DancesWithLeto
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2021
If a straight dude misrepresented himself that way to a woman (I don't know how, but if he did), then people would call it rightly a rape by deception. Dude was lied to and had sexual contact with someone he did not consent to. Of course, for some reason, that logic doesn't apply to trannies, even in this case where he wasn't using a picture of himself.
What I find darkly entertaining is that these are the same assholes that will tell people over and over that men can also be raped and be victims of sexual violence (they can and I am not disputing that - it is just in their delusions they are being raped by the hot cis lesbians or something). If I would be understanding of a woman who kills a rapist in self defence, why would I not be understanding of a man who does similar? He had time to go away and become progressively more confused and upset by the situation. Rate me autistic but if it was a woman in that situation we would not think about how "violent" it was; we would empathize with the idea that this was the victim of a sexual assault. I am a woman and I think there is an aspect of someone reacting to a sexual assault.
This is something that troons, for all the screaming that they do about "men can be victims", are very anxious to shut down. I know that the argument in the case was self defence because the victim believed the other man was reaching for a gun and a knife was found at the scene but I still find it bemusing that any upset or distress he felt over the initial encounter (because he did not give consent to it) cannot be explained. And that would never happen if this had been a woman on trial - and women have been on trial for killing their rapists, also sometimes in very brutal ways. We tend to have empathy for them (and should, because rapists aren't human). I just find their double standard interesting and predictable. As I do how far they will go to trans the dead, even including literal rapi- well, birds of a feather.