The largely quantities of masses of abandoned equipment and the atrocities are a matter of record for anyone but Russian propagandists and those who believe them. There are so many recording where vehicles with crews of at least three were struck and no evidence of evacuation.
Anyone attempting to understand a war based on 30 second clips of shit exploding is a fucking retard, I'm sorry but there's no nicer way to say this. All of these clips are fairly irrelevant outside of the entertainment factor.
However the main point about the loss per vehicle is to highlight the incredible claims about Russian losses the Russian MoD makes.
Legitimately who cares. Nobody is going to tell the truth about their losses, it's the middle of war. You don't want to demoralize your men and you want to demoralize the others. You'd be a retard to believe either side's MoD. Armies couldn't count kills in previous wars and they certainly cannot count them now, even if they had the best intentions in mind.
Some of the Moskva sailors lost are now classed as AWOL and apparently the ship was not taking part in the 'special operation' when lost. The efforts of some of the next of kin to get answers appears the reason for this slight
Russian cope, who cares. Their navy sucks ass, always has and probably always will. Next of kin being unable to get answers is sad, but not really relevant to the situation on the ground.
. The initial operation was laughable with a vast confusion of vehicles and men of three sides of Kyiv, with similar at Cherniv and Sumy,
Obviously the first few days were rife with confusion, yes.
That supposedly elite operation was defeated by the most improvised forces Kyiv had.
If you're referring to the VDV drop on the airport, that's not the truth at all. The VDV's casualties notwithstanding, by all accounts they held Hostomel, and not against "improvised forces". Ukrainian special force were present there and fought them. The VDV held Hostomel until the Russian Army linked up with them, I understand that people have taken the VDV and started meming them, and I don't really care, but I don't think I need to point out that due to this "the VDV was shredded guys" meme, Ukrainian civilians were surprised to see them patrolling the outskirts of the airport the day after the initial air drop.
The sheer inability of Russian troops to deal effectively with ambushes is well known.
When you're trying to gun it full speed around cities, through well defended bush and forests, yes, your ability to deal with ambushes is going to suck ass. That phase of the war is over and done with, it was an OK idea if they expected the UAF to collapse, but they didn't, and it failed. I really don't see how this is relevant to this phase of the war, where advances are counted in meters and not kilometers, and every inch of land is fought over, and half the fighting is done in urban settings.
Firing of Russian artillery to destroy vast urban areas, a blanket bombing from the ground, is the main Russian tactic. It was a characteristic of the second Chechen War, the Russian effort in Syria where urban areas where the Russian forces under Dvornikov battered cities until their populace could take no more, and now in Ukraine.
OK?
This has to be contrasted with Ukrainian operations into Russia which resulted in few to almost no civilian casualties.
Seriously what relevance is this? I don't care about the 6 gorillion civilians dying, that sucks, but I'm here because I like wars and seeing them happen. Mass war crimes and repeating Grozny, unless it's militarily relevant, I really couldn't less about. If you're going to kvetch about civilian casualties, by all means do so, but find someone else to argue with because I don't deny them and I don't care to discuss them either.
Russia keeps launching precisely scheduled wave attacks which makes almost no progress
Citation needed. 99% of attacks that Russia launches are meant to prove Ukrainian defenses, and progress is made daily. Today, the UAF likely retreated from Popasna, one of the most heavily defended cities in the Donbas.
, and there are reported loss of ground around Kharkiv and Kherson.
Kharkiv yes, the Russians abandoned many villages in the face of a Ukrainian counter-offensive because they did not have enough men to properly defend against it. They're currently attempting to secure a 7-8km buffer zone from the Russian border to Kharkiv, but most sources believe that more men must be sent to that front if this is to be achieved.
Kherson? No. There has been no UAF gains in that area in weeks and no Russian offensives. The battlefield there is reported as being static as the bombing of Mykolaiv continues. The Kryivi-Rih offensive is also stopped as the surrounding villages are bombed.
Aside from Kherson, Russia hasn't taken a single large urban area in this war. Mariupol is still contested, and utterly wrecked.
Mariupol is not contested and it's major cope to say so. Most Russian and DPR troops, as well as all the Chechens, have already been removed and redeployed to other fronts. What remains is a bunch of soldiers low on ammo, with no medicine or food, begging Turkey and their president to arrange a way for them to leave ASAP and occasionally staging breakout attempts that result in all of them being captured, wounded or killed, such as yesterday when a group attempted to leave through a field and was captured, and another attempted to leave in a car which resulted in 1 dead and 6 wounded.
The weaknesses of Russian communications and command coordination is well known. Operations with little or no coordination was the story of Russian military operations in the north. Use of Chinese made Baofeng civilian walkie talkies has been claimed by Ukrainians, but while not confirmed,
If it is not confirmed; then it is irrelevant. All of what you said, while it can easily be inferred in the North, is not true in the South and is already old news at this point.
Convoys without escort were possible in Syria, but ambush has a rich source of success for Ukrainian troops and foreign contingents like the battle hardened Georgian Legion.
Was. That ended with the North offensive. Why are you constantly bringing up shit that isn't relevant to the current situation on the ground anymore?
The partly Chinese made
R-187P1 Azart is supposed to provide Russian troops with secure comms, but it has had severe issues and there are notable doubts about how many units have access to them. Its manufacturer has been investigated for the usual embezzlement.
Early doubts about Russian comms have been borne out b
> One of the most striking
images from Russia’s war in Ukraine so far has been the photograph of a civilian handheld radio. Although impossible to confirm,
sources on social media said this radio had been captured by Ukrainian troops
Great source. Next time link directly to Twitter so I don't waste my time reading this shit.
Incredibly some troops are relying on mobile phones for communication despite them being meant, wisely, to be left behind or confiscated if found.
Citation needed, unless you're stupid enough to believe what the SBU puts out.
Ukrainian intelligence can be contrasted to Russian efforts where an assassination squad brought a copy of the Sims rather than sim cards.
Seriously, no offense but you're a complete moron. Attempting to compare intelligence agencies using this is so stupid I legitimately have nothing else to say, everyone with working brain cells should be able to recognize how stupid this argument is.
Not sending their best. This claimed intercept with 25k losses has more credibility than the tiny numbers Peskov asserts have been lost. Many claims are propagandistic, but what matters is results, and Russia has not been shown results.
You're arguing in complete bad faith. If the tiny numbers bother you so much, then I can't imagine how much it bothers you the 3 instances where the Ukrainian government posted videogame footage and passed it off as true and honest. You're clearly attempting to cope and believing what you want to despite there being no proof, and that's fine, but don't shit up the thread with uneducated opinions and walls of text with nothing of value in them.
25,000 losses would imply around 80,000 wounded as well, which would have effectively ended Russian military involvement in Ukraine. These numbers, simply, cannot be true either. And just for good measure, I'm going to call you a drooling moron again for unironically believing wartime propaganda from one of the war's belligerents.
By the by, found this
funny Russian propaganda where Moslem migration to Europe is attacked, the masculinity of European men attacked, but Russia has a vast level of migration from almost wholly Moslem Central Asia (many bewildered migrants have been taken as prisoner) which adds to an already large native Moslem population.
How the fuck is this relevant to this war? I don't care. I'm not Russian and I most definately don't spend my time on the internet chimping out about sand niggos. I've never seen a Buryat or Tajik and I probably never will in my entire life.
@ColtWalker1847
Why are you assuming only the Russians have artillery and drones in this war? Seems like a weird point to make when the Ukes have largely the same shit deployed as some kind of own. Msta, Giatsint, Pion, Grad, Smerch, etc.
The Russians have a lot more of all of these things, and more by the day as Ukrainian artillery is destroyed by the Russians and cannot be easily replaced, while the Russians have more than enough of this shit on stockpile to replenish any losses. Remember that Russia has one of the most artillery-heavy armies on Earth. I can't find the article now, and witness accounts aren't worth much in war, but a Ukrainian soldier in the Donbas claimed for every 3 artillery shells they fire, the Russians fire 300.
Also worth nothing is that the Russians can bring much more of their artillery force to bear on any given target - they're not defending and don't need reserves in several places like the Ukrainians do.