What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

Flat-Earthers are just plain nuttier characters than anti-vaxxers, first off. The implications of a vaccine conspiracy are really mundane while the flat earth leads you to some fantasy land where the hollow earth is full of dragons and hobbits or something like that. Second, the experiments showing the earth is round are independently neat to see as a cool science experiment; there's no equivalent pro-vaccine experiment other than saying "clinical trial data showed more benefit than harm."
It's actually more complicated than that. The whole Flat Earth thing originally started as a "cool science project" that was trying to measure the curvature of the Earth by watching a boat with tall flag on a long straight river disappear behind the horizon.
It never did though (because of atmospheric refraction, which is also what causes Fata Morganas) causing the whole flat Earth thing to get its start.
It is not that easy to prove that the Earth is actually spherical unquestionably.
What makes Flat Earthers obviously deranged is their belief of a massive perfect global conspiracy where every scientist and government is lying to them without clear motives. Which isn't all that different from anti-vaxxers.
 
The "intolerance of the intolerant" part, specifically? Or?
They read the first part, that unlimited tolerance leads to the end of tolerance, and the last part, where he says we should reserve the right to suppress intolerance and not tolerate it, and leave out the rest of his argument. By doing this they skip straight from "there are intolerant people" to "we persecute people who express views we consider intolerant".

What the miss is the middle, where he said:

I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise.
As far as he was concerned, the "intolerance of intolerance" should be a last resort; an escalation to match the opposition, rather than a brutal suppression of intolerance speech, merely because it feels uncomfortable. Suppression of intolerance should only come at the point when the intolerant are employing violence and suppression of their own.

His paradox is used to justify all kinds of hate speech law and the suppression of disagreement with current sociopolitical dogma, under the justification that "intolerance should not be tolerated". That's the twisting that gets me. He would be apoplectic at the way his words are used to justify the wholesale suppression of dissent from the mainstream, especially given his entire philosophy required such dissent.

I just want to know how flat eartherers can explain Oceania and such. I mean, I'm fairly certain I exist.
Everyone knows Australia is a spook. And when was the last time you even saw New Zealand on a map?
 
It never did though (because of atmospheric refraction, which is also what causes Fata Morganas) causing the whole flat Earth thing to get its start.
It is not that easy to prove that the Earth is actually spherical unquestionably.
Funnily enough, that's where I started from, as well. What really made me do a double-take to that was watching demonstrations with modern cameras sporting some impressive zoom capabilities. People would take these things out to a shoreline on a nice clear day and be capable of zooming in so far as to pull boats back into view which should have been completely over the curvature by that point. You could not see these boats (wake and all) without the aid of the extreme zoom lens. As far as I could tell, they were in crystal clarity, too. I do not see how it was (or could have been) simply just a mirage.

Ever seen that before? Shit's wild, frankly.
He doesn't actually believe it, is the problem. Almost none of the people shilling it do, its just designed to sabotage. Nothing else. There is no meaningful discussion to be gained from it. Its a weapon.
There is nothing to be gained from having such rigid beliefs that you are incapable of humoring new or different information.

I would certainly hope you've changed your own beliefs in a myriad of ways throughout your life, for example. Personally, I believe we're being lied to about many, many things in life, and I just want to figure out some answers (come what may). You don't (or shouldn't) do that through zeal and rigidity. I don't know what the Earth is shaped like for certain, but hardly anyone actually does. I do know that I've seen enough information that SCIENCE!™ cannot/will not answer (not to mention the hilarious amount of literal caca NASA puts out) about the widely pushed/accepted model to call bullshit on that, though.

Things are never black and white, sir. Putting people into boxes or playing team a vs team b is silly, as it just causes further problems..in case the last few years somehow breezed right by you. I look forward to speaking with you in a frank manner after you finally jerk off that hate boner and get it to go away.
 
I genuinely believe Tik-Tok was designed by China to capitalize off of and further the destruction of our society and social bonds. If you look at the Chinese side of Tik-Tok, the content is completely geared towards educational topics and subjects like engineering, they know exactly what they're doing.
 
dr6glr4cmx091.jpg
 
Funnily enough, that's where I started from, as well. What really made me do a double-take to that was watching demonstrations with modern cameras sporting some impressive zoom capabilities. People would take these things out to a shoreline on a nice clear day and be capable of zooming in so far as to pull boats back into view which should have been completely over the curvature by that point. You could not see these boats (wake and all) without the aid of the extreme zoom lens. As far as I could tell, they were in crystal clarity, too. I do not see how it was (or could have been) simply just a mirage.

Ever seen that before? Shit's wild, frankly.
This is the internet. Let's see one.

There is nothing to be gained from having such rigid beliefs that you are incapable of humoring new or different information.
There is absolutely nothing new or different about the information you are proposing.

I would certainly hope you've changed your own beliefs in a myriad of ways throughout your life, for example. Personally, I believe we're being lied to about many, many things in life, and I just want to figure out some answers (come what may). You don't (or shouldn't) do that through zeal and rigidity. I don't know what the Earth is shaped like for certain, but hardly anyone actually does. I do know that I've seen enough information that SCIENCE!™ cannot/will not answer (not to mention the hilarious amount of literal caca NASA puts out) about the widely pushed/accepted model to call bullshit on that, though.
I absolutely believe we are being lied to about a great number of things. However, Flat Earth, Geocentrism and the Tartarian Empire are poisoned salt licks designed to weaken and destroy anyone asking questions. The basic design of these weapons is to take real informational problems we have, such as our science community lying to us or our history being rewritten/flawed, and then place them into artificially exaggerated situations that have no possible basis in reality. The afflicted subject becomes overly concerned with complex fantasy scenarios that make great, sweeping promises about the potential of humanity and are generally designed to make the target become bogged down with excessive, meaningless extra information so as to make any point they have to say on the subject unintelligible.

Things are never black and white, sir. Putting people into boxes or playing team a vs team b is silly, as it just causes further problems..in case the last few years somehow breezed right by you. I look forward to speaking with you in a frank manner after you finally jerk off that hate boner and get it to go away.
What's more, the immediate, short term use of these weapons is to disrupt honest discussion of the real flaws in the science and history of the accepted paradigm. Which you have done, directly, with your first post in this thread, interrupting one of the very people I was talking to and asking genuine questions to with your bullshit. We were even discussing false or imperfect history. I find it curious that your showboating carnival ride arrived only days after the topic of false or imperfect history was broached by several people, not just including myself, there were other conversations ongoing that I don't necessarily believe in or agree with, but at least what they were proposing was novel and I was genuinely interested to hear them elaborate upon it. Which is not the case with you. And, what's more, two users also had just brought up their concerns that Flat Earth specifically was a weapon designed to suppress anyone who might be on to something.

Isn't it fascinating how Flat Earth was used to disrupt discussion just after two people discussed the idea that Flat Earth was being used to disrupt discussion?

You don't actually present any facts or arguments. Instead you present a flat chain of suppositions and insinuations, while also not actually committing to the subject matter at hand. When people ask you for details, all you have to offer are more insinuations. It would be one thing if you were merely discussing a theory as the rest of us are, but your sleazy salesman demeanor and your open contempt for actual discussion on the subject makes you absolutely untrustworthy in every way. Yours are not the words of an honest man. They are the words of a shilling glowkike.
 
Last edited:
Flat earth is a lame and gay conspiracy.

Give me Hollow Earth with giants or reptilians inside any day.

I'm more interested in Antarctica myself. Why is it that it looks like large parts of it were blocked out in satellite view?

ant.jpg

Why did the Nazis claim a portion of it?
800px-Emblem_of_the_Nazi_German_Antarctic_Expedition.svg.pngFlagge_Reichskolonialbund2.svg.png

Why was Stravas app able to find seemingly invisible(underground?) Human activity maps?

government-base-Antarctica-679615.jpg
 
I'm more interested in Antarctica myself. Why is it that it looks like large parts of it were blocked out in satellite view?

View attachment 3309546

Why did the Nazis claim a portion of it?
View attachment 3309556View attachment 3309555

Why was Stravas app able to find seemingly invisible(underground?) Human activity maps?

View attachment 3309570
Didn't the Nazi's believe there was some super cool awesome powerful artifact/s there? (The Holy Grail maybe?)

I've heard of this one before and it was pretty interesting but I can't quite recall.
 
Didn't the Nazi's believe there was some super cool awesome powerful artifact/s there? (The Holy Grail maybe?)

I've heard of this one before and it was pretty interesting but I can't quite recall.

Apparently the Nazis formed a Think Tank to discern what they theorized was the hidden history of the Aryan race and maybe a true religion, separate from the semetic roots of Christianity. Many expeditions funded by the Nazis and other wealthy backers were sent out. One of which was to New Swabia.

 
Why is it that it looks like large parts of it were blocked out in satellite view?
Probably has something to do with being unable to fly over it without getting shot out of the sky, or drop anchor anywhere near it without getting sunk, or go on a proper expedition into the interior without getting buried in bureaucracy such that you ultimately can't get anything done. Oh, and then there's the treaty signed by a plethora of nations ensuring you cannot do any of these things. So many nations agreeing to play nice with each other over a huge unconquered landmass (one supposedly rich in resources, at that) happens all the time, too. Totally routine.

Yeah, nothing to see in that blocked out "satellite view" at all, I'm sure.
Flat Earth is so fake and gay instead of laughing about it, I'm forced to post pages of autistic sperging about how it's poisoning minds. This is the actions of an intellectual heavy weight.
Dude, no kidding. And that's ignoring every other unhinged fabrication and insult, to boot.
 
With the flat earth thing, I noticed the same thing- it's extremely marginal at best and was being propped up as this huge threat to Science and Truth. Why were they doing it, well, that's the part we can debate but it was obviously astroturfed. I don't think it's because the earth is actually flat and they don't want us to find out, it's far more complicated than that. Trying to get people with other sets of view sucked into it so they could look dumb by being labeled "flat earthers" was the largest piece.
Replying to this again to say I agree with you much more just seeing the trajectory of the thread after you brought the topic up. Not trying to call anyone out, but this topic does seem to have a special way of really getting under people's skin, regardless of what 'side' they're on.

@Sex Cannon Lupa
Bob Saget raped and killed a girl in 1990, also he abused the Olsen Twins. His friends were either mocking us with their inside knowledge of his crimes when they made the jokes, or they were trying to put it out there for future generations to figure out. He also died a pervert's death just like Bob Crane.
Can you, or anyone who wants to jump in elaborate on this? I ask because I see this frequently where people with no inside connections vehemently claim Bob Saget abused kids on set with total confidence but zero evidence other than a comedy roast. Listening to the jokes in question, they seemed much more like roast masters searching for any angle on a guy who's not really all that interesting as a roast subject and throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks. They would have told the exact same jokes on an edgy roast of Mr. Rodgers.

I'm just curious what explains the lack of evidence combined with the total confidence people have in this
 
Last edited:
The government actively fosters and eggs on some conspiracy theories to both make themselves look more powerful than they really are and shake people off the real way more mundane truth (area 51 really is just a place to test experimental aircraft but whackos going on about aliens and UFOs and shit is more entertaining and draws attention away from those top secret airplanes)

I mean come on most conspiracy theories are retarded
 
I mean come on most conspiracy theories are retarded
I believe *most* people know this, but it is still fun to speculate and have a little mystery in life. It's like how I know ghosts aren't real, but I still want to see one because it would be cool. It's just fun.

At the same time, MKULTRA actually happened so I'm willing to suspend my disbelief some times for the not so whacko ones.
 
Back