Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

I can't enjoy that movie as much as I used to after seeing the animated series. Do not ever look it up. Also Blazing Saddles is better than Spaceballs anyway fight me.
Oh, you mean Spaceballs 2: The Quest for More Money? Don't worry, that's not canon. That was a mean prank the studio played on G4 to destroy it faster.
 
I think the underlying conceit of even writing a sequel to this is terrible. Some things don't need a sequel way too many years after the fact for it to make any sense. See: A Christmas Story, Slap Shot, American Psycho.

Perhaps Alan Moore could pull it off by pulling this all into League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, but those are more homage than sequel
Slap Shot 2 was still decent though...
 
My god he’s insufferable. He talks about Donald Trump more than Donald Trump talks about himself.

I think there's some potential in the basic premise. I don't think Patrick is the person to execute it, though.

Kiwis could probably workshop a better version of the story. Personally, I'd take it in a supernatural direction: grown-up scholar Timothy is the only one to know Scrooge's secret encounter with the ghosts, and when Scrooge dies, Timothy makes a pact with a ghost to help him investigate the murder.
That does sound like a cool read. I’d prefer it to Tim going on a bloody rampage.

If Patrick is insisting on including resurrection men circa the 1860s, though, I'm not sure where he's going with this. The workhouse poor were a perfectly adequate supply of bodies for the medical schools by that era. Maybe someone is robbing the graves to make a Frankenstein or something?
He just thinks they’re cool and wants them in his book, history be damned.

It just occurred to me that Pat might go so far as to involve Jack the Ripper several decades too early. If it happened in England in the 1800s, throw it in the blender.

I'm more a The Producers guy myself.
I like Young Frankenstein (neigh!).

I think the underlying conceit of even writing a sequel to this is terrible. Some things don't need a sequel way too many years after the fact for it to make any sense. See: A Christmas Story, Slap Shot, American Psycho.
Besides, the trend now is taking classic works and remixing them by setting them in modern times or from the POV of a different character (The Great Gatsby just became available for this, so there’s a book about Nick). Pat is a fool. A corpulent fool.
 
Last edited:
Besides, the trend now is taking classic works and remixing them by setting them in modern times or from the POV of a different character (The Great Gatsby just became available for this, so there’s a book about Nick). Pat is a fool. A corpulent fool.
He should really be trying to do anything at all with his life's work, the Tomlinverse, while he still has the chance. At some point, quasi will gain all that ip in exchange for a couple of thousand off the debt
 
Anybody who doesn't include Spaceballs in their All-Time Top 5 is a humorless, unsophisticated faggot unworthy of further consideration or attention.
I'm sorry, I can't even put it in my top 5 Mel Brooks movies, when there are Blazing Saddles, The Producers, Young Frankenstein, High Anxiety, and History of the World: Part I.
 
Included this one purely because he managed to spell three words wrong in the same post and I find that funny.
He also asked a dumb question. The answer is actually yes. And I'm not even going to cut slack for it being 2005 because even then it was common knowledge. Using quantum entanglement or superposition for the distribution of cryptographic keys or even theoretically unbreakable one-time pads has sort of been the Holy Grail of cryptography for a while, because quantum computing (for different reasons) threatens to break existing crypto at some indeterminate future date.

Still lmao qaunmt cmoupitgn. Dyslexic fat faggot.
 
There's been an update to the google quash:

244332.png

6k was added to the initial 5k of fees:

13rfdsd.png

Bringing the total of fees owed to 11k:

ewwedwew.png

Also, someone (Pat) was trying to settle:

wdcdwd.png

Quick note for those who might be unfamiliar with this case, on 3/22/2021 Brinton Resto (Pat's lawyer) filed a subpoena to Google requesting information about the owner of the website "onaforums.net". This is a separate case to the one that Pat lost late last year, if he loses this case as well then he'll owe an additional 11k. (This figure assumes that no additional legal fees will be incurred).
 
Last edited:
There's been an update to the google quash:

View attachment 3127865

6k was added to the initial 5k of fees:

View attachment 3127866

Bringing the total of fees owed to 11k:

View attachment 3127869

Also, someone (Pat) was trying to settle:

View attachment 3127876

Quick note for those who might be unfamiliar with this case, on 3/22/2021 Brinton Resto (Pat's lawyer) filed a subpoena to Google requesting information about the owner of the website "onaforums.net". This is a separate case to the one that Pat lost late last year, if he loses this case as well then he'll owe an additional 11k. (This figure assumes that no additional legal fees will be incurred).
Will Fat Rick succeed in his quest to own the stalkers? Or will he end up owing more money to Quasi? Find out in the next episode of Dragon Ball Z!
 
I think the underlying conceit of even writing a sequel to this is terrible. Some things don't need a sequel way too many years after the fact for it to make any sense. See: A Christmas Story, Slap Shot, American Psycho.

Perhaps Alan Moore could pull it off by pulling this all into League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, but those are more homage than sequel
A Christmas Carol wasn't a story with unexplored corners waiting for some intrepid soul to venture into. It shared the tale of a soul plagued with the vices of greed and pride seeing the error of his ways and repenting of his evil. If someone was going to try and continue the story, then thematically it would mesh if you carried the same exploration into other vices. Instead of greed, it could be someone consumed by gluttony or anger, and Tiny Tim could help them learn some self-control and empathy. Given that Fat has neither of those virtues, he clearly cannot write such a book.

Nothing that Fat has hinted about in his book suggests that it bears any connection whatsoever to the original book, save for the names of a couple of characters, and the setting. Of course, given how Fat portrayed an alien space station as substantively identical to the modern American Midwest, I doubt we're going to get much of the richness of 19th century London... And we certainly won't be getting any characters that are recognizable from the Dicken's books. Tiny Tim was such a pure-hearted boy that he was able to extend love to a man Dickens described as, "...a squeezing, wrenching, grasping, scraping, clutching, covetous, old sinner! Hard and sharp as flint, from which no steel had ever struck out generous fire; secret, and self contained, and solitary as an oyster." And Tim's generosity of spirit gave Scrooge the inspiration and hope he needed for the change of heart that saved his soul and made him a new man.

And Fat wants to take this paragon of virtue and turn him into a serial killer, hell-bent on revenge.

I cannot express the depths of my contempt for the lowliness of soul and depravity of spirit contained in the corpulent, porcine form of Patrick S. Tomlinson. That man's feeling for his fellow humans is so constrained that it cannot reach beyond the limits of his own skull. He literally cannot write a character that isn't himself, because he cannot fathom that creatures other than himself exist. Every virtue that he sees in someone else is one that he has pretended to himself, every vice he perceives in those he hates is one he gleefully exercises. There isn't an ounce of genuine compassion or empathy for another person in his soul, so the idea of him taking the embodiment of charitable love that is Tiny Tim and defacing him by turning him into the flesh-glove for all the wretchedness that is Pat Tomlinson is utterly repellant to all wholesome sensibilities.

tl;dr: Fat has so much awfulness of character that it couldn't be contained within a single human form, and therefore it made him fat. Not just fat, but morbidly obese. And his writing is an abomination before God.
 
I think the underlying conceit of even writing a sequel to this is terrible. Some things don't need a sequel way too many years after the fact for it to make any sense. See: A Christmas Story, Slap Shot, American Psycho.

Perhaps Alan Moore could pull it off by pulling this all into League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, but those are more homage than sequel
There are plenty of good stories written as sequels or expansions to public domain works. These are usually best when they're telling a completely new story that just uses the familiar world-building as a jumping off point. I have no idea if what Patrick's making will be good or not, I haven't read it and I don't really plan on it. I'll just say that, generally, there are no good or bad concepts, only good or bad execution.

But the things you listed there are actually interesting. A Christmas Story was an exaggerated biographical story based on a book the original author wrote, and A Christmas Story 2 wasn't. It was vaguely similar to a completely different story the author created, but ultimately had nothing to do with his actual life. So, in essence, it's basically a fake sequel. American Psycho 2 is an even worse example of a fake sequel because nobody ever wanted it to be a sequel in the first place, it was a completely different movie that a hackneyed executive slapped the branding on, because he had no faith in the project. A very sleazy move usually only seen in he days of bad VHS/DVD releases.

I haven't seen Slap Shot or the sequel so I can't comment on it.

Patrick Tomilson is fat, gay, and he cheated on that half marathon.
 
There's been an update to the google quash:

View attachment 3127865

6k was added to the initial 5k of fees:

View attachment 3127866

Bringing the total of fees owed to 11k:

View attachment 3127869

Also, someone (Pat) was trying to settle:

View attachment 3127876

Quick note for those who might be unfamiliar with this case, on 3/22/2021 Brinton Resto (Pat's lawyer) filed a subpoena to Google requesting information about the owner of the website "onaforums.net". This is a separate case to the one that Pat lost late last year, if he loses this case as well then he'll owe an additional 11k. (This figure assumes that no additional legal fees will be incurred).
That's not how you plea bargain, Fatrick.
 
Nothing that Fat has hinted about in his book suggests that it bears any connection whatsoever to the original book, save for the names of a couple of characters, and the setting.
He will not even read it, I guarantee. Dickens is far too dense and wordy for fat Rick's ADHD brain to take in, even the easy novellas like a Christmas carol. I'd give him 100 dollars for the Quasi fund right now if he wrote an actual, non plagiarised close read analysis of one single page of Dickens, but we all know that won't happen because he is an illiterate mongoloid who openly admits he seldom reads anything more than once. All of his research will be cribbed from reddit posts and movie adaptations. It's going to be the worst thing he's done by a country mile and I really fucking hope it gets released.
 
He will not even read it, I guarantee. Dickens is far too dense and wordy for fat Rick's ADHD brain to take in, even the easy novellas like a Christmas carol. I'd give him 100 dollars for the Quasi fund right now if he wrote an actual, non plagiarised close read analysis of one single page of Dickens, but we all know that won't happen because he is an illiterate mongoloid who openly admits he seldom reads anything more than once. All of his research will be cribbed from reddit posts and movie adaptations. It's going to be the worst thing he's done by a country mile and I really fucking hope it gets released.
There's been a lot of hope expressed that Quasi gets the rights to one of Fat's published books as part of the payment for the lawsuit. Realistically, that would be complicated by the fact that those books are under contract with Publishing Houses, who have rights to the works that Fat can't violate.

The book we know exists that isn't contracted to a publisher? A Christmas Murder, or whatever horrible title Fat has for it. It is a legitimate commodity, what with Fat being a published author. Of course, its value would be next to nothing, given the abysmal sales of his other books. You'd have to take his lowest selling book, and then half the value because that's the consistent trend with his works, and then decrease the value again, because it's not part of one of his ongoing series, or even the same genre, and so could not be expected to carry over fans from Fat's other work. Of course, all this plays out in Quasi's favor because he could get the book and still have the bulk of the judgment to collect in property that might actually have monetary value. In theory, one could even request discovery from Fat on communications between him and his publisher regarding his contracts (and the lack of further contracts) to help guage the value of his manuscript, and that would be rich. And I'm sure Quasi would want the book to be available for purchase should he get the rights to it.
 
I once appeared in a production of a play/musical that I enjoyed so much I decided to write a sequel. I had got about 20 pages in when I realised:

1 - Writing a play is actually hard
2 - What I had written sucked donkey dick
3 - Writing a sequel to a beloved property is gay and retarded, come up with your own ideas, sped.

So I downed tools and worked on less shit ideas. I was 11 when all this happened. Fat is still writing fanfic for old literary canon into his 40s and still hasn't realised that it's lame. What a literal child.
 
Back