it behind closed doors I'd probably still be okay with it, even knowing what I've learned since.

But that was if it had been that way. But it hasn't been. Instead over the last ten years homosexuality has been thoroughly shoved into everything, made into some weird sacred class and even gone so far as to be peddled to fucking kids in school. That is not "behind closed doors"! And you can't just say "that's just those sjws" because those sjws are also fucking gay!
 
Last edited:
I'm going to reply to you because you seem far more genuine than half the posters here who I think nobody can reason with and are also very fucking dishonest with that one guy skipping the verb "acting" which I highlighted and uppercased the second post and assume I said "are normal". I literally never said in this entire thread that homosexuality or even transsexualism was normal, I said that gays and trannies could act normal like they can take a bath, have a normal conversation with other people (Without politics or talking about their "gayness"/"transness") or even buy things from the shop and come back home without having a tantrum. You can be abnormal, but act like a normal everyday person. Apparently that concept is too hard to grasp for some retarded autists on this forum.

"Acting normal" would mean not indulging in ass sex. Sodomy is not normal.

First I'm not really apathetic, I'm empathetic. I have no reason to hate homosexuals and I always thought that what they were doing were completely harmless, (fucking love that one guy who compares sodomy to pedophilia and cannibalism as if the 3 had anything in common) so I default to let them live because it's a waste of time to focus on others when I should worry about myself first, for real I only have problem when they do weird shit in public, I don't care of what sex they practise in private as long as it's legal and not cannibalism/pedophilia.

Faggotry has a huge overlap with pedophilia. This has been pointed out many times and you just flat out ignore it. Likewise I don't necessarily hate faggots, so long as they aren't going after children or otherwise being predatory, in the same way that I don't necessarily hate alcoholics or drug addicts. I recognize that what they are doing is wrong and harmful without hating them for it (again, except for the pedos and other predators, which unfortunately there are many of--but yes, #NotAll of them do that). This seems like an impossible concept for you to grasp.

I fully agree with the second paragraph and I have stated this much myself that homosexuality is usually caused by pornographic consumption, however this issue with Pedophilia should atleast be spread. Furries are fully complacent and let the worst degeneracies in their fandom like Zoophilia and whatnot so they're irredeemable, I hope this isn't also true for most homosexuals, but according to some 'experts' here: gays are SJWs, so that must be a no, they don't tolerate this. SJWs in general hate Pedophiles, so if that was true then by default homosexuals wouldn't tolerate Pedophiles either. Anyways this should be brought up more frequently to the attention of the LGB community so that something can be done about the problem if it is this widespread.

Furries are a great analogue to fags in this sense. Just like furries will obviously be more complacent in zoosadism than normal people, fags are going to be more complacent in pedophilia and other degenerate behavior which inherently stems from their "community" and more likely to ignore it or make excuses for it compared to normal people who don't feel any inherent threat from targeting and eliminating deviant behavior.

Again sorry for my scepticism, but if this was very widespread I'd see more of it being brought up on social media, particularly on right-wing circles, but every single time the grooming comes from trannies.

This could possibly be an underground practise like the elusive Pedophile rings which we don't hear much about on the daily, but which are apparently frequent to come across unknowingly.

It's "underground" in the sense that it's massively censored and suppressed in any even vaguely normie-level media and is a completely untouchable topic in the culture, so yeah, you don't get to see much about it and you have to come to fringe places like this one to start really learning the truth. Right wing media is still catching up on this, and still focuses on trannyshit because that's much lower hanging fruit, but they're getting there.
 
"Acting normal" would mean not indulging in ass sex. Sodomy is not normal.
Homosexual behaviour, right up to penetrative sex, is observed in multiple species. And before you wheel out the appeal to nature thing, consider that the assessment of "normal" has to at least start with an examination of nature, given we are ultimately a part of it and driven far more by our instincts than we like to pretend. When something appears in multiple species, including those closely related to us, that has to be taken into account.

"Normal" is not a good argument, either against or for a thing.
 
Homosexual behaviour, right up to penetrative sex, is observed in multiple species. And before you wheel out the appeal to nature thing, consider that the assessment of "normal" has to at least start with an examination of nature, given we are ultimately a part of it and driven far more by our instincts than we like to pretend. When something appears in multiple species, including those closely related to us, that has to be taken into account.

"Normal" is not a good argument, either against or for a thing.
Two notes:

One: Even the most careful and gentle anal intercourse is harmful to the one receiving, with severe longterm consequences for those who engage in it regularly.

Two: Exclusively homosexual behaviour is not generally seen in nature.
 
Likewise I don't necessarily hate faggots
I don't even think I can add anything to this comment, it's hilariously wrong but whatever mate.
start really learning the truth
Go back to /pol/ nigga.
Homosexual behaviour, right up to penetrative sex, is observed in multiple species. And before you wheel out the appeal to nature thing, consider that the assessment of "normal" has to at least start with an examination of nature, given we are ultimately a part of it and driven far more by our instincts than we like to pretend. When something appears in multiple species, including those closely related to us, that has to be taken into account.

"Normal" is not a good argument, either against or for a thing.
Honestly that was an opinion made into an argument by the local poltards gang weeder and LurkNoMore when all I did was to say "if you act normal I like you". Either way, whether a person is normal or abnormal that doesn't make them worth of any attention.
 
Last edited:
Homosexual behaviour, right up to penetrative sex, is observed in multiple species. And before you wheel out the appeal to nature thing, consider that the assessment of "normal" has to at least start with an examination of nature, given we are ultimately a part of it and driven far more by our instincts than we like to pretend. When something appears in multiple species, including those closely related to us, that has to be taken into account.

"Normal" is not a good argument, either against or for a thing.
Appealing to the behavior of animals is also a silly argument. I agree that appeals to muh normality are not good arguments. In this case I was just pointing out that, given that such an appeal had been made, ass sex is not a normal behavior anyways. In the sense that the average person does not engage in it.
 
Some of the things that's vehemently condoned in the LGBT would make a sane homosexual rat each other out and willingly put themselves on the wall.

Jokes aside, I got nothing against the dudes. Just stay away from kids and practice protected sex. We cool? It doesn't have to end in a sex war y'know?
 
Last edited:
Faggotry and lgbt shit goes so far you actually can see fags making fun of the whole slphabet movement. Just keep this in mind, there are fruity npc fags and then there are men who are just homosexual, these two rarely overlap irl.
Well put. The alleged overlap between being a homo and a pedo may correlate but I don't see causation. Some people are gay, and some people are pedophiles. The common denominator is depravity, not sexual attraction. I would say that depraved child fuckers engage in homosexual behaviour to satisfy their deviancy, not that gays fuck kids because they're perverts across the board.

Being gay isn't haute anymore. It's not good enough. Being gay is so normalized today that kids don't magically end up gay the same way they magically end up being a tranny. Determining homosexuality is easy for any normie: you either like the idea of fucking the same sex or you don't, and there's nothing wrong with that going either way. Depraved people build on to this simple concept with different groups and labels: homoromantic, homoerotic, homosexual, etc.

Not all fags are perverts but all perverts will be fags if the price is right. Homosexuality is an attractive prospect for sexually depraved individuals rather than pedophilia being a virtue for gays.
 
View attachment 3045558
All faggots have butt worms that alter their brains like la plaga from rezi 4, but gayer.

cuckservatives have no standing ground. in 10 years they will defend trannies like they defend gays, women, blacks, the working class etc. the left just need to find something even more repulsive to distract cuckservatives

View attachment 3048594

That's why true nationalists don't really care for cuckservatives. Too much being proper, too much worshipping jewish fairy tales.

Homosexual behaviour, right up to penetrative sex, is observed in multiple species. And before you wheel out the appeal to nature thing, consider that the assessment of "normal" has to at least start with an examination of nature, given we are ultimately a part of it and driven far more by our instincts than we like to pretend. When something appears in multiple species, including those closely related to us, that has to be taken into account.

"Normal" is not a good argument, either against or for a thing.

What Pajeet does in the middle on the street is natural too. Very natural, bonobos and chimps fling it all the time. We are just smart enough to realise it has bad consquences like cholera.
The only good argument for human life mattering more than a... fish for example, is that we can rise above the crude, mindless casuality of nature.
 
Faggotry and lgbt shit goes so far you actually can see fags making fun of the whole slphabet movement. Just keep this in mind, there are fruity npc fags and then there are men who are just homosexual, these two rarely overlap irl.
PREACH! Ser Prize will probably not agree with you there, but it's a fact.

I think the real issue is the amount of SJWs who also claim to be queer or queergender. "Queer" used to be an insult like faggot, nowadays it's an off-brand of homosexuality that's dedicated to particularly deviant and mentally ill people, thus this creates the mindset for people who then think SJWs are always gay or that gays are always into social justice.
 
That's why true nationalists don't really care for cuckservatives. Too much being proper, too much worshipping jewish fairy tales.
Forget being proper, the cuckservative values the opinion of the man who wants to kill him more than anything else on the planet and will gladly watch his wife get raped and killed by a pack of niggers so he can accumulate tolerance points (tm) and show that he is morally superior to those dang dirty liberals. The cuckservative is the end game of pathological altruism, helped along by a semetic desert religion that tells him he will get a heaven of sporzbawl and tv if he turns the other cheek like a pussy.
 
Because if you admit that homosexuality is and always been the result of molestation you have to admit that troons are the result of indoctrination; and no one wants to recognize that bending the sapling deforms the tree.
What a absurd fucking claim. Are you aware homosexuality correlates highly with certain genotypes and hormones levels in utero?
 
How it started: Muh closed doors, how does it affect you, consenting adults

How it is going:

rsd9e31xnxn81 - Copy.jpg
Screenshot_38.jpg
Screenshot_39.jpg
 
How it started: Muh closed doors, how does it affect you, consenting adults

How it is going:

View attachment 3127883View attachment 3127905View attachment 3127913
That's the thing that gets me: they were lying. And for the longest time I fell for it.

All you need to do is start digging around the history of the "LGBT" community and what they do to find out that they're fucking lying. But they've got the best PR department in the world right now. People love gays so much that even when you show them proof that it's widely accepted that molestation happens in the community they just don't fucking care.
 
Forget being proper, the cuckservative values the opinion of the man who wants to kill him more than anything else on the planet and will gladly watch his wife get raped and killed by a pack of niggers so he can accumulate tolerance points (tm) and show that he is morally superior to those dang dirty liberals. The cuckservative is the end game of pathological altruism, helped along by a semetic desert religion that tells him he will get a heaven of sporzbawl and tv if he turns the other cheek like a pussy.
What would be your religion then?
 
Back