The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

Not everyone on this site is a raging racist like you bro. Tho I agree it's weird how neither Gang Weeder nor Eris-Chan are all for it while they support deporting them to Africa.

Guess we'll never understand white ethno-nationalist fundamentalists.
If you can't see the difference between killing innocent babies and shipping out a race that never belonged here to begin with that accounts for most violent crime, then you just don't want to see it.

Not to say you can't disagree with shipping out the race of criminals, but there is a really big fucking difference, but you'll give this a thumbs down because your feelings dictate everything.

yea i agree. a fetus isn’t a child though and abortion isn’t murder
So a minute prior to birth the fetus wasn't a child? What significant biological structural change occured in the fetus' anatomy within that time which is so significant that it went from "not a child, suck its brains out" to "precious miracle, must protecc infant"?
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: Lurker
Bullshit paranoia, Christ taught not to force anyone,
fucking christians try to force their religion down people’s throats constantly. whether it be blaming someone’s life problems on a “lack of christ” or telling them to go to church or pray to fix all their problems. they will tell you to change your harmless lifestyle choices cause it’s “sinful” and you’ll go to hell for it and judge the shit you do.

a fuckton of pro birthers in this thread use religion to justify their insane points and talk about GOD’s PLAN!!! and why women should be forced to keep a pregnancy caus godjesus said so or whatever. this fucking holier-than-though mindset and attitude that christians have is annoying and they need to be knocked down a peg. stop fucking forcing your religion on everyon you talk to
 
fucking christians try to force their religion down people’s throats constantly. whether it be blaming someone’s life problems on a “lack of christ” or telling them to go to church or pray to fix all their problems. they will tell you to change your harmless lifestyle choices cause it’s “sinful” and you’ll go to hell for it and judge the shit you do.

a fuckton of pro birthers in this thread use religion to justify their insane points and talk about GOD’s PLAN!!! and why women should be forced to keep a pregnancy caus godjesus said so or whatever. this fucking holier-than-though mindset and attitude that christians have is annoying and they need to be knocked down a peg. stop fucking forcing your religion on everyon you talk to
no criticism/questions or else you'll burn in hell forever
 
"You can be unconscious and be murdered because the definition of murder has literally NOTHING to do with consciousness." This would also imply that when you kill a fetus, consciousness does not factor into it, and therefore it is still murder despite the victim lacking consciousness. So you sort of actually arrived at the correct answer, albeit completely unintentionally and in a really roundabout retarded way. Still, nice job.
“Murder is having the intent and action to take a person’s life”
P E R S O N
You should be arguing why a fetus should be seen as a person. But you’re still trying to prove a straw man argument, because you’re dense.
 
You might wanna run a check because, last time I checked, the founder, IE, the guys that wrote the constitution that determine what your rights are, expressly and in no uncertain terms said the following:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain anlienable Rights, that among thse are LIFE, liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness."

You have a right to live and be alive in this country. Every fucking law we have is in the spirit of perserving life until it proves itself unworthy of having life.

There is not a right to an abortion.
There is not a right to force your neighbors to have a vaccine mandate
The Fed is not allowed to pass laws preventing you from butt fucking your consensual neighbor

There's a shit load of stuff stupid niggers like yourselves think are rights but are not, and a shit load of stuff you think are rights and are not. If you ignorant niggers bothered to read once in your life, and if you're failing public school teachers would have taught you critical thinking at any point, the constitution is a pretty straight forward document, when combined with the Declaration of Independence that does a VERY good job of laying out what rights you have, what the Fed or State can do to you, and what their intent behind these documents is/was.
if the gov can't force you to have a vax, they sure as fuck can't force you to have a baby.
 
fucking christians try to force their religion down people’s throats constantly.
That's not true, but even if it was, the fact is they're not supposed to. Christians do all sorts of things they're not supposed to, but just because they do doesn't mean Jesus didn't teach not to do those things.

a fuckton of pro birthers in this thread use religion to justify their insane points
Really, mind pointing out a few who use religion as the crux of their arguments, then?
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: Lurker
That's not true, but even if it was, the fact is they're not supposed to. Christians do all sorts of things they're not supposed to, but just because they do doesn't mean Jesus didn't teach not to do those things.
then stop pushing your religion down our throats
Really, mind pointing out a few who use religion as the crux of their arguments, then?
almost all of the pro lifers in this thread.
 
You might wanna run a check because, last time I checked, the founder, IE, the guys that wrote the constitution that determine what your rights are, expressly and in no uncertain terms said the following:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain anlienable Rights, that among thse are LIFE, liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness."

You have a right to live and be alive in this country. Every fucking law we have is in the spirit of perserving life until it proves itself unworthy of having life.

There is not a right to an abortion.
There is not a right to force your neighbors to have a vaccine mandate
The Fed is not allowed to pass laws preventing you from butt fucking your consensual neighbor

There's a shit load of stuff stupid niggers like yourselves think are rights but are not, and a shit load of stuff you think are rights and are not. If you ignorant niggers bothered to read once in your life, and if you're failing public school teachers would have taught you critical thinking at any point, the constitution is a pretty straight forward document, when combined with the Declaration of Independence that does a VERY good job of laying out what rights you have, what the Fed or State can do to you, and what their intent behind these documents is/was.
You’re just like the other dimwit. Arguing points that I never made. Do you people lack reading comprehension? When did I say a right to life wasn’t a thing?
 
So a minute prior to birth the fetus wasn't a child?
you’re reaching here dude. i and many others disagree with abortions that late into a pregnancy. it becomes a child when it’s able to live outside the womb. i do believe abortions this late shouldn’t be allowed unless there’s deformities/complications, a woman who willingly is going to get an abortion should not have to wait that long to get one. aborting a 3 month pregnancy is not murder
 
That's not true, but even if it was, the fact is they're not supposed to. Christians do all sorts of things they're not supposed to, but just because they do doesn't mean Jesus didn't teach not to do those things.
it is true though. whether or not they’re supposed to a lot of them still do. i have met a range of christians, from the CHRIST IS KANG types to people who live by the bible as well as they can. and nearly all the ones i’ve met can’t stfu about what jesus would want ME to do
Really, mind pointing out a few who use religion as the crux of their arguments, then?
search the terms “god” “jesus” “church” “bible” in the thread lol. don’t feel like going through and quoting every fucking post
 
Empathy doesn't really factor into it when it's, y'know, total strangers either way.
that’s your problem though. you whine about the poor clumps of cells that’ll be aborted but don’t take a second to think about yourself being in the pregnant woman’s situation. you act like every woman’s reason for abortion is the same, if you did have empathy and took a moment to look at different women’s reasons, you’d be pro choice. but no, think about the poor fetus that will never have to go through the hardships that these women do
Obviously I think that growing human embryos (i.e. human beings) for the purpose of being studied in laboratories for a few days before gracelessly expiring is wrong and should be made illegal.
why? these experiments are beneficial to improving medical technology and our understanding of pregnancies (y’know, these studies are beneficial to helping women have safer pregnancies and less complications, seems like a good deal for pro-birthers). really it just goes to show that you don’t actually care about life if you think that even studying a 12 week old embryo should be illegal
go back to /pol/ you retard sperg
 
then stop pushing your religion down our throats
I'm not, you faggot retard

almost all of the pro lifers in this thread.
Prove it, faggot retard.

you’re reaching here dude. i and many others disagree with abortions that late into a pregnancy.
Not all do, so the only thing I can do is take someone at their word that a fetus is not a child.

it becomes a child when it’s able to live outside the womb.
So 200 years ago the children who couldn't survive outside the womb, which would've survived if born today thanks to advanced medical technology, weren't children? So our humanity is determined by technology's progress? Currently 21 weeks is the earliest a "fetus" can survive, which was not possible before. Tomorrow it may be 20 weeks, so is a child that isn't viable today not human until tomorrow?

So, that's dogshit reasoning, viability doesn't determine whether it's a child or not, why would it? Just because it is in an exceptionally vulnerable stage of development doesn't change what the subject in question is--a human.

Think about it: you're telling me that if technology advances to the point that we can determine viability down to the minute that you'll watch the baby on a screen with a timer, and if someone blends him just before he reaches "viability" you'll be okay with it? What if your clock was off? Oops, now it's a tragedy and a murder.

Absolutely arbitrary, point of viability is nonsense and is not set in stone, plus otherwise we can kill anyone who requires medical aid since they're no longer "viable". We can't grant and rescinded "personhood", it's an inherent trait we possess.

i do believe abortions this late shouldn’t be allowed unless there’s deformities/complications, a woman who willingly is going to get an abortion should not have to wait that long to get one. aborting a 3 month pregnancy is not murder
You're the same organism you are today that you were yesterday, and yesterday you were the same organism you were a decade ago, and a decade ago you were the same organism you were at birth, and at birth you were the same organism you were at 9 months in your mother's womb--at which point, unsurprisingly, you were the same organism you were 9 months prior, at conception.

There is no logical point of divergence that you can point to between the you of now and the you of then. Humans have inherent value, and the right to life, from their beginning. After so luckily being born and conveniently not scrambled, you simply decided that others, including yourself at some ambiguous point, have no value until your arbitrarily chosen criteria is met.

And regardless, if it's about "bodily autonomy " at 3 months then that applies at 9 months; either the excuse works or it doesn't, because the argument isn't about viability, it's "my body, my choice". By that logic the baby could even be fully removed but then smashed with a sledgehammer before the cord is cut and it'd be fine. It is, after all, still "her body" as it was just a moment prior.

it is true though. whether or not they’re supposed to a lot of them still do. i have met a range of christians, from the CHRIST IS KANG types to people who live by the bible as well as they can. and nearly all the ones i’ve met can’t stfu about what jesus would want ME to do
Certainly not my experience, outside of Mormons. Even if they won't shut up though, at worst it's mildly annoying, you'll live.

search the terms “god” “jesus” “church” “bible” in the thread lol. don’t feel like going through and quoting every fucking post
99% of the results will be HHH saying "bible thumper" and "megachurch" bro. Only Dude Weed made an argument from Christiaity, and he barely posted at all.

There's plenty of religious arguments in here though, but they're all from adherents to Wokeism.
 
Lol this thread is like moths to a flame for ErisChan

If you evangelical incels cared as much about living babies as you do fetuses, this world would be in a better spot. Instead you want to force women to give birth because you want to bring us back to the 1700s like most fundies, but once they're born you don't give a fuck about them because that requires sacrifice on your part and you'd rather be a slacktivist
I agree with a good amount of you’re points in this thread, though Christians are actually the most likely demographic to foster and adopt, at least in America.
In my mind though, adoption/fostering is a different argument than life vs choice, at least by my logic of what the argument boils down to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lily Says 41%!
I'm not, you faggot retard


Prove it, faggot retard.


Not all do, so the only thing I can do is take someone at their word that a fetus is not a child.


So 200 years ago the children who couldn't survive outside the womb, which would've survived if born today thanks to advanced medical technology, weren't children? So our humanity is determined by technology's progress? Currently 21 weeks is the earliest a "fetus" can survive, which was not possible before. Tomorrow it may be 20 weeks, so is a child that isn't viable today not human until tomorrow?
are you really this stupid?
yes, let's go by specific days. i was born on my birthday, not the day before nor the day after. when my or your date of birth comes up, whatever agency needs it doesn't give a damn about the day you were conceived nor the day before you were born. all that matters is the day you were born.
So, that's dogshit reasoning, viability doesn't determine whether it's a child or not, why would it? Just because it is in an exceptionally vulnerable stage of development doesn't change what the subject in question is--a human.
it isn't a human being until it develops consciousness
Think about it: you're telling me that if technology advances to the point that we can determine viability down to the minute that you'll watch the baby on a screen with a timer, and if someone blends him just before he reaches "viability" you'll be okay with it? What if your clock was off? Oops, now it's a tragedy and a murder.
what if what if what if.

nobody cares about your unrealistic hypotheticals.
Absolutely arbitrary, point of viability is nonsense and is not set in stone, plus otherwise we can kill anyone who requires medical aid since they're no longer "viable". We can't grant and rescinded "personhood", it's an inherent trait we possess.
physician assisted suicide is okay if the patient consents to it. fetuses can't consent nor are they capable of consenting.
You're the same organism you are today that you were yesterday, and yesterday you were the same organism you were a decade ago, and a decade ago you were the same organism you were at birth, and at birth you were the same organism you were at 9 months in your mother's womb--at which point, unsurprisingly, you were the same organism you were 9 months prior, at conception.
uh no? your brain doesn't stop developing until you're about 25 years old. and all the cells in my heart, limbs and most of my immune system are different than the cells that they consisted of 10 years ago.
There is no logical point of divergence that you can point to between the you of now and the you of then. Humans have inherent value, and the right to life, from their beginning. After so luckily being born and conveniently not scrambled, you simply decided that others, including yourself at some ambiguous point, have no value until your arbitrarily chosen criteria is met.
this is just blatantly false and stupid.
And regardless, if it's about "bodily autonomy " at 3 months then that applies at 9 months; either the excuse works or it doesn't, because the argument isn't about viability, it's "my body, my choice". By that logic the baby could even be fully removed but then smashed with a sledgehammer before the cord is cut and it'd be fine. It is, after all, still "her body" as it was just a moment prior.
no, we told you a million times that it's about consciousness and the ability to feel pain.
Certainly not my experience, outside of Mormons. Even if they won't shut up though, at worst it's mildly annoying, you'll live.
no. you are fanatics.
99% of the results will be HHH saying "bible thumper" and "megachurch" bro. Only Dude Weed made an argument from Christiaity, and he barely posted at all.
okay yallqaeda
There's plenty of religious arguments in here though, but they're all from adherents to Wokeism.
lol
 
viability doesn't determine whether it's a child or not,
yes it fucking does. a weird gooey period blood clot resembling fetus is NOT the same as an infant that doesn’t need to be in the womb to survive.
Think about it: you're telling me that if technology advances to the point that we can determine viability down to the minute that you'll watch the baby on a screen with a timer, and if someone blends him just before he reaches "viability" you'll be okay with it? What if your clock was off? Oops, now it's a tragedy and a murder.
you’re splitting hairs here. i’ve already said it’s irresponsible to have an abortion that late into a pregnancy. obv viability isn’t set in stone and varies (just like women’s reasons for having abortions!). you’re so autistic for using this extremely specific scenario to try to disprove my point
There is no logical point of divergence that you can point to between the you of now and the you of then.
since you love being literal, there is a difference. my body is not made of the same cells and blood it was 10 years ago, your body completely regenerates itself multiple times throughout your life. you’re retarded if you think you’re the same person now as you were when you were 4 years old
Humans have inherent value, and the right to life
a non viable fetus is not a human
 
@SSj_Ness it won't let me quote, but jesus christ you're autistic as fuck, Erischan. I ain't reading all that autistic babbling.

And yes, people do starve in America. Just because your megachurch pastor tells you otherwise doesn't make it true.

And no, this ruling is saying people don't have the right to bodily autonomy. That means they can force you to donate organs, too. Although it's ironic how you "MAH BODY MAH CHOICE" when it came to vaccines that can help protect people from a disease, but when it comes to forcing women to give birth, you think the government should control their bodies. You are literally arguing a corpse, which has bodily autonomy, has more rights than a woman. And then you get upset when people point out that you are an incel that hates women :story:

You keep saying you aren't a religious fundie, which is pretty hilarious given your views and belief in QAnon (like calling everyone who is pro choice a pedo). So let me ask you, do you belong to a church, Erischan?

you’re reaching here dude. i and many others disagree with abortions that late into a pregnancy. it becomes a child when it’s able to live outside the womb. i do believe abortions this late shouldn’t be allowed unless there’s deformities/complications, a woman who willingly is going to get an abortion should not have to wait that long to get one. aborting a 3 month pregnancy is not murder
It's a dumb argument, too, because no woman is going to carry a pregnant 8 months then just decide to abort it. An abortion that late is a life or death thing, but ErisChan thinks that the woman should die then because his megachurch pastor tells him godjesus said so
 
@SSj_Ness it won't let me quote, but jesus christ you're autistic as fuck, Erischan. I ain't reading all that autistic babbling.

And yes, people do starve in America. Just because your megachurch pastor tells you otherwise doesn't make it true.

And no, this ruling is saying people don't have the right to bodily autonomy. That means they can force you to donate organs, too. Although it's ironic how you "MAH BODY MAH CHOICE" when it came to vaccines that can help protect people from a disease, but when it comes to forcing women to give birth, you think the government should control their bodies. You are literally arguing a corpse, which has bodily autonomy, has more rights than a woman. And then you get upset when people point out that you are an incel that hates women :story:

You keep saying you aren't a religious fundie, which is pretty hilarious given your views and belief in QAnon (like calling everyone who is pro choice a pedo). So let me ask you, do you belong to a church, Erischan?
Well, the fundamental disagreement is that the prolife side believes the fetus isn’t the woman’s body, at least past a certain point, while the choice side believes it is the woman’s body.
 
Back