Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Slight PL: A few years, shopping (UK, large local store) with a pal who bought a pack of knickers with no time to try them on for size (yeah it was a done thing)...she gets home tries every pair on and decides they didn't fit too well and tells me she's taking them back for an exchange. I laughed at the idea of the store taking them back but that smile dropped when they actually did. The store assistant "re-assured" me that the protective strip was a "barrier" and nothing else was necessary.

I'm not sure if the practice has ended by now, I hope so. The thought of these blokes trying on female undies, jacking off and then not buying turns my stomach - even the thought of a manky female trying them on...
Protip: Wash anything you can wash ASAP. I worked at a warehouse for a couple months. Assume everything you buy has been manhandled and has touched the floor at least twice, seals be damned.
 
Elon ain't got shit on this.
41j06n.png
Lifeless eyes, black eyes, like a doll's eyes...
 
View attachment 3261175View attachment 3261155 twitter
Hundreds of tranny lynchings now. Apparently.

View attachment 3261198 twitter

"Is a dog a cat?"
"No"
"You are literally advocating that dogs be removed from society"

Alexander the Great had an infinite number of arms.

Alexander the Great was a great general.
Great generals are forewarned.
Forewarned is forearmed.
Four is an odd number of arms to have.
The only number that is both even and odd is infinity.
Therefore, Alexander the Great had an infinite number of arms.

Same logic. Except that in my example every single statement taken on its own is true, save the last one, which is where the logic breaks down entirely. But even this nonsense "logic" is more internally consistent and grasps at fewer straws than that trannies' leap of "logic".

(I'll take my puzzle pieces, this is pretty autistic)
 
I don't see how that's advocating they be removed from society, just that society refer to them as men, but I'm a cissy so who knows 🤷

It's called "narcissistic injury." One of the symptoms of narcissism is treating everyone else like an extension of yourself, and becoming EXTREMELY angry when they don't act as such.

Your refusal to play along with their fetish is seen as an existential threat to them.

That said, Troons have done absolutely no good for society, and trying to accommodate them has done nothing but drag everyone else down. I'm absolutely down for removing them from society, but that mostly means I think they should be institutionalized if they cannot be made to understand that they can never, EVER be a member of the opposite sex, or some weird alien hermaphrodite with a barbie doll crotch, and that LARPing as such is retarded and makes them worthy of scorn and mockery.

Some mental illnesses are socially contagious, so the only sensible solution would be to quarantine the infected.
 
Last edited:

They are talking about this study. Which is weird because the "adaptations" roughly translate to "Do you get aroused when expecting a sexual encounter?" and not the troon style full on getting boners when wearing skirts

The latter is pervert behaviour

This study (besides being made on a sample of 51 women, so lol sample size), is also transparently trying to find a certain result. If you define autogynephilia incorrectly, leaving out the transformation aspect and adding in the idea of visualizing a sexual encounter, then 93% of women report getting horny while picturing sex in their own bodies! If you were to ask men if they would get horny picturing themselves in a sexual encounter, you would also find that the vast majority would say yes. It's disingenuous as fuck and speaks to the shoddy scholarship and deliberate faulty study designs pro-troon researchers depend on to reach their conclusions.
 
This study (besides being made on a sample of 51 women, so lol sample size), is also transparently trying to find a certain result. If you define autogynephilia incorrectly, leaving out the transformation aspect and adding in the idea of visualizing a sexual encounter, then 93% of women report getting horny while picturing sex in their own bodies! If you were to ask men if they would get horny picturing themselves in a sexual encounter, you would also find that the vast majority would say yes. It's disingenuous as fuck and speaks to the shoddy scholarship and deliberate faulty study designs pro-troon researchers depend on to reach their conclusions.
This "argument" of theirs is a total red herring anyway. Even if there were actual women who were literal autogynephiles, they would still be women and men would still be men. The presence or absence of a paraphilia doesn't determine sex. Women with fetishes are women, men with fetishes are men.
 
You mean to tell me girls don't jizz themselves while wearing formal dresses and to the tactile sensation of silky/satiny fabrics? I don't believe you!: 😉

View attachment 3260586
View attachment 3260588View attachment 3260589
View attachment 3260591

He orgasmed in one of the dresses and laid down another one on top of a toilet. And then put them back on the shelf. A literal underaged girl is going to wear one of these dresses.

I’m so disgusted.

Thankfully, I'm pretty sure this is a troll post. "OJ Didn't Do It" posting about cumming while trying on a 15 year olds dress is too on the nose.
No, he has also posted multiple photos of him trying on wedding dresses (here, here) and also posts on wedding dress subreddits telling women how good they look (presumably while jerking off). One post he commented on like that had a child in it.

BOLO for this guy:

1.png

This study (besides being made on a sample of 51 women, so lol sample size), is also transparently trying to find a certain result. If you define autogynephilia incorrectly, leaving out the transformation aspect and adding in the idea of visualizing a sexual encounter, then 93% of women report getting horny while picturing sex in their own bodies! If you were to ask men if they would get horny picturing themselves in a sexual encounter, you would also find that the vast majority would say yes. It's disingenuous as fuck and speaks to the shoddy scholarship and deliberate faulty study designs pro-troon researchers depend on to reach their conclusions.

I suppose if you’re pornsick and dissociated enough, the idea of getting horny to the idea of yourself having sex with someone is novel enough to seem like a fetish.
 
Nah. He was just mimicking the barricade method of wedging a flimsy chair under the doorknob to somehow prevent the door from opening, as you'll frequently see in cartoons or movies, which are a much more reliable source of knowledge than silly patriarchal concepts like physics or biology.

I like how the chair just gently fell over, which is how I always expected this barricading tactic would work. Chair didn't give a shit.

You're supposed to wedge a chair under door HANDLES, which have to rotate down about 45 degrees to release the latch and open the door. The chair does approximately fuck all if your door has a KNOB, for obvious reasons.

Apparently this is boomer knowledge now.
 
A while ago, a polycule of troons was arrested for producing CP involving the 7 year old daughter of one of the members. Some of their social media accounts are still up and people are looking through them in this thread:


Here's some posts from one of the child abusers with a long internet footprint:

bj.pngbj.pngbj.pngbj.pngbj.pngbj.png
bj.png
bj.png

A few years before the arrest he was reblogging posts complaining about terfs calling transwomen male predators.
bj.png
 
Last edited:
View attachment 3257460

I know it sounds like a LARP but here's the archived post: https://archive.ph/DDmUc

This is the poor lady who still posts on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/user/FionaAtWork222
It fits with what happened back then at a friends party. He had this golden retriever who was an absolute lovely dog to be around. Then one of our buddies turned up couple hours later and the dog quietly sank the head down and trotted away.
She was actually scared of a guy she never saw and no matter how much our buddie tried that evening she never let her be touched by him.
Keep in mind this dog was member of the group „you’re a person trying to enter my home at 3 am? Let me welcome you by allowing to pet me without barking and alerting anyone.“
She never did this behavior with anyone else that’s why it was so memorable to us.

Well guess who trooned out couple years later? Guess who was a piece of shit and left his wife and two kids behind to pursue his retarded faggot ideas?
Dogs are too good for this world man.
 
.... I don't like the implication that in order to be gender non conforming you have to be queer.

You will accept the labels the ragtag collection of assorted perverts and degenerates tell you to, and you'll like it!

Welcome to the gay new world.

(For the incredibly autistic, see tagline)
 
Back