Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

trans1.png
trans2.png

trans3.png
Internet and Tumblr were a massive disaster for humanity, directly from a tumblr-like server and the person in question is a female minor (allegedly trans and whatever else...)
Sad people get groomed into this.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Lily Says 41%!, UnsufficentBoobage, InteracialBowelSyndrome and 6 others
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: LemonKingLover, Wych Elm, UnsufficentBoobage and 5 others
PurpleEater said:
visiting a U.S. state is immoral and cruel because muh native locals
View attachment 3176350
View attachment 3176352
View attachment 3176354

Notice that local Hawaiians' opinions are shut down by SJW Karen genderspecial, as per usual.
Click to expand...
SJW always feel they have to speak for people and see their words as gospel. For anyone to disagree with them, regardless if they're white or colored, will be shut down as reactionary. Even if it's more personally opinion than based of rival politics for example.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Exterminatus, UnsufficentBoobage, Flexo and 10 others
PurpleEater said:
visiting a U.S. state is immoral and cruel because muh native locals
View attachment 3176350
View attachment 3176352
View attachment 3176354

Notice that local Hawaiians' opinions are shut down by SJW Karen genderspecial, as per usual.
Click to expand...
Imagine thinking Hawai'i isn't massively supported by tourism and that it should be closed off to "help" the less than 10% of the population (the Kanaka aka Native Hawaiians) they say doesn't own any of the land or resources so probably disproportionately has to rely on tourism over other industries. (I imagine if it was still the Kingdom of Hawaii with massively fewer whites and other immigrants it would be a tourist and gambling haven rather some kind of communal subsistence farming "paradise" these people envision.)
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Winner
Reactions: Lily Says 41%!, mrpatapon, UnsufficentBoobage and 9 others
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Lily Says 41%!, UnsufficentBoobage, lolcow yoghurt and 8 others
I would imagine the Hawaiian savages telling white people to stay away from the island are the same type as on the mainland who are just insufferable assholes who hate white people as a social virtue signal. I believe the natives on Hawaii want tourists to stop coming about as much as I suspect the casino-owning Indians on the continent to stop gambling
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: madethistocomment, Flaming Insignias, Aunt Carol and 8 others
282305EA-FDA5-4785-B417-0040C3E0B279.jpeg


The more that I look at a video game company like Blizzard trying to appeal to “female gamers” in this context, the more you start to realize that things like this go against the standard of video gaming in a nutshell.

Gaming can be for everyone, but it does not deserve to be shoehorned or pandered to in a way that almost looks to be condescending in nature.

Just my two cents on this matter. I’m just going by how I remembered when the PS1 version of Tomb Raider came out, while also remembering some women (and men, to an extent) getting upset at showing the differences of polygons of how Lara Croft looked over the years:

8B689FBB-2201-4FD8-89D1-2FB1DF8F502D.jpeg0065308E-C013-4F3C-AEC6-77682EDA0FB4.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Disagree
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, NoReturn, Flexo and 11 others
albert the programmer said:
View attachment 3176866

The more that I look at a video game company like Blizzard trying to appeal to “female gamers” in this context, the more you start to realize that things like go against the standard of video gaming in a nutshell.

Gaming can be for everyone, but it does not deserve to be shoehorned or pandered to in a way that almost looks to be condescending in nature.

Just my two cents on this matter. I’m just going by how I remembered when the PS1 version of Tomb Raider came out, while also remembering some women (and men, to an extent) getting upset at showing the differences of polygons of how Lara Croft looked over the years:

View attachment 3176876View attachment 3176875
Click to expand...
I think the bigger problem is that they try to appeal to women in the wrong genres. The women I know mainly play more causal and creative games like the sims and animal crossing or Nintendo RPGs like Zelda and pokemon. If blizzard really wanted they could make a title that combines the core elements of the other games with some Blizzard flair mixed in, but instead they made the Burger King Kids Club of competitive shooters.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Lily Says 41%!, mrpatapon, UnsufficentBoobage and 6 others
1.png

PurpleEater said:
Notice that local Hawaiians' opinions are shut down by SJW Karen genderspecial, as per usual.
Click to expand...
Can't you see the High Priests, Priestesses and Priestexxex are liberating the unwashed savaged from their false consciousness through the lens of CRT? When they are liberated they will no longer need incomes from tourism!
 
  • Horrifying
  • Lunacy
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, NoReturn, Flexo and 7 others
Positron said:
View attachment 3177386


Can't you see the High Priests, Priestesses and Priestexxex are liberating the unwashed savaged from their false consciousness through the lens of CRT? When they are liberated they will no longer need incomes from tourism!
Click to expand...
Adoption is a "baby trade?" Oh god, is she one of those people who thinks that a white couple adopting say, an abused child from Kenya is somehow *colonizing* the child and that they'd be better off with Kenyans even if those Kenyans couldn't afford to feed them? Seems like the type. Reminds me of that book and show Little Fires Everywhere where they had that whole debate over who the child's "real mother" was even though her real mother abandoned her. It was a sad story but it was pretty fucked.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Lily Says 41%!, UnsufficentBoobage, NoReturn and 9 others
Nigger Respecter said:
I would imagine the Hawaiian savages telling white people to stay away from the island are the same type as on the mainland who are just insufferable assholes who hate white people as a social virtue signal. I believe the natives on Hawaii want tourists to stop coming about as much as I suspect the casino-owning Indians on the continent to stop gambling
Click to expand...
The current king of the native Hawaiians is also the head of Hawaii's tourism bureau. I guess it's possible he hates white people and colonialism but to me that says probably not.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Feels
Reactions: Lily Says 41%!, Rabid Northman, deeplyhigh and 13 others
PorkeyDuck said:
View attachment 3177298

View attachment 3177305
View attachment 3177311
View attachment 3177310
Click to expand...
This is similar to how they tried to get Defiant L banned. I guess they didn't learned their lesssons.

Btw, American Thinker posted a interesting article about the left.
April 14, 2022

The Left Did This to Itself​

By D.F. Mulder

The standard for “free speech” these days is basically: if it offends someone it can and should be censored. After all, feelings come first. If it is witty, if it is offensive, if -- god forbid -- it is “hateful,” it must go! Scrub it from the internet! That is the standard set by the left, set in stone by Big Tech, and consecrated by the Cultural Marxist state.
Leftists cannot have it both ways, but they do not understand that, partly because they keep driving out their more gifted members. If you want free speech for the voices of sexual liberation, you must tolerate it for more traditional, sexually temperate voices. If you want free speech for BLM and other pro-black activists, you have to permit speech for dissident rightists too, including white advocates. That is, if you want to be morally and philosophically consistent. The Left wants to have its cake and eat it too. That just does not work long-term. Those terrible, self-serving standards tend to boomerang back on the standard-bearers.

A number of pro-LGBTQRSTLNE teachers in one school district in Texas are reportedly upset that they cannot express their support for gay pride in the classroom and on their vehicles. Some are even being pushed out of their jobs on account of their activism. Now they know how righties have felt for decades in America. We have long been terrified that if we speak out our livelihoods will be threatened, we will be publicly harangued and shamed, or worse still, we will be charged with hate crimes. Yet the dominant forces on the political left have consistently celebrated the persecution of actual dissidents.

These teachers claim it is unbearably oppressive to not be able to stand up for what they believe in at work. Try walking in the shoes of someone really reviled and opposed by the U.S. power structure. These teachers say they wish to be role models, and to teach their students to stand up for what they believe in. But what has the Texas legislature been doing? Are state representatives who restrict overt, overwhelmingly left-wing political activism not standing up for their own beliefs and their own people? These pro-gay teachers are only for you standing up for what you believe in when they approve of and agree with what you believe in.

We are told gay and trans teens need the presence of rainbow flags and pride stickers to feel safe. How that makes someone feel safe is beyond me. Stickers do not actually make anyone safe, just as cops do not actually make anyone safe. They may make some people feel safe, but it is basically an illusion, rooted in myth and state propaganda. The government’s mindless muscle may be symbols of safety to some, but they are symbols of terror and state criminality to others. And for good reason. Some people find rainbow flags beautiful, others find them loathsome. Such is the nature of all symbolism and expression. Everything is open to interpretation by the listener/viewer. You can feel very strongly that your rainbow flag or pride pin is a symbol of inclusion, but a lot of folks find such symbols noxious, alienating, scandalous, and threatening. Many folks may lack the imagination to understand why that is, but it is. One person’s pride is another’s deprecation.

The messy culture wars in Texas are a backlash against decades of illiberal abuse by the political left. Conservative legislatures are giving leftists a dose of their own medicine. It is a readily observable reality that the lay of the sociocultural land allows lefties to express themselves whenever, but does not allow righties to do the same. Gay pride is glorious. Straight pride is despicable (and stupid). Black pride is necessary. White pride is hate. The list of double standards is endless. It only ever goes one way.
That is why a number of states have passed laws over the last decade preventing school districts from essentially endorsing certain viewpoints on charged issues. Banning Critical Race Theory can be justified on far more grounds than just this one, including the ugly fact that brainwashing young white children to hate themselves is frankly diabolical, if not child abuse, and will invariably have all kinds of negative long-term effects on the psychological well-being of white children. But what these laws really come down to is the political right reacting to a sociopolitical arrangement where only one viewpoint is truly permitted, namely the leftist viewpoint, the one that aligns with the prevailing wokeshevik zeitgeist.

The right is fed up with it, and so where it can, it is understandably doing what the left is always all too eager to do, namely silencing its political opponents. Ultimately, you can have speech for all or none, in any place that demands moral consistency. Thus, that is how it tends to go in more sophisticated contexts like the law. In society at large, including the free market, double standards reign. The government context is not society at large however. The right cannot openly silence the left in the governmental/legal context, as the left does to the right in other contexts, so it has opted for the next best thing, namely bans on fundamentally political and/or ideological educational methods and curricula, in other words category-wide bans on speech. The impetus behind these laws is a desire to level the playing field and stop the indoctrination. Since the left has nearly all the cultural power in modern America, the right must righteously fight from whatever terrain it still possesses, against a creepy and creeping crypto-bolshevist totalism.

People who get punched in the mouth for thinking freely are liable to eventually punch back. If leftists had their way, none of us would have Twitter accounts. Half of us already don’t. The Left has no desire to give us any say over our own future, or any influence in our hallowed democracy. After all, the last time they did that, we got "Trumpian fascism."
Thomas Paine once wrote, “he who would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.” The Left has nothing to gripe about. If gay and pro-gay teachers can no longer express themselves on campus, it is their own doing. If you do not respect the voices of your adversaries, your adversaries and the standards you establish for censorship, are liable to come back to haunt you. Censorship is not consistent with a free society. It never has been. Until the Left demonstrates a commitment to the free speech rights of everyone, its own rights to speech will, and perhaps should, remain imperiled.
Click to expand...
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Flexo, Flaming Insignias and 6 others
PurpleEater said:
Adoption is a "baby trade?" Oh god, is she one of those people who thinks that a white couple adopting say, an abused child from Kenya is somehow *colonizing* the child and that they'd be better off with Kenyans even if those Kenyans couldn't afford to feed them? Seems like the type. Reminds me of that book and show Little Fires Everywhere where they had that whole debate over who the child's "real mother" was even though her real mother abandoned her. It was a sad story but it was pretty fucked.
Click to expand...
On one hand, I agree that their complaints are stupid. On the other hand, I feel like that one celebrity who trooned out her adopted African kid is definitely doing some kind of colonialism, making me wonder if their complaints have merit to them.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Lily Says 41%!, UnsufficentBoobage, NoReturn and 7 others
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Flaming Insignias, madethistocomment and 5 others
  • Like
Reactions: Flexo, FierceBrosnan, Flaming Insignias and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back