Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
Biden will get blamed for it this time. So good luck with that. They don't have orange man to blame anymore.
Remember when the Dems established that Trump has a 'shadow presidency'? Remember that Trump is engulfed in legal battles over Jan 6th? Remember that the present narrative is that Trump tried to dismantle American democracy? Yeah, they still have Orange Man.

If they say niggers are bad because we hit them too hard 80 years ago, they'll say orange man bad when he was in power only 2 years ago.
 
More insanity
 

Attachments

  • E6C9830E-0E49-4A40-A824-259D94813080.jpeg
    E6C9830E-0E49-4A40-A824-259D94813080.jpeg
    168.6 KB · Views: 133
  • 7DE9551B-ED45-4BD8-A821-D47839F4AD08.jpeg
    7DE9551B-ED45-4BD8-A821-D47839F4AD08.jpeg
    117.2 KB · Views: 128
  • 1A6B6A79-C285-4131-8DF3-99851B51CD92.jpeg
    1A6B6A79-C285-4131-8DF3-99851B51CD92.jpeg
    38.6 KB · Views: 122
  • 0A20BD4F-8977-4ED1-8F8F-3AF749FB43CE.jpeg
    0A20BD4F-8977-4ED1-8F8F-3AF749FB43CE.jpeg
    109.4 KB · Views: 119
  • A616BD7B-1D23-410A-BC0E-389C835B9151.jpeg
    A616BD7B-1D23-410A-BC0E-389C835B9151.jpeg
    64.6 KB · Views: 122
  • A46535CC-4FF2-44ED-B4F6-A76251B31F5D.jpeg
    A46535CC-4FF2-44ED-B4F6-A76251B31F5D.jpeg
    260 KB · Views: 131
That's interesting and highly likely.
All I'll say is I have no opinion about this particular person, but she definitely fits the profile, i.e. a law clerk for a SCOTUS Justice. For some reason, I am not discounting a rogue clerk for a majority Justice having leaked it. My only reason for not discounting it is a majority Justice clerk would be more likely to have access to a draft opinion.

There's often a fair amount of horse trading internally in cases like this, though, trying to peel one more Justice off to make it look more legitimate and less like a reckless 5-4 curbstomp spitting on stare decisis. So sometimes they'll take something like a draft dissent and look at it and address some actual legit criticism, and mold the opinion to represent the majority opinion more clearly or make it even palatable to some of the previous dissenters.

If you can get actual unanimity on an issue by narrowing the scope of the basis for the decision, you'll do this.

Roberts hates this kind of drama shit and if the ultimate opinion isn't as bad as it looks to be, it will probably be from him massaging it a bit and working out deals.

We really don't know at what point in the deliberations they were at which is yet another reason it was absolutely reckless and irresponsible to leak this now. I also strongly suspect it constitutes a "crime of moral turpitude" under bar rules, one serious enough to justify disbarment or refusal to admit.
 
Ok so I get why terminally single boxed wine addicted socially anxious girl boss types are freaking out but what's the incentive for scrawny goony bearded male hipsters to be this mad? Unlike Chad who couldn't care less I doubt most of these guys are in a position to impregnate anyone.
Simping is a helluva drug.
 
All I'll say is I have no opinion about this particular person, but she definitely fits the profile, i.e. a law clerk for a SCOTUS Justice. For some reason, I am not discounting a rogue clerk for a majority Justice having leaked it. My only reason for not discounting it is a majority Justice clerk would be more likely to have access to a draft opinion.

There's often a fair amount of horse trading internally in cases like this, though, trying to peel one more Justice off to make it look more legitimate and less like a reckless 5-4 curbstomp spitting on stare decisis. So sometimes they'll take something like a draft dissent and look at it and address some actual legit criticism, and mold the opinion to represent the majority opinion more clearly or make it even palatable to some of the previous dissenters.

If you can get actual unanimity on an issue by narrowing the scope of the basis for the decision, you'll do this.

Roberts hates this kind of drama shit and if the ultimate opinion isn't as bad as it looks to be, it will probably be from him massaging it a bit and working out deals.

We really don't know at what point in the deliberations they were at which is yet another reason it was absolutely reckless and irresponsible to leak this now. I also strongly suspect it constitutes a "crime of moral turpitude" under bar rules, one serious enough to justify disbarment or refusal to admit.
Judicial verdicts should not be a matter of horse trading. They should be on: "Is this correct or not".
 
Trump Derangement Syndrome never ended
Remember when the Dems established that Trump has a 'shadow presidency'? Remember that Trump is engulfed in legal battles over Jan 6th? Remember that the present narrative is that Trump tried to dismantle American democracy? Yeah, they still have Orange Man.

If they say niggers are bad because we hit them too hard 80 years ago, they'll say orange man bad when he was in power only 2 years ago.

Do you think the public is really going to buy it anymore? It's the dog ate my homework at this point.
 
From what I'm hearing, being a SCOTUS clerk is extremely prestigious and is a launch pad for federal judges.
Clerking is how careers start, not where they remain. It's something that is generally done immediately after graduating at the top of your class as your gift for those years of gunning.

It should be distinguished that a law clerk is entirely different than the clerk of a court, often an elected position and probably one of the most important people in the court with the possible exception of the chief judge.

That person would also be privy to all these drafts and documents, but I'd actually just rule people like that out. Nobody like that would just suddenly break bad and do something this profoundly unethical at the height of their career.
Judicial verdicts should not be a matter of horse trading. They should be on: "Is this correct or not".
If it can't get five votes, then by definition it is not correct.
 
These hoes are talking about how their lives will be worse if they continue to engage in casual sex like that isn't the point.
 
If it can't get five votes, then by definition it is not correct.
The suggestion that judges choose which way to vote based on horse trading however, implies they themselves are not voting according to if it's correct or not. That is what I meant.
 
Honestly? Yes. There is a critical mass of willful stupidity in the electorate.
You're wrong then. Biden's approval rating is in the trash can. He's getting the blame for the way things are right now without a doubt. Bitching about the last preisdent has never worked even though every president does it, and the public has never awarded a president for doing that instead of fixing shit on his own.
 
View attachment 3247475

"It's different this time because...IT JUST FUCKING IS OKAY?!"
Imagine calling anti-covid vaxxers retards for using a medicine proven to help against a sickness with a 1% fatality rate, then following it up by using horse medicine to perform experimental DIY abortions without a hint of irony
 
they aren't fool proof like any contraception
They're better than nothing by a long shot and would minimize the need for emergency contraception. Nonhormonal nonsurgical contraceptive options for men would be nice too, but IUDs, condoms and so on are functional. The only 100 percent effective option is abstinence. Good luck getting them on board with that en masse.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back