Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

I love clocking ftms via text so here are the things I noticed:
- Women apologize in their posts. A lot. They apologize the post is too long, too short, too emotional, badly formatted, chaotic, anything goes. Sometimes they do that "oh I know it's boring to read, feel free to skip, sowwy" spiel.
- As you said, emotions, talking about them, overanalyzing them, worrying overtly about hurting someone's feelings.
- Softening their points with phrases like "I think", "It seems like...", "I guess maybe we should...". I noticed women at work do this constantly while proposing something (and I used to do it too), ftms are no different.

Hell, browse r/ftm for a minute. I'm a true and honest female and I couldn't write that girly if I tried.
100% agree. If you want a great example of female speech, r/ftm is ironically one of the best places on the internet (maybe because the user base is mostly teenage girls who only talk to other teenage girls, maybe also because the hugbox environment amplifies a lot of the "analyzing emotion" elements). And it sticks out even more because they stick "bro" and "dude" awkwardly into every second sentence.

Another thing I didn't see mentioned yet when it comes to male speech is that men tend to be cruder about describing bodily functions (not just sexual ones). You can see that on trans twitter a lot where the AGPs are always talking about "pissing" or "taking a dump" in women's bathrooms. Not that women never use words like that, but when they do it's usually for shock/humor value, it's not standard speech.

Bringing it back to FTMs, I actually went to r/FTM and did a quick search for "peeing" vs. "pissing" to test out this hypothesis. FTMs on a whole are obsessed with achieving "male" urination, and yet they still cannot bring themselves to use anything but gentle euphemistic words to describe it 90% of the time:

2.png

3.png
 
I will like to congratulate America on becoming the most porn obsessed nation on Earth:
Now I know what many of you are thinking, how can that be?
I don't know, let's read the fucking article

Americans' monthly searches for porn are over four times higher than the runner-up, the United Kingdom - with 16.6million on average.
gee i wonder why
United States/Population 329.5 million (2020)
United Kingdom/Population 67.22 million (2020)
 
Bringing it back to FTMs, I actually went to r/FTM and did a quick search for "peeing" vs. "pissing" to test out this hypothesis. FTMs on a whole are obsessed with achieving "male" urination, and yet they still cannot bring themselves to use anything but gentle euphemistic words to describe it 90% of the time:

View attachment 3153772

View attachment 3153773

Handling food in her piss-soaked pants: 😷

ipissedmypantsusingmystpatwork.png
 
An actual woman posted a response to the label "cis/cisgender" troons love to use so much.
View attachment 3153735
This woman raises a point. Why the fuck should we adhere to a label you chose for us? Also a woman is "what" you are, not "who" you are.
And secondly while a little off topic: LatinX is the worst label white people have come up with in a while. I know Mexicans who'd rather be called a wetback or a beaner over "LatinX".

Goddamn, she called the whole TRA movement the fuck out w/o getting emotional or resorting to anything that could be remotely called insulting (not that troons won't try). Shit, I could go straight for a woman like this.
 
r/LabourUK’s top posts for the last month have lots of pro-tranny content. None at all in the first two pages of r/Democrats. Why has this become a much bigger issue in England?
because four years ago the conservatives kicked off a legal change about self ID to try and make themselves look socially liberal but didn't consider the effect on women and they all got pissed off an organised.
 
An actual woman posted a response to the label "cis/cisgender" troons love to use so much.
View attachment 3153735
This woman raises a point. Why the fuck should we adhere to a label you chose for us? Also a woman is "what" you are, not "who" you are.
And secondly while a little off topic: LatinX is the worst label white people have come up with in a while. I know Mexicans who'd rather be called a wetback or a beaner over "LatinX".
whenever i hear the word “latinx” i remember my white teacher in school who would interrupt and correct students mid sentence every time they said “latino”. it’s a stupid unnecessary term only used by white people just like how there’s real women/men who insist on normal people adding some stupid identifier in front of their sex.

that makes me think though, how many of these people insist on troons putting “trans” in front of their identified gender? many of these guys say they want to be stealth as women, but expect real women to use these labels. entitled cunts
 
r/LabourUK’s top posts for the last month have lots of pro-tranny content. None at all in the first two pages of r/Democrats. Why has this become a much bigger issue in England?

because four years ago the conservatives kicked off a legal change about self ID to try and make themselves look socially liberal but didn't consider the effect on women and they all got pissed off an organised.

Plus the UK TERFs have some advantages over other countries in the Anglosphere where feminists are trying to pushback:
  • JK Rowling
  • Small country so easier to organise in person
  • Things like access to abortion and contraception aren't issues in the UK the way they are in the US, so there's less to distract feminists away from the trans issue
  • There seems to be much more vocal pushback to the trans movement in the UK than in other countries, possibly due to the final thing on this list...
  • Dentons report, (and here) which when uncovered spurred the UK feminists into being as loud as they possibly could in response to the TRAs trying to sneak in policy by the back door
 
The beautiful Celeste Dasgluck (LeChance)
...
View attachment 3147732

I don't get it but I don't get trans either
And that's the thing, I don't need to get homosexuality. Frankly, I really don't, at least not male homosexuality. But I don't have to get homosexuality or affirm them or anything, it's only transsexuals who need this shit. Everyone else is fine with just being left alone.

That's rapey and gross. Makes me think of this story
View attachment 3149912

View attachment 3149937
Link
A rare case of a woman trooning out to avoid accountability.

I know this has probably been sperged about to death here, but the whole non-binary ideology is plagued with incredible circular logic and so many contradictions that it'd make most people's heads spin, even the most open-minded liberal types. The troon stuff I can at least make sense of; non-binary is just a whole lot of ??? and there's a reason most people are confused by it. It's fucking confusing. The ideology presents this seemingly radical template to live by ("JUST BE YOU") yet at the same time, completely reinforces gender roles and stereotypes.

Either gender is some innate essential inner immutable thing or it isn't. How does one "feel" like a boy or a girl? How does one "feel" like neither? If you don't know what it "feels" like, how do you know you're NOT a boy or NOT a girl? And if gender is a construct, how is someone's gender determined at birth/in childhood before a person is even formally socialized? Why do people feel need to troon out so badly and as children? Why the need for all these cosmetics and invasive procedures if everything is merely a construct/fluid?

Even diehard uWu liberals often admit they're confused too by the non-binary shit, but I've noticed they are usually told to just accept it and shut up so they swallow their rightful confusion and parrot what everyone else around them is saying.
Non-binary is just a logical extension of the concept of gender identities. That's why the TRAs are mostly unifying behind this fringe identity that most people consider ridiculous even if they're willing to accept the equally absurd premise that a man can secretly have a woman's brain or vice versa. If you draw the line at non-binaries then the entire thing collapses because people will inevitably start asking, "why is that unfalsifiable and unquantifiable gender identity not valid and your is?" or "if gender is socially constructed but your gender identity is innate then why does it always happen to fit into the socially constructed boxes" or "wait, now it's acceptable to point out how ridiculous this whole thing is?". They have to put up a unified front because the second the cracks start showing the whole thing falls apart, the best defense is a good offense after all.
 
An actual woman posted a response to the label "cis/cisgender" troons love to use so much.
View attachment 3153735
This woman raises a point. Why the fuck should we adhere to a label you chose for us? Also a woman is "what" you are, not "who" you are.
And secondly while a little off topic: LatinX is the worst label white people have come up with in a while. I know Mexicans who'd rather be called a wetback or a beaner over "LatinX".
A good, smart woman.
 
"If trans women have an advantage then why are all top female athletes cis women?"
Because we didn't allow trans women in female sports before? What kind of ass backwards logic is that? Are these people for real?
"Trans women have an advantage because they have to train harder. They don't have any advantages a cis woman can't get"
You heard it ladies. Don't want to be beaten by a man? Just train harder.
 
Back