Then russian propaganda are comes to the same conclusion as independent observer, hurray to them.
Claims ignorance
Presents the "obvious"
Claims the obvious may have different interpretations
He've asked for summary of last pages in few words to avoid the autism, not the autism itself, you idiot...
About what specifically? It's true that there's legitimate grievances underlying the breakaway bullshit republics, but it's also true that most likely none of them exist today if Russia hadn't intervened, and in the case of Ukraine, Russian glowniggers were instrumental in stoking that resentment into an uprising in the first place. Ukraine and Moldova are both countries that would have sought closer alignment with the EU, so a genocide of Russian speakers isn't a realistic proposal. Their grievances could be solved internally, politically, there's nothing that is a major problem (outside of Russian sponsored horseshit, everything Russians claim "western NGOs" do, Russian glowies actually do x 100).
So tldr russians shouldnt intervene in interest of russians? What are you smoking? Should all nations abandon their people if they dont live inside their borders?
Objectively none of these interventions have been to the benefit of the people Russia sided with, and neither have they been to the benefit of the Russian people in Russia, since these regions cost a lot of money to maintain in this state.
Here's the big issue. Ukraine and Moldova have large Russian Speaking populations. A large, largely ethnic/culturally Russian or Russian connected population thriving in a largely democratic environment such as the EU poses huge political problems for Putin. In much the same way that Taiwan and to a lesser extent Hong Kong causes political problems for Xi. That Chinese culture thrives in a democracy causes people to ask "why can't we have that?". The existence of the independent democratic republics of Russian or Chinese heritage creates something to compare the authoritarian regimes to, and not in a flattering way.
Man drop this retarded “Russians in Ukraine are so free” bullshit. Nobody in Ukraine is “free” because Ukraine is a poverty-ridden shithole that everyone wants to leave.
Russian propaganda also uses anti-Russian sentiment that resulted from the Russian invasions/interventions to justify those interventions retroactively.
Black people make up 13% of the US population and everyone else thinks the entire country is just blacks. Likewise, Jews made up 10% of the Polish population and everyone seems to think every Pole's next door neighbor attends synagogue. The point is that the influence of such a percentage, both domestic and abroad, will be absolutely unmistakable if they remain.
Resettlement (people going back to their country after a war) isn't some exceptionally difficult thing to accomplish that's never been heard of before. Most people do it willingly in fact. You have 2 whole ass world wars showing refugees successfully resettle back to their countries of origin after a war. If you want more recent and more dramatic examples, you can look at Kosovo and Bosnia where well over 50% of the population was displaced and came back after the conflict (atleast the fighting) was resolved. Of course there's always a % that stays if they can help it but in Ukraines case it's gonna be a fraction of what is already a fraction of the population. Short of the country disappearing tomorrow, a demographic crisis is unlikely. For as much of a hohol-shill @Elbereth is he is right about that.Good luck, you're gonna need it
You were so close yet you failed at the last hurdle. With Crimea you at least had the excuse of the region going back and forth between Russia nd Ukraine, and there being some legitimate tension between the region and the general Ukie gooberment. This was not the case with the East of Ukraine. The eastern republics or provinces or whatever you want to call them exist purely out of the knee jerk react of Russia after losing one of it's major puppets. It has nothing to do with planning 7 moves ahead or 83D chess or whatever meme you decide to spew senselessly. Russia wanted to hold on to a crumb of influence so they backed whoever was willing to give them said influence.
This is also non-sensical, Transnitria is a relic of USSR meddling in the region, which funnily enough Moldova itself is a relic of USSRs meddling in the region, it's a relic of a relic. It has nothing to do with Russian's being considered second class citizens. The region simply refused a regime change because the region had a heap of USSR bases/troops and pro-USSR-administrators located in it, had a couple of skirmishes and has been completely dependent on Russia since.
There was no UN right after WW2 you idiot. The Allies got together and decided to have the trials as per the the Charter of the International Military Tribunal aka the Nuremberg Charter, same for the trial of Japanese war criminals, the Tokyo Charter.United nation is not court
Excuse me, but who do you think sentenced nazis after WWII? What organization states international law?
View attachment 3274265
Again, there was no United Nations after WW2. The UN does a lot of things but trying cases is not one of them, The ICC is in the Netherlands. A country has to be a signatory to the treaty establishing it in order to be subject to its jurisdiction and the USA famously (or infamously, depending on your take) refuses sign and to submit to its authority.
The UN came into being on 26 June 1945, and the UN Charter came into force on 24 October 1945.
Endorsed by the government (one way of getting rid of white supremacists)
So, right after the war was over. But not during. And the UN did not convene a court or tribunal. The ICC is separate from the UN, which may refer cases to it but it is a separate entity.
