Amber Heard v. Johnny Depp Legal Proceedings - "And on my side of the bed was human fecal matter."

Who is the real criminal in this trial?

  • Amber Heard

    Votes: 767 72.0%
  • Johnny Depp

    Votes: 43 4.0%
  • Both

    Votes: 256 24.0%

  • Total voters
    1,066
  • Poll closed .
This is some great programming. Absolutely fantastic. He said, she shit the bed!

Amber is a crazy bitch. She is just all over the place. She beat her previous girlfriend. She beat Johnny. Typical crazy ass lesbian. No telling how many other men and women she has assaulted.

The whole thing with the bottle is...just wow. She honestly expects anyone to believe he raped her with a broken bottle and his doctors fixed her? I imagine most women would have bled to death if something similar occurred to them. Let alone get up the next day and make their rapist a cup of coffee. Absolutely crazy lesbian bitch, but I repeat myself. Cross better be brutal. I mean johnny's team better go in fast and hard. Just tear her apart up there on the stand.

Hope Johnny wins. Hope he gets the fifty million. Hope this kills metoo and all associated feminist bullshit. Hope she has a meltdown on the stand during cross.

The one thing this trial has done is shown men can be victims. That women lie and will happily run around town with said lies. I can only hope the major take away is that women are just as shitty as men by the public.
Watched the Amber testimony. She didn't say that the "square bottle" was broken. In fact. She didn't' feel it.

I'll tell you now, if I had anything stuffed up my snatch that was that uncomfortable or BROKEN, I would feel and remember it, no matter how disassociated I was with the memory. Researched actual victims too.

I don't know if she would have bled to death but the resulting issues would have made some sort of medical effect. Enough that there would have been some medical testimony.

Bitch, don't be so one dimensional. We should absolutely encourage men of domestic violence to speak out. We should encourage and support them. Amber Heard is destroying the actual intent of the METOO movement. The fact that we get actual facts and go from here is so great going forward but we need to remember that facts are kings in this situation.

Here's the black and white. No matter what you believe from either testimony, Johnny gave facts. Building on from that, Amber that so fucking sensationalist, she couldn't even provide tears, let along facts. WUT DOO??
 
Someone's putting their imdb editing priviliges to good use.


1651954820224.jpg


 
You seem to think JD cares if he wins.


Winning would be a bonus.
The possible outcomes that are a win for JD are:
Jury finds for JD, awards him 50+ million or whatever - Obvious vindication, plus the possibility of getting some money back (Amber is broke but it'll be fun to try).
Jury finds for JD, awards him some minor amount - Obvious vindication as above, with less dragging of Amber into court to seize her Honda.
Jury gets deadlocked, awards money for nobody - A mistrial gives the option to try again, but with the PR war won JD might not bother.

The only real loss is if the jury finds in favor of Amber, which I don't think will happen. They would need to be unanimous and there is at least 2-3 older Asian men and one autist on the jury, so the likelihood of her sweeping them off into her fantasy is pretty slim. She told such an amazing grandiose series of easily disproven lies already, with details that beggar belief like being pummeled and having her nose broken multiple times, etc, while providing no medical records or photographs, etc that they simply collapse in the telling. If the cross-exam is halfway competent she should get shredded.

So i think the worst possible case is that one Heard-simp makes it to deliberations and forces a locked jury and mistrial, which would still be a win for JD as he finally got to tell his story and expose her lies.
 
Someone in her legal team should have taught her not to contradict herself if she at least wanted to pretend to be believable.

Listening to her first afternoons' testimony she contradicted herself to minimise her drug taking - something that literally didn't even matter.

Pretty much stopped paying attention to her after that.

This case was always for the court of public opinion, for Depp to get a shot of having his career back and his testimony managed to make him connect with the public in such a way I'd never seen anyone manage in a legal setting before, it was very impressive.
 
The only real loss is if the jury finds in favor of Amber, which I don't think will happen. They would need to be unanimous and there is at least 2-3 older Asian men and one autist on the jury, so the likelihood of her sweeping them off into her fantasy is pretty slim. She told such an amazing grandiose series of easily disproven lies already, with details that beggar belief like being pummeled and having her nose broken multiple times, etc, while providing no medical records or photographs, etc that they simply collapse in the telling. If the cross-exam is halfway competent she should get shredded.

So i think the worst possible case is that one Heard-simp makes it to deliberations and forces a locked jury and mistrial, which would still be a win for JD as he finally got to tell his story and expose her lies.

Is there a chance that if the Jury goes in favor of JD, that Joe Biden decides to pardon Amber, to own the "dirty whites", and as "a way" support women's abortion rights and Ukraine, for some reason? Do Presidential pardons even work that way?
 
Is there a chance that if the Jury goes in favor of JD, that Joe Biden decides to pardon Amber, to own the "dirty whites", and as "a way" support women's abortion rights and Ukraine, for some reason? Do Presidential pardons even work that way?
This is a civil case in a state court. So no, they don't.
 
Someone in her legal team should have taught her not to contradict herself if she at least wanted to pretend to be believable.

Listening to her first afternoons' testimony she contradicted herself to minimise her drug taking - something that literally didn't even matter.

Pretty much stopped paying attention to her after that.

This case was always for the court of public opinion, for Depp to get a shot of having his career back and his testimony managed to make him connect with the public in such a way I'd never seen anyone manage in a legal setting before, it was very impressive.
Yeah, because someone like that is reasonable and listens to constructive criticism.
 
People are claiming that NYP changed its article and edited out the fake tears but they don't realize there's actually two articles about Amber's testimony, both published on the same day. This is the archive to the one that has the photoshopped tears, in case they ever do change it. Reuters also featured the faked article, but as far as I know there's no way to archive it in such as way as to prove it, because they used a slideshow and didn't feature it on the first image. NYP tweets 42 million times a second so it's hard to find an individual tweet (as they like to repeat the same ones) but despite claims that they deleted the tweet, they did not. It's still up too. Here's an archive of it in case it ever goes down. Now people can stop saying that the articles were all changed and the tweet was deleted before they could be archived. If someone goes looking for them in the future they can be easily found here.
 
Oh good, I didn't know if there was a way to do that.
It works on most slideshows. Right click image, copy image link, paste it into archive.

It doesnt quite retain the context l. Technically they could later claim it is an article about how the nyp photoshopped it. But in practice most publication's allegiances are so static that wouldn't happen.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Smaug's Smokey Hole
The extreme exaggerations of her wild accusations makes me really believe the borderline personality disorder.

I’ve worked with individuals with BPD who made similar wild accusations with a mixed of MST.

They are exhausting, and sanctimonious all rolled up into a truly draining season.
Amber on the stand is behaving exactly the way the doctor who diagnosed her with BPD and HPD said she would, like exactly. If for some reason anyone doubted the testimony the proof is right fucking there


Do Presidential pardons even work that way?
Just for future reference presidential pardons are only for Federal crimes
 
Isn't the whole trial based on Amber Herd calling Johnny Depp abusive in a book and him suing her over libel? Depp tried to sue UK newspapers over the libel of calling him abusive only to lose BADLY because there were a few instances of him being abusive which meant the headlines were in fact true enough to hold up.

So this is probably going to end up with Depp losing (unless US libel laws are absolutely retarded) because even if Amber Herd hit him a billion times, if Depp struck back a few times she's got enough ammo to win. These court cases are usually for things like pure lies, yet the whole relationship seems toxic enough to not rule in any conclusive way. It's just a public shitstorm and Depp is going to lose the PR game HARD if after all this the judge rules in Herd's favour.

Depp's defence is seemingly "No, I didn't hit you, you hit me so I hit you back!" which might be one of the most retarded ways to argue your defence.
 
She was A grade coked up whore so I totally getting why Captain Jack would excuse her crazy.


I can't condemn his poor judgment. I dated a couple of BPD's in my younger years, when I was a hot fuck boy, and I can't say I regret it. Luckily didn't marry them but memories that will stay with you forever,
 
Isn't the whole trial based on Amber Herd calling Johnny Depp abusive in a book and him suing her over libel? Depp tried to sue UK newspapers over the libel of calling him abusive only to lose BADLY because there were a few instances of him being abusive which meant the headlines were in fact true enough to hold up.

So this is probably going to end up with Depp losing (unless US libel laws are absolutely retarded) because even if Amber Herd hit him a billion times, if Depp struck back a few times she's got enough ammo to win. These court cases are usually for things like pure lies, yet the whole relationship seems toxic enough to not rule in any conclusive way. It's just a public shitstorm and Depp is going to lose the PR game HARD if after all this the judge rules in Herd's favour.

Depp's defence is seemingly "No, I didn't hit you, you hit me so I hit you back!" which might be one of the most retarded ways to argue your defence.
Why are you commenting on something. You clearly haven’t tried to understand or catch up with?

A book?

What?

Look the whole thing can be boiled down to this.


Me too movement

You remotely identify as female? You got a story to tell and got visibility and a jump to a potentially worthless career.

In this case a little of that and crying abuse means the divorce proceeding you already started are speed up and you get your check to walk out from bid daddy Deep.

Deep at the time? Did give a fuck he wanted her gone and go just act and so drugs.

For a moment things are going well as Heard had her fuck off money.

But then she “wrote” an opinion piece where she eluded strongly that her marriage to deep coulponded with woman’s movements of the time to paint a picture of the attention whore whoring out.

This was compounded by a gossip paper in the UK picking up off that opinion piece Heard wrote to call Deep a wife beater.

In turn Deep became a social out add within Holly weird and thus removed and bared from acting. Apart from drugs the only thing he seemed to care about.

This braking the camels back and Deep no longer allowing Heard and public opinion to treat him like a cabin boy instead of a pirate king he fought back. Legally.

Because I’m the end it’s not about winning in court. It’s about leveling the playing field.

Unlike a women where it’s believe the victim without question and no more proof then “I said it therefore it happened”.

It’s not this person was accused of this and he is a man he must be cancelled.


It’s hey I’m a man. I tried to be cool and take the smaller lose to my identity, money, and public opinion by giving you want you want. For me to shut up and give in.

However, you took everything and that more then I can accept.


Here is what I endured. And if the pronoun was she/her the simps would defend from on high and the president himself would decry the sheer audacity of what she experienced.

But it’s not a she/her it’s a he/him. So fuck him. The vendor stereo type is fuck him. He is a man there for it was deserved and low level violence.

However this trial is making that notion take a 180. That’s the brilliant thing Deep is doing. He is using the liberal play book against themselves and making a legal president for future me too believe me because I say so think twice.


Sure he may lose. That’s not the point. It’s not about wining. Deep doesn’t need to win he can burn money and time unlike nearly any other man accused of me too and show in this case me too? Sure let’s play that game. I’ll me too you to submission.

Because even if I lose this legal case like the UK one (which didn’t allow for much of the evidence Deeps team is using in this case) against the gossip publisher he lost. In the US and even the world as a televised court case he wins.

Public opinion shifts faster then anything. Use liberal thinking against itself to show he is as much if not more the victim as a member of the me too movement and he wins.

He wins film roles. He wins public trust. He demonizes the very woman who defamed him in the eyes of the public. Because he can lose this case and still win. So long as public opinion is on the majority favoring Deep they will see his movies. They will fight his causes to remove Heard as an actress in movies and tv. They will say until the next Holly weird scandal that Deep was the real victim. They will has tag Justin for deep until the day he dies like they still do over Trump losing the election.
 
Back