US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
It's better to have an enemy in front of you than an 'ally' in the rear that will stab you in the back at worst moment. Romney types play along until the last minute and then sabotage, setting everything back to zero. McCain campaigned on repealing obamacare, played along until the critical vote and stabbed voters in the back. That pretty much killed of any momentum of repealing it. That is the purpose RINOs serve.
Sure, but most of the time you're not going to flip a state from blue to hard-red in one election cycle. I don't recall who said it in this thread, but they were right - Florida didn't magically turn into a hard-red state when DeSantis was elected. If both a RINO and a Democrat are equally likely to vote against your policies (which almost certainly isn't true, but for the sake of argument let's just say it is), the RINO is still preferable because he is easier to replace with a MAGA than the Democrat is.
 
Expect more of these, especially if and when the ruling is finalized. Roe v Wade has way too much importance in maintaining the status quo and losing it is an unfathomably painful loss.

Sure, but most of the time you're not going to flip a state from blue to hard-red in one election cycle. I don't recall who said it in this thread, but they were right - Florida didn't magically turn into a hard-red state when DeSantis was elected. If both a RINO and a Democrat are equally likely to vote against your policies (which almost certainly isn't true, but for the sake of argument let's just say it is), the RINO is still preferable because he is easier to replace with a MAGA than the Democrat is.
I understand people like the one you are posting to. They have seen the system stagnate entirely and the real fear is that failing to get a MAGA guy in now just means it will stagnate later.

I'd remind anyone who worries that. This stagnation is itself unusual and artificial. It is not the normal state of things. And it is breaking down before your very eyes. Lett he incremental changes now occur and gain their own momentum. Those changes will be in place a lot longer than a sudden change.
 
Expect more of these, especially if and when the ruling is finalized. Roe v Wade has way too much importance in maintaining the status quo and losing it is an unfathomably painful loss.


I understand people like the one you are posting to. They have seen the system stagnate entirely and the real fear is that failing to get a MAGA guy in now just means it will stagnate later.

I'd remind anyone who worries that. This stagnation is itself unusual and artificial. It is not the normal state of things. And it is breaking down before your very eyes. Lett he incremental changes now occur and gain their own momentum. Those changes will be in place a lot longer than a sudden change.
The meltdown will be explosive
 
He's married though.
He's saying that the person's gay friend doesn't get to have an opinion on abortion, which misses the point that the gay guy is worried that gay marriage could be overturned.

Instead of being a snarky twat and looking like an idiot, he could have pointed out the times that the Supreme Court has reversed decisions, such as Brown v BoE.
 
He's saying that the person's gay friend doesn't get to have an opinion on abortion, which misses the point that the gay guy is worried that gay marriage could be overturned.

Instead of being a snarky twat and looking like an idiot, he could have pointed out the times that the Supreme Court has reversed decisions, such as Brown v BoE.
Shouldn't the whole argument on Roe v Wade be that the abortion debate now defers to the states as before?
 
Any news on if this is rocking any election-level boats? As in swinging expected outcomes or anything like that.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
During the 1970's many gay men (especially from the Black community) had wives and even children. They were mainly CEO's and the like but still weird stuff.

Beards / Being on the "Down Low" are both very common in the black community.



ben is a homosexual, nothing to be confused about

True, but cute big-boobed jewess sister tho.
 
the RINO is still preferable because he is easier to replace with a MAGA than the Democrat is.
Yeah, good point. It becomes less "we have to flip this seat" and more "we have to replace this RINO faggot with a better guy". Of course the usual problem is the RINO faggots get entrenched and name recognition + GOP rigging primaries keeps them there for way too long.
he could have pointed out the times that the Supreme Court has reversed decisions, such as Brown v BoE.
Could he? He's not that educated, he just learned how to debate. If you mentioned Brown to him you'd see the wheels turning as he tried to recall that one.
 
Yeah, good point. It becomes less "we have to flip this seat" and more "we have to replace this RINO faggot with a better guy". Of course the usual problem is the RINO faggots get entrenched and name recognition + GOP rigging primaries keeps them there for way too long.
This is less usual than you think... Romney and McCain are/were the only two actually entrenched. Everyone else is a lot more vulnerable than you'd think. It is why the Uniparty apparatus was designed to prevent any challenges at all.

And well... Romney is on thin ice and his children can never enter politics unless they disown their father. And God took care of McCain.
 
> Be a Republican
> Plot
> Cultivate
> Execute Roe_KILL.exe
> Bully a murder granny on live TV

So their "windfall" is an absolute pittance. They are focusing on a divisive issue during a bad economy. And to top it all off Robert's is using language like "Betrayal" and saying the final tally isn't final.



Let me provide a different reading of that.


"I am Justice Robert's. Every decision I have made is to avoid rocking the boat. I want above all else to maintain my personal view of the sanctity of the court. Now someone, part of this establishment, leaked private communications and threw in the trash that sanctity.


I am now considering changing -my- vote."
I think this is possible. It would take something of THIS magnitude, on HIS turf, to shake him out of his sanguine reverie. This could do it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back