Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread

How well is the war this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 249 10.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ I ain't afraid of no Ghost of Kiev

    Votes: 278 11.8%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 796 33.7%
  • ⭐⭐ Stalemate

    Votes: 659 27.9%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 378 16.0%

  • Total voters
    2,360
Status
Not open for further replies.
China would win since America has niggers. No country with a case of niggers or jews ever amounted to anything in the end and the US has both diseases in spades with an added bonus of spics.
America can and has thrived with niggers and kikes. What’s changed is that open hostility against the Productive pop is pretty intense.
Think of a slow boil demo a la Rhodesia.

It’s OK to subsidize the parasitic subhumans as long as you realize what really powers the economic engine (not them).

Since they decided to stop giving preference to European immigrants, America has been degrading precipitously and taking down the rest with it and now with open season on huwites, recovery seems a remote possibility.

You have too much faith in bugmen that eat sewer stew and are eaten by escalators.
Yes, Chinese don’t invent a thing, other than new ways to bribe and corrupt. They won’t win.
 
And we could stop exporting to China, especially all that food. Works both ways.
China would be hurt more by the US halting all trade with them than the other way around. It would still affect the US, but Chinese agriculture production is nowhere near enough to feed their entire population, so without the US, they’ll starve.
 
China’s exports as a share of their gdp has halved in a decade, the US is entirely reliant on Chinese machinery, metals, and other manufactured goods, Mexico and SEA combined wouldnt even make up a quarter of the loss and would likely side with China in a geopolitical conflict(in SEA’s case) or stay neutral.

You claiming that China has done nothing to make it less reliant on us money is laughably dumb.
Trump started a trade war with Chyna and they cried uncle in a month. The reason is their whole economy is predicated on exports. Same as Germany.

The US may take a bloody nose but it can make its own stuff if needed. The Chinese would die without the cash from exports.
 
China would be hurt more by the US halting all trade with them than the other way around. It would still affect the US, but Chinese agriculture production is nowhere near enough to feed their entire population, so without the US, they’ll starve.
This is true.

Has anyone looked into how much food Russia + Ukraine(when they take it over) could supply to China?
 
This is true.

Has anyone looked into how much food Russia + Ukraine(when they take it over) could supply to China?
More than enough as they grow 40% of all wheat in the world, or atleast did before this mess. Just using rail or trucking it across Siberia is more of a PIA than shipping it. They already export food to china and south asia.
 
Kinda surprised people are seeing this as Ukraine vs Russia and not Nato vs Russia with all the equipment and intelligence given to Ukraine and not to mention all the men on the ground from the US/UK/France. There is a French journo who reported its American generals running things on the ground there right now.

Not sure we have to wonder what NATO vs Russia looks like, we are seeing it. If the Russians backing off of Kiev and focusing on Eastern Ukraine and finishing of Maripol is Russia losing and Nato winning, fair enough, but that's what's happening by almost every report coming out of both sides.

If LAPD decided to fight organized gang violence by rounding up every actual retard in an adult daycare across LA and armed them with LAPD-issued equipment and gave them senior commanders from the LAPD to advise them, would you describe that as an LAPD vs Bloods confrontation? Or would it just be a bunch of armed retards, getting (and likely ignoring) good advice, and dying by the droves for an organization that doesn't care about their well-being?

For the sake of this argument, there will be some suspension of disbelief, as LAPD is actually manned partially by actual retards, but you get my point.
 
China would be hurt more by the US halting all trade with them than the other way around. It would still affect the US, but Chinese agriculture production is nowhere near enough to feed their entire population, so without the US, they’ll starve.
We constantly had to bail out the USSR with food exports, too, usually at ridiculously low prices they didn't deserve and essentially amounted to foreign aid.
 
If LAPD decided to fight organized gang violence by rounding up every actual retard in an adult daycare across LA and armed them with LAPD-issued equipment and gave them senior commanders from the LAPD to advise them, would you describe that as an LAPD vs Bloods confrontation? Or would it just be a bunch of armed retards, getting (and likely ignoring) good advice, and dying by the droves for an organization that doesn't care about their well-being?

For the sake of this argument, there will be some suspension of disbelief, as LAPD is actually manned partially by actual retards, but you get my point.
The LAPD is better than the NYPD at nigger control. It’s only a question of their chosen masters ordering to bring down the hammer. Remember the summer of love and how quickly the nigger riots got quelled.
 
If LAPD decided to fight organized gang violence by rounding up every actual retard in an adult daycare across LA and armed them with LAPD-issued equipment and gave them senior commanders from the LAPD to advise them, would you describe that as an LAPD vs Bloods confrontation? Or would it just be a bunch of armed retards, getting (and likely ignoring) good advice, and dying by the droves for an organization that doesn't care about their well-being?

For the sake of this argument, there will be some suspension of disbelief, as LAPD is actually manned partially by actual retards, but you get my point.
No I wouldn't but idk that that's what's happening in Ukraine. With all the troops doing "exercises" and "training" around the area it wouldn't surprise me at all if countries had soldiers there who shouldn't be there.

But fair enough, it's quite possible that despite Ukraine having the equipment, intelligence, experience, and advice of NATO countries the actual man power of NATO isn't there and that would make the difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager
And this is just a localized war in Eastern Europe, could you imagine the modern internet being around during WW2?

“Holy fuck Hitler just invaded Poland :stress:

“Well, looks like the Japs got nuked, and nothing of value was lost :story:
r/redditmoment: "Thousands of Jews hiding from the Nazis were doxed and found by the Gestapo because a Redditor made a selfie."
 
The White House seems to have come to terms with the idea that their self-propelled presidential setup can now simply be ignored - and that's fine. The old man there is muttering something into the microphone - and let him mutter. Today about the genocide, yesterday about the tobacco industry and prostitutes - it's okay.

Just don't pay attention, he's just old, act based on your interests.
 
This is true.

Has anyone looked into how much food Russia + Ukraine(when they take it over) could supply to China?
Chinese food imports 2020
HQTS-Countrys-china.png
Nb not all imports are fungible (animal feed can't be substituted for lamb) but they've got a pretty broad supply chain. America could stress that supply chain but probably not demolish it (opportunity for Thailand, Indonesia and Brazil to step up, as well as Russia. Also China has a growing African presence they could leverage (they currently have modest agricultural projects there). Might be better for Africans than their current ag trade with the EU.

But food sanctioning China would be bad, seems like that would work about as well as embargoing oil to the Japs in 1941. Best case, they switch supply lines to beef up trade with Russia, Asia, LATAM and African countries. Worst case, they retaliate by kicking the US Navy and its allies out of the South China Sea, meaning war.
 
China would be hurt more by the US halting all trade with them than the other way around. It would still affect the US, but Chinese agriculture production is nowhere near enough to feed their entire population, so without the US, they’ll starve.
It's one of the reasons the Chinese have been trying to get New Zealand on board with the belt and road initiative. They want the kiwis food, and PM horseface wants to sell out to them. I think it's going to eventually cause the kiwis and the Australia to become hostile to each other, especially as the aussies continue to deepen their defence ties with the US.
 
Chinese food imports 2020
View attachment 3176225
Nb not all imports are fungible (animal feed can't be substituted for lamb) but they've got a pretty broad supply chain. America could stress that supply chain but probably not demolish it (opportunity for Thailand, Indonesia and Brazil to step up, as well as Russia. Also China has a growing African presence they could leverage (they currently have modest agricultural projects there). Might be better for Africans than their current ag trade with the EU.

But food sanctioning China would be bad, seems like that would work about as well as embargoing oil to the Japs in 1941. Best case, they switch supply lines to beef up trade with Russia, Asia, LATAM and African countries. Worst case, they retaliate by kicking the US Navy and its allies out of the South China Sea, meaning war.
Remember the trade war shit with Trump when China stopped buying American soybeans? What actually happened was US soybeans went to Brazil, and Brazilian soybeans went to China.

Pretty sure this is what would happen again if the US embargoed all food exports to China.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back