Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread

How well is the war this going for Russia?

  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Blyatskrieg

    Votes: 249 10.6%
  • ⭐⭐⭐⭐ I ain't afraid of no Ghost of Kiev

    Votes: 278 11.8%
  • ⭐⭐⭐ Competent attack with some upsets

    Votes: 796 33.7%
  • ⭐⭐ Stalemate

    Votes: 659 27.9%
  • ⭐ Ukraine takes back Crimea 2022

    Votes: 378 16.0%

  • Total voters
    2,360
Status
Not open for further replies.


You really had to use news-front, a confirmed Russian propaganda outlet, as your source? Sure.

Are these sites labeled as high credibility also part of some wokist leftist pedophile ring kabal?
https://theworldnews.net/lv-news/de...vijas-pilsonibu-kara-noziegumu-atbalstitajiem

https://lr1.lsm.lv/lv/raksts/pecpus...msanu-kara-noziegumu-at.a158717/?highlight=ES

https://www.delfi.lv/news/national/...u-kara-noziegumu-atbalstitajiem.d?id=54214654

https://lat.press.lv/post/bordans-r...lsonibu-kara-noziegumus-atbalstosam-personam/

To limit the spread of disinformation campaigns, Delfi has suspended the possibility of commenting on articles

Saeima Defence, Home Affairs, and corruption prevention commission on Tuesday, 5. in April, conceptually supported the amendments prepared by the minister of Justice, Janis Bordans (Conservatives), to the Citizenship Law, which provides a legal basis for depriving persons supporting war crimes of Latvian citizenship. At the same time deputies agreed on Wednesday, 6. in April, continue discussions on how to make changes to the law legally correct.

Amendments to the law are justified by the 24th of this year. in February, Russia started unprovoked hostilities on the territory of Ukraine.

The grounds for deprivation of citizenship are currently laid down in Section 24 of the Citizenship Act. the first part of the article, which lists four grounds for the deprivation of Latvian citizenship. All these grounds for deprivation of citizenship are related to violations committed by a citizen of Latvia in relation to the state of Latvia and thereby undermine the principle of mutual loyalty between the state of Latvia and that citizen.

At the same time, the law does not currently provide for the deprivation of Latvian citizenship in cases related to violations of generally accepted international law against another Democratic state, which at the same time would pose an indirect threat to the democratic system and constitutional values of Latvia.

"It is considered that a Latvian citizen who has substantially supported military aggression carried out by a state and internationally punishable crimes against another Democratic state, thus contributing to the threat to the democratic system of Latvia, has violated the duty of mutual loyalty of the state and The Citizen," the authors of the amendments to the law say.
 
For god's sake, look at how Chechnya looks now as part of Russia, and then look at Afghanistan after the USA "liberated" them. The results speak louder than the words.
Afghanistan didn't have a Kadyrov Sr. and Jr..
If the point was that democracy is gay and the US bureaucracy fundamentally misunderstands the region in a way that prevents them from ever building a successful Afghan state, you'd be correct.
Janurary 6th was an armed coup attempt orchestrated by Trump supporters that attempted to overturn the legitimate democratic election where it turned out Biden won, and not Trump. How come that there was no January 6th attempt from the "left" when Trump got elected, but only a Twitter meltdown? I assume you'd quote the Euromaidan as a hypocrisy example. Here's one thing: Yanukovich indeed got elected legitimately in 2010. The Euromaidan happened in 2014! That was after Yanukovich decided to scrap the EU integration plan in favour of closer ties to Russia that was in place, and jailed his opponent Yuliya Tymoshenko.
The EU laws are only against big tech, and not individual people, and for far more retarded disinformation. In Russia, anything critical of the government can land you in prison for "disinformation". You also have anti war protests being broken up, and political opponents jailed. There's a good reason that Russia is ranked so low for its political freedom and freedom of the press.
But I assume you're gonna tell me that all of these organizations assessing the political freedoms around the world are part of some wokist pedophile kabal ring or something.
Just like I hate my fellow right wing schizos who turned into Putin cocksuckers to own the libs, I'm also going to call you out for acting like a lib to own the Z-posters.
Most of the people who invaded the capitol were unarmed. I've not actually seen evidence of anyone who brought a gat into DC although it's possible that it happened.
The events seemed to have been incited by suspicious people in the crowd.
The election, even if legitimate, was questionable at best with several red flags.
There's been lib invasions of government buildings that you're conviniently glossing over.
 
Last edited:
Afghanistan didn't have a Kadyrov Sr. and Jr..
Kadyrov junior lmao. Now imagine him wearing a propeller hat.
I'm now going to call him that.
If the point was that democracy is gay and the US bureaucracy fundamentally misunderstands the region in a way that prevents them from ever building a successful Afghan state, you'd be correct.
It wasn't me who wanted to complain about the bombing of Chechnya. While examples like Afghanistan are fresh in everyone's memory, it is a losing battle.
 
Now imagine if Mexico put Mexican weapons in California
They don't need to, lol. This is the LAPD:
download (1) (18).jpeg
Now, I've got nothing against beaners. A lot of them are good people, and that Despacito song was pretty cool. If the emerging Hispanic majority in California wanted to break free of the evil gringo regime in DC, you'd hope the Yanquis wouldn't react by setting up neo nazi paramilitary groups and terrorizing elderly abuelas and random hombres for 8 years, trying to ban Spanish and other petty nonsense.

If they did, a lot of people would be sympathetic to an official Mexican invasion, even tho Mexico is also a highly corrupt state run by sociopaths.
 
Fun fact, Canada did sign a military cooperation pact under the Harper government. That's what lead to the flurry of CHINESE TROOPS CONCENTRATING IN CANADA articles by schizo news sites but the Canadian government said they backed off from joint training with China in 2019.
Now imagine if Mexico put Mexican weapons in California so that they could fight a war of secession, and when the US fought back Mexico insisted it was a genocide and had to invade the US. The US had a militarized Mexican puppet inside its borders for 8 years, and now Mexico says it will have independence referendums all the way up to Washington state to cut off the US from the Pacific.

Meme magic should make the VDV shootdown real, but there's been no pictures of a wreckage apart from that one so burnt down we couldn't even tell if it was a Russian or Ukrainian aircraft.
I think the most honest (but not perfect) example would be if Comintern had preformed a coup in Canada against legitimate, but corrupt government, after which radical Quebec social nationalists take power, force angloids to learn Franch, and declare any anglo who refuses to do it a traitor to the nation and capitalist puppet. And after all of that they proclaim that, after pacification of anglo menace that dare to rebel and try to join their brothers in the good old U S of A(Though it simply hypothetical), they would join into Comintern as a full fledged member which will lead to establishment of military bases and deployment of nuclear weapons right at the US border (And i know about Cuba, but it is not like US did not try their hand at trowing out Castro by many means - from attempted assassinations to the Bay of Pigs invasion. At the end of the day problem with nuclear weapons was fixed diplomatically, and there never was any sentiment of joining the US in Cuba.) Would US have a right to interfere, or should they just watch as there fellow anglo-saxsons get slaughtered and military bases of hostile block being built right at there border?(It's hard to pretend that angloids would feel anything towards America, but just for the sake of this argument let's pretend that anglos really love USA and they see them as brothers.)
 
If Mexico was on the verge of joining a military pact with China that could see Chinese weapons systems moved there to reconquer the rightful Mexican clay of California I think the American military would have something to say about it.

It’s a threat to Russian security interests in Europe that the largest non-Russian European military has been built up and trained by Russia’s chief geopolitical rival for half a decade. Russia now has a militarized anti-Russia American puppet on its border that is aggressively derussifying and increasingly hostile to Russia. I can’t believe this needs to be explained to people.
And you think someone is going to invade Russia? A nuclear power? Also a good way to not get invaded is to not piss off all your neighbors every 5-10 years by performing blatant land grabs, but I guess that's too hard for Slavs and especially Russians.
 
Features of the defense of "azovstal".

"They have a lot of water. Barrels with antiseptic are used instead of stoves. They do not produce smoke."

The Russians, moving forward, found a huge warehouse of water at the factory. The Ukrainians didn't even begin to evacuate it - they have a sea of water. But they also say there is food left for only 9 days.


 
I think the most honest (but not perfect) example would be if Comintern had preformed a coup in Canada against legitimate, but corrupt government, after which radical Quebec social nationalists take power, force angloids to learn Franch, and declare any anglo who refuses to do it a traitor to the nation and capitalist puppet. And after all of that they proclaim that, after pacification of anglo menace that dare to rebel and try to join their brothers in the good old U S of A(Though it simply hypothetical), they would join into Comintern as a full fledged member which will lead to establishment of military bases and deployment of nuclear weapons right at the US border (And i know about Cuba, but it is not like US did not try their hand at trowing out Castro by many means - from attempted assassinations to the Bay of Pigs invasion. At the end of the day problem with nuclear weapons was fixed diplomatically, and there never was any sentiment of joining the US in Cuba.) Would US have a right to interfere, or should they just watch as there fellow anglo-saxsons get slaughtered and military bases of hostile block being built right at there border?(It's hard to pretend that angloids would feel anything towards America, but just for the sake of this argument let's pretend that anglos really love USA and they see them as brothers.)
Okay, but now imagine the legitimate Canadian PM Justin Trudeau had ordered the police to crack down on the trucker protesters, and their course of action was to fire steel slugs meant to disable engine blocks into the crowd rather than bean bags or rubber bullets. Castro Trudeau then decides to flee to Cuba for fear of being prosecuted, along with some of his ministers and attorney general. Without a PM, the still legitimate parliament votes to relieve him of his duties.
Maricon Macron floods Quebec with weapons and equipment to fight a separatist war, to the point that a French Roland missile system shoots down an airliner. Quebecois even post their cheers on social media not knowing it was a civilian flight, assuming it was a Canadian air force transport aircraft.
Canada gets buttmad about the French separatism and removes French as an official language.
France cannot concern-troll about French-Canadians getting slaughtered when in this case France wanted this civil war to happen to justify French invasion. It's not a question of sitting there and watching, it's actively supporting the existence of the conflict.
 
France cannot concern-troll
I think you'll find they can
french-guy.jpg
It doesn't really matter what the governments of Russia, or Ukranine, or the US, or whoever say. That's just for public consumption by dumbass voters. The guys in charge all wanted this war and did what they could do to make it happen.

Like in WW1, where the official explanations were about defending poor little Serbia (lol) or Britain's "commitment" to defend France (double lol), or the Lusitania (underwater lol). None of that stuff caused the war, the war happened because powerful men on all sides wanted it to happen, and whipped their respective publics into a frenzy of patriotic let's-go-die-ism thru excuses and wacky tales about how Germans were cutting the hands off babies, bombing hospitals and trying to take over the world somehow. Nothing has changed since 1914 except you can put a gay little flag on your social media avatar now, instead of having to put a gay little flag on your house or whatever.
 
If this thing was only focused on Donbass, this thing would have ended long ago, and Ukraine would have come to the table very quickly. Instead, they turned a war many Ukrainians wanted to just end and give up on Donbass into one of national survival, either for a Ukrainian state at all or preventing it to turn into a total rump state.
This is giga cope fanfiction. No, they wouldn't have, lmao.
 
Need I remind you that Ukraine, which is being hailed as the model of democracy, the champion of European values and the bulwark of freedom outright banned all independent press and opposition parties? Why are these organizations keeping mum about that?
Dude, they didn't ban all opposition parties :story: They banned 11, none of them were even in parlament but Opposition Platform for Life, which was lead by Viktor Medvedchuk, Russian Oligarch.
 
I think you'll find they can
View attachment 3222444
It doesn't really matter what the governments of Russia, or Ukranine, or the US, or whoever say. That's just for public consumption by dumbass voters. The guys in charge jews all wanted this war and did what they could do to make it happen.

Like in WW1, where the official explanations were about defending poor little Serbia (lol) or Britain's "commitment" to defend France (double lol), or the Lusitania (underwater lol). None of that stuff caused the war, the war happened because powerful men jews on all sides wanted it to happen, and whipped their respective publics into a frenzy of patriotic let's-go-die-ism thru excuses and wacky tales about how Germans were cutting the hands off babies, bombing hospitals and trying to take over the world somehow. Nothing has changed since 1914 except you can put a gay little flag on your social media avatar now, instead of having to put a gay little flag on your house or whatever.
Fixed it for you. Gotta be specific!
 
One of those Azovstal commanders.

They all seem to remember how to speak Russian after crying for help everywhere else, huh.
Note how he is dressed and that there is vapor coming out his mouth.
62 days of fighting in full encirclement, over 600 wounded in desperate need of urgent medical attention, since they don't have proper medical supplies or conditions. That includes wounded civilians.
Claims hundreds of civilians, including elderly, women, people with disabilities and dozens of children.
Huge problems with food and water. Same thing with armament, they are short of ammunition.
Asks for an "extraction" procedure. Gives some example from ww2 where Gitlar himself allowed for "extraction" of over 300 French people from German encirclement in 1940.
(Some are saying that he probably meant Dunkirk. Well done trying to rewrite history, if so.)
So ruskies are worse than Hitler, because ofc they are.

"Our wounded will die, those alive will die fighting. Civvies are dying with us here in bunkers, in private houses, multi-story buildings, where they are being shot to death."
"My main message today: pls halp."


Слабовато ебём, не?
 

Attachments

  • Слабо ебете.jpg
    Слабо ебете.jpg
    214.3 KB · Views: 20
Last edited:
Arestovich said that "if Moldova asks Ukraine to take control of Transnistria, the AFU has enough forces for this."
(https://glavred.info/ukraine/ukrain...po-shchelchku-palcev-arestovich-10367349.html)

View attachment 3222447
It makes sense. Russia doesn't have enough forces to defend the area right now, but if they want to take Odessa they need Transnistria to hit it from two fronts. Ukraine may want to nip this issue in the bud. It would also be a massive humiliation for the Russians if one of their frozen conflict clients got its shit pushed in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back