Wuhan Coronavirus / COVID-19 Thread 2: Booster Shot - Resume all Corona sperging here.

Update, I pretty much ignored HR because fuck this shit, but they sent me another tasteful e-mail today and CC'd my damn supervisor. I replied with a straight up lie saying I got two shots early last year, lost my card forever ago, and haven't been weekly testing consistently but I've totally definitely done it since November! This must be a mistake!

Guess I'll suck it up and swab away. They won again. But even with my lie, it's not enough of a leg to stand on socially, because the definition of fully vaccinated includes having a booster. How dare I be so rebellious as to not even get my 3rd shot? Imagine putting the juice in you 3+ times just so you don't have to swab JUST so you can keep your job.... Also this probably ruined any and all chances I had at another role within my building; I had an interview earlier in the week that went decently well. I went home without speaking to my supervisor in person but now I'm pretty much forced to face this head on with a sweet lie at my side.
Did they send any email in between? Or was it just one email a few months ago and then straight to letting your supervisor know? I'm not a lawyer but I feel like potentially revealing medical info like that should be a major issue and possibly a violation of the EEOC
 
  • Like
Reactions: Forsaken Wanderer
The hepatitis thing is bizarre and worrying since it doesn't appear directly linked to vaccines. A lot of the stats on the hepatitis outbreak regard kids ages 1-6, but only 5-6 year olds can receive the Moloch injection (under 5 I think there were only a few trials). The younger children 1-2 can be attributed to breastfeeding from vaxxed mother, but what about the kids too young to be vaxxed but too old to be breastfed? Drinking after their parents/vaxxed siblings and sharing a plate? It's a bit distressing knowing that the vaxx can be spread so easily.
They haven't given specific ages, just the range "1-6", which they all fall under. Don't overthink it.
 
The hepatitis thing is bizarre and worrying since it doesn't appear directly linked to vaccines. A lot of the stats on the hepatitis outbreak regard kids ages 1-6, but only 5-6 year olds can receive the Moloch injection (under 5 I think there were only a few trials). The younger children 1-2 can be attributed to breastfeeding from vaxxed mother, but what about the kids too young to be vaxxed but too old to be breastfed? Drinking after their parents/vaxxed siblings and sharing a plate? It's a bit distressing knowing that the vaxx can be spread so easily.
According to my two favorite Covid munchie lunatics the Hep crisis is all part of the plan and why Covid gonna kill us all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Forsaken Wanderer
Did they send any email in between? Or was it just one email a few months ago and then straight to letting your supervisor know? I'm not a lawyer but I feel like potentially revealing medical info like that should be a major issue and possibly a violation of the EEOC
Exactly that. I received the first e-mail that I completely ignored back in late March, and then they sent a second e-mail yesterday and included my supervisor in on it so they "could help me resolve this issue".

Which, with my lie included, has highlighted me as not only not being fully vaccinated according to current law, but not following their new rule of compliance required to be employed, which is getting a swab up my nose every single week of employment.
 
They were attaching J&J to "extremely rare" blood clots from the very beginning, and personally I think that the negative side effects of J&J are on par with Pfizer and Moderna, not spectacularly worse. Both Pfizer and Moderna also can cause bloodclots on top of all other nasty side effects they have. Since J&J gave up on raking it with vaccines, they became a proof that vaccines get any proper scrutiny. They can wave it in front of our eyes, while simultaneously overlooking copious problems with Pfizer and Moderna shots.
the syndrome associated with j&j/astrazenica is called vaccine associated immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia or VITT, and isn't associated with mRNA. the mRNA vaccines are associated with peripheral blood clots, meaning clots that form in one part of the body (usually the leg) that can become dislodged and travel to other organs. the j&j associated blood clots are massive and usually form in the sinuses of the brain, and there are not many platelets left in the blood that is outside of the huge clot, there is a high rate of mortality. . peripheral blood clots are deadly less often, their main danger is if they travel to the heart, lungs, or brain and get stuck, or if treatment is delayed for too long. with peripheral blood clots, the rest of the blood contains normal levels of platelets. The normal treatment for blood clots is to give heparin, a blood thinning medication. if you give heparin to a VITT patient you will likely kill them since they have very few platelets and now their blood is even thinner, so any minor injury will bleed profusely & we all break small blood vessels each day just from the act of moving around and bumping into things. VITT is relatively new and treatments are evolving because of that. peripheral blood clots are as old as obesity, the treatment is pretty well established.

I am not saying that either shot is better or worse, just that the blood clotting problems from each shot aren't the same. it is plausible that the risk of peripheral blood clots is elevated for a long time after mRNA while the risk of VITT is only there very soon after vaccination, and in that case the mortality rate might go either way. there are a whole bunch of other problems that have to be compared between each shot to see how the safety profiles stack up, too. The political pressure being exerted makes it basically impossible to know what the truth is exactly.
 
Breaking News - People who died of covid already had one foot in the grave anyway and a lot of them probably would have been counted as natural causes if not for the positive test. An Irish professor and infectious diseases specialist has finally identified this phenomenon more than two years after it was posted on the Farms.

McConkey: At least half Ireland's COVID casualties 'may not have survived in any case'

“To me, the big take-home message here is, we know there were 6,000 or 7,000 deaths of people who died with COVID in their nose, but it's clear now, when we're talking about 2,000 or 3,000, about half of those at least or perhaps two thirds actually died with COVID but may not have survived to December 2021 in any case,” he said.


Recently we've gotten outright admissions that the J&J is dangerous and most people who died of covid didn't. Who wants to bet on how long it'll take for "if you or a loved one has been affected by myocarditis" to hit the mainstream media? I'm going with late 2023, that's the big one they really won't want to admit to but it can't be hushed up forever.
 
Last edited:
So I ended up getting an emergency referral to the dermatologist today for ( 99% sure ) perhaps the absolute gayest reason known to man: Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) in response to an OTC antihistamine

What does this minor powerlevel have to do with the Wuhan bioweapon? I was asked at least half a dozen times if I had gotten vaccinated?/are you sure?/Intimate partner vaccinated?

Yes, making ab-so-fuckinglutely sure that I didn't get exposed to the magic juice was apparently an integral part in the differential diagnosis of my grotesque mystery skin condition. Amazing.
 
the syndrome associated with j&j/astrazenica is called vaccine associated immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia or VITT, and isn't associated with mRNA. the mRNA vaccines are associated with peripheral blood clots, meaning clots that form in one part of the body (usually the leg) that can become dislodged and travel to other organs. the j&j associated blood clots are massive and usually form in the sinuses of the brain, and there are not many platelets left in the blood that is outside of the huge clot, there is a high rate of mortality. . peripheral blood clots are deadly less often, their main danger is if they travel to the heart, lungs, or brain and get stuck, or if treatment is delayed for too long. with peripheral blood clots, the rest of the blood contains normal levels of platelets. The normal treatment for blood clots is to give heparin, a blood thinning medication. if you give heparin to a VITT patient you will likely kill them since they have very few platelets and now their blood is even thinner, so any minor injury will bleed profusely & we all break small blood vessels each day just from the act of moving around and bumping into things. VITT is relatively new and treatments are evolving because of that. peripheral blood clots are as old as obesity, the treatment is pretty well established.

I am not saying that either shot is better or worse, just that the blood clotting problems from each shot aren't the same. it is plausible that the risk of peripheral blood clots is elevated for a long time after mRNA while the risk of VITT is only there very soon after vaccination, and in that case the mortality rate might go either way. there are a whole bunch of other problems that have to be compared between each shot to see how the safety profiles stack up, too. The political pressure being exerted makes it basically impossible to know what the truth is exactly.
Do you mean this side effect happens shortly after vaccination only? That would explain why they are open about it. It's harder to plausibly deny the connection...
 
So I ended up getting an emergency referral to the dermatologist today for ( 99% sure ) perhaps the absolute gayest reason known to man: Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) in response to an OTC antihistamine

What does this minor powerlevel have to do with the Wuhan bioweapon? I was asked at least half a dozen times if I had gotten vaccinated?/are you sure?/Intimate partner vaccinated?

Yes, making ab-so-fuckinglutely sure that I didn't get exposed to the magic juice was apparently an integral part in the differential diagnosis of my grotesque mystery skin condition. Amazing.
Interesting that the doc suspected exposure to a vaxed partner might have been the cause of your horrific skin rash. Are they finally quietly disseminating info about how shed spikes can cause immune responses?
 
Do you mean this side effect happens shortly after vaccination only? That would explain why they are open about it. It's harder to plausibly deny the connection...
I looked over some of the vaers reports to confirm what I remembered (which is symptoms coming on the same day as getting vaccinated), and the reports I was able to find seem to also have same-day onset of symptoms. Some of the people didn't get blood clots until later but had symptoms of extremely low platelet counts the same day.

This condition is exactly the same thing that caused the regulatory "pause" on j&j right at the start of the release of all the vaccines. I don't know why the government isn't liable for deaths when they reviewed this exact vaccine for this exact condition and approved it anyway, only to revoke some of the approval later on for safety reasons. In theory they are supposed to make sure that things are safe before they put them out.

naomi wolf keeps suggesting that this is a national security problem, that some other country has infiltrated enough of the regulatory and corporate framework to push damaging vaccines on people. I don't know if that's the explanation for all this, but maybe. she thinks it is china. I do know that when the swine flu vaccine came out in the 70s and people died, the machinery of the government worked exactly as it was supposed to. They paused the roll out, they reviewed the deaths carefully, they apologized to the families and compensated them when it became obvious that they had been killed by the vaccine. It was something like 30 or 50 people dead with millions of doses given out, and they followed the guidelines in place right away. Things aren't working that way anymore, so something changed.
 
Just because a drug isn't recommended for that age group doesn't mean it's not pushed on them by pediatricians or parents. There's certainly a chance they received a jab even if it's not recomended.
There were also a few cases where children under 5 were "accidentally" given the covid shot at places like Walgreens (Walgreens had a major problem getting the covid jabs and the flu shot mixed up).
 
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.10...6B_645JlGoJ3ff89cWYLfESsXBqdlDYySnIzrk7rOvOgU

Using an active nationwide surveillance system administered by the Israeli Ministry of Health, we previously found a higher incidence of myocarditis among persons 16 years of age or older who had received the BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer–BioNTech) than among historical controls and unvaccinated persons; the incidence was highest among young male recipients.1 The Food and Drug Administration recently granted emergency use authorization for the two-dose regimen of the BNT162b2 vaccine in adolescents 12 to 15 years of age. Here, we report the incidence of hospitalization for myocarditis between June 2 and October 20, 2021, among adolescents in this age group within 21 days after receipt of the first vaccine dose and within 30 days after receipt of the second dose.

Clinical data that involved International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, 422.0-9x and 429.0x codes were reviewed by a cardiologist and a rheumatologist, and the severity of disease was classified according to the Brighton Collaboration Case Definition for myocarditis (see the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this letter at NEJM.org).2 These data were collected by the Israeli Ministry of Health. Pfizer–BioNTech had no role in the collection or analysis of the data or in the reporting of data in this letter.


During the period under study, 404,407 adolescents (195,579 of whom were male) received the first dose of vaccine, 326,463 adolescents (157,153 of whom were male) received the second dose, and 18 cases of myocarditis leading to hospitalization were reported. Two cases of myocarditis were excluded from the study owing to reasonable alternative diagnoses. Of the remaining 16 cases, 1 occurred in an unvaccinated adolescent and 15 occurred in vaccinated adolescents — 1 case within 21 days after receipt of the first vaccine dose, 12 cases within 1 week after receipt of the second dose (Figure 1), and 2 later cases (1 each at 46 days and 70 days after receipt of the second dose); the 2 later cases were considered by the investigators as unlikely to be related to the vaccine.

The demographic characteristics of the 13 adolescents with myocarditis occurring within 21 days after receipt of the first vaccine dose or within 30 days after receipt of the second dose are shown in Table S1 in the Supplementary Appendix. These 13 cases were classified as probable or definitive myocarditis according to the case definition. All the cases were clinically mild, involving a mean duration of hospitalization of 3.1 days (range, 1 to 6) and no readmissions during 30 days of follow-up. Symptoms at presentation, laboratory features, and echocardiographic findings are shown in Table S2.

The risk estimates of myocarditis among male recipients in the 21 days after the first and second doses were 0.56 cases per 100,000 after the first dose and 8.09 cases per 100,000 after the second dose; the risk estimates among female recipients were 0 cases per 100,000 after the first dose and 0.69 cases per 100,000 after the second dose. The risk of myocarditis after receipt of the second vaccine dose among male adolescents 12 to 15 years of age was estimated to be 1 case per 12,361; the corresponding risk among female adolescents was estimated to be 1 case per 144,439.

The risk estimates per person in this study were lower than the previously reported risks among male recipients 16 to 24 years of age,1 but they were slightly higher than the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimate of approximately 1 case per 16,129 male recipients 12 to 17 years of age after receipt of the second dose.3 These differences may be explained by the active surveillance in our population. In a phase 3 trial of the BNT162b2 vaccine, the relatively small number of vaccinated adolescents 12 to 15 years of age (1131), of whom 567 were male, is a possible explanation for the absence of reported cases of myocarditis during the trial.4

Limitations of the current study are that myocarditis was not validated on myocardial biopsy, that misclassification and reporting bias may have taken place, and that we acquired only reports of cases of myocarditis that led to hospitalization. In conclusion, the incidence of myocarditis leading to hospitalization among adolescents who received the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine was low but was higher than among recipients of the first vaccine dose and proportionately numerically higher than in recent estimates of incidence among unvaccinated persons.
 
^I'm not sure how the Israeli data compares to the rest of the world but if we assume there wasn't a higher rate of saline shots mixed in with the mrna shots than in other countries then how do we explain why they didn't have as many reported fertility issues as was seen elsewhere?
 
Back