- Joined
- Jul 3, 2021
You’re looking at this backwards.Normally I would agree, but you pay into employment insurance every week so you can draw benefits when you're laid off or sick. You can draw benefits if you have to take time off to get open heart surgery. Why shouldn't you be able to draw benefits when you have a baby? You pay into this pot of money so you can draw if there's a gap in your employment due to a shortage of work or for health issues or other things along those lines. What logical reason would there be not to pay benefits someone who has taken time off to have a baby? By not supporting working women who want to have kids, it's like the US only wants unemployed white trash and niggers on welfare to be able to have kids.
Most companies worth working for and keeping a job after having a baby already have paid maternity leave (and paternity leave). Sometimes a lot of fucking maternity leave, to the point we straight up forget someone who had a baby is still employed.
Yeah, low wage jobs often don’t offer anything beyond what’s required by the federal and state level, but that usually isn’t important. The cost of childcare outweighs whatever the job pays, so nobody actually keeps working those jobs after having a baby. They just get support from either the husband, their family, or the state (see below).
The best welfare and tax benefits are given to people with kids, so the absolute garbage poors are getting subsidized anyway and don’t need paid maternity leave as they don’t need a job in the first place.
The (somewhat) lack of (Federal) maternity leave is really not a big problem here and nobody is not breastfeeding because of it. They are not breastfeeding because they are fucking retarded. Formula use started before the big Career Woman movement.