Careercow Taylor Lorenz - Crybully "journalist", self-appointed Internet Hall Monitor, professional victim, stalks teenagers for e-clout

[thismanlies]

This is incredible and out of everything possible with this thot I never would've thought she would've fabricated something so painfully easy to debunk. So what's the over/under on absolutely nothing happening to her blatantly lying and shitty reporting? How blown out will her asshole be for her to keep her job?

Journalism is a profession made by lying sociopaths for lying sociopaths. If anything she's overqualified to work at the Washington Post.

 

[Trianon]

They have now corrected this story a bunch and keep compounding the lies.

After Alyte (@LegalBytes) said she wasn't contacted via email, the WaPo made a note saying she was contacted through Instagram. But she wasn't.







"In a statement to Fox News, [Alyte] Mazeika said the incident 'appears to be a microcosmic example of bigger issues going on in mass media these days' which is 'the reason why I was attracted to live-streaming every minute' of the Depp-Heard trial."

YouTuber says WaPo correction on Taylor Lorenz story claiming contact on Instagram before publication is false

The Washington Post appeared to make an erroneous claim in its correction that columnist Taylor Lorenz attempted to contact one of the YouTubers in her story prior to publication.

www.foxnews.com

A well-earned drag video from @ThatUmbrellaGuy

 

[A1 Steak Sauce]

This is a massive pile of bullshit. WaPo doesn’t give a shit about integrity, they just don’t want bad press. The line about a miscommunication with the editor is definitely cap and is just something that’s unverifiable to the public and doesn’t give blame to one person so it can be used as an excuse. Taylor is also not a good journalist.
(A)

(A)

Woe is Taylor, evil right wingers are targeting her.
(A)
(A)

This is more of the thread quoted above. Whataboutism at its finest.

This is just funny to me.
(A)

Doesn’t Taylor limit replies a ton?
(A)

It’s never her fault.
(A)

(A)

 

[Dean Pentel]

They have now corrected this story a bunch and keep compounding the lies.

After Alyte (@LegalBytes) said she wasn't contacted via email, the WaPo made a note saying she was contacted through Instagram. But she wasn't.

View attachment 3353401
View attachment 3353404
View attachment 3353409
View attachment 3353407
View attachment 3353430

"In a statement to Fox News, [Alyte] Mazeika said the incident 'appears to be a microcosmic example of bigger issues going on in mass media these days' which is 'the reason why I was attracted to live-streaming every minute' of the Depp-Heard trial."

YouTuber says WaPo correction on Taylor Lorenz story claiming contact on Instagram before publication is false

The Washington Post appeared to make an erroneous claim in its correction that columnist Taylor Lorenz attempted to contact one of the YouTubers in her story prior to publication.

www.foxnews.com

A well-earned drag video from @ThatUmbrellaGuy

If That Inbred Child Pimp can dunk on you, you're a real piece of shit.

 

[Next Task]

It's never her fault.

Noticeable, isn't it. Just like Amber Heard, who would have won if she didn't insist on portraying herself as a complete innocent, victim of a vast conspiracy.

I'd bet psychologically they're very, very similar. Especially in the Cluster B/Dark Triad areas.

 

[An Sionnach Seang]

how long will it be before the UN invites her to address them about the dangers of facing mild criticism online?
I reckon it'll happen in less than a year

 

[Lou's Sentient Backfat]

how long will it be before the UN invites her to address them about the dangers of facing mild criticism online?
I reckon it'll happen in less than a year

Really depends on how many dicks she's willing to suck.

 

[Trianon]

Most reporters don't write stories about themselves, but Lorenz is chasing that clout and trends as a result of her narcissism. And she's mad that instead of people getting angry at the newspapers she works for, they've put the pieces together and realized the pattern is HERS at this point.

 

[thismanlies]

This is a massive pile of bullshit. WaPo doesn’t give a shit about integrity, they just don’t want bad press. The line about a miscommunication with the editor is definitely cap and is just something that’s unverifiable to the public and doesn’t give blame to one person so it can be used as an excuse. Taylor is also not a good journalist.
(A)

There comes a point where maintaining a lie is more of a pain in the ass than telling the truth and we’ve clearly passed it.

 

[Sprate Header]

Okay, two points:

1) Taylor's assertion that the online right focuses on MSM fuck-ups to attract people to their own sites/viewpoints is correct. She is also correct when she says that the online right focuses on cases like Amber Heard and Jussie Smollett to sow doubt in leftist groups/movements, like MeToo and BLM. However, these cases the right focuses on are still fuck-ups - whether you want to admit it or not - and as much as the online left bemoans this argument (from what I've seen), you really aren't helping stop people from flowing to right-leaning sites by making the news coverage of these legitimate fuck-ups, instead of about the people that did the fucking-up, about the people reporting on the case that you aren't.

Why do you think it is, Taylor, that the right focuses on these cases at all? Could it be that when people with large followings misuse one of the left's tools, it makes the tools look bad, thereby making people consider the right's POV in your absence of coverage or an explanation? Maybe if, instead of making the Heard news cycle about the evil Daily Wire running advertisements about your side's fuck-up, you focused on why Heard being a manipulative cunt doesn't delegitimize the MeToo movement, and took the time to remind the public of the past cases that MeToo helped bring to light, like Weinstein or Schneider? Or instead of frothing at the mouth when Andy Ngo (who does deserve his own, separate criticisms) covers a faked hate crime and whining about the ebil yahtzee right-wing, you talked about the criminally under-reported actual hate crimes that occur out there.

While it is important to counter opportunistic grifters that use whatever's in the news cycle to their advantage, making the near-entirety of your reporting on a happening about the other people covering the happening forces people to listen to the grifters' coverage.

2) It shouldn't be a surprise that the group of people whose knowledge of Internet history starts at GamerGate believes that the "accountability mob" is a distinctly right-wing, or even an extremist thing. Apart from anything and everything political, if you make a massive, public fuck-up, and your response is "it wasn't me, and everyone who said it was me is disingenuous," you will universally receive a near-unending torrent of backlash.

To relate it to Taylor's neck of the woods, imagine if David Dobrick responded like this. What if David highlighted Kat Tenbarge's repeated (over months) use of "we need to hold LA creators accountable" rhetoric, highlighted her public support of Taylor's horrible Mr. Beast articles, and concluded that the cancelling of him was a targeted, disingenuous move from MSM to attempt a strike against YouTube? Assuming he's correct (and he totally would be btw, I'm not sure we've talked about "JournoGate" ITT yet... ), that doesn't erase the legitimate wrongdoing he was "cancelled" for in the first place. And in the case of Taylor, she has gotten caught in multiple instances of wrongdoing, none of which she's received any non-Internet-PR repercussions for, and used this argument almost every single time.

I am becoming more and more convinced that Taylor has shacked up with the left, in part, to shield herself and her work from criticism by accusing critics of being enemy ideologues.

 

[Meat Target]

Taylor's assertion that the online right focuses on MSM fuck-ups to attract people to their own sites/viewpoints is correct. She is also correct when she says that the online right focuses on cases like Amber Heard and Jussie Smollett to sow doubt in leftist groups/movements, like MeToo and BLM. However, these cases the right focuses on are still fuck-ups - whether you want to admit it or not - and as much as the online left bemoans this argument (from what I've seen), you really aren't helping stop people from flowing to right-leaning sites by making the news coverage of these legitimate fuck-ups, instead of about the people that did the fucking-up, about the people reporting on the case that you aren't

Few things make leftists scream bloody murder like the crime of noticing what they do.

 

[An Sionnach Seang]

Really depends on how many dicks she's willing to suck.

that said, going by their precedents, the UN can't get enough of wealthy white women chelping on about shite

 

[Din Djarin]

Before I joined this thread, I thought WaPo was an okay source for news, and now I'm embarrassed. What is a good source? AP? I don't know anymore honestly.

To keep on thread topic so I don't get yelled at: The backtracking Taylor did to try and say that the lines were added after the fact without her knowledge is funny.

 

[Shaka Brah]

Few things make leftists scream bloody murder like the crime of noticing what they do.

Exactly. It works because the right-wingers are pointing out the truth. It's gotten to the point where "right wing recruitment" is just people confirming common sense and reality.

The messaging only has to be "You can trust what you see with your own two eyes" and it will be appealing in the face of blatant lying. If these journos stopped lying it would stop working.

 

[A1 Steak Sauce]

Even fellow journos have had enough.
(A)

It’s cuz ur a bitch
(A)

The dickriding is insane.

Lol at these replies.

 

[Chocolate Wombat]

Exactly. It works because the right-wingers are pointing out the truth. It's gotten to the point where "right wing recruitment" is just people confirming common sense and reality.

The messaging only has to be "You can trust what you see with your own two eyes" and it will be appealing in the face of blatant lying. If these journos stopped lying it would stop working.

What kills me about this is a lot of the people turning to right wing sources aren't even really right wing, they've just realized they're being lied to and manipulated to fulfil some bizarre agenda. Idiots like Lorenz are the real radicalization pipeline and always have been, but they are too firmly entrenched in their own bullshit to realize it.

 

[mandatorylurk]

This 50 year old woman with predetermined chubby granny cheeks is acting like she's 22 year old Pamela Anderson in how she carries herself. Oliver Darcy is a cuck just above Tater Stelter in terms of carrying water for the cathedral, and she's now deciding to throw him under the bus. Cut your fucking losses, WaPo, or Democracy Dies in Smelly Fish Vag.

 

[Flexo]

Taylor, why don't you have a seat over there and let me tell you about the boy who cried wolf...

whining about the ebil yahtzee right-wing, you talked about the criminally under-reported actual hate crimes that occur out there.

lol they won't because the actual hate crimes that occur would paint a very different picture than the one they want.

I am becoming more and more convinced that reporters have shacked up with the left, in part, to shield herself and her work from criticism by accusing critics of being enemy ideologues.

There. Fixed that for you. And welcome to the party.

 

[Sprate Header]

There. Fixed that for you. And welcome to the party.

I make the distinction between Taylor and other journos because I think most journos believe in the leftism plateau wholesale, while Taylor strikes me as more of an opportunistic mouthpiece that just wants to be a popular writer by any means necessary despite sucking shit at writing.

 

[Flexo]

I make the distinction between Taylor and other journos because I think most journos believe in the leftism plateau wholesale, while Taylor strikes me as more of an opportunistic mouthpiece that just wants to be a popular writer by any means necessary despite sucking shit at writing.

Ah I got you. The old true believers vs exploiters debate.

Hmm... tough call. I would place Taylor as an exploiter but what gives me pause is that she is a modern woman and they often will work extra hard to convince themselves of insane things - so I can't rule out true believer...