Theorycraft: Social Justice and Pedophilia

Kiwis, I've been doing some research into Social Justice Warriors for some time, surprising nobody remotely familiar with my work on the Wiki. Recently, after the hilarious and darkly fascinating chapter we saw during the ongoing RationalWiki thread, I thought I'd elaborate a bit on the results of my research, and explain why I believe Social Justice created what is, in essence, a perfect storm scenario for Pedophiles trying to push normalization on everyone else.

I didn't want to fag up the RationalWiki thread with this analytical piece (there's too much going on and you don't want to miss any of it, believe me, it's guvking glorious - Dynastia's work alone makes that thing worth checking out), and this goes beyond any one lolcow community, so through process of elimination, I thought I'd plunk my findings down here and we'd get a little discussion going.

Those familiar with the Farms' previous encounters with pedophiles, from the horrors of Nick Bate to the numerous Tumblr Pedos we've featured know that Pedophiles have tried to make in-roads anywhere they can for years. From Tumblr to Reddit, from 8chan to 9gag, FurAffinity to DeviantArt, if your site has user-generated content and some level of user control, you will have countless attempts by Pedophiles to use it. If not to share outright CP, then it'll be to share content in the same vein and maybe get that much closer to a child.

It's an inevitability, and one of the costs of running a site that features user-generated content. Most of the time, Pedo content is flagged and removed immediately, and that's a fine thing. In fact, the Pedophiles are so consistent and so aggressive in doing this that it can get to the point that some sites will ban certain content because Pedophiles keep using said content to do an end-run around the system and get a foot in the door. On 4chan, we saw this with Loli; on FurAffinity, this apparently was "cub porn." I learned about that one from @KidKitty, who tends to track furry cows.

Pedophiles will join any site that has user-generated content for the purposes of sharing it, and very often, as we've seen multiple times, will push a pro-Pedophilia agenda once there. They try to normalize it, to make the argument that it's natural, just like homosexuality, and that they can and are upstanding members of the community, but we've all heard this song and dance before. It's the same defense that's been used since time immemorial, and by one group in particular that I can recall.

If you're in the USA, you've heard of NAMBLA, if only from comedians making fun of it, but if you're not, it's a pedophile advocacy group that seeks to abolish age-of-consent laws. Fittingly, almost immediately, NAMBLA became implicated in a number of high-profile criminal incidents; these included members of NAMBLA being caught in sex trafficking, molestation, and worse. NAMBLA originally had small but noted support from other gay and lesbian groups in the USA, but by the 1980s, this was gone as NAMBLA repeatedly got implicated in sex trafficking scandals and at least one murder.

It wasn't long until NAMBLA was being exiled from associating with other gay and lesbian rights groups, but the group didn't really get outright blacklisted until the 90s with the IGLA Controversy, in which the International Gay and Lesbian Association got UN consultative status, had its major ties to NAMBLA (and pedophilia) known, had NAMBLA's ties to criminal behavior likewise known, and subsequently, lost such status. This led to a rare outbreak of common sense in which Jesse Helms demanded a bill to withhold funding from any organization that condoned Pedophilia, a bill that got unanimous approval, for reasons that should be obvious.

All of which brings us to Nyberg and the staggering number of pedophile defenders we keep running into in the same social circles.

hGYRJTa.jpg

This image is spreading in Social Justice circles. It's Photoshopped, obviously.

The natural tendency of Pedophiles is to congregate - both to share content (remember Nyberg's spamming of 12chan links and defending "non-nude model pics") and to find ways to "normalize" their behavior and make it seem like less of a problem. Most sane groups will have nothing to do with them since nobody wants to be associated with someone who potentially fucks children. But in Social Justice, you have people who believe that the ends justify the means, that nothing need be substantiated if the "feels" are strong enough, and, most alarmingly, that anyone in Social Justice is inherently more moral than someone who does not share these views, so they're willing to overlook cronyism for the sake of their overall goals.

That, as we say, is the foot in the door.

This is a dream scenario for Pedophiles. They can find people with mainstream media attention to parrot their talking points and operate pretty much free from persecution so long as they don't get caught fucking children, and all they need to do is scream the virtues of feminism and Social Justice. They can even have a criminal record and Social Justice won't care! Even better, it can lead them to positions of authority where they can then defend their fellow pedophiles (a scenario that is to be avoided at all costs). Moreover, as Salon later proved, very often they can be outright caught trying to meet with a child for sex and modern Neoprogressives will defend you as some paragon of virtue:

CSZzwAEWoAAqimf.png

Source: This fucking shambles.

I am now convinced that this complete incapacity to go after Pedophiles if they're valued allies of Social Justice is, ultimately, what led to this infestation. Because Social Justice Warriors are loath to criticize their own (since someone who believes as they do is inherently more moral than someone who isn't) and believe that anyone who has a condition that puts them lower on the sliding scale of privilege is inherently less-privileged and thus more valuable, you have pretty much the inevitable happen when these ideologies collide; Pedophilia is now an oppressed minority, and suddenly, things have become hilarious.

Suddenly, you have what we in the lolcow chronicleering community have seen in the last 2 years: case after case after case of a high-profile nutter in Social Justice being a Pedophile, from Sarah Nyberg to Valis99 (Feminist Frequency's former moderator and convicted child molester), HannibaltheVictor (guy who went after Thunderf00t and has a criminal history of sexual assaulting a minor) to Lena Dunham (who molested her younger sister), to the ass clowns recently exposed on RationalWiki. This is only going to get worse as time goes on and more and more of them come out of the woodwork, all of which reminds me of a quote by HP Lovecraft:

So what think you, Kiwis? Do you think my analysis is on-the-spot? Do you think there's another reason that Social Justice has such bizarre ongoing ties to pedophilia? As ever, I'm interested in hearing your commentary and insight on the matter.
I agree some people are born sick disgusting perverts, but that does not mean we have to hold their hand and baby them, we should run in the opposite direction and tell everyone
 
I'll give my two cents regarding this matter.

From what I glanced through this whole Sarah Nyberg stuff, there's really none of the SJWs defending Nyberg because he/she/xe/whatever's a pedo, and it's more towards:
  1. Sarah Nyberg's chatlogs were years ago (even though it's proven that Sarah was 18+ when Sarah did it)
  2. Sarah Nyberg was roleplaying (but still creepy)
  3. Sarah Nyberg's chatlogs were fake (even though there's sources)
  4. etc.
I don't remember seeing one example where someone defending Sarah because of standing up for pedos or some shit like that. The closest thing to that is some Twitter idiots sending kid pics to Sarah to show support, but trying to prove that they're defending pedos via that is not really close. The infamous notorious #IStandForButts trend on Twitter was due to Sarah getting doxxed and unrelated to Sarah being a pedo.

Even before that, the SJWs all over on Ghazi etc. were trying to report 8chan for CP and this already caused 8chan to get removed from Google searches a few times. They really took an anti-pedo stance really seriously based on my GamerGate lurkings when it first started, and tried to connect pedos with GamerGate to attack them, such as them trying to report Hotwheels for hosting 8chan due to CP hosting assumptions.

And speaking of Tumblr, I don't remember seeing much of the pedo-defending there. There's indeed some rare obscure ones like one random SJW post about pedophobia (forgot what is it though), but nothing noteworthy. The closest Tumblr pedo we had was James Terry Mitchell Jr., but he's not really much of an SJW but more of a retarded user who uses Tumblr.

So that's my two cents, I don't really think that there's any much relationship between SJWs and pedophilia even though there are some very small minor links to it. Perhaps some Salon articles would be great too.

This actually has coincided with something I mentioned earlier. The more I've been going over it, the less that Social Justice seems outright complicit in it, and the more it just seems like it got taken along for the ride, as it were.

I have to credit yawning sneasel with encouraging me to look a bit wider instead of locking onto the obvious here, so here's what I've noticed, taking a closer look:

1. Sarah Nyberg's defense, has been (mostly) less about Pedophilia and more about her being an Anti-GGer.
The only exceptions to this have been Izzy Galvez's friends (Virped members), the likes of Valis99 (a convicted sex offender not allowed near schools), et al, as well as myriad smaller defenders.
In this particular case, we can see a unique delineation. On one hand, we have those defending her for ideological reasons (Todd in the Shadows, Randi Harper, et al); on the other, we have people who seem to have an ulterior motive.
This would certainly explain the likes of Del Harvey, of PJ fame, suspending Encyclopedia Dramatica for outing Sarah Nyberg being a pedophile; Twitter is very much in support of Anti-GG (See also: Randi Harper and Brianna Wu's ability to get anyone they dislike banned for spurious reasons, Twitter actively removing "problematic" hashtags from Autocomplete because they're pro-GG, et al).

2. Salon's pedophile defense is not as clear-cut as it appears.
Salon has always pinballed between being outright retarded, and having something distantly related to relevance. Like a lot of leftist publications and sites, the march of clickbait was not kind to it, so it's quite possible that this has a hand in things as well. It's not the first time that Pedophilia has been used in such a fashion (Gawker's "HERE'S THE STORY OF A WOMAN FUCKING HER FATHER" comes to mind), so that could be a factor. On the other hand, we have Todd Nickerson, aka Markaba, the writer of the original "I'm not a monster" pedo articles, who was, indeed, clearly trying to shove a foot in the proverbial door, using the same arguments we've seen made since the days NAMBLA actually had credibility.
On one hand, Salon may have been trying to garner clickbait (which is probably why they allowed this shit in the first place), but looking beyond the obvious clickbait, there seems to be a genuine attempt, albeit indirectly, to play down Pedophilia's dangers and establish Pedophiles as a an oppressed (and thus protected) class. Similar Pedophile-supporting articles we've seen trend to follow the same categories: either out-and-out clickbait or attempts to frame Pedophiles as oppressed by the right and thus worthy of being protected.

3. Analysis of the Pedos Indicates Piggybacking Causes.
Looking at the various pedos involved with all levels of Social Justice, a pattern emerges. Looking at Tumblr, you can see that, some aside, they dislike Pedos. Similarly, in more rational and reasonable communities on the left, they generally don't allow pedophiles either. There is shockingly little pedo-defense from the mainstream left, even within the SJW camp, though there is a number of prominent SJWs who are willing to do so.
Indeed, traditionally, defense of pedos only comes into play when an existing SJW is exposed as one, and at that point, the justifications begin, less because of outright implicit support, and more because of the pedos being ideological allies and SJWs initially disbelieving the claims.
A good example of this in action was several Antis who abandoned the cause when it became clear that the parents of the child Nyberg was obsessed with backed and supported the legitimacy of the Breitbart articles covering Nyberg.

CONCLUSION: What we can gather from this is that Social Justice's "support" of pedophilia isn't support at all - so much as it is unwitting SJWs defending them for ideological reasons, not really realizing the implications or depth of the situation. When they do know, many tend to abandon defending such individuals en masse, and only the ideological puritans won't do so. Whilst there is a number of true believers that flat-out don't care and will support them anyway, and a number that are pushing an agenda, these people are such a tiny minority of the larger whole that it's a logical fallacy to think it's the rank and file.

Similarly, support from Neoprogressive media seems to be primarily clickbait in nature, and is content to allow these articles just to drive clicks. Some idiot on Salon defends child-fucking, portrays a guy who tried to meet with a child and got busted by the cops as a helpless victim, and people click. Que sara, right? Well, not really. Whilst there is a lot of "let our idiots drive clicks" mentality going on, this doesn't explain the pedophiles-as-an-oppressed-class narrative being pushed forward, and the most likely scenario is the permissive nature of clickbait being abused by idiots to push an agenda. Similarly, as we saw during the Kiwi Farms' infiltration of VirPed, any defense of what they claim they're doing is buried under the fact that they're actively grooming kids.

TL;DR: What we can take home from all this is that Social Justice itself is not what is actually causing this; instead, it's a perfect storm of people with an exploitable ideological blindness, greedy clickbaiters who don't care what's on their site if it drives a click or stirs controversy that they can milk, and Pedophiles using the same tactics to legitimize themselves they've used since the 1970s. Said Pedos see opportunities and have been taking them, which leaves in the bizarre position where Social Justice, and indeed, Neoprogressivism, seem to be victims of this sort of behavior. This isn't really new for Pedophilia; attempting to normalize it via conflating it with gay rights/transgendered rights has been SOP with groups since the 1970s at least, it's just recently that they've found platforms they can get away with it from.

A curious occurrence to say the least. Only time will tell whether those being taken advantage of wise up or not.

What think you, Kiwis?
 
Useful idiots.

Secondly the ideology itself is one that cannot obtain power by its very nature.

I would have to disagree with that.

The progressives/SJW's used to be the fringe.Now they are the dominant class and anti progressives are the new fringe.

They are in the White House.

They are in the courts.

They influence laws and policies.

They own the media.

They own the school system and colleges.

They control the future generation.

They are the mainstream.

Do not underestimate their power nor the need to stop them.

Pedophile acceptance might seem absurd right now but I bet so did gay and transsexual mainstream acceptance in the 50's.Do you see what I am getting at?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
1. Sarah Nyberg's defense, has been (mostly) less about Pedophilia and more about her being an Anti-GGer.
The only exceptions to this have been Izzy Galvez's friends (Virped members), the likes of Valis99 (a convicted sex offender not allowed near schools), et al, as well as myriad smaller defenders.

So far as I know, they dumped Valis99 immediately. Of course, he's a case of an actual convicted sex offender, and he is also a case of someone affiliated only with Sarkeesian's people, so far as I know. So that would have been entirely Sarkeesian's choice.

But you'd have to go well beyond willful blindness to defend Valis99, especially as he was in charge of a chat room including underage people where he presumably had some access to identifying information.

In any event, though, that case involved no defense of such people whatsoever as he was toast the moment he was exposed.

Correct me if I'm wrong and that guy is still around, which actually would be very significant.
 
So far as I know, they dumped Valis99 immediately. Of course, he's a case of an actual convicted sex offender, and he is also a case of someone affiliated only with Sarkeesian's people, so far as I know. So that would have been entirely Sarkeesian's choice.

But you'd have to go well beyond willful blindness to defend Valis99, especially as he was in charge of a chat room including underage people where he presumably had some access to identifying information.

In any event, though, that case involved no defense of such people whatsoever as he was toast the moment he was exposed.

Correct me if I'm wrong and that guy is still around, which actually would be very significant.

Valis was forced to leave in disgrace, and EDiots took over his account after it was forcibly closed. Feminist Frequency dropped him like radioactive material once it was known he was a sex offender, and the defense of him died quickly and quietly, much as it had when Nick Bate got nailed. This plays into my above theory that the Pedophile occupation of Social Justice is not a willing one and is mostly happening due to them trying to find natural allies.

If he's popped back up since then, I've no idea as ED is being DDOSed.

Useful idiots.



I would have to disagree with that.

The progressives/SJW's used to be the fringe.Now they are the dominant class and anti progressives are the new fringe.

They are in the White House.

They are in the courts.

They influence laws and policies.

They own the media.

They own the school system and colleges.

They control the future generation.

They are the mainstream.

Do not underestimate their power nor the need to stop them.

Pedophile acceptance might seem absurd right now but I bet so did gay and transsexual mainstream acceptance in the 50's.Do you see what I am getting at?

SJWs have never been the mainstream, have never been the majority, and more critically, will never be the mainstream or majority. They're loud, and they're corrupt, but they're incompetent and fucking stupid. They're not the fucking Illuminopoly, they're idiots. Useful idiots for some, but idiots all the same.

If they were masterminds, they sure as shit wouldn't have gotten owned by a group of nerds who weaponized their Autism.
Or fucking had a meltdown on one of their HQ sites where they have all the power because a community that chronicles Lolcows triggered them.
And so on and so on.

Fact is, these people are part of an outrage culture that's dying a tortuous death, and it's almost entirely at their own hands. Laugh as it expires and take notes so we can mock it relentlessly should it resurface in our time.
 
Valis was forced to leave in disgrace, and EDiots took over his account after it was forcibly closed. Feminist Frequency dropped him like radioactive material once it was known he was a sex offender, and the defense of him died quickly and quietly, much as it had when Nick Bate got nailed. This plays into my above theory that the Pedophile occupation of Social Justice is not a willing one and is mostly happening due to them trying to find natural allies.

If he's popped back up since then, I've no idea as ED is being DDOSed.



SJWs have never been the mainstream, have never been the majority, and more critically, will never be the mainstream or majority. They're loud, and they're corrupt, but they're incompetent and fucking stupid. They're not the fucking Illuminopoly, they're idiots. Useful idiots for some, but idiots all the same.

If they were masterminds, they sure as shit wouldn't have gotten owned by a group of nerds who weaponized their Autism.
Or fucking had a meltdown on one of their HQ sites where they have all the power because a community that chronicles Lolcows triggered them.
And so on and so on.

Fact is, these people are part of an outrage culture that's dying a tortuous death, and it's almost entirely at their own hands. Laugh as it expires and take notes so we can mock it relentlessly should it resurface in our time.
That seems to have been my experience with them as well. Just retards who find minor, inconsequential shit to bitch about and fight over. Some of the more clever ones will resort to doxing because they don't know what else to do. They are outnumbered, especially on YouTube. The humor is seeing them repeatedly not understand why not many people take them seriously in the first place.

One other observation I've noticed is that a few radfem and TERF cows don't identify themselves with that whole SJW thing at all but have been seen commenting a lot on certain smaller SJW channels on the site.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Jaimas
One technique I've noticed being used on Tumblr from the threads from this forum is users posting pedophilic stuff and everyone on Tumblr seemingly completely approving of their behaviour because they claim to be "survivors" of some vague kind and use it "to cope" (Some people mentioned on this thread for example, it's art but really creepy stuff like graphic murder and rape and the people doing this are in their late 20's to 30's whereas the average user of Tumblr seem to be a lot younger)

To quote from some super edgy Tumblr users who send gore to people:
If you’re not a survivor, and you’re a minor, and we’ve sent gore to you, you must’ve done some pretty bad things. If you don’t recognize that your ships are problematic, you’re gonna get people pissed. And we’re going to send you gore UPON REQUEST. We delete a ton of requests daily, but if we find that you’re “not a survivor” because you don’t state it or at least hint at it, we’re going to think you’re not using it to cope and we’re going to send you gore. I’m not denying that.

..

Now, you’re probably thinking “but why are these ships bad? do you really need to send gore?”
Well, the more people that ship the problematic ship, the more normalized it becomes. If you’re not a survivor, you have no say in this. Pedophilic and abusive ships are used to groom people. It happens. Ereri is pedophilic. A 30+ man with a 15 year old is pedophilia. It would be pedophilia in real life, right? So why is fiction any different? Try to prove me wrong, go ahead. But that’s the facts. If you say “it isn’t pedophilia” then you’re a pretty disgusting person.
(From http://edg3cu1t.tumblr.com/post/136865299243/psa-from-mod-colere )

So far it seems to be drawn images they use "to cope" but it's not out of the realm of possibility they are people who do or will in the future use it as an excuse to look at actual child porn.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Male Idiot
SJWs have never been the mainstream, have never been the majority, and more critically, will never be the mainstream or majority. They're loud, and they're corrupt, but they're incompetent and fucking stupid. They're not the fucking Illuminopoly, they're idiots. Useful idiots for some, but idiots all the same.

I don't know what your basis for this is.

They already are the mainstream.By that I don't mean they are the majority of Americans.However they are the mainstream influence.

The current US administration are SJW's.That means the president and his cabinet.

They are the media.They are the courts.They are the government.

They are the public opinion even if a silent majority disagrees.It doesn't matter because that silent majority does not have control of the above.

And that is not even the big threat.The big threat is the future generation that they are breeding which will become the majority who will be utterly corrupted by them.That is the real danger.Recognize the danger because it is no fantasy.This is a coming reality unless something is done.The web is being woven right in front of your face.

If they were masterminds, they sure as shit wouldn't have gotten owned by a group of nerds who weaponized their Autism.
Or fucking had a meltdown on one of their HQ sites where they have all the power because a community that chronicles Lolcows triggered them.
And so on and so on.

That's focusing on a irrelevant issue.

The issue is that they are dominant in the media,the universities,the government,the courts,etc.

Some SJW's making a fool of themselves and being mocked and disregarded does not address the above.

Fact is, these people are part of an outrage culture that's dying a tortuous death, and it's almost entirely at their own hands. Laugh as it expires and take notes so we can mock it relentlessly should it resurface in our time.

It is not dying.

I would love for you to be correct by the way.I would be quite happy if I could agree with you.I wish I didn't have to because that speaks to the state of the current world.

But unfortunately I do have to disagree.

It's true that resistance is starting to form and beginning to fight back.A counter movement is beginning to develop.

But let me tell you it's going to take alot more than just that to bring down this beast.Do not underestimate this evil.
 
You seem to use a very specific, alien definition of "mainstream" here.

"the ideas, attitudes, or activities that are regarded as normal or conventional; the dominant trend in opinion, fashion, or the arts."

I would say SJW's/liberals/progressives would fit that description.
 
"the ideas, attitudes, or activities that are regarded as normal or conventional; the dominant trend in opinion, fashion, or the arts."

I would say SJW's/liberals/progressives would fit that description.
On this sub, SJW is understood to mean the extreme social left; progressive the social left, and liberal the center left.

With that in mind I think its hard to argue that the govt and cabinet believe in exclusive feminine lists for all political positions, exclusion of whites from all positions of power, reparations to all blacks for slavery and imperislism, mandatory classes for all white people on their inhetent racism, anticapitalism on the grounds that it is an oppresive system, free on demand abortion no questions asked and a reversal on the burden of proof in rape cases if not just convicting on the word of the accuser alone.

The policies of far left groups (referred to here as sjws) like blm etc are provably not the policies of govt.

The rest of your post is off topic- this thread is about a possible link in the fringe of an extremety between sjws and pedos and the baffling mental gymnastics needed to justify said link.
 
The rest of your post is off topic- this thread is about a possible link in the fringe of an extremety between sjws and pedos and the baffling mental gymnastics needed to justify said link.

Well I will keep that in mind and not derail the thread then in a alternative direction.

Thank you for explaining and clarifying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vitriol
The SJWs "just" deny Nyberg being a pedo, they (neither RW nor any significant number of other SJWs) don't condone child-molestation. This utter bullshit reminds me of red-baiting.
 
This actually has coincided with something I mentioned earlier. The more I've been going over it, the less that Social Justice seems outright complicit in it, and the more it just seems like it got taken along for the ride, as it were.

I think you're getting close to the mark. You won't hear the SJ community explicitly defend pedophilia. Nor will the Catholic Church, or the Penn State football team. But all those organizations were used as shields for pedophiles.

Why did it happen? Because they're hierarchical groups with a lot of social capital that represent themselves as being highly moral and principled. This is like a glowing neon beacon for pedos. They're kind of like vampires, with a need to hide from discovery and camouflage themselves so they can safely hunt.

Religions are especially good for this, because they have ritualistic practices that are supposed to make you a certified Good Person™ if you follow them to the letter. And in a hierarchical religion, someone who can walk the walk and manage to climb up a few rungs in the hierarchy is mostly above suspicion. After all, who'd expect a priest to molest kids?

And as many people have pointed out, Social Justice is really just a rebranded Christianity with privilege in the place of original sin. Christianity has a built-in narrative that excuses any fuck-up ("we're all born sinners") and provides a get-out-of-jail-free card ("I prayed for forgiveness and God has changed me"). Social Justice offers something similar to members of any designated victim-class. "I acted out inappropriately because I've experienced so much oppression for my identity."

1. Sarah Nyberg's defense, has been (mostly) less about Pedophilia and more about her being an Anti-GGer.

3. Analysis of the Pedos Indicates Piggybacking Causes.

Whether it happens in the Catholic Church or Tumblr, it plays out the same way. Pedos enter a group that's respected, then cloak their actions behind the group's mythology. People who identify the group defend them because they see them as fellow members of their community, and because admitting their wrongdoing would suggest that the mythology is false. According to SJ holy writ, trans people are victims of the world who must be protected, not perpetrators of abuse.

Thinking further, the SJ community is at major risk for pedo-infiltration. They can be very insular and cult-like and their concepts of right and wrong hinge mostly on the image a person projects rather than their actions. Unlike mainstream religions, they put members under a lot of pressure to disregard popular opinions, get all their information from community sources and resolve disputes "inside" rather than going to authorities. If pedophiles with brains and political skills manage to enter their community (and in all likelihood some already have) they could leave a long path of destruction before someone stops them.
 
Last edited:
Feminists don't support pedophilia. As people have said in this thread, the Nyberg defenders think Nyberg was framed by the gamergate illuminati. Nyberg is just a random no body on the internet, most feminists probably don't even know who he is. To me this idea that these sjws are going to some how make pedophillia accepted, reminds me of the anti gay witch hunt retoric, ("gay marriage! what next marrying a horse!?")
 
Last edited:
Feminists don't support pedophilia. As people have said in this thread, the Nyberg defenders think Nyberg was framed by the gamergate illuminati. Nyberg is just a random no body on the internet, most feminists probably don't even know who he is. To me this idea that these sjws are going to some how make pedophillia accepted, reminds me of the anti gay witch hunt retoric, ("gay marriage! what next marrying a horse!?")

At this point I'm entirely convinced it's less a Social Justice thing and more a Rat King thing.
 
I too think that mostly its the case of disbelief and thinking that its just "Oh gamernazi slandering, poor oppressed minority can do nothing bad" case than rightout pedophile defending. Of course this is just what I think the majority is, we all know Mrs Rapp don't we? Also, pedophiles being an oppressed minority does make them appleaing to the SJWs (total lack of) logic.

Still, what is a SJW depends on what you consider extreme left wing ideology. That depends on your upbringing, country of origin and culture.
To some of the more conservative nations, most of the US population could be labelled as such, and even here opinions vary greatly of just what constitutes as SJW and what not.
 
5. Salon and several other leftist publications have gotten increasingly more willing to outright defend or even attempt to normalize pedophilia as a sexual identity issue. Several other users here have covered it in far more detail, but the TL;DR is that they've essentially declared that Pedophiles aren't inherently dangerous - even as one of Salon's most infamous articles has its writer trying to defend someone who was caught by police trying to meet with a child.
Analysis: There is a clear and present attempt to normalize Pedophilia being taken by several Neoprogressive outlets. Salon is merely the loudest and most obvious; there's more of it on there at Social Networking.

I'm not sure if anyone knows this, but David Talbot is the Founder of Salon. Now, David Talbot is a friend of Bill Clinton. The other person who is also friends with Clinton is Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein is the owner of the private jet known as the "Lolita Express"

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...lita-Express-private-jet-anonymous-women.html

It stands to reason that Talbot would be fine with a Pedophile on staff, even writing articles about such things.
I follow this stuff quite a bit since its fascinating watching what is the immutable law to us, crumbles and washes away around these types of people.

Useful idiots.
I would have to disagree with that.

The progressives/SJW's used to be the fringe.Now they are the dominant class and anti progressives are the new fringe.

Pedophile acceptance might seem absurd right now but I bet so did gay and transsexual mainstream acceptance in the 50's.Do you see what I am getting at?

I don't think pedophile normalization is quite that much of a worry. Firstly the people who have power, who are in the White House, Billionaires and such, they don't really have a need to normalize pedophilia. Why? They are not subject to the law already. From the things I've read, seen, and listened to, child and underage sex gatherings for the elite are considered fairly commonplace. They quite literally have nothing to fear from the law right now, they are effectively untouchable. Do they have anything to gain by normalising it in the media? I'm not sure, maybe someone could shed some light on that.
 
And where on Planet Moonbat do you live exactly?

If you've done any digging on Pedophile rings, Yewtree, Pedowood, Boys Town, Franklin Affair, the scandals just keep going on and on, Rumors in Hollywood have been swirling for years about actors and producers, and you know people will step up only after those people are dead. Is less of a case of a few isolated incidents, and more of a case of the termites you find before your house caves in.
 
Back