Careercow Taylor Lorenz - Crybully "journalist", self-appointed Internet Hall Monitor, professional victim, stalks teenagers for e-clout

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
>facts get drowned by lies
>when free speech becomes propaganda it becomes problematic
>free speech is not for everyone

Sounds like this person believes free speech should be a privilege, one you lose when you are caught lying about something or pushing a false narrative. I wonder how he reconciles this buttfuck retarded belief with Taylor's countless half-truths and lies?

Also I think it's safe to say at this point that the LibsOfTikTok fiasco inadvertently revealed one of TPTB's main attack dogs before they were fully within the swing of their hitpiece-work. With the amount that bugman talking heads have been pointing all their followers to Taylor's articles (and the amount that Taylor has focused on targeting whatever it is that the right is doing, be it good or bad), it's clear that she's made the full transition from anti-YouTuber smear merchant to "you work for us now" establishment robot.
None of these idiots ask themselves why did the Biden Administration go to the "social media reporter" for the Washington Post to give her the scoop on how they were canning the Disinformation Board and the dummy they hired to lead it along with a list of a bunch of people in the Disinformation Industry to quote about how horrible it is that the Biden Administration gave into "right-wing" disinformation.
 
A little off topic, but I think it's worth sharing with the thread: this article (also posted here by @Meat Target) is a good deconstruction of the new disinformation discourse that Taylor is helping spearhead.

It's looking like the next election season is going to be characterized by arguments over what inconvenient hate-facts are and aren't "disinformation", and I have no doubt that Taylor is going to play a large part in that (assuming nothing drastic happens between then and now). I'm just getting so fucking tired of these lizard people trying to destroy our rights and destroy the free and open Internet. Fuck these "people."
 
Last edited:
A little off topic, but I think it's worth sharing with the thread: this article (also posted here by @Meat Target) is a good deconstruction of the new disinformation discourse that Taylor is helping spearhead.

It's looking like the next election season is going to be characterized by arguments over what inconvenient hate-facts are and aren't "disinformation", and I have no doubt that Taylor is going to play a large part in that (assuming nothing drastic happens between then and now). I'm just getting so fucking tired of these lizard people trying to destroy our rights and destroy the free and open Internet. Fuck these "people."
Glenn Greenwald also has an article about MSNBC's Nicole Wallace, whom he dubs "the Typhoid Mary of Disinformation".
 
Taylor's jumping into the Trial of the Century:
View attachment 3303386View attachment 3303405
View attachment 3303389

Ryan Broderick is the guy who got fired from Buzzfeed for plagiarism and making up sources in a bunch of articles. IIRC, he's never apologized.

A fan:
View attachment 3303396
Screenshot_20220521-021138_Chrome~2.jpg
Screenshot_20220521-021010_Chrome~2.jpg
Dios mio
su mama lo dejo cayer en la cabeza
 
"The Daily Wire Spent Thousands of Dollars Promoting Anti-Amber Heard Propaganda"

I like how this bitch thinks that journalism is just pointing out her old, chubby finger at things she doesn't like and scream "BAD! BAD! THEY ARE BAD!" I dunno if she wrote this, but even if she didn't, it does have her style.

"The DW paid for advertising supporting Johnny Depp"

There, a completely neutral headline that says exactly what it says in the article.
 
I can understand the whole playing-devil's-advocate-during-a-massive-online-movement thing. The wing of the commentary community that I follow has done it multiple times - focusing on Chris Hansen during the Onision drama, for example - but this new wave of criticism towards Johnny / the people online being critical of Amber just comes across as... not that? Especially when cunts like Taylor are attaching a whole bunch of unrelated political shit to it. And I have no idea why ContraPonts had to liken the situation to GamerGate lmao
contra.jpg
 
I like how this bitch thinks that journalism is just pointing out her old, chubby finger at things she doesn't like and scream "BAD! BAD! THEY ARE BAD!" I dunno if she wrote this, but even if she didn't, it does have her style.
It's literal projection.


In a carefully orchestrated operation, extensive documentation of which I’ve detailed on Substack, we now know from testimony and email evidence that the communications, “development,” “artist engagement,” and legal teams of the ACLU crafted, wrote, lawyered, and placed the salacious 765-word Washington Post “op-ed” that implied Depp was a wife-beater with a 26-word assertion: “two years ago, I became a public figure representing domestic abuse, and I felt the full force of our culture’s wrath for women who speak out.”

“The ACLU was a co-conspirator with Ms. Heard,” Depp’s attorney, Ben Chew, said during his arguments on Tuesday. “Of course, Mr. Depp chose not to sue them,” responded Heard’s lawyer, Benjamin Rottenborn. Heard’s and Depp’s PR firms didn’t comment further. The ACLU and Washington Post didn’t return several requests for comment.

‘Amber’s Ad’

Two slips-of-the-tongue during the recorded deposition of ACLU Chief Operating Officer Terence Dougherty shared in court reveal exactly how the ACLU and the Washington Post were complicit in a hit job against Depp.

In the first Freudian slip, 14:30:51 into his deposition, Dougherty explained that emails in Exhibit 41 documented ACLU staffers from its fundraising “development” department discussing “the placement of Amber’s ad…”

He quickly tried to correct himself: “Not ad. Sorry. I mean op-ed.”

No, he said it: “the placement of Amber’s ad.”

That’s what the “op-ed” was: “earned media,” as they call it in the media industry, for the ACLU, Heard, and the release of the Warner Bros. film, “Aquaman.”

Then, in the second slip, at 14:40:35 in his deposition, Dougherty explained how Stacy Sullivan, deputy director of editorial and strategic communications at the ACLU from September 2014 through October 2019, according to her LinkedIn account, emailed Michael Larabee, the Post’s op-ed editor and top boss in the opinions section, then Larabee’s colleagues Michael Duffy and Mark Lasswell when she got an automatic out-of-office reply from Larabee.

In the second slip, Dougherty said about Sullivan: “She reached out to him first about placing the ad” from Heard. This time, he didn’t even correct himself.

Phase 1: Building Credibility

Everyone involved in this situation used Depp’s cachet for private gain. The ACLU used Heard’s relationship with Depp to win “earned media,” which is much more lucrative and trustworthy than a paid advertisement. The Washington Post sold newspapers and got clicks. The ACLU got a donation. Heard earned status as a women’s rights activist.

In my 35 years of professional journalism, the last 20 of them writing op-eds, I have never before witnessed a more explicit example of deception.
 
Gamergate is when women decide to be evil whores and we expose it.

It's obviously all of our fault for exposing it.


I'm joking here, but abusers often claim to be the victims when their abuse is exposed and they blame the real victim for it. "It's your fault for crying. If you hadn't cried, nobody would have known!" The victim is so terrorised by them that they take it personal and indeed, blame themselves and see themselves as the wrongdoers here. No wonder they all side with Amber Heard.
 
It's literal projection.


In a carefully orchestrated operation, extensive documentation of which I’ve detailed on Substack, we now know from testimony and email evidence that the communications, “development,” “artist engagement,” and legal teams of the ACLU crafted, wrote, lawyered, and placed the salacious 765-word Washington Post “op-ed” that implied Depp was a wife-beater with a 26-word assertion: “two years ago, I became a public figure representing domestic abuse, and I felt the full force of our culture’s wrath for women who speak out.”

“The ACLU was a co-conspirator with Ms. Heard,” Depp’s attorney, Ben Chew, said during his arguments on Tuesday. “Of course, Mr. Depp chose not to sue them,” responded Heard’s lawyer, Benjamin Rottenborn. Heard’s and Depp’s PR firms didn’t comment further. The ACLU and Washington Post didn’t return several requests for comment.

‘Amber’s Ad’

Two slips-of-the-tongue during the recorded deposition of ACLU Chief Operating Officer Terence Dougherty shared in court reveal exactly how the ACLU and the Washington Post were complicit in a hit job against Depp.

In the first Freudian slip, 14:30:51 into his deposition, Dougherty explained that emails in Exhibit 41 documented ACLU staffers from its fundraising “development” department discussing “the placement of Amber’s ad…”

He quickly tried to correct himself: “Not ad. Sorry. I mean op-ed.”

No, he said it: “the placement of Amber’s ad.”

That’s what the “op-ed” was: “earned media,” as they call it in the media industry, for the ACLU, Heard, and the release of the Warner Bros. film, “Aquaman.”

Then, in the second slip, at 14:40:35 in his deposition, Dougherty explained how Stacy Sullivan, deputy director of editorial and strategic communications at the ACLU from September 2014 through October 2019, according to her LinkedIn account, emailed Michael Larabee, the Post’s op-ed editor and top boss in the opinions section, then Larabee’s colleagues Michael Duffy and Mark Lasswell when she got an automatic out-of-office reply from Larabee.

In the second slip, Dougherty said about Sullivan: “She reached out to him first about placing the ad” from Heard. This time, he didn’t even correct himself.

Phase 1: Building Credibility

Everyone involved in this situation used Depp’s cachet for private gain. The ACLU used Heard’s relationship with Depp to win “earned media,” which is much more lucrative and trustworthy than a paid advertisement. The Washington Post sold newspapers and got clicks. The ACLU got a donation. Heard earned status as a women’s rights activist.

In my 35 years of professional journalism, the last 20 of them writing op-eds, I have never before witnessed a more explicit example of deception.
Ah, so this entire situation, "from the top on down", is the result of ACLU fuckery. They wanted another GamerGate, and are now pitching a fit that it's falling apart and their enemies are reaping the benefits.

"WHY ARE PEOPLE BEING PUSHED TO THE RIGHT!?" they shout as they push people to the right. Just amazing.

Archive of the Federalist article: https://archive.ph/VMVLp
 
"WHY ARE PEOPLE BEING PUSHED TO THE RIGHT!?" they shout as they push people to the right. Just amazing.
It's definitely their own wrongdoing because this was never meant to be political nor should have been at least this way. I've met many progressives and feminists who hate female abusers the same as they hate male abusers. They know this is wrong and this is a subject most people would have almost universally agreed on.

They went for the lower denominator to make it a women vs men affair and only the most rabid and narcissistic feminists are on their side, sperging because the rest of the world can recognise and despise an abuser.
 
Well, at least she's sticking to her "air conditioners are racist/evil" guns. 87 degrees, Jesus.

View attachment 3295303

"Coordinated online attacks".

Just like LoTT, reposting their own uploads in their own words is ATTACKING.

ETA: more sperging.

View attachment 3295769
View attachment 3295770
View attachment 3295772View attachment 3295771
"vulnerable targets" like a woman put in charge of an entirely new wing of government?
They are not vulnerable targets, they are vulnerable narcissists using their chronic victimhood mantle to shield against any hit to their self-image.

I can understand the whole playing-devil's-advocate-during-a-massive-online-movement thing. The wing of the commentary community that I follow has done it multiple times - focusing on Chris Hansen during the Onision drama, for example - but this new wave of criticism towards Johnny / the people online being critical of Amber just comes across as... not that? Especially when cunts like Taylor are attaching a whole bunch of unrelated political shit to it. And I have no idea why ContraPonts had to liken the situation to GamerGate lmao
View attachment 3305490
They showed their hand by going for "the far right" as the boogeymen instead of just commonplace sexism. That, at least, would have some semblance of sense, at least for people who haven't been watching the trial and don't know how ludicrous Amber's story has been.
 
I can understand the whole playing-devil's-advocate-during-a-massive-online-movement thing. The wing of the commentary community that I follow has done it multiple times - focusing on Chris Hansen during the Onision drama, for example - but this new wave of criticism towards Johnny / the people online being critical of Amber just comes across as... not that? Especially when cunts like Taylor are attaching a whole bunch of unrelated political shit to it. And I have no idea why ContraPonts had to liken the situation to GamerGate lmao
View attachment 3305490
I posted in A&N the Vox article that Taylor boosted (but wisely prevented replies to), the well known idiot author compared the Depp/Heard trial to "Gamergate times tens of millions" and said we'll never recover from it unlike Gamergate: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/why-the-depp-heard-trial-is-so-much-worse-than-you-realize.119457/
 
I posted in A&N the Vox article that Taylor boosted (but wisely prevented replies to), the well known idiot author compared the Depp/Heard trial to "Gamergate times tens of millions" and said we'll never recover from it unlike Gamergate: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/why-the-depp-heard-trial-is-so-much-worse-than-you-realize.119457/
This is the first time a thread has shaken my faith in humanity. This is the most retarded thing I've ever read. I'm actually getting depressed, holy shit.
 
Just a quick update.

The guy stalking Taylor (Malek Karim) deleted his apology video, and renamed the secondary account it was posted to.

Secondary account was @malekkarim67 - Archived
Changed to @grandtourstan and deleted the Apology video - Archived
Found via his main TikTok - Archived

His corresponding freshly created Twitter is almost completely dedicated to responding and @ing Taylor - Archived
1653302828426.png

1653301222427.png

1653302707096.png


He also just posted a video on TikTok on "how to fact check" Tweets via the birdwatch app, which, although off topic seemed interesting enough to share. - Archived

Essentially it's;
Find tweet you dislike, Google what you hope is an existing counter point, read headline only, not byline or the actual article, disregard that you may be misrepresenting the articles take, link it as "eViDeNce", profit.

 
Last edited:
Why is it so hard for partisans to admit they like doing shit for laughs? It's the common solution to the hypocrisy problem for which we find ourselves posting here. These retards argue constantly about how their doxxing is righteous and the doxxing of their enemies is dangerous to democracy. Why can't they just stop being cunts and admit they like doing it because it's funny and enjoyable and they like when the blue bird app blows up their phone with notifications?

View attachment 3212219
Because they unironically see themselves as some kind of savior and not just for keks and lulz.
 
Back