Diseased #Comicsgate - The Culture Wars Hit The Funny Books!

Twitter has deleted Vito's tweet.
It'll be truly interesting to see how Musk handles things like this.

Frankly, I don't think Vito should be censored unless he actually posts CP or something like that.

But, by the same token, it should be everybody's right and prerogative on Twitter to call him a worthless attention whoring pedo faggot, and be free from being silenced as well.

In the end, Vito is one of those type of people where the best thing you can do is pay out a generous amount of rope. He'll continue to do himself in.

Like you said, Vito's gonna Vito. Such is Vito.
Yep.

Say what you want about @FROG, but he and just about everybody on his panel made the right call in refusing to touch Vito with a barge pole. It amazes me there's apparently a handful of people who haven't gotten the memo about him.
 
It'll be truly interesting to see how Musk handles things like this.

Given what else is suddenly allowed on Twitter in the chaos of Musks approach, like some giant space daddy asteroid looming over the earth, I'm surprised he got singled out. But then baby-killing jokes go a little further than 'there are two genders'.

I'm torn. It's obvious that he's going for the lamest lowest-effort max-impact trolling, as P5fever says, but somehow I'm cooler with censoring him over that than if he was more serious. Than if there was a more pertinent point to be made or seen. Or just a kind of 'fuck off and come back with better material' reaction. The same reaction to Wiggles interview technique, strangely.
 
I'm torn. It's obvious that he's going for the lamest lowest-effort max-impact trolling, as P5fever says, but somehow I'm cooler with censoring him over that than if he was more serious.
Oh, I 100% believe he's serious about the pedo shit. Like I said here and elsewhere, I've adopted a stance called the "Amos Yee protocol," whereby if somebody says they're a pedo, it's perfectly acceptable to take them at their word. I think it's even prudent to do so.

1651662993351.png

1651663074639.png


There' s a certain "air" about these tweets where he comes across as more sincere than usual (as if seeking acceptance).

The "baby killing" shit from the other day? I dunno. That could indeed be low effort troll. Hell, it probably is. I'm guessing it's spurred by the SCOTUS leaks that came out (re: abortion).

But if one presupposed he's a pedo, him trolling about baby killing (or anything else) hardly seems to even matter IMO.

Any way you slice it, I'd like to think most of us can agree he's scum.
 
There' s a certain "air" about these tweets where he comes across as more sincere than usual (as if seeking acceptance).
Yea it does seem like a "Vito doth protest too much, methinks" kind of situation. I looked for the tweet to see the context of it, but only screenshots remain. Was it just something that he just thought about and tweeted out randomly, or was it a reply to someone else? If it was a stand alone random tweet, he is "protesting too much" if it was a reply to someone else, maybe more of a troll, but still a chance of too much protesting.
 
Yea it does seem like a "Vito doth protest too much, methinks" kind of situation. I looked for the tweet to see the context of it, but only screenshots remain. Was it just something that he just thought about and tweeted out randomly, or was it a reply to someone else? If it was a stand alone random tweet, he is "protesting too much" if it was a reply to someone else, maybe more of a troll, but still a chance of too much protesting.
What you see is what you get. He apparently deleted the tweet, and I don't know if anybody bothered to archive. You could check elsewhere on the site, I suppose.

As I understand it, the first tweet in the first image is indeed the first tweet. He made an unsolicited statement on his Twitter about the need to support "non-offending pedos," and then when pressed on the issue of "we," he confirmed the we. As in "I am a "non-offending pedo.""

If he's trolling, he's an idiot. If he's not trolling, he's an even bigger idiot. Speaking for myself, I'm just gonna go ahead and take him at his word that he's a pedo.
 
Oh, I 100% believe he's serious about the pedo shit. Like I said here and elsewhere, I've adopted a stance called the "Amos Yee protocol," whereby if somebody says they're a pedo, it's perfectly acceptable to take them at their word. I think it's even prudent to do so.

View attachment 3246386
View attachment 3246390

There' s a certain "air" about these tweets where he comes across as more sincere than usual (as if seeking acceptance).

The "baby killing" shit from the other day? I dunno. That could indeed be low effort troll. Hell, it probably is. I'm guessing it's spurred by the SCOTUS leaks that came out (re: abortion).

But if one presupposed he's a pedo, him trolling about baby killing (or anything else) hardly seems to even matter IMO.

Any way you slice it, I'd like to think most of us can agree he's scum.
There's no sarcasm or irony to read in those tweets. There's no punchline. Seems like a confession, pleading for understanding.

Jesus Christ.
 
@Mister Dongs Liana Kerzner is old school leftie-but-on-GG commenter, something like a based Anita Sarkesian and had quite a few good (if boring) takes on Culture War. I remember JSG namedropping her years ago so he was probably a fan.
Fits right in with the anti-CG crowd.

YBZ had a vintage Zack take on HA computer breaking down.
Basically YBZ has a hyperliteral mind so he still, after 5 years, cannot comprehent that IDW is so broke they cannot buy HA a work computer while HA is also too broke to buy one herself.
 
Yaboi:



Presented without comment.
I getthe impression that Simple Zack thoings that people watch his youtube because they like his commentary and buy his books because they like his comics. This creates the cognitive dissonance that leads to bouts of sperging.

Also, he claimed recently that he hides videos that underperformed because he has too many of them.
 
What you see is what you get. He apparently deleted the tweet, and I don't know if anybody bothered to archive. You could check elsewhere on the site, I suppose.

As I understand it, the first tweet in the first image is indeed the first tweet. He made an unsolicited statement on his Twitter about the need to support "non-offending pedos," and then when pressed on the issue of "we," he confirmed the we. As in "I am a "non-offending pedo.""

If he's trolling, he's an idiot. If he's not trolling, he's an even bigger idiot. Speaking for myself, I'm just gonna go ahead and take him at his word that he's a pedo.
What is it with pedos and their weird compulsion to inform others that they're pedos? I'm seeing this shit all over the place, most recently from JSG and Vito. If you're supposedly non-offending and have no intention of ever offending, wouldn't it be prudent to reveal your taboo attraction to as few people as possible? There's absolutely nothing to be gained from people knowing you're literally one of the worst things a person can be, and if it's never going to become a real-world issue, why not just take it to the grave? People like Vito seem to not realize that coming out as, or even alluding to being a pedo gives a sizable portion of normal people the moral green light to make them take the asphalt temperature challenge.
 
What is it with pedos and their weird compulsion to inform others that they're pedos? I'm seeing this shit all over the place, most recently from JSG and Vito. If you're supposedly non-offending and have no intention of ever offending, wouldn't it be prudent to reveal your taboo attraction to as few people as possible? There's absolutely nothing to be gained from people knowing you're literally one of the worst things a person can be, and if it's never going to become a real-world issue, why not just take it to the grave? People like Vito seem to not realize that coming out as, or even alluding to being a pedo gives a sizable portion of normal people the moral green light to make them take the asphalt temperature challenge.

They think it's the logical progression from being pro free sex in 1970, pro-abortion in 1990, and pro-queer in 2006
 
Last edited:
Its been about a week since my last update, so let look back in on JSP's socials.
Twitter:
JSP continues to soft block most of his followers. It looks like he does it every 2 or 3 days. Also, he still hasn't made a tweet or reply(unless he has deleted them) since April 25th. He has only retweeted things. Screenshot (75).png
YouTube:
JSP has lost 2k more subs and is now at 195k subs.
Screenshot (74).png
He has made 2 videos. One about Disney and Florida that we have already discussed and ridiculed(start at the post below for the discussion)
Looks like JSG is continuing his spiral.
He's bought the leftist corpo media narrative about the "don't say gay" bill and is now characterizing deSantis (and anyone who agrees with the bill) as the "Bigot Brigade"
The other video is his normal cookie cutter, flavor of the week video about the cancellation of Batwoman. Basically, "it should have been cancelled earlier, its audience dipped every season, it was awful, blah blah same take as everyone else blah blah". I will point out, his Batwoman video already has almost 30k more view than the Disney and Florida video. Its almost like his audience doesn't care about his shitty takes on general politics and cares more about his takes on pop culture. :O
He also appeared on a Nerdette livestream . @Mister Dongs did a write up about it.
Please triple down more Just Some Fag, it’s entertaining.


Just Some Guy on with Nerdette, Saggy Melonz (Nerdette's black friend) and Liana Kerzner (Nerdette's jewish friend). The relevant excerpt at which point JSG relates his actual abandonment of CG:


Nerdette: 23:34:
Like the whole movement was, to me, was something I actually believed in at one time until I started seeing the fringes on the edge. Like, you can only make so many videos calling Vita Ayala retarded you can only do so many of these things. When you're just repeating your points over and over and over and I'm just like, you're, you've become what you hate it and that's where my real issue always came from. You've become exactly like the far left on the on the other side. And I was like-

Just Some Guy: 24:55
They didn't become that, they were always that.

Nerdette: 24:58
I didn't see it

Just Some Guy: 24:59

I mentioned this when this this whole thing first started, I said "This probably going to happen, it's going to fall out just like Gamergate. It's gonna play out same way." And it pretty much has. You know, the people who were the biggest kind of had their fall, everybody went their own separate ways. And there are a lot of people who got very attached to certain folks. And when that didn't play out the way they wanted, they lost their minds. They were trying to pull me into this nonsense with EVS years ago over his comic book, because of the pages not being printed on regular comic book paper. It was printed on magazine paper, and there was a fallout over that. And then there was, there were issues over like, who owns the name "Comicsgate"?. There was issues over-

Nerdette: 25:43
Oh, um, isn't it getting sued for it? Somebody got served papers.

Just Some Guy: 25:48
I haven't followed that, because I just don't care enough.

Liana Kerzner: 25:50
Yeah.

Just Some Guy: 25:51
But then there was, there was an issue over like people like Engletine had been talking about comics for a while, and then people like EVS coming in, and sort of turned it into make comic books. And that back and forth.

Nerdette: 26:03
Engletine's awesome. Yeah, we disagree on so much. And he's still awesome.

Just Some Guy: 26:08
Yeah he's a cool guy, and he took the brunt of all of that, because him and, I think it was him and who else was it? I forget who the other person was on the chat with him. But it was EVS and Jon Malin. And they were, they had the debate and the debate-

Nerdette: 26:25
Unranked Chevron, was that his name?

Just Some Guy: 26:28
Yeah, I think so. And it just devolved into them yelling at the other two, "Well, we're making comic books and you're not doing anything." It's like, okay, that's not how that works. But that's what it has sort of became. And I've never been particularly interested in that kind of back and forth. So I just didn't get involved in any of that nonsense, and that seems to have been one of the reasons why people have been annoyed with me for years is because I wouldn't get into their internet beef. So they've been trying to find a thing to use to like drag me into their shit. And this shit over the Don't Say Gay bill was sort of their avenue. And then I didn't respond in the way that they want it. And that made them mad. I'm like, "Well, too bad. As I don't take you seriously." I'm an 80s baby. I'm a 90s baby if all you're gonna do is say mean things about me, I got newsflash for you: I don't fucking care. You're gonna have to up your game baby. You're gonna have to like, I don't know, threaten to dox me to actually get me worried and-
Click to expand...

Things we can take from this transcription.
  • Apparently Just Some Guy silently turned away from Comicsgate all the way back in 2018, he just never said anything. Perhaps predictably, it was based when someone had the temerity to disagree with an opinion he held, or more or less exactly like what happened when Nick Rekeita disagreed with his interpretation of the anti-grooming bill on account of having actually read it. For a guy who has spent years dishing out vitriolic videos full of declaratives, JSP consistently explodes like a tissue paper soaked with gasoline the moment someone disagrees with his often unfounded and falsifiable claims.
  • The blowback from the Rekeita incident where he defended graphic sex education to primary schoolers and called his audience bigots is really part of a CG conspiracy to get him on account of his declining to get involved with the likes of VikkiVerse and Cheyenne heckling Frog for the fluting issue with the first Bloodhoney print (to which he made a video about how he wasn't getting involved back in 2019)
  • Of the four people on this pop culture commentary panel, Liana Kerzner is the only one who has actually read X-Men comics to the point of having an informed opinion on the state of the franchise.
Patreon:
JSP's patreon took a slight hit. He went from 124 patrons at $368 to 107 patrons at $343. It seems like the ones that cancelled were lower paying patrons.
Screenshot (76).pngScreenshot (77).png
Thats all for this week in JSP news. Will his numbers continue to trend downward? Will he see that his audience doesnt care about his shitty takes on general politics? Will he finally get it over with and just add MAP to his bio like @P5Fever suggested? Find out now. Yes, No chance in hell, and god I hope so.
Until next week :drink:.
 
Last edited:
They think it's the logical progression from being pro free sex in 1970, pro-abortion in 1990, and pro-queer in 2006
So they went from whores, to practitioners of infanticide, to sodomites. The first one, I can understand, whores have been with us since the beginning of human history, it is the oldest profession for a reason. But the last two, well, that explains why the west is losing the demographics competition to Asians, Africans, and Latinos. Queers don't make kids of their own, the best they can do is adopt someone else's kids, and abortion knocks down replacement rates even further. And it's funny to see JSG and Vito support the next step: doing something that will make kids suffer in their lives.
 
  • Political Sperging
Reactions: Analog Devolved
What is it with pedos and their weird compulsion to inform others that they're pedos?
I don't pretend to have all the answers, but if you got 8 minutes to spare, Null has what I think is a plausible theory.


TL;DR: Pedos have a compulsion to let other people know they are "abhorrent to nature" because they get off on it. So, it would be a troll, but one based on a factual admission (unlike most trolling).

I would also add that I personally think they're ultimately hoping for societal acceptance and normalization of their perversions, and things like what Vito said in those tweets is them "testing the waters."

Many moons ago, there was a documentary called Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys, where the filmmaker interviewed a bunch of people from NAMBLA. Same thing, basically. They wanted to appear harmless and human. All that film did was incriminate them further and make people hate them more.
 
I don't pretend to have all the answers, but if you got 8 minutes to spare, Null has what I think is a plausible theory.


TL;DR: Pedos have a compulsion to let other people know they are "abhorrent to nature" because they get off on it. So, it would be a troll, but one based on a factual admission (unlike most trolling).

I would also add that I personally think they're ultimately hoping for societal acceptance and normalization of their perversions, and things like what Vito said in those tweets is them "testing the waters."

Many moons ago, there was a documentary called Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys, where the filmmaker interviewed a bunch of people from NAMBLA. Same thing, basically. They wanted to appear harmless and human. All that film did was incriminate them further and make people hate them more.
I agree with most of what Null said in that video. Hopefully retards like Vito and JSG are about to find out the hard way that when you push the overton window too far, it tends to slam shut.
 
Back