Trashfire Ethan Ralph vs. Mister Metokur & Gator - It's finally happening

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who did the worse beating?

  • The 14-year-old transgender prostitute in Lisbon.

    Votes: 599 24.8%
  • A Minnesota cancer patient.

    Votes: 1,302 53.8%
  • Mundane "Boulder King" Matt Jarbo.

    Votes: 517 21.4%

  • Total voters
    2,418
I was pretty unfamiliar with Nick Fuentes before this and I honestly do not understand why anyone would follow this absolute weirdo.

He does not come off as remotely intelligent or knowledgeable.

I think Jim was 100% right when he asked if this was just a publicity stunt. I also do not believe for a second Nick Fuentes gets 7k actual viewers.
Idk either...and if you go far enough in one direction, you'll come full circle. The Right can be just as fascist & mired in faggotry as the rabid Left.

Exhibit A: AF & its leader, (catboi aficionado, repressed homosexual & self-hating latino) Nicolás J. Fuentes.
 
So what's the takeaway from all of this? Nick and everyone affiliated with him are the delusional narcissistic losers and Nick himself a wispy limp-wristed grifter. Such a stunning revelation. Of all the people involved in this shit fest, I actually found myself feeling bad for Micheal. The kid embodies cringe but he seems good natured all things considered. If he happens to be reading this message, I have a bit of advice for him: step away from this nonsense. Watch anime, play video games, go to school, enjoy your youth while you have it. Nothing good will come from involving yourself with this band of misfits.
My take away is they would be better of not engaging this guy. Nick's strategy of "Oh i've heard it all before [Psycho analysis of a tweet here] i flag people who make fun of me, i hate women, tell me somethong new" just made him look like a creepy seething homo. Like it's not that jim is completely unstoppable, these people are just stupid and make themselves look like fools when there is nothing to gain from engaging him this aggresively.
 
Is anyone else shocked at how Nick presented himself?

The knife branding (which I assume he had there with him to make the "Nick the knife joke"), the constant slip ups, the Joker lines, his mannerisms, his whole "I'm actually super smart and funny".

I had legit moments of awe at how a person like this could actually be real.
 
That was fucking stupid.

Jim should have given this to PPP as soon as it was shown what kind of "debate" was to take place,
papa Null said it well a couple weeks ago on stream, Jim is a defensive type and this was just a shit show that was unwinnable as soon as it wasn't about shitting on Ethan for being a cunt to him and his wife.
PPP would have fucking dragged all those MFer's because he is aggressive and I would think upto date with their grifts/careers enough to cause some actual Kino.
I mean nick threatened to kill baked among the many other shitshow moments. the thing is it really isnt worth it to try and debate the af dogpile, baked grandstanded and hogged time to try to make it impossible to answer any of his questions in a way he approves or be subjected to an ever growing tree of questions or statements that make it impossible to address any single one. You cant really debate if the person is only interested in justifying their crimes by saying youre doing crimes because muh priest and trying to say you condone bloody open murder if you try and argue any single point and not just do the disavowal they want.

the best course was to make them engage in ways that shows how desperate unhinged idiotic and shitty they are and i think jim did that. the perfect example i think was baked kvetching about his priest being "doxed" to link that to swatting, jim knew if he said anything about any supporting point itd devolve into hours of baked screaming about how hes a satanic priest killer, instead he brought up baked macing innocent people to which baked had no answer. now does this really address the point in an intellectual good faith debate sense? no but jim wasnt going to be able to do that anyway unless he muted baked and it was a good parry optically and emotionally and also undermines his logic that hes the victim even if it didnt intellectually engage with bakeds attempt to smear jim as a murderer of priests and a christian baby blood drinker.
 
For someone who likes to pretend he's a based white man he sure does a shit job of it by not using that hard r and saying it like a try hard wigger. Jim said it when he was recounting those rumors that Fuentes's sister was a dyke who loved nigger dick.
If Ethan indeed said that about Nick's sister, I'm shocked that he's still standing by him & doubling down on being a guntguard for him. Damn, I guess his disdain for women extends to his sister too. eek.
 
I mean nick threatened to kill baked among the many other shitshow moments. the thing is it really isnt worth it to try and debate the af dogpile, baked grandstanded and hogged time to try to make it impossible to answer any of his questions in a way he approves or be subjected to an ever growing tree of questions or statements that make it impossible to address any single one. You cant really debate if the person is only interested in justifying their crimes by saying youre doing crimes because muh priest and trying to say you condone bloody open murder if you try and argue any single point and not just do the disavowal they want.

the best course was to make them engage in ways that shows how desperate unhinged idiotic and shitty they are and i think jim did that. the perfect example i think was baked kvetching about his priest being "doxed" to link that to swatting, jim knew if he said anything about any supporting point itd devolve into hours of baked screaming about how hes a satanic priest killer, instead he brought up baked macing innocent people to which baked had no answer. now does this really address the point in an intellectual good faith debate sense? no but jim wasnt going to be able to do that anyway unless he muted baked and it was a good parry optically and emotionally and also undermines his logic that hes the victim even if it didnt intellectually engage with bakeds attempt to smear jim as a murderer of priests and a christian baby blood drinker.
I feel like getting Nick to admit he doesn't care about shit unless it affects him is more damaging than he realizes. He said it almost jokingly, but it didn't come across as a joke at all.
 
The only thing i really don't get is Jim's stance on Internet friends. Feels like he places too much on what a friend is, when a casual relationship shooting the shit online is enough to qualify.
I have probably 10-15 or so guys I shoot the shit with online or play games with with some regularity and I generally would refer to most of them as friends offhand, but there are only 2 of them I would ever actually invite over to my house. Really no different from the guys I work with. I'm not sure there's a threshold for when you're placing "too much on what a friend is", some people just draw a finer line between "friends" and "acquaintances" than others.
 
All I got from this was Fuentes thinks very highly of himself as a political figure and yet he's defined by being narcissistic, egotistical, duplicitous, facetious, challenged when it comes to grasping sarcasm, arbitrary to a despicable degree, he's probably gay and he despises 50% of the population strictly on the basis of gender. I'd really want a guy like that in charge of an authoritarian system.

Also the dumb fucking retard kept saying 'insinuate' over and over because I guess he's too caught up in admiring himself to realise he meant to say 'insert' or 'invest'. Fuentes is a write-off, this was a colossal waste of time and it seems to me like Fuentes and Ralph get along so well less because Ralph is of some value to Fuentes and more because they just have a lot of traits in common.
 
Last edited:
All I got from this was Fuentes thinks very highly of himself as a political figure and yet he's defined by being narcissistic, egotistical, duplicitous, facetious, challenged when it comes to grasping sarcasm, arbitrary to a despicable degree, he's probably gay and he despises the 50% of the population strictly on the basis of gender. I'd really want a guy like that in charge of an authoritarian system.

Also the dumb fucking retard kept saying 'insinuate' over and over because I guess he's too caught up in admiring himself to realise he meant to say 'insert' or 'invest'. Fuentes is a write-off, this was a colossal waste of time and it seems to me like Fuentes and Ralph get along so well less because Ralph is of some value to Fuentes and more because they just have a lot of traits in common.
I could ask micheal berry, a big political dude in Texas, about Nick Fuentes and I'm pretty sure he won't know who he is.

And that's the funniest part
 
Back