Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
If a straight dude misrepresented himself that way to a woman (I don't know how, but if he did), then people would call it rightly a rape by deception. Dude was lied to and had sexual contact with someone he did not consent to. Of course, for some reason, that logic doesn't apply to trannies, even in this case where he wasn't using a picture of himself.

What I find darkly entertaining is that these are the same assholes that will tell people over and over that men can also be raped and be victims of sexual violence (they can and I am not disputing that - it is just in their delusions they are being raped by the hot cis lesbians or something). If I would be understanding of a woman who kills a rapist in self defence, why would I not be understanding of a man who does similar? He had time to go away and become progressively more confused and upset by the situation. Rate me autistic but if it was a woman in that situation we would not think about how "violent" it was; we would empathize with the idea that this was the victim of a sexual assault. I am a woman and I think there is an aspect of someone reacting to a sexual assault.

This is something that troons, for all the screaming that they do about "men can be victims", are very anxious to shut down. I know that the argument in the case was self defence because the victim believed the other man was reaching for a gun and a knife was found at the scene but I still find it bemusing that any upset or distress he felt over the initial encounter (because he did not give consent to it) cannot be explained. And that would never happen if this had been a woman on trial - and women have been on trial for killing their rapists, also sometimes in very brutal ways. We tend to have empathy for them (and should, because rapists aren't human). I just find their double standard interesting and predictable. As I do how far they will go to trans the dead, even including literal rapi- well, birds of a feather.
 
After a year on E I look like my mother at 17 😂
A5F4BB16-1160-4439-B8E4-3FDE282012F5.jpeg
Interesting motive. Maybe Freud was right all along.
lol even calling that a filter is a huge reach, it literally traced the outline of your face and drew an anime girl inside it.
 
Violently harassed = someone told him to not beg directly outside the door of the grocery store where functioning members of society shop?

I hate everything about your life as well, Rachel.

View attachment 3330363
If ADF still had a subforum, Rachel would totally have a thread. And honestly I still think he needs one.

screenshot_20220528-165516_facebook-jpg.3330650


Edit: They're called sister sizes, you moron - every natal woman knows about them. And just because you CAN fit into a bra doesn't mean you SHOULD.
 
lots of threads over there with photos of Elliot and the question "Would transition have saved her?" I think he was a complete piece of shit who hated women, so it's not outside the realm of possibility.
what type of individuals would ask these type of questions that shows willingness to accept him into their own group?? its not like chinese people out here be like if he was a full blooded descendent of the dragon would he have been ok or gays be like if he was gay would it have saved him. also with that ted bomb guy saying oh he briefly cross dressed before he bombed a bumcha people if he had transitioned blahblah. just for what reasons one would want to associate with them? maybe there are some edgy appeal from unabomber for young political fags but still pointing out ted crossdressed before fully going murderous makes gender dysphoria/or even just plain simple faggotry seem like a diseased state of mind or prodrome to more extreme forms of mental fuckery? but alsothe fact that these two fucks killed a bunch of poeple shows they are no where close to women, as men exhibit this type of violent behabiors and extreme externalized hatred etc >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> women.
 
If a straight dude misrepresented himself that way to a woman (I don't know how, but if he did), then people would call it rightly a rape by deception. Dude was lied to and had sexual contact with someone he did not consent to. Of course, for some reason, that logic doesn't apply to trannies, even in this case where he wasn't using a picture of himself.

Pure reactionary tribalism.

E: Also the gay panic "defense" is not a legal thing. It's a tactic that people argue for lesser charges on the grounds of incitement or diminished capacity. The bans are big showy things, but in practice the defense has actually rarely worked, and has never (to my knowledge) resulted in acquittal. The best these dudes get is voluntary manslaughter instead of murder. I also find it infuriating that trans people equate a gay panic, where theoretically the incitement is flirting, with the trans panic, where the incitement is the discovery of a deception after sexual intercourse has occurred. One of these things is waaaaaaaayyyyy more of a personal violation than another.
There's a bonus to this as Virginia has banned the gay/trans panic defense thanks to their troon legislator. This fact doesn't confirm anyone's priors so they ignore it.

Right?? Like point to one shred of evidence he was trans! And even then he would have been deceitful by using another person's pictures!
One shred of evidence? He was trying to manipulate people into sex. They're practically screaming that they're afraid someone will do this to them when they do the same thing.

Also, I hope Jerry Smith's brave struggle as a trans woman isn't forgotten on Transgender Day of Remembrance.
 
Last edited:
Something tells me that those who whine about the "trans panic defense" or "gay panic defense" secretly believe that troons or gays should be permitted to rape or sexually harass people.

All claims made in the court of law have to be proven, including if the assailant's victim did something to provoke them, whether it be anywhere from attempted sexual assault or making inappropriate comments that would be out of line even if a straight or mentally healthy person made them.

Sure, gay bashers might attempt to make the defense, but wouldn't banning it result in people being unable to defend themselves against potential rapists or sex pests just because they happened to identify with the LGBTQ?
 
what type of individuals would ask these type of questions that shows willingness to accept him into their own group?? its not like chinese people out here be like if he was a full blooded descendent of the dragon would he have been ok or gays be like if he was gay would it have saved him. also with that ted bomb guy saying oh he briefly cross dressed before he bombed a bumcha people if he had transitioned blahblah. just for what reasons one would want to associate with them? maybe there are some edgy appeal from unabomber for young political fags but still pointing out ted crossdressed before fully going murderous makes gender dysphoria/or even just plain simple faggotry seem like a diseased state of mind or prodrome to more extreme forms of mental fuckery? but alsothe fact that these two fucks killed a bunch of poeple shows they are no where close to women, as men exhibit this type of violent behabiors and extreme externalized hatred etc >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> women.
Dude if you're trying to make sense out of 4chan thread topics, I have bad news for you.
 
If ADF still had a subforum, Rachel would totally have a thread. And honestly I still think he needs one.

screenshot_20220528-165516_facebook-jpg.3330650


Edit: They're called sister sizes, you moron - every natal woman knows about them. And just because you CAN fit into a bra doesn't mean you SHOULD.
I got bad news for him. His “breasts” aren’t growing from the hrt. They’re growing from the fact he’s gaining weight. You can look and he’s gain, what’s look like , ten pounds so far. Ffs
 
Something tells me that those who whine about the "trans panic defense" or "gay panic defense" secretly believe that troons or gays should be permitted to rape or sexually harass people.

All claims made in the court of law have to be proven, including if the assailant's victim did something to provoke them, whether it be anywhere from attempted sexual assault or making inappropriate comments that would be out of line even if a straight or mentally healthy person made them.

Sure, gay bashers might attempt to make the defense, but wouldn't banning it result in people being unable to defend themselves against potential rapists or sex pests just because they happened to identify with the LGBTQ?
No, self-defense is still a thing. The gay/trans panic defense is more specific, which is why it's basically never used, in that you find out someone is gay/trans and then decide to kill them. You're still not allowed to rape through deception.

One reason the gay panic defense was rarely successful before they started banning it is you have to argue something like that the guy sucking your cock tricked you into it in some way and you wouldn't have let him do it if you knew he was gay. Juries aren't going to buy it now that being gay is close enough to acceptable in and of itself everywhere especially after the prosecutor tears your life apart.
 
I got bad news for him. His “breasts” aren’t growing from the hrt. They’re growing from the fact he’s gaining weight. You can look and he’s gain, what’s look like , ten pounds so far. Ffs
They aren't growing at all, he just keeps shifting up to the next sister size and those padded cups have nothing in them but air.
 
Bit of a shitshow kicking off on US tranny Twitter today over the acquittal of Isi Etute. Summary of the case, archive.

The short of it is: Etute hooks up with a woman on Tinder, gets a blowie in her flat in the dark, leaves, tells friends he's confused about the weird blowie in the dark, friends say "are you sure it was a woman?", goes back to see her to find out, in the dark again, shines phone light on her face, turns out it's a dude, dude goes for something, Etute thinks he's going for a gun and smacks him about. Dude had used some random woman's photo on Tinder. Dude dies. Police find knife. Etute is unanimously acquitted after 3 hours' deliberation.

Victim's name is Jerry Smith, and is referred to as Jerry Smith throughout the case. No-one suggests he is anything other than Jerry Smith, some dude using a random woman's photo to trap men on Tinder, who he would blow in the dark in his flat while wearing a hoodie. Eventually Jerry gets found out, goes for a weapon, and gets his face caved in.

Whatever you think of the ultimate outcome, this does not sound to me like an innocent victim.

Don't worry tho, the troons have come to this brave and stunning now-transwoman's rescue!

View attachment 3330285
(source, archive)

View attachment 3330286
(source, archive)

Obviously I'm including Tony here because he is my one true love. Note that the defence in the case did not use the gay panic defence. The defence was that Etute thought Smith was going for a gun. Police found a knife.

To be fair to Tony he did issue a (very partial) correction:

View attachment 3330284
(source, archive)

lol but one that makes it sound like Etute went back a month after the blowie in the dark to specifically murder Smith. Good save! (Maybe Tony's just mad because he has a felony on his record and Etute doesn't.)

More garbage from the "no of course you don't have to disclose your trans status before sex" crowd (forgetting that there was no suggestion that Smith, who had facial hair, was trans):

View attachment 3330283
View attachment 3330282
View attachment 3330281
View attachment 3330280

Edit: Tony has a TikTok about it because of course. Uploading it here as I've a feeling he might pull it. (source, archive)

View attachment 3330333

Edit edit: Tony thought this was good enough to retweet himself so I can't deprive you lot of it.

View attachment 3330430
(source, archive)

(Again, not what was argued by the defence in court!)


Y are his teeth running away from each other?
 
No, self-defense is still a thing. The gay/trans panic defense is more specific, which is why it's basically never used, in that you find out someone is gay/trans and then decide to kill them. You're still not allowed to rape through deception.

One reason the gay panic defense was rarely successful before they started banning it is you have to argue something like that the guy sucking your cock tricked you into it in some way and you wouldn't have let him do it if you knew he was gay. Juries aren't going to buy it now that being gay is close enough to acceptable in and of itself everywhere especially after the prosecutor tears your life apart.
Would the banning of such a defense perhaps have the reverse effect? Where a homosexual rapist could try and paint his actions as being entirely consensual, with "gay panic" being the reason the victim ultimately decided to press charges. I suppose not, but I thought I'd ask.
 
Look out world!

1653790002358.png

This is almost a parody. You naturally assume that with the title and order of pictures, he transitioned to the guy smiling, but it literally is the reverse.

1653790551777.png

1653790113099.png

Mother literally crying because her son thinks he looks like a girl in her dress.

1653790138551.png

1653790341470.png

I think it isn't the leather....
1653790442187.png
1653790465115.png
 

Attachments

  • 1653790248955.png
    1653790248955.png
    183.7 KB · Views: 253
Look out world!

View attachment 3330953

This is almost a parody. You naturally assume that with the title and order of pictures, he transitioned to the guy smiling, but it literally is the reverse.

View attachment 3330981

View attachment 3330954

Mother literally crying because her son thinks he looks like a girl in her dress.

View attachment 3330955


I think it isn't the leather....
View attachment 3330972
View attachment 3330974
Nigga literally looks like Dustin Hoffman on the Tootsie poster in the first pic
 
Would the banning of such a defense perhaps have the reverse effect? Where a homosexual rapist could try and paint his actions as being entirely consensual, with "gay panic" being the reason the victim ultimately decided to press charges. I suppose not, but I thought I'd ask.
That's not really a defense. You can always argue that a sexual encounter was consensual as a defense but you can't just claim it to avoid charges, the prosecutor has discretion to whether or not he believes charges are warranted. It happens that prosecutors drop charges because someone says it's consensual but you kinda have to assume that they don't really if there's other evidence. Depending on the circumstances they might even pursue charges if there's no evidence and people deny there was anything that happened period like Mike Nifong did.

Probably one of the most disturbing Twitter threads about Etute's acquittal.View attachment 3330988View attachment 3330989
Yes, EV is a troon.

View attachment 3330987
Just like Keffels, this troon either doesn't understand or doesn't care about raping people by deception.
I think the part where he used some woman's photo on his profile was a bit of a lie. It also helps explain why he was insisting on hiding in the dark, and freaked out when the guy shone a light, which was a bit of a lie by obfuscation. Maybe he wasn't lying and actually was the woman in the photo instead of Jerry Smith, but it was Jerry Smith who wound up dead. A bit difficult to get around that piece of evidence, EV.
 
Would the banning of such a defense perhaps have the reverse effect? Where a homosexual rapist could try and paint his actions as being entirely consensual, with "gay panic" being the reason the victim ultimately decided to press charges. I suppose not, but I thought I'd ask.
"Gay panic" is specifically a tactic arguing diminished capacity/loss of self-control due to provocation. It basically only occurs in murder trials where guilt is otherwise certain. With gay panic, it's not the discovery of homosexuality that's at issue the way it is with trans status, "gay panic" is when non-violent sexual advances are argued as being provocative enough that the defendant lost control and committed murder. The ban means that defendants can't use the idea of provocation due to non-violent sexual advances as an argument for diminished capacity.

Now, the ban is dumb, because the provocation arguments are a legitimate tactic, and it's stupid to treat this one case as the bridge too far. But it's not a defense that can be used for non-consensual sex, it's not saying you can't object to sex because someone is gay.


The "Trans panic" one I actually think is more problematic, because it can be argued before or after sex. I think it's fair to say most people would say that discovering that someone who is hitting on you is a trannie (if you couldn't tell initially) isn't enough of a provocation to warrant murder, but that seems a very different argument than discovering someone you actually had sex with was trans. It's still not a defense that the trans party can use, but the argument of provocation seems much more reasonable in that situation, to me at least.
 
Back