Plagued Incels.is (Previously known as /r/incels) - Subreddit's banned, entitled Manchildren whine about why they can't get laid.

If you really had to who would you sex?


  • Total voters
    3,844
It's not that women are not shallow, it's that they value different things. Like, if I were just banging a woman, no strings attached, I would only care about how physically attractive she is. Most women would actually still want to like the guy's personality in a nsa situation. Men send women dick pics on dating sites because they would love to get pictures of tits and ass and think women think like they do. That's why trannies can't just flip a switch and be a woman. Any man with a modicum of experience with women can tell you women's brains are wired different.

I agree with you partially. I don't think it's personality though. Women like to sext before an inperson hookup, because it builds up the mental arousal beforehand. I remember a girl on lolcow.farms being horrified after she had a one night stand. Because she discovered talking to him afterward she had slept with a Trump supporter. I guess she wasn't doing much other than sexting beforehand.
 
Last edited:
If they're 100 photos only, it's going to be skewered because women care more about personality and education and skills and shit than most men do.
Exactly. It's easy for a man to look at those graphs and conclude that modern dating is unfair until you realize that men usually move up on the attractiveness scale as they age and women peak on the attractiveness scale in their 20s, then only lose ground as they age.
Incels want to destroy the economic dating game. Just like the "body-positive radfem" women want to destroy the appearance dating game.
IMO, our ancestors have already developed a system that is an excellent compromise between the competing interests of men and women: monogamy.

Men make the sacrifice of not trying to fuck everything that moves and staying around to raise the offspring of the relationship. In return, men receive sex and a genetic future with one woman. Women make the physical sacrifice and biological investment associated with childbirth. In return, women are given a guarantee that the man won't flake out on his financial responsivities to her children. The system is such a perfect compromise that I'm convinced it was arrived at after generations of trial and error (then they just made up the religious framework as an ex post facto way to justify the dating compromise).

Modern dating is like a game of musical chairs that favors women in their 20s and favors men in their 30s and 40s but everyone is ending up alone in the end. This results in an unsustainable birth rate.
 
Modern dating is like a game of musical chairs that favors women in their 20s and favors men in their 30s and 40s but everyone is ending up alone in the end. This results in an unsustainable birth rate.
Thank the gods I dated in a different age then, fuck.

It's the most hilarious sampling bias ever, in fact. They're comparing the most haughty of women with the most desperate of men.
Anyone who thinks that this is representative of humanity probably thinks Reality Shows are real.
 
IMO, I think a more precise term to describe what's happening is "segregation of the genders." Women are also having statistically less sex and relationships.

This is why I have a hard time sympathizing with incels. They have more agency in their situation. Physical attractiveness has always been a secondary concern to women, which is why short and bald men are still in the gene pool. Most women (rightfully) won't consider any sort of relationship with a man if he doesn't have some semblance of financial independence (notably missing from the vast majority of vocal incels). If they focused their energy towards having a career and a future (all fully within their control), more opportunities for relationships with women would open up.

Women who aren't born physically attractive are permanently hindered in finding mate for the rest of their life since the primary factor most men consider in dating is physical attractiveness. There's only so much the modern beauty industry can do for a woman with unfortunate genetics. In addition, women also need to be laser focused on what they want in life well before they finish emotional and mental development in their mid-20's. By their mid-thirties, women are essentially locked into their career/family balance pathway. Single mothers over 30 are effectively locked out of the viable dating market for the rest of their lives.

Assuming they grow out of their NEET phase, most incels are complaining about a dry spell that is virtually guaranteed to clear up by the time they hit their thirties (when they start hitting their financial prime) and only improve up until they experience erectile dysfunction. A single mother's dry spell essentially lasts the rest of her life, so yeah... I think this situation is worse for women.
This would all be fine and dandy if enough men could have their healthy relationship if it came along with their careers. Too many are being deprived of this.

I don't believe inceldom itself is a major problem. There's a very small amount of men that are so unfortunate genetically they cannot have sex. The topics that incels, and more so blackpillers bring up, are drawing in people. Even normies today.

It's the general quality of life for men today, and the difficulty for many to find relationships. You don't even need statistics to see this, just look at how successful garbage like Onlyfans is. These mostly aren't men just looking to coom, they're unbelievably desperate for any connection with a woman.
 
This would all be fine and dandy if enough men could have their healthy relationship if it came along with their careers. Too many are being deprived of this.

I don't believe inceldom itself is a major problem. There's a very small amount of men that are so unfortunate genetically they cannot have sex. The topics that incels, and more so blackpillers bring up, are drawing in people. Even normies today.

It's the general quality of life for men today, and the difficulty for many to find relationships. You don't even need statistics to see this, just look at how successful garbage like Onlyfans is. These mostly aren't men just looking to coom, they're unbelievably desperate for any connection with a woman.
Just stop desiring emotional intimacy, bro. :smug:
 
Hm, tried to find the source of that ok cupid graph, and the best I could do was a tweet which linked to an archive of an article written in 2009. Is it really that old?
What is with incels and their hatred towards black women?

Did a quick deep dive, bout 5 minutes between 3 different videos. He's 20. He had a crush on a girl who was 11 when he was 12 and a couple years later, he said some sexual stuff toward her with his buddy that he admits was inappropriate at the time. After, he says she became a feminist bitch and her friends bullied him.

But the biggest red flag was when he said he was super addicted to anime as a teenager. Every. Single. Time. This seems to be a factor with incels. He said she even liked anime as a kid too (one of the reasons he had such an obsession with her) but grew out of it. Anime is doing some strange stuff to young men. Its main side effect appears to be turning them into pussy repellent.
 
Last edited:
Yes, you're correct. A woman's sexual prime is when they're in college (early 20s). A man's physical peak is in his 30's.
Women believe Men are at their sexual prime during their thirties, because they make an assumption they are now stable financially, and at the same item not too old and ugly.

I mean they at least have a smartphone, they must be stable, and they are still alive... right?
 
Last edited:
Women believe Men are at their sexual prime during their thirties, because they make an assumption they are now stable financially, and at the same item not too old and ugly.

I mean they at least have a smartphone, they must be stable, and they are still alive... right?
How many vaginas has your dick been in?

*Edit*

I only ask because every time there's one of these threads, there's inevitably an influx of dudes who clearly do not have much relationship experience telling a bunch of other dudes who have seemingly had multiple long term relationships and have actually lived with women and shit like that how women think and act. It's like someone who's only seen pictures of lions in books trying to tell an experienced lion tamer how lions act.

You can post a million graphs telling me apple seeds contained cyanide and therefore I should not eat apples because just a couple apples will kill me, but at the end of the day I have eaten many apples and have not died of cyanide poisoning, so I can clearly observe what you are saying is not accurate.
 
Last edited:
But the biggest red flag was when he said he was super addicted to anime as a teenager. Every. Single. Time. This seems to be a factor with incels. He said she even liked anime as a kid too (one of the reasons he had such an obsession with her) but grew out of it. Anime is doing some strange stuff to young men. Its main side effect appears to be turning them into pussy repellent

If you’ve seen one incel on YouTube, you’ve seen them all. Why do a lot of incels still remember intricate details about girls that they had crushes on in middle school and high school? That’s hella creepy. I rarely think about the girls I was interested growing up. Yes, anime does a lot to a young boy. Mainly because of how oversexualized it is. Girls with faces that appear flawless and overly busty breasts can warp a man’s perception of what the average woman is supposed to look like in real life. A lot of the weird/nerdy/low market/alternative kids at my high school were super into anime, so this honestly doesn’t surprise me. There was another nerdy black incel sperg that I shared on here that had an anime obsession, but his was so bad that he had an anime girl pillow (pretty sure if you were to shine a blacklight it, it would glow in the dark). His channel got flagged down and I regret not archiving the videos. Recurring themes I’ve noticed with most incels on YouTube: alternative nerdy black dude, likes anime, not masculine, robotic monotonous voice, abuses the word “bruh” a lot to sound cool even though it comes off as cringe, and has a disdain for black girls because they bullied and rejected them growing up.
 
This would all be fine and dandy if enough men could have their healthy relationship if it came along with their careers. Too many are being deprived of this.

I don't believe inceldom itself is a major problem. There's a very small amount of men that are so unfortunate genetically they cannot have sex. The topics that incels, and more so blackpillers bring up, are drawing in people. Even normies today.

It's the general quality of life for men today, and the difficulty for many to find relationships. You don't even need statistics to see this, just look at how successful garbage like Onlyfans is. These mostly aren't men just looking to coom, they're unbelievably desperate for any connection with a woman.
sucks for them. nobody's entitled to a relationship
 
sucks for them. nobody's entitled to a relationship
This is one of those statements that's strictly true, but vacuous. It might also be said that you're not entitled to, say, employment. It's true, but it's a real problem for you as a human being if you've never had a job, even if it's your own fault.

The vast majority of adults have been in a relationship at least once, and it's part of the human condition to want both emotional and physical intimacy, and not just sexually either. It's not the same level of importance as food or water, but the drive might actually be even stronger. They did experiments with baby monkeys where one "mother" doll was made of wire and had food, and one was made of cloth but had no food. Nearly all the monkeys strongly preferred the cloth. That's how strong the drive for intimacy and physical comfort is even in ANIMALS, never mind humans.

When people say "you're not entitled to a relationship", usually with the implication "so you should just stop wanting one, loser", I get kinda salty.
 
Last edited:
This is one of those statements that's strictly true, but vacuous. It might also be said that you're not entitled to, say, employment. It's true, but it's a real problem for you as a human being if you've never had a job, even if it's your own fault.

The vast majority of adults have been in a relationship at least once, and it's part of the human condition to want both emotional and physical intimacy, and not just sexually either. It's not the same level of importance as food or water, but the drive might actually be even stronger. They did experiments with baby monkeys where other "mother" doll was made of wire and had food, and one was made of cloth but had no food. Nearly all the monkeys strongly preferred the cloth. That's how strong the drive for intimacy and physical comfort is even in ANIMALS, never mind humans.

When people say "you're not entitled to a relationship", usually with the implication "so you should just stop wanting one, loser", I get kinda salty.
they can want it till the cows come home, but if absolutely nobody wants them then that's usually their problem.

why can't they get emotional intimacy from friendships? surely monkeys don't need to fuck their moms?
 
  • Autistic
  • Like
Reactions: Dittto and Näkki
they can want it till the cows come home, but if absolutely nobody wants them then that's usually their problem.

why can't they get emotional intimacy from friendships? surely monkeys don't need to fuck their moms?
Oh, come on. Sometimes that's the best you can do, and both friends and family are definitely good things. But friendship is OBVIOUSLY not the same as romantic or sexual love. To pretend otherwise is either deliberately deceptive or deliberately ignorant.
 
Oh, come on. Sometimes that's the best you can do, and both friends and family are definitely good things. But friendship is OBVIOUSLY not the same as romantic or sexual love. To pretend otherwise is either deliberately deceptive or deliberately ignorant.
so why use monkeys needing a "motherly" figure as an example?
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Dittto
so why use monkeys needing a "motherly" figure as an example?
the thing about monkeys is they live in what's essentially tribes. you do your job to survive and if you don't get killed by a tiger, you get to mate eventually. Incels exist because of the lack of a tribe.
you think there were any incels in primitive human tribes, or even those modern south american tribes.
 
To show that the drive for emotional desires can be just as powerful as the drive for physical desires. If you don't understand how love for family, friends, and partners are related but distinct, I really don't know how to help you.
i don't need a romantic relationship to be happy, even though i can easily get as many as i want. women aren't wired like men though

you think there were any incels in primitive human tribes, or even those modern south american tribes.
yes
 
Back