Are you getting the vaccine? - Absolute trashfire thread, please enter with caution

[AnOminous]

How many crack rocks were burned to make that post? Brutal.

Remember the 18 gorillion vaxeme deaths. Sure that shit never happened, but you drooling speds will never admit that.

 

[draggs]

Even the negligible benefits helped me though.

It's a decent preventative therapeutic medicine

If you have been jabbed and catch it you'll much more likely than not have a mild case

If you catch it not too long after getting injected, effectiveness starts going down after 2 months and is so gone by four they want you to get a booster if you're in a big risk category like being old af or diabetic or whatever

It's unfortunate that it makes the pythons mad that the shots are useful but to put it nicely have huge room for improvement. I never got them, I caught it, and now that I caught it and recovered I have actual real immunity and don't have to worry about any of this folderol. From the peer reviewed studies by experts that the python seethingly proselytizes for I have approximately a 5% chance of ever catching it again in an environment of high community spread. Which is unlikely to happen again. Unless it very drastically mutates which seems unlikely given how it has mutated so far. I know that millions of years of evolution being superior to 9 months of scientific groundbreaking laboratory work also makes the pythons really seething for some unknown reason

If you want to get it there's almost no reason not to, it won't kill you or fuck you up for 99.99% of the population and will give you a very good chance of no symptoms or mild symptoms if you do catch the coof, you just have to go back for more every 16 weeks until they come up with better ones that last longer and hopefully confer real immunity like what I have

 

[WinnieTheJew]

Remember the 18 gorillion vaxeme deaths. Sure that shit never happened, but you drooling speds will never admit that.

It's unreasonable to expect me to have any control over what retards were saying on the Internet a year ago. Not my problem.

 

[Epic Fail Man]

Covid is over, mods close thread pls.

 

[Buck Mullet]

Hell no. I'd say 10% of the reason is questions about it's effectiveness and anecdotal evidence of it causing cardiovascular harm, and the other 90% is the creepy propaganda urging you to get jabbed and veiled threats of losing your job or ability to travel freely unless you comply. I guess it's in some people's nature to blindly obey whatever they're told if it's scary enough, but not mine.

 

[AnOminous]

And some people blindly believe tinfoil hat lunatics crouching down in their trailer parks spewing absolute nutso-bongo bullshit some sped posted on 4chan.

 

[PeggieBigCock]

Why you need a gun at all in your life and how many times are you expected to use it?

Niggers bro, because of niggers. You obviously live in a safe bubbled off white community where everything is sunshine & rainbows, the only reason you’d need a gun is to blow your brains out, which I highly recommend you do.

 

[Saint Agustin]

It's a decent preventative therapeutic medicine

If you have been jabbed and catch it you'll much more likely than not have a mild case

If you catch it not too long after getting injected, effectiveness starts going down after 2 months and is so gone by four they want you to get a booster if you're in a big risk category like being old af or diabetic or whatever

It's unfortunate that it makes the pythons mad that the shots are useful but to put it nicely have huge room for improvement. I never got them, I caught it, and now that I caught it and recovered I have actual real immunity and don't have to worry about any of this folderol. From the peer reviewed studies by experts that the python seethingly proselytizes for I have approximately a 5% chance of ever catching it again in an environment of high community spread. Which is unlikely to happen again. Unless it very drastically mutates which seems unlikely given how it has mutated so far. I know that millions of years of evolution being superior to 9 months of scientific groundbreaking laboratory work also makes the pythons really seething for some unknown reason

If you want to get it there's almost no reason not to, it won't kill you or fuck you up for 99.99% of the population and will give you a very good chance of no symptoms or mild symptoms if you do catch the coof, you just have to go back for more every 16 weeks until they come up with better ones that last longer and hopefully confer real immunity like what I have

Don't know dude, COVID-19 sounds a lot like HIV in the way it slowly makes you susceptible to other pathologies which you never even had history with.

I know, legit know, people who got the vaccine and boosters and are now developing weird blood clothes, neurobiological problems and got COVID twice already even though they are fully vaxed.

COVID sounds a lot like HIV in the way it lowers your autoimmune response. won't outrighr kills you but it will open the door for things that will weaken you over and over again.

 

[draggs]

Don't know dude, COVID-19 sounds a lot like HIV in the way it slowly makes you susceptible to other pathologies which you never even had history with.

I know, legit know, people who got the vaccine and boosters and are now developing weird blood clothes, neurobiological problems and got COVID twice already even though they are fully vaxed.

COVID sounds a lot like HIV in the way it lowers your autoimmune response. won't outrighr kills you but it will open the door for things that will weaken you over and over again.

I'm glad I don't have to worry about any of that silly stuff because I have the superior natural immunity

 

[Kiwi & Cow]

Not taking a glorified Flu vaccine that isn't effective like the measles or mumps vaccine. haven't taken the vaccine and haven't had millions die around me, in fact most of the people who wanted the vaccine got it.

Also @Kiwi & Cow Guns are an effective and useful tool. you don't need to be 6'2/ be a warrior to kill someone. Most Knife user's tend to be 200x more irresponsible with their weaponry then the average criminal gun user.
Also Since you sound like a Bong what are you going to do if someone with guns invade your house and hold you hostage. A gun gives me a chance at having my freedom. You never will understand what it's like to be in a situation where You wish you had a gun because you knew you could have saved a bunch of people.

The problems of liberal gun laws outweight the benefits.

For example, there was a mass shooting recently that got 18 children killed.

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/opinion/editorials/article/abbott-uvalde-shooting-reaction-17196685.php#photo-22519139

If this dude was carrying a knife, he would have never killed this many people. He would have been apprehended before he even had the chance to commit his crime. If gun laws in US were more restrictive and conservative, this would have saved the lives of 18 children. That's not rocket science, it's a literal fact.


As for all the flailing about knives versus guns here, here's a factsheet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5210006/
Experts found that in every case, gunshot wounds were consistently worse than stab wounds on the neck, go figure.

Here's another one, much older that corroborates the most recent study: https://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/1993/10/05/knives-00000
5% mortality for stab wounds vs 17% mortality shotgun wounds.

 

[McMitch]

The problems of liberal gun laws outweight the benefits.

For example, there was a mass shooting recently that got 18 children killed.

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/opinion/editorials/article/abbott-uvalde-shooting-reaction-17196685.php#photo-22519139

If this dude was carrying a knife, he would have never killed this many people. He would have been apprehended before he even had the chance to commit his crime. If gun laws in US were more restrictive and conservative, this would have saved the lives of 18 children. That's not rocket science, it's a literal fact.


As for all the flailing about knives versus guns here, here's a factsheet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5210006/
Experts found that in every case, gunshot wounds were consistently worse than stab wounds on the neck, go figure.

Here's another one, much older that corroborates the most recent study: https://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/1993/10/05/knives-00000
5% mortality for stab wounds vs 17% mortality shotgun wounds.

You faggots always use the caskets of children as a soapbox to proselytize gun control, as if that was the only factor in any of this. Conveniently, you overlook the fact that law enforcement, which would have been the ones to enforce gun control laws, waited an hour to actually do their ducking jobs and enter the building to save those children. There is also the issue that law enforcement allegedly had prior contact with this guy and could have legally apprehended him.
The sad truth is, the cost of gun control is greater than the lives it would supposedly save (there is zero statistic link between gun control laws and gun violence, just look at Chicago and New York or even countries like Russia), and permissible access to weaponry exists in the foundation of the US for a concrete reason. Look at how countries without armed citizens treated their citizens “for their own good” these last two years. Without civilian access to arms on par with the government, those decisions get easier to make and harder to return from. You stupid motherfuckers are free to disassociate the US in its entirety, and I would be glad to see each of you gun grabbing retards shipped to some godforsaken hellhole like the UK or Australia if it means this country can operate as intended.

 

[LeChampion1992]

Well, neither happened. How much longer do I have to wait for that big reveal, doc?

at your current rate I say a couple years before you turn troon.

The problems of liberal gun laws outweight the benefits.

For example, there was a mass shooting recently that got 18 children killed.

https://www.houstonchronicle.com/opinion/editorials/article/abbott-uvalde-shooting-reaction-17196685.php#photo-22519139

If this dude was carrying a knife, he would have never killed this many people. He would have been apprehended before he even had the chance to commit his crime. If gun laws in US were more restrictive and conservative, this would have saved the lives of 18 children. That's not rocket science, it's a literal fact.


As for all the flailing about knives versus guns here, here's a factsheet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5210006/
Experts found that in every case, gunshot wounds were consistently worse than stab wounds on the neck, go figure.

Here's another one, much older that corroborates the most recent study: https://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/1993/10/05/knives-00000
5% mortality for stab wounds vs 17% mortality shotgun wounds.

Spree killers are more common yes but I'm not disarming the United States and creating a situation like Brazil or Mexico where we have Draconian gun laws for law abiding citizens and criminals will simply ignore them.
lastly the dude killed as many as he did because he was essentially given 45 minutes alone and a rifle to do evil.

 

[Kiwi & Cow]

Covid is over, mods close thread pls.

This is officially the gun thread now.

The sad truth is, the cost of gun control is greater than the lives it would supposedly save (there is zero statistic link between gun control laws and gun violence,

https://www.thetrace.org/2021/10/why-more-shootings-in-america-gun-violence-data-research/

BTW not a single European country other than Funland, Belgium, France and Switzerland appears on any gun-related violence statistic. At that, Finland and Switzerland show up only for suicides not murders.

just look at Chicago and New York or even countries like Russia), and permissible access to weaponry exists in the foundation of the US for a concrete reason. Look at how countries without armed citizens treated their citizens “for their own good” these last two years. Without civilian access to arms on par with the government, those decisions get easier to make and harder to return from.

Comparing a dictatorship like Russia to confirm your point is gay. Most countries other than those in America have strict gun laws and nope they don't mistreat anyone unlike autocratic govs like Russia or North Korea.

Again, you mutts are so paranoid that you're afraid of literally fucking nothing. Even if all guns were banned in the US, it won't turn into fucking Russia.

You stupid motherfuckers are free to disassociate the US in its entirety, and I would be glad to see each of you gun grabbing retards shipped to some godforsaken hellhole like the UK or Australia if it means this country can operate as intended.

Jokes on you, I don't even live in the US, thankfully.

I don't have to worry about having my life taken away by a gun raving bastard or some angry manchildren mad at women because there are stringent gun laws where I live.

Spree killers are more common yes but I'm not disarming the United States and creating a situation like Brazil or Mexico where we have Draconian gun laws for law abiding citizens and criminals will simply ignore them.

Even the local criminals ignore gun laws here, but it is made so difficult to get a gun that most don't even bother trying. Brazil doesn't have a working police department and is basically what amounts to a third world country shithole.

Law abiding citizen don't need guns, America is the outlier because, just like their measurement systems, they're the only ones doing it and at that it's not even a good thing.

lastly the dude killed as many as he did because he was essentially given 45 minutes alone and a rifle to do evil.

He would have gotten restrained by the adults if he was carrying a knife, you can easily disarm someone carrying a knife if you know what you're doing.

https://www.6dragonskungfu.com/self-defense-how-to-defend-against-a-knife-attack/

Or just like I said, carry a knife on your own for self-defence.

However, you can't disarm a gunman unless you're Lucky Luke and using a gun on your own. If you try to get too close to disarm him, he'd still got plenty of time to shoot you.

You can blame the cops all day long for this tragedy, but you can't deny the outcome would have been different if he didn't show up with a rifle.

This above also applies to this:

You faggots always use the caskets of children as a soapbox to proselytize gun control, as if that was the only factor in any of this. Conveniently, you overlook the fact that law enforcement, which would have been the ones to enforce gun control laws, waited an hour to actually do their ducking jobs and enter the building to save those children. There is also the issue that law enforcement allegedly had prior contact with this guy and could have legally apprehended him.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

If this dude was carrying a knife, he would have never killed this many people.

Too bad guns won't magically disappear. And if this woman wasn't carrying a gun then there would be another massacre:

Armed female bystander kills man firing at party in West Virginia

If gun laws in US were more restrictive and conservative, this would have saved the lives of 18 children. That's not rocket science, it's a literal fact.

That must be why Chicago is so safe, their more restrictive gun laws. Stupid faggot.

 

[Kiwi & Cow]

Too bad guns won't magically disappear. And if this woman wasn't carrying a gun then there would be another massacre:

Armed female bystander kills man firing at party in West Virginia

If gun control was implemented nationwide and correctly at that, his gun would've been confiscated as much as hers and then the confrontation would've not happened in the first place.

That must be why Chicago is so safe, their more restrictive gun laws. Stupid faggot.

Since 1982, 74 Percent Of Mass Shooters Obtained Their Guns Legally​

Cope.

Double cope.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

If gun control was implemented nationwide and correctly at that, his gun would've been confiscated as much as hers and then the confrontation would've not happened in the first place.

By gun control are you talking about a total gun ban?

Since 1982, 74 Percent Of Mass Shooters Obtained Their Guns Legally​

Cope.

Double cope.

Who gives a shit if the gun is legal or not, the dead people don't, and they'll obtain them regardless.

 

[CAPTAIN HAPPY]

And some people blindly believe tinfoil hat lunatics crouching down in their trailer parks spewing absolute nutso-bongo bullshit some sped posted on 4chan.

Surely, a pharma corp would never do anything bad, especially with a massively innept and corrupt government on their side.

 

[Lurker]

Who gives a shit if the gun is legal or not, the dead people don't, and they'll obtain them regardless.

shit, why even have laws? criminals don't follow laws so we just shouldn't have them

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

shit, why even have laws? criminals don't follow laws so we just shouldn't have them

You're retarded if you think banning guns will stop shootings, simple as that.

 

[Lurker]

You're retarded if you think banning guns will stop shootings, simple as that.

lol eris-chan, neither will doing literally nothing

so is this like your new hangout after being banned from the abortion thread? can't sperg about borties so you sperg about vaccines and for some inexplicable reason guns?