Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
View attachment 3261175View attachment 3261155 twitter
Hundreds of tranny lynchings now. Apparently.
View attachment 3261198 twitter
"Is a dog a cat?"
"No"
"You are literally advocating that dogs be removed from society"
View attachment 3261175View attachment 3261155 twitter
Hundreds of tranny lynchings now. Apparently.
View attachment 3261198 twitter
"Is a dog a cat?"
"No"
"You are literally advocating that dogs be removed from society"
I don't see how that's advocating they be removed from society, just that society refer to them as men, but I'm a cissy so who knows![]()
They are talking about this study. Which is weird because the "adaptations" roughly translate to "Do you get aroused when expecting a sexual encounter?" and not the troon style full on getting boners when wearing skirts
The latter is pervert behaviour
Both as mental as each other.I don't believe in Jesus, but damn! When did the xtians become the rational ones?
View attachment 3261095
ThIs iS tHe GaYbOrHoOd AnD yOu ArE nOt WeLcOmEREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!
talk about a truly progressive attitude
aw man I'm an autoautophile ): I can't take knowing I'm a disgusting fetishist, why did you do this to meIf you were to ask men if they would get horny picturing themselves in a sexual encounter, you would also find that the vast majority would say yes.
This is a safe place. Plz tell us more. For science, not for nefarious reasons.aw man I'm an autoautophile ): I can't take knowing I'm a disgusting fetishist, why did you do this to me
well sometimes I think about sleeping with my wife instead of thinking of someone else sleeping with her, I didn't realize this was part of a pattern of sexual deviancy on my part. I promise I'll do better.This is a safe place. Plz tell us more. For science, not for nefarious reasons.
This "argument" of theirs is a total red herring anyway. Even if there were actual women who were literal autogynephiles, they would still be women and men would still be men. The presence or absence of a paraphilia doesn't determine sex. Women with fetishes are women, men with fetishes are men.This study (besides being made on a sample of 51 women, so lol sample size), is also transparently trying to find a certain result. If you define autogynephilia incorrectly, leaving out the transformation aspect and adding in the idea of visualizing a sexual encounter, then 93% of women report getting horny while picturing sex in their own bodies! If you were to ask men if they would get horny picturing themselves in a sexual encounter, you would also find that the vast majority would say yes. It's disingenuous as fuck and speaks to the shoddy scholarship and deliberate faulty study designs pro-troon researchers depend on to reach their conclusions.
no, it’s a manView attachment 3261175View attachment 3261155 twitter
Hundreds of tranny lynchings now. Apparently.
(I Googled and nothing about lynchings came up. Hey ho)
View attachment 3261198 twitter
"Is a dog a cat?"
"No"
"You are literally advocating that dogs be removed from society"
He orgasmed in one of the dresses and laid down another one on top of a toilet. And then put them back on the shelf. A literal underaged girl is going to wear one of these dresses.You mean to tell me girls don't jizz themselves while wearing formal dresses and to the tactile sensation of silky/satiny fabrics? I don't believe you!:
View attachment 3260586
View attachment 3260588View attachment 3260589
View attachment 3260591
![]()
No, he has also posted multiple photos of him trying on wedding dresses (here, here) and also posts on wedding dress subreddits telling women how good they look (presumably while jerking off). One post he commented on like that had a child in it.Thankfully, I'm pretty sure this is a troll post. "OJ Didn't Do It" posting about cumming while trying on a 15 year olds dress is too on the nose.
This study (besides being made on a sample of 51 women, so lol sample size), is also transparently trying to find a certain result. If you define autogynephilia incorrectly, leaving out the transformation aspect and adding in the idea of visualizing a sexual encounter, then 93% of women report getting horny while picturing sex in their own bodies! If you were to ask men if they would get horny picturing themselves in a sexual encounter, you would also find that the vast majority would say yes. It's disingenuous as fuck and speaks to the shoddy scholarship and deliberate faulty study designs pro-troon researchers depend on to reach their conclusions.
Nah. He was just mimicking the barricade method of wedging a flimsy chair under the doorknob to somehow prevent the door from opening, as you'll frequently see in cartoons or movies, which are a much more reliable source of knowledge than silly patriarchal concepts like physics or biology.
I like how the chair just gently fell over, which is how I always expected this barricading tactic would work. Chair didn't give a shit.
It fits with what happened back then at a friends party. He had this golden retriever who was an absolute lovely dog to be around. Then one of our buddies turned up couple hours later and the dog quietly sank the head down and trotted away.View attachment 3257460
I know it sounds like a LARP but here's the archived post: https://archive.ph/DDmUc
This is the poor lady who still posts on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/user/FionaAtWork222
.... I don't like the implication that in order to be gender non conforming you have to be queer.
Help, my girlfriend won't let me express my explosive autism. What do I do?View attachment 3261882
man: I'm trans.
woman: No you're not.
man: Oh, ok.
edit to include this gem from Oli:
View attachment 3261896