The Tenacious Unicorn Ranch / @TenaciousRanch / Steampunk Penny / Penellope Logue / Phillip Matthew Logue - Don't cry because it ended, laugh because it's still getting worse.

[Oxyjen]

I think that’s why he’s floating the idea of charging them rent. It’s a threat to make life difficult unless they pay him off. And again, it’s another hint that they’ve suddenly got money from somewhere - there would be no point in Bonnie saying this unless he thinks they can actually pay. Finding out they are solvent and not about to collapse may be what’s causing him the most upset.

Thing is, I think Penny is exactly the type to call his bluff and burn everything down rather than give him the satisfaction.

Shit is going to get interesting.

 

[Winnie the Poohnani]

Will They skin him and get one of Kev’s furry suit makers to make a Troon suit out of his hide?

Correction: Two, maybe two-and-a-half Troon suits. Mandozer is one fat fuck, is what I'm sayin'.

 

[Ultrapenguin]

Can't wait for this fight
View attachment 3298427
Link | Archive

I'll give them this: they sure have the insufferable passive aggression of a woman.

 

[HackerX]

Can't wait for this fight
View attachment 3298427
Link | Archive

I think Bonnie is making a massive mistake by threatening them with a signed lease.

I imagine he's eyeing property value, and to be fair, there's a nice chunk of change in selling, even on the lower end of estimates. HOWEVER, the status quo is not only easier but requires nothing out of pocket (from him) and doesn't require the complications and hassle of selling a house in the first place. This isn't even including the aspects of the 2 others on the mortgage.

This is the scenario I see playing out:

I expect the remaining Tranchers to just bail if Bonnie puts out a contract, after the maximum amount of time before eviction, of course. Oh, and he'll have to deal with the hassle of evicting people.

So after they bail, then momma Nelson, Sky, and Bonnie must come to some form of agreement on selling, which I assume Bonnie will make that process as complicated as possible.

After that, then is the fun process of finding a real estate agent that will sell the house. That’s the easy part. The hard part is that the agent is going to want many of the issues fixed, replaced, renovated, etc. (I don’t even know how they handle the arid wasteland in this aspect?) Either way, that cost $$$$$. Obviously, they don’t HAVE to do improvements, but it obviously makes the property desirable to potential buyers.

It looks like the time it was listed previously ranged from 2-3 years. (Not 100% on this but looks that way) There’s no way they can afford no tenants for 2-3 years, much less 2-3 months. Either way, that’s money Bonnie and Sky don’t have, so hopefully, Mama Nelson has it covered.

Obviously, they can’t do any of this since it requires a modicum of effort. So the most likely course of action is the DSP route and ignore the mortgage until the bank takes them to court. He “could” find new tenants and continue renting out, but many of the same issues apply that he simply doesn’t have to deal with the current tranny tenants.

End Result, either status quo and hopefully build more equity with little to no effort OR bank is gonna take it back because of missed payments.

 

[Ghostse]

Can't wait for this fight
View attachment 3298427
Link | Archive

You either die by 41%ng yourself, or you live long enough to become Earl.

Boner coming to get his shit. An armed troon going against a house of heavily armed, paranoid, and surly troons. Local news needs to start watching the place.

 

[Oxyjen]

You either die by 41%ng yourself, or you live long enough to become Earl.

Boner coming to get his shit. An armed troon going against a house of heavily armed, paranoid, and surly troons. Local news needs to start watching the place.

Better get the kiwi drones charged and hidden around the perimeter again.

 

[White Peach]

If Bonnie is smart she would make sure the Tranch complies to the letter of the law and the HOA bylaws. Treat them as renters in violation and Sky can’t do shit about it unless they come into compliance.

 

[DemonicMustache]

Not one of these fools is smart.

 

[retard strength]

Very transphobic of Fat Paul to threaten rent payments from unhoused transsisters just trying to survive the transgenocide out in MAGA country. Where's the solidarity you landlord bigot nazi???

 

[AnOminous]

Very transphobic of Fat Paul to threaten rent payments from unhoused transsisters just trying to survive the transgenocide out in MAGA country. Where's the solidarity you landlord bigot nazi???

Is this MAN claiming to own PROPERTY? Doesn't he know that property is theft? They would be completely justified in going all Butch Cassidy & the Sundance Kid finale on him if he dares to show up and demand his fictional "property" like the capitalist pig monster cishet motherfucker he is.

He went Judas after a mere taste of crazy pussy.

Can the other troons hold out?

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

I think Bonnie is making a massive mistake by threatening them with a signed lease.

I imagine he's eyeing property value, and to be fair, there's a nice chunk of change in selling, even on the lower end of estimates. HOWEVER, the status quo is not only easier but requires nothing out of pocket (from him) and doesn't require the complications and hassle of selling a house in the first place. This isn't even including the aspects of the 2 others on the mortgage.

This is the scenario I see playing out:

I expect the remaining Tranchers to just bail if Bonnie puts out a contract, after the maximum amount of time before eviction, of course. Oh, and he'll have to deal with the hassle of evicting people.

So after they bail, then momma Nelson, Sky, and Bonnie must come to some form of agreement on selling, which I assume Bonnie will make that process as complicated as possible.

After that, then is the fun process of finding a real estate agent that will sell the house. That’s the easy part. The hard part is that the agent is going to want many of the issues fixed, replaced, renovated, etc. (I don’t even know how they handle the arid wasteland in this aspect?) Either way, that cost $$$$$. Obviously, they don’t HAVE to do improvements, but it obviously makes the property desirable to potential buyers.

It looks like the time it was listed previously ranged from 2-3 years. (Not 100% on this but looks that way) There’s no way they can afford no tenants for 2-3 years, much less 2-3 months. Either way, that’s money Bonnie and Sky don’t have, so hopefully, Mama Nelson has it covered.

Obviously, they can’t do any of this since it requires a modicum of effort. So the most likely course of action is the DSP route and ignore the mortgage until the bank takes them to court. He “could” find new tenants and continue renting out, but many of the same issues apply that he simply doesn’t have to deal with the current tranny tenants.

End Result, either status quo and hopefully build more equity with little to no effort OR bank is gonna take it back because of missed payments.

More likely, every trancher is going to bail, abandoning the tranch and the animals. Much as I would love to see a final shootout, or even a legal slapfight, I don't see them confronting each other. These men, fundamentally, are cowards.

 

[HackerX]

More likely, every trancher is going to bail, abandoning the tranch and the animals. Much as I would love to see a final shootout, or even a legal slapfight, I don't see them confronting each other. These men, fundamentally, are cowards.

The animals are the reason I think they haven't abandoned the tranch already.

The only options that are feasible are to either give the Alpacas away in small amounts at a time (because they fucked up big in taking that original llama donation) OR just bailing. And I highly doubt their genuine love for the animals outweighs the amount of spoons needed to put in the effort of finding 30-50 different takers for them.

Although, I do think it'd be hilarious if Penny and squad bail, forcing Paul to be the only one responsible for the Alpacas. They'd still be fucked, but it'd be funnier.

 

[kaien]

More likely, every trancher is going to bail, abandoning the tranch and the animals. Much as I would love to see a final shootout, or even a legal slapfight, I don't see them confronting each other. These men, fundamentally, are cowards.

It's true. The great troonican standoff, with Phil and Bono pointing their gaily painted meme guns at each other, will have to live only in my imagination.

Really, the status quo is still giving Pablo the best deal he's ever going to get. As long as the tranchers pay the mortage every month they're functionally handing their money right to him. It's not like he could enforce the terms of any lease he made them sign, if they were even willing to sign it, and I strongly doubt that. Trying to squeeze more blood from Phil's nonexistent balls is not a winning strategy.

We can hope that he will do something stupid to amuse us, but I'm gonna guess he drives out to the tranch, grabs his kipple, and drives back home to change Alyssa's diaper without incident.

 

[Bob_]

TRANCH APOCALYPSE 2022

Holy fuck it is actually happening

 

[lamp shade]

TRANCH APOCALYPSE 2022

Holy fuck it is actually happening

Nothing is happening. Paul’s just bitching like always.

 

[AGPinochet]

Correction: Two, maybe two-and-a-half Troon suits. Mandozer is one fat fuck, is what I'm sayin'.

Three or four if the suits are for the Loathsome Dung Eater


It is also very appropriate for the Tranch to collapse during The Year Of The Chud

 

[AnOminous]

Although, I do think it'd be hilarious if Penny and squad bail, forcing Paul to be the only one responsible for the Alpacas. They'd still be fucked, but it'd be funnier.

Section 18-9-202 reads that:

(1) (a) A person commits cruelty to animals if he or she knowingly, recklessly, or with criminal negligence overdrives, overloads, overworks, torments, deprives of necessary sustenance, unnecessarily or cruelly beats, allows to be housed in a manner that results in chronic or repeated serious physical harm, carries or confines in or upon any vehicles in a cruel or reckless manner, engages in a sexual act with an animal, or otherwise mistreats or neglects any animal, or causes or procures it to be done, or, having the charge or custody of any animal, fails to provide it with proper food, drink, or protection from the weather consistent with the species, breed, and type of animal involved, or abandons an animal. (b) Any person who intentionally abandons a dog or cat commits the offense of cruelty to animals.

 

[Boris Blank's glass eye]

Section 18-9-202 reads that:

Are these laws being enforced strictly enough?

IME everyone talks big about animal cruelty and there's public outcry every time a high profile animal cruelty case happens - cranky old woman dragging her dog behind her car for 15 kilometers straight or backyard breeders caught doing something real fucking fucked up - but they usually get away with extremely lenient sentences: six months of jail suspended for two-three years and/or paying a fine of up to €1000.

I'm fairly certain all of them aren't using their legal names publicly either.

 

[Coccxys]

Are these laws being enforced strictly enough?

IME everyone talks big about animal cruelty and there's public outcry every time a high profile animal cruelty case happens - cranky old woman dragging her dog behind her car for 15 kilometers straight or backyard breeders caught doing something real fucking fucked up - but they usually get away with extremely lenient sentences: six months of jail suspended for two-three years and/or paying a fine of up to €1000.

I'm fairly certain all of them aren't using their legal names publicly either.

It's handled by the town sherif who has much, much bigger things to care about than a bunch of mentally ill gun toating uwu women neglecting a few (financially) worthless fad animals. Even if he didn't the risk calculus of rocking up to the tranch in a cop car to dicuss their various transgressions doesn't weigh in favour of doing it.

I've posited before that the dry wall project is actually the tranch collapse fall back plan. Though if that is the case penny has more sense than we credit him with using the last of the cash to set up the nect venture.

 

[Ghostse]

Are these laws being enforced strictly enough?

IME everyone talks big about animal cruelty and there's public outcry every time a high profile animal cruelty case happens - cranky old woman dragging her dog behind her car for 15 kilometers straight or backyard breeders caught doing something real fucking fucked up - but they usually get away with extremely lenient sentences: six months of jail suspended for two-three years and/or paying a fine of up to €1000.

I'm fairly certain all of them aren't using their legal names publicly either.

I am going to try to make this sucinct as possible, so I'm going to type and then edit it like Kreuger so appologies if theres some rapid train of thought track switches and maybe context that got dropped:
There are different rules for 'stock' animals and for pets. Sheriffs via DAs (via lobbies) are discouraged from all but most aggregious stock animal welfare cases for two reasons.
Firstly, doing it opens the door for PETA crazies to start calling about the KFC chicken farm ten times every hour. Second, the animals seized/processed are not likely to see a better outcome - they most likely just see the slaughter house early. (Also as these are economic assets, there is a case of income loss/civil case to be had. Even if he local department prevails, the suite eats resources and the plaintiff is likely to be judgement proof.)
In cases where it is really fucking bad, the Sheriff usually just applies threats and connections to get the abusers to sell the animals (to another farmer or the meat processor) or turn them over to a rescue by threats of seizure.

Horses are the only kinda exception to this rule since in the US they are practically pets, and there are crazy horse people who get really uppity about horse treatment.

anyway, let me apply my experiences in another state to the tranch.
The Tranchers have rescue Alpaca - alpaca already abandoned or turned over. These Alpaca have no where to go. They are starving but not OBVIOUSLY in agony. The rescue should be checking up on them, but for "novelty" livestock like Alpaca... no one cares. Resources are scarce and disproportionately go to horses - likely why the Tranch hosted that rescue horse for a while, trying to get in on the equine grift. So the rescue gives the tranch their free hay and just pretends they are getting taken care of correctly. Sort of like the foster-care system. Even if south-american specializing vet Dr. Joseph L. Camelidlover was elected sheriff of Tranch County, the usual thing that happens is just an admonishment.

Again, Kiwis have done autistic analysis to show the alpaca are starving. The Sheriff, who is not a trained vet, will roll up and see animals that aren't obviously bleeding or diseased, then shrug and say "Looks fine to me, case closed". The Rescue doesn't want to deal with trying to rehome 100+ alpaca so the most they might do is stop sending fresh ones the Tranch's way; the ones that are currently inside Alpacaschwitz, their fate is already sealed.

unless the tranchers start physically abusing the animals to the point of leaving obviously injured animals, they will keep getting away with it.


anyway, tl;dr
Animal welfare for stock animals is a bitch. Tranch alpaca grift will continue. The ovens at Alpacaschwitz will run day an night. Or rather they would but the Tranchers will probably run out of propane.