This one is just brain melting. First of all, materialism is one type of metaphysics, Mao and Lenin opposed philosophical idealism. The notion of womanhood existing at all is a metaphysical, idealist argument. If you remove the construct of womanhood as a discreet category that exists on its own, all you're left with is a human population defined by sexual dimorphism and observable behavior differences. You can label one side of this divide women, but materialism would not assume that "womanhood" is something that can exist outside of the observed phenomena it describes.
Without some sort of dualist conception of human existence, antithetical to materialism, trans identities make no sense. A trans identity is at best a subordinate epiphenomenon that makes people think they are the opposite sex, but Lenin himself said that human senses are supposed to give you an accurate, correct representation of reality. There's literally no way to reconcile that with troonism.
I wanted to go to one growing up as a lgb kid in Cali, until my friends manage to get to the San Fran one. They described the state of the bathrooms/portapotties and said one of their (grossly overweight, either mentally disabled or just autistic) friends went to get publicly spanked/whipped (???), plus sunburn for the whole gang. Glad I avoided that mess. Can't imagine what it's like with troonery on top of those things nowadays. I'm sure it dominates the event.
Opposite-sex incest has a rather obvious argument for why it's wrong, but what of homosexual incest? Other than the religious angle, I can't think of why it might be wrong. Not that I think it's right, of course. My mind just can't form a proper reasoning, on this subject. Probably because I'd rather not think on it much.
People who shave their faces, bodies, etc, and people who work out are now trans. Any effort to transform your physical appearance to make yourself more attractive now places you in the category of trans. Of course, seeing things through their eyes, it all makes sense. Before the transition, they were all just filthy disgusting genderblobs who couldn't even bring themselves to shower due to the massive amounts of dysphoric seizures it causes. But now that they're taking care of themselves, self-care suddenly becomes 'gender-affirming practices.'
Maybe if trannies would stop having dogshit takes, they would be better accepted in general society.
Most likely. It's part of the reason I'd like to see one, but it's probably for the best that I can't/never will.
Opposite-sex incest has a rather obvious argument for why it's wrong, but what of homosexual incest? Other than the religious angle, I can't think of why it might be wrong. Not that I think it's right, of course. My mind just can't form a proper reasoning, on this subject. Probably because I'd rather not think on it much.
our society glorifies familial relationships to the point that when sexual abuse occurs between relatives, it’s very common for families to sweep it under the rug because it would bring shame to the family and potentially cause it to split apart as people who support the victim want nothing to do with the members who support the abuser or want to keep quiet about it. not only that, kids who grew up with abusive/neglectful parents, and who have every right to cut said parents off as adults, often may struggle with the choice on and off for many years until it’s too late, because we’re taught to believe family is always supposed to be there for and love one another no matter what, and it’s hard to completely let go of this belief.
when you consider this, how would we legally and definitively distinguish incestuous relationships between actual consenting adults and incestuous relationships where one half groomed the other half, using their familial relationship as leverage or to get access to their victim? how often do you think actual, legitimately consensual incestuous relationships happen, compared to incestuous relationships born from abuse?
it’s not just about inbred babies, it’s about not allowing abusers to victimize their family members and then get away with it. that’s why a lot of people still find sexual abuse from stepfamily to be almost if not just as insidious as bio family — it’s an abuse of the family dynamic all the same. and what happens when a kid is groomed from childhood to think incest is normal but their abuser keeps the relationship a secret until they can legally consent? i guarantee you that is the case in AT LEAST 99.9999% of cases where a parent/grandparent/aunt/uncle and their kid/grandkid/niece/nephew suddenly get together when the latter is an adult.
and you can’t just legalize it between family members within the same age group — full legalization would only become an eventuality at that point.
Opposite-sex incest has a rather obvious argument for why it's wrong, but what of homosexual incest? Other than the religious angle, I can't think of why it might be wrong. Not that I think it's right, of course. My mind just can't form a proper reasoning, on this subject. Probably because I'd rather not think on it much.
My reasoning has always been that okaying incest in any circumstances is a can of worms that can't be un-opened, and you have to draw the line somewhere. If you permit homosexual incest on the basis that it can't produce any disabled children, you're going to have people who argue that opposite-sex incestuous couples should be allowed to exist as long as they use contraception (unenforceable) or are forcibly sterilized (human rights violation).
So, I would say it's much neater to make it an all-or-nothing deal, especially because there are a whole host of other arguments against incest that could also apply to same-sex couples, like the power imbalance of family bonds - which is conducive to grooming and manipulation - or potential damage to the family structure as a result of the relationship. Overall, I would say that not every argument against incest is going to apply to every single situation, so the law should do its best to protect the vulnerable in a general sense, even if it means banning the mythical non-abusive incestuous gay couple. Of course, a troon wouldn't understand that, because his interest lies in getting his peepee hard at all costs, no matter who is harmed in the process.
This is transsexuality under another guise, if you think about it. Rather than focus on the problem at hand, more effort is placed on making psychotics and schizophrenics comfortable with their delusions and visions.
No. It's the exact opposite. The alternative to getting schizophrenics comfortable with the idea they have experiences that others don't is pumping them full of drugs that cause permanent involuntary facial movements, heart disease, metabolic syndrome, and are linked to premature death.
It's the same concept as getting people with gender dysphoria to accept the way they feel and have a good life despite it without undergoing hormone treatment and SRS.
Psychiatry and Psychology's approach to the trans issue gave us this very lovely thread. I'm not sure why you'd put so much faith in their approach to psychotic disorders. Pharma has made nearly 1 trillion dollars from atypical antipsychotics. Public health systems paid as much as $3k/patiet per month for pharmacological interventions that do not lead to significant improvement. Otherwise schizophrenia wouldn't still be a leading cause of disability and long term institutionalization among young people.
However, I've known a few men. I can't say that any of them ever were so terrified of getting a woman pregnant that a dude with an axe wound that smells and looks like a Lovecraftian horror seemed like a suitable alternative to the real thing, "Naomi".
No. It's the exact opposite. The alternative to getting schizophrenics comfortable with the idea they have experiences that others don't is pumping them full of drugs that cause permanent involuntary facial movements, heart disease, metabolic syndrome, and are linked to premature death.
It's the same concept as getting people with gender dysphoria to accept the way they feel and have a good life despite it without undergoing hormone treatment and SRS.
Psychiatry and Psychology's approach to the trans issue gave us this very lovely thread. I'm not sure why you'd put so much faith in their approach to psychotic disorders. Pharma has made nearly 1 trillion dollars from atypical antipsychotics. Public health systems paid as much as $3k/patiet per month for pharmacological interventions that do not lead to significant improvement. Otherwise schizophrenia wouldn't still be a leading cause of disability and long term institutionalization among young people.
You're somewhat correct, but not in a lot of ways, unfortunately. Not to PL too much, but given my own experiences with schizophrenia, and with those of people around me, you can't therapy your way out of it depending on how it effects you. Really intense episodes are full blown breaks in reality that are extremely dangerous for yourself and people around you, and medication, as horrible as anti-psychotics are, believe me, really do help mitigate the issues. The pharamaceutical machine abuses the fuck out of the mentally ill, but for anyone with major psychotic episodes, their poison is a necessity. Trannies and their 'dysphoria' are a realtively moderate psychosis at worst, but are usually closer to personality disorders which can be treated fairly thoroughly with therapy.
Crazy bitch on Reddit that is probably a Kindness in the future. Meet harlothex of reddit! "but call me Hex!"
She's been taking T since she was 18, is histrionic and demands attention. She identifies as a Transmac Nonbinary. Many of her posts get removed and many are cross-posted into other subreddits of varying topics. For example, she'll post something into "creative autists" and then go and post into another unrelated subreddit with the same pictures and posts. The girl demands attention, and it is likely her parents aren't giving it to her. So it is hard to verify how many things she claims is true or simply embellished.
Crazy shit she posted into r/CPTSD
One claim I can probably accept is that she's been abused, likely sexually. She gives quite a few of the signs that many do when they want to troon out and she has the self harm scars on her thighs and even tries to make light of it or ignore it; unless she can smell it giving her more attention or updoots.
Here is where she claims abuse from family friend and family
One of her hobbies for attention is to troll grindr users and provoke reactions to where they either want to fuck her, or tell her to go away because she's a woman. She presumably gets off on calling the gay men transphobic for not accepting her as a man.
She has an obsession with piercings and likes to talk about piercing her "dick" (as she prefers to call it) or tdick that keeps growing. She loves to show off her clit on reddit, including pictures of her wardrobe ensembles. I think she plans to pierce her clit in the future.
She claims she's a disabled FTM and even shows off a picture of a walker here, more than likely her parents paid for it but I'm not sure what she's suffering from to require it. It may just be an excuse to post more nudes.
She's aware of the effects of T, but I guess she wants those side effects, and likely doesn't know the long-term effects so she's gonna have a fun time in a few more years if she somehow survives the complications she may already be experiencing.
She's obsessed with a certain anime boy named Dabi. Best I can find of him is he's from an anime called My Hero Academia. It is probably her ideal guy since she cosplayed as him, here's some pics of it.
Here is her talking about her appendix removal which got removed a few times from other subreddits for being off-topic. She claims that surgery sucks and talks about multiple issues including crying in front of female nurses so she didn't feel as bad as it would've been to cry to a male nurse.
Even though the surgery sucked, it won't deter her from her master plan of getting an arm sausage dick so she can live out her futanari dreams. Here's her crude drawings she made recently and it kinda reminds me of elephant dick. She's been planning this for a while so I doubt even drawing this attention to her will sway her decision and I look forward to laughing at her pitiful results in the SRS Surgeon thread sooner or later.
The T has been going on a while since she's basically gone through another puberty and you can see the facial hair growth acne and aging speeding up here with that hairline. If you look at her pics that show off her belly you can see she has patches of hair growing on it.
I'm going to cut this off here because there's too much content here for a sideshow and I can barely stomach just this chunk of her.
" Doctor prescribed sex change drugs via private 'online GenderGp clinic' to seven transgender patients - including a child, just NINE, and a teen who later took their own life - without 'proper tests or consent' " DM article / archive
Him and his wife sound like grasping street-corner drug pushers. To call them shady is an understatement...she was/is(?) "suspended from practising as a doctor in Britain, after running an unlicensed clinic that treated hundreds of youngsters hoping to change their birth sex", prescribing meds without making a comprehensive physical or psychological assessments, she didn't have the adequate training, qualifications or experience to do so. She was fined, left devastated yet not devastated enough as she "moved" her tranny meds business to Spain where she and her "consultant" husband live and still operate their so called online business "helping" thousands of trannies.
Too much to go into in one post, suffice to say these two are doing everything they can to bypass UK's, medical, safety standards via a EU loophole which needs to be plugged asap. First step to stop this would be to stop honouring tranny med prescriptions that this clinic dishes out like smarties. If the trannies want to go on HRT etc then get the f2f diagnosis and treatment from a bona fide UK practising doctor, imo...if the procedure(s) and wait is too much, tough titty. Want the op and won't wait? then fund it yourself along with all the follow-ups, any medical interventions and meds met £ privately. Leave the NHS alone.
An older article on this gruesome twosome and their dubious shenanigans... DM article / archive
All the wife can say about it all is
No mention of her heart and soul going out to the young kid who had severe MH problems who committed suicide.
You're somewhat correct, but not in a lot of ways, unfortunately. Not to PL too much, but given my own experiences with schizophrenia, and with those of people around me, you can't therapy your way out of it depending on how it effects you. Really intense episodes are full blown breaks in reality that are extremely dangerous for yourself and people around you, and medication, as horrible as anti-psychotics are, believe me, really do help mitigate the issues. The pharamaceutical machine abuses the fuck out of the mentally ill, but for anyone with major psychotic episodes, their poison is a necessity. Trannies and their 'dysphoria' are a realtively moderate psychosis at worst, but are usually closer to personality disorders which can be treated fairly thoroughly with therapy.
I'm in no way saying all psychosis can be managed with talk therapy or lifestyle changes. I was critiquing comparing a movement that sought to reduce medical treatment and distress among people with mental illness (HVN) with a movement that seeks to maximize medical treatment and capitalize on distress (TRAs). The critique of medication was mostly that psychiatry spent a lot of money on treatments that were no better or more tolerated than older drugs. That money should have been spent on vocational and social rehabilitation. See the NIMH's CATIE study results for details.
Funny thing is, I think Dolezal was kinda unfairly treated. Like sure, she was a larping dumbass, but what did she do with her larp? Actually advocate for better treatment for blacks. She was actually a real activist with her local NAACP chapter.
When was the last time you can recall a troon advocating unselfishly for women's rights?
