Crime Gunman at a Texas elementary school kills 19 students and two adults before being fatally shot, officials say - yeehaw

(CNN)A suspect is in custody after a shooting incident at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, left at least two dead and injured 14 people, including students, authorities said.

The Uvalde Consolidated Independent School District (UCISD) posted about an "active shooter" at Robb Elementary at 12:17 p.m. local time and said law enforcement was on site.

The suspect was taken into custody as of 1:06 p.m. local time, according to the Uvalde Police Department.
Two have died after the shooting at Robb Elementary School, a spokesperson from Uvalde Memorial Hospital told CNN.

The hospital received 13 children at their facility who were being treated for varying injuries, he said. Two children were transported to San Antonio and another is pending transfer, Tom Nordwick said.

Additionally, two patients were dead on arrival, he said. Nordwick was not sure of the ages of the two deceased. A man in his 40s was also being treated there, he said.

Nordwick did not have conditions on any of the victims.

This is a developing story and will be updated.

 
Many states have laws that prohibit permanent expulsion.
For example, Washington: RCW 28A.600.015 (d): School districts may not impose long-term suspension or expulsion as a form of discretionary discipline.
Yeah that is fucking stupid.
 
Meximutt shoots up a school. Probably won't stick around much on news tbh.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Lil Miku
Or maybe that process was well underway once we decided it was okay to stick knitting needles into a 7-8 month old fetus as a convenient substitute for birth control.
View attachment 3317122
It was over once Diane Feinstein stood on top of the corpses of those children with a massive gun ban list with "exceptions the government would allow you to have." The list would have banned nearly every semi auto rifle and pretty much any modern handgun since any handgun that could take over an eight round magazine would be banned. Of course once shootings continued with shotguns, revolvers, and bolt actions, those would go as well.
 
You're half right. The issue can be attributed to antisocial mass media and violent culture. People who say that violent X can't cause violence need to realize that if this was true then advertising would not exist. The content of the media that people consume affects their actions or at least their worldview.
People's influence by adverts has been going down over time. Thats why the advertising companies invented click bait articles
 
Mexico has no gun violence since they only have one legal gun store in the entire country
This is a good argument against people who say that gun control will stop homicides. Less so with regard to school shootings.

School shooters do not obtain guns in the same manner that mexican gangbangers do. The overwhelming majority either get them legally or steal them from a family member who obtained them legally. Sometimes a straw buyer (columbine involved this). It is entirely conceivable that some of the dumb\autistic fucks that decide to shoot up schools would not be able to do so, or do so as efficiently, without the proliferation of legal firearms in civilian hands. That newton creep was a great example. The little twerp couldn't even touch grass but, because mommy had AR-15s, so did he.

Note: I'm not suggesting that this means guns should be banned. I accept that having individual rights of all types tends to decrease security. But I also recognize that there are policy choices on guns that could effect this phenomenon, even if I disagree with them.

Notably, the standard talking points about "universal background checks" and "assault weapon bans" will do fuck-all but the mainstream left knows that it's the only thing they can trot out there without everyone seeing what they really want to do.
 
Or maybe that process was well underway once we decided it was okay to stick knitting needles into a 7-8 month old fetus as a convenient substitute for birth control.
1653451486769.png
Brilliantly convenient of him to put ((())) on his name himself. Love it when the memes unironically, ironically work with extra unirony.
 
You're half right. The issue can be attributed to antisocial mass media and violent culture. People who say that violent X can't cause violence need to realize that if this was true then advertising would not exist. The content of the media that people consume affects their actions or at least their worldview.
Social media algorithms were a mistake, but unfortunately it's not gonna change because it makes the people in power oodles of money. It's worth more than dead people to have YouTube teaching losers nutty shit.
 
View attachment 3317144

The school doors were glass.

I don't think it matters. AR's and other tactical rifles only provide a negligible edge over a pistol in most of these shootings In others the rifle alerts people earlier than a handgun. The only benefit that comes with tactical rifle is when you are being opposed by other armed people. I hate sounding morbid but that sick fucker was shooting fish in a barrel. A handgun and a shotgun could have caused similar casualties.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunblane_massacre

Dunblane massacre of children had a similar death toll (16 dead kids), and he used pistols.
 
Most people vote in similar patterns to their parents. AS THE IDEOLOGY OF PARTIES CHANGE: People's votes shift. They also tend to vote in similar ways to their neighbors and co-workers on a long enough timeline
Agree. As long as we continue to participate in this two party system we will get more of the same. The only problem is that people are FUCKING RETARDED and have no integrity. Remember years ago when gas prices first started to rise heavily (I think maybe mid naughts, I know it was big on Facebook) there were those big event pages about a nationwide gas protest. On whatever day, nobody buy any gasoline, this way they lose a bunch of money and are forced to lower the prices. Except it never worked because people are fucking stupid and lazy. While I think you are correct about the need to stray from party lines, people simply will never learn or wake up.
 
Lets assume all guns stop being sold tomorrow in the US. You really think mentally ill people would be unable to get them from somewhere? As long as guns are around, these things will happen because americans allow it.
Don't blame Americans when in the magical absence of guns, Mexico cartels start bringing them over the border for criminals because their value suddenly increases tenfold. 60 miles/1 hr drive from the border.
 
Of course the shooter died. Never, never do these fuckers get actual justice. They’re either killed by the cops in a shootout or they take the easy way out and kill themselves like cowards.

People are genuinely becoming more insane and at this rate, everyone is going to be armed to try and stop these lunatics from killing people. I don’t even know how effective that would be.
 
I agree with some of the sentiment behind what you're saying but how would taking away guns from normies
Which I don't support. If my neighbor, or a random Joe wants to have 1, or 12 guns let them. Don't take them away. If you are a citizen, and have enough mental function to navigate through life, own a car, keep a job, then have all the guns you want. Shit will still happen, but there is a baseline of competency. Now some people wouldn't like that for a variety of reasons, but I prefer keeping maladjusted speds unarmed than armed.

stop people from getting them illegally? It really doesn't make any sense. When you really want to get your hands on something, you're going to get it.
Sure, not that there are thousands and thousands in prision from getting shit illegally. If someone really want to kill someone else, chances are they'll kill them, doesn't mean it shouldn't be apathetically brushed aside just because it is an inevitability.

The reason people sperg when you talk about banning guns is because criminals and government officials (not that there's much of a difference between the two) will be the only ones with guns if you ban them.
They sperg out because that's how they have been conditioned to be spergs about it. They are conditioned with their own brand of fearmongering to truncate any conversation about the issue. Not that is exclusive to on one side, but in the case weapons it is mostly the one side which truncates it.

Owning a gun don't protects from shit unless you can use it. I know people who own guns for protection, but bough them 15 years ago and shoot them maybe twice a year. They are more liable to kill one of their kids sneaking back in one night, than they are of fending any criminal. Community programs for legal gun owners would benefit us all, and those smaller networks of gun owners which pop up across the country can be a real resource for instruction and preparedness, yet that isn't a factor for the corporations and politicians that much prefer to have gun owners as a quantity without building them up to also have a little bit of quality.
 
Back