Kara Dansky once said at a abortion protest she saw the usual "hey hey ho ho roe v wade has got to go" and then another one said "trans" rights start at conception
Yet some trannies have a pregnancy fetish. I have seen a few trannies with a pregnancy fetish all uwu validated and excited to get a uterus implant only to realize it won't work in them.
And more and more trannies get their boner harder when a little girls
Roe v Wade was really a terrible decision reasoning-wise.
Privacy has never been a blank check for anything, other than specific protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.
There's never been any other alleged crime that you can perpetrate privately and then claim privacy as to why prosecution would be outright unconstitutional. Drug use, consensual incest, self harm, certain body modifications, laws restricting them have all been held up, time and time again, as constitutional, no matter how privately they're executed. (I know people can nitpick about these, like "what if the incest couple procreates", or "self harm is a mental illness, you can't consent to that" but you can see my general point.)
(In fact, while we're on this point, I think Lawrence v Texas was also wrongly decided.)
And in the Roe decision, they really didn't try very hard to even elaborate why the privacy thing applied. It was just kinda handwavy and "uh... uh... privacy?"
Legal scholars have remarked on how vague the justification was. I think anyone who's been paying attention knew that, on its merits, Roe deserved to be overturned, and if it stayed up, it is only because of a sort of an attitude of "honor" in the Supreme Court where they respect past judgments until circumstances change.
I'm actually very pro-choice. I think this is horrendous and is going to fuck a lot of people's lives up. But I think betting the farm on Roe v Wade was a bad approach. I think activists should've been treating Roe v Wade solely as a stopgap, while agitating to pass better laws on the state level. (Some have done this, there are laws protecting abortion in like 16 states.)
The US liberal left has this thing where they hold up Supreme Court decisions in favor of things they like as divine talismans of truth, despite the fact that historically the court has been more on the side of conservatism that anything else. That's why you get movies like Amistad or On the Basis of Sex, which celebrate the court as though it could always be trusted to deal out rulings in favor of the less powerful. The Democrats have depended on these spotty decisions like Roe v. Wade, and yes, Lawrence v. Texas, to avoid having to try and push for creating any sort of actual legislative protection at the federal level, which they know would be a massive project and open up a lot of animosity even in Dem circles when you have to start actually deciding for the entire country things like when/if in a pregnancy there should be cutoffs to access, or exactly how access should be guaranteed. Roe v. Wade was always in danger, that's why a lot of southern States managed to pass laws that restricted abortion to sometimes literally no locations being suitable, but the Democrats and activists at no point in the last half a century took the chance to try and putting something into law that would be a lot harder to overturn.
It's funny because troon activists fall right into this group of passive slacktivists who though sharing memes about how RBG was a saint and buying funko pops of her somehow constituted a strong defence of abortion rights.
Content:
Tedious twitter communist talking about this like it's some conspiracy coming out of COVID? A bearded person using the phrase reproductive labour to talk about pregnancy? I wonder if:
This pisses me off. Republicans know full well what women are yet these fuckers STILL want to play the gender neutral card.
Transwomen are NOT fighting for my rights because not a single one has ever defended reproductive healthcare. It's all been about grooming kids to become trans like them.
Lose some weight, Sarah, and you wouldn't be fucking disabled.
Are you really trying to gaslight me into thinking everyone I dislike isn't aligned in a massive conspiracy against me right now? When this is just proof that J.K. Rowling is trying to Genocide me personally? This is exactly what TERFs want; to silence lesbians who speak up against their Christofascist capitalist agenda! This is why Elon Musk and Dave Chappelle need to be stopped more than ever.
They're going after Julie Bindel for her comments on the UK's sex specific laws, one of the few things they have a benefit in. They're naturally calling her a genocidal bigot.
>I spend so much time being in tune to other's needs but people just ignore mine.
That is just a flat out admission that he wants to massage women (in a professional setting) to fulfil his own (fetish) needs. The woman could probably smell the creep from a mile away.
Am I wrong in thinking that massage is a service industry? In what clown world is it acceptable for a service industry employee to prioritise their own needs over that of a customer when on the clock.
*woman walks in a clothes dept: hello i want to buy this.
Tranny: Well, i want you to dress that skimpy bikini and i want to be in the changing booth with you
Woman: i dont want a bikini and i wont change with you.
Tranny: but what about my feelings? Woman: nigga, I AM PAYING*
Roe v Wade was really a terrible decision reasoning-wise.
Privacy has never been a blank check for anything, other than specific protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.
There's never been any other alleged crime that you can perpetrate privately and then claim privacy as to why prosecution would be outright unconstitutional. Drug use, consensual incest, self harm, certain body modifications, laws restricting them have all been held up, time and time again, as constitutional, no matter how privately they're executed. (I know people can nitpick about these, like "what if the incest couple procreates", or "self harm is a mental illness, you can't consent to that" but you can see my general point.)
(In fact, while we're on this point, I think Lawrence v Texas was also wrongly decided.)
And in the Roe decision, they really didn't try very hard to even elaborate why the privacy thing applied. It was just kinda handwavy and "uh... uh... privacy?"
Legal scholars have remarked on how vague the justification was. I think anyone who's been paying attention knew that, on its merits, Roe deserved to be overturned, and if it stayed up, it is only because of a sort of an attitude of "honor" in the Supreme Court where they respect past judgments until circumstances change.
I'm actually very pro-choice. I think this is horrendous and is going to fuck a lot of people's lives up. But I think betting the farm on Roe v Wade was a bad approach. I think activists should've been treating Roe v Wade solely as a stopgap, while agitating to pass better laws on the state level. (Some have done this, there are laws protecting abortion in like 16 states.)
Dems really fucked themselves not passing the legislation they're whining didn't get passed when they had ample opportunity to do so in Obama's first term. This, RBG not stepping down under Obama, Obama just kind of going okie doke when R's asked him not to appoint a justice. I'm beginning to think that the military industrial complex only exists because the D's need to develop increasingly powerful weapons to shoot themselves in the foot with.
Dems really fucked themselves not passing the legislation they're whining didn't get passed when they had ample opportunity to do so in Obama's first term. This, RBG not stepping down under Obama, Obama just kind of going okie doke when R's asked him not to appoint a justice. I'm beginning to think that the military industrial complex only exists because the D's need to develop increasingly powerful weapons to shoot themselves in the foot with.
And now they're doubling down on trans kids, just yesterday the official Democrat Twitter tweeted a lame "trans kids belong" graphic. That was the whole tweet, "trans kids belong". WTF? The quote tweets were absolutely brutal, no one was having it, but it's such a tone deaf, niche thing to hyperfocus on going into the midterms.
We've had a few older troons on recently so I thought I'd contribute. I was originally just focussed on one but the house of horrors just got bigger with every click. I've been retching from these photos so I couldn't not inflict it on you all. Here's Mike & Friends plus a minor cameo from a special guest.
It's a long post, so I've spoilered it into sections. Thankfully I have avid Kiwi Farms reader Erin Anthony Aaron "Tony" L Reed to help:
Mike Barela / Michael J Barela / Anne Barela @anne_engineer / @mirrorher / @mikedigitalhome
@mirrorher (archive) is a (now-)private alt account which I hope to gawd is not lewd.
Graduated Whitman College in 1984 (archive), went to Cal Tech, then a few engineer jobs before ending up in the State Department doing technical security stuff from the early 1990s. In his retirement he's doing various computer stuff.
Here's a picture of Mike (on the right) holding a gun behind Harrison Ford. (Twitter, archive)
But he is very definitely now a Woman Engineer, doing Womanly Engineering. (Twitter, archive)
His wife Traci (Hill) Barela also went to Whitman, a year ahead, so I'd guess they were together from the early 1980s. Mike announced (archive) his trooning out in November 2019, and Traci mentioned a "trans spouse" in a tweet (archive) in summer 2020, so it seems they stayed together for a bit. But not for too long!
Mike has one expression: "Come have some iced tea with tranny granny before I imprison you in my BDSM dungeon".
They make a particularly gruesome twosome cute couple (Twitter, archive).
They seem to see themselves somewhat differently:
Obviously they are lesbians:
And, less than 18 months after ditching his wife of 35 years, Mike and Armando are now engaged! (Twitter, archive)
Timaz congratulated them:
Armando mentioned having a great-grandchild but he fucking posts a lot (including openly bitching about colleagues, very professional NASA space man!) and I couldn't stomach going back through his timeline.
I was wondering whether these two are just repressed HSTS using the trans wave to come out in their old age, but there are a few things that shout AGP at me, and it's probably best not to draw a clear divide between the two anyway:
Anyway, back to Mike and Armando's engagement. I really hope they share the photos of their wedding because the ones from their troon friends' wedding are horrifying adorable. You're going to want to open this up large and play spot the tranny. Wedding photos. (archive)
The groom & groom on this occasion were Jillian Whitton (archive) and Gary Dennis Sell / Scarlett Addams (archive). Jillian's real name wasn't immediately obvious. I skimmed a few photos from recent tweets but I'm sure there's plenty more to be had. They're not exactly shy about oversharing online.
Jillian:
Good luck with the stink ditch Jill! Hope you don't get a gross fistula into your colon.
Gary:
Gary plays Second Life (still a thing?) where he takes photos(??) and is nervous apparent them appearing in a gallery(???).
Surprise! Gary is also a weird perv in Second Life!
Meanwhile, to come back to the topic du jour, Jillian tries to make the Roe v Wade stuff about him and the trans:
Ahahaha I just discovered that Chris Hansen of "why don't you have a seat, pedo?" fame did a lil YouTube video about @K11ngM1dasxxx here. You know you fucked up when Chris Hansen tells on you.
If this IRT my edit, that's definitely not what I was trying to say. In comparison to them he's a total Chad. I just, personally, don't like him. Given my choice between them, I'd date Musk over the ugly tranny OR the greasy girl.
If this is IRT the original tweet then thunkful indeed.
The fascinating thing about Elon Musk is that he has 40 gorillion dollars and is still desperate for approval from random Twitter users, just as much as someone like Keffals is. He is walking proof that if you can’t get over your dad not loving you, no amount of money is going to fill that hole.
I do appreciate his troon-angering powers, but that is just incidental.
Women lurking in this thread, this is for you: look how nice this lady was. Gendering him "correctly," writing a multi-paragraph email apologizing for her own trauma response around males touching her body after she was targeted by males in the past. It did not matter. The autogynephile still seethed and raged and wailed about how he doesn't feel "safe" around her. And other autogynephiles are in the comments defending him and propping him up.
Your boundaries will NEVER matter, no matter how much you explain or how much you try to "be kind." If you are in a similar situation, just say no, and do not attempt to provide any explanation. You don't owe an explanation, and more importantly, nothing you do to try to soothe these men will help.
Just say no, walk out, don't explain, and then warn other women if you are able to.
Anyone lurking in this thread who might ever be in a position to hire an autogynephile: note how this man reacted as soon as a client hurt his feelings by not catering to him immediately. The client sent the business a private email containing information about past traumatic experiences, which the autogynephile then put on Reddit in order to whine about his needs not being met (archive). Imagine what will happen if the business name attached to this man gets out. How many more female clients can they expect to attract?
The man dressed as a woman is acting this way because he is part of a movement that tells him that anyone who does not play along with his delusions is an evil, murderous subhuman, so rules do not apply anymore and any action against them is permitted. Do not associate these people with your business.
The fascinating thing about Elon Musk is that he has 40 gorillion dollars and is still desperate for approval from random Twitter users, just as much as someone like Keffals is. He is walking proof that if you can’t get over your dad not loving you, no amount of money is going to fill that hole.
I do appreciate his troon-angering powers, but that is just incidental.
Women lurking in this thread, this is for you: look how nice this lady was. Gendering him "correctly," writing a multi-paragraph email apologizing for her own trauma response around males touching her body after she was targeted by males in the past. It did not matter. The autogynephile still seethed and raged and wailed about how he doesn't feel "safe" around her. And other autogynephiles are in the comments defending him and propping him up.
Your boundaries will NEVER matter, no matter how much you explain or how much you try to "be kind." If you are in a similar situation, just say no, and do not attempt to provide any explanation. You don't owe an explanation, and more importantly, nothing you do to try to soothe these men will help.
Just say no, walk out, don't explain, and then warn other women if you are able to.
Anyone lurking in this thread who might ever be in a position to hire an autogynephile: note how this man reacted as soon as a client hurt his feelings by not catering to him immediately. The client sent the business a private email containing information about past traumatic experiences, which the autogynephile then put on Reddit in order to whine about his needs not being met (archive). Imagine what will happen if the business name attached to this man gets out. How many more female clients can they expect to attract?
The man dressed as a woman is acting this way because he is part of a movement that tells him that anyone who does not play along with his delusions is an evil, murderous subhuman, so rules do not apply anymore and any action against them is permitted. Do not associate these people with your business.
Imagine feeling somewhat obliged to apologise to a bloke because you didn't want his mitts on you. The reason behind her refusal, to me, is irrelevant...no means no, no ifs no buts, no questions, no answers, no apologies.
Of course he has the support of like-minded blokes. How very dare the little woman.
68 to 70 percent of Americans support abortion rights. No one wants this but the right wing and there will be riots in the streets. The right wing has been angling to overturn Roe v Wade for decades, by astonishing luck and chance Trump got to appoint 3 out of the 9 justices. (I never got the impression Trump actually gives a shit about abortion. But he had to throw bones to the hicks.)
"Burgerland" I literally only see this term on Kiwi Farms, it's really weird. Like an idea from the 50s. Europeans consume billions of burgers a year at McDonald's alone (France weirdly being #1). Not that there's anything wrong with burgers, but when it comes to fast food, IF you eat fast food, tens of millions of Americans don't, places like Chipotle or Taco Bell or Panera are right up there in the US, burgers are I guess still best-sellers but they're not some national obsession, and non-Americans certainly consume a fuckton of hamburgers themselves. "Burgerland" is just stupid.
The US liberal left has this thing where they hold up Supreme Court decisions in favor of things they like as divine talismans of truth, despite the fact that historically the court has been more on the side of conservatism that anything else. That's why you get movies like Amistad or On the Basis of Sex, which celebrate the court as though it could always be trusted to deal out rulings in favor of the less powerful. The Democrats have depended on these spotty decisions like Roe v. Wade, and yes, Lawrence v. Texas, to avoid having to try and push for creating any sort of actual legislative protection at the federal level, which they know would be a massive project and open up a lot of animosity even in Dem circles when you have to start actually deciding for the entire country things like when/if in a pregnancy there should be cutoffs to access, or exactly how access should be guaranteed. Roe v. Wade was always in danger, that's why a lot of southern States managed to pass laws that restricted abortion to sometimes literally no locations being suitable, but the Democrats and activists at no point in the last half a century took the chance to try and putting something into law that would be a lot harder to overturn.
It's funny because troon activists fall right into this group of passive slacktivists who though sharing memes about how RBG was a saint and buying funko pops of her somehow constituted a strong defence of abortion rights.
Tedious twitter communist talking about this like it's some conspiracy coming out of COVID? A bearded person using the phrase reproductive labour to talk about pregnancy? I wonder if: