Amber Heard v. Johnny Depp Legal Proceedings - "And on my side of the bed was human fecal matter."

Who is the real criminal in this trial?

  • Amber Heard

    Votes: 767 72.0%
  • Johnny Depp

    Votes: 43 4.0%
  • Both

    Votes: 256 24.0%

  • Total voters
    1,066
  • Poll closed .
Even if Depp never stars in another project, he can more live comfortably off his royalties and music career.

Amber cannot. She's ruined. Even if she gets some minor roles, the fact that she's been revealed to be such a vile person has utterly annihilated her career in big name Hollywood.

She won't go to the poorhouse, but her dreams of ever seeing her name up in lights again are fucking over, and that along with the vindication of Depp is more than enough for me.
 
Last edited:
Radfem website Ovarit on suicide watch (x)
View attachment 3343183
"Ladies, one day you too will be beat, and nobody will listen"
View attachment 3343184
"Most misogynistic era I have lived through" immortal woman checking in:
View attachment 3343185
Watch out wimmins, Johnny is going to shove a bottle up your fanny in broad daylight:
View attachment 3343186
And my personal favourite:
View attachment 3343187
Oh yeah, Evan Rachel Wood is another lying psycho who wrote fake FBI letters to intimidate witnesses and others to leak information against Marilyn Manson aka Brian Warner. Gentlemen, let this be a lesson to you: never get sexually involved with lesbians. It's not as fun and sexy as you imagine it will be.
 
These are the same people who screech about DEMOCRACY when Republicans are in power.
They screech democracy simply because they believe that if we were a direct democracy country (or if all illegal-under-law ballots were always counted) republicans would never again be in power.

If they thought that would result in Republicans gaining more power, they wouldn't say shit (just like every time a Republican clearly wins). They're mostly for whatever means their side wins.

They're also pretty quick to let the quiet part slip out if you press them - that they would prefer anyone who voted for Trump/Republicans have their voting rights permanently removed since they're "obviously too stupid to be trusted with voting and are destroying the country".
 
This isn't going to set back victims of domestic abuse FFS. This was a defamation trial, not a criminal trial. It takes a lot to win defamation, especially when you're a public figure. If the juries found for Depp that means that the evidence was overwhelmingly in his favor.

Will women be less believed when they claim abuse? In the public opinion, yes. But let's be honest, even with me too women weren't believed. The only thing to come out of me too was Weinstien and he was guilty af. Everyone else accused of abuse is back at their jobs because public opinion wanted them there.

Will women be less believed in court? I doubt it. Not at a criminal trial anyway. Because women were already not believed by the justice system.

What this will do is mean more men speak up, and that's good. It's harder to abuse men because of the strength thing, but women can be evil cunts too. The only people less believed than women are men who claim abuse. I'm pretty feminist, but I'm more about equity than anything else. Men deserve protection under the law too. The law is supposed to be blind, after all.
 
Posting rare Johnny's to celebrate his win against the turd.
1653599041903.png
1621323971203.png
johnny_dubb.png
1653423716549.png
1622359732813.png
 
Even if by some weird reason you feel bad for her, don't. She can raise/earn that 8 million quite easily without winning any major roles. And even though she looked pretty bad in court, she's still beautiful enough with a big enough name to make her a good enough catch to marry some millionaire/billionaire if she gets truly desperate. She's going to be fine, for better or worse depending on how you feel about her.
Who in their right mind would want anything to do with a jezebel like her? Not even the horniest Saudi prince would dare touch that shit with a ten-foot pole. Forget about her beauty, she's proven that she's a sociopath that will destroy your life if given the opportunity.
 
Will women be less believed when they claim abuse? In the public opinion, yes. But let's be honest, even with me too women weren't believed. The only thing to come out of me too was Weinstien and he was guilty af. Everyone else accused of abuse is back at their jobs because public opinion wanted them there.
Half the metoo accusations weren't about illegal things anyways. Like Louis CK, he asked every single one consent and his career was demolished. Meanwhile kids are getting fucked for nickelodeon productions and they got off Scott free. If anything metoo showed that women's accusations are taken very seriously and are toxic to reputations.
 
Who in their right mind would want anything to do with a jezebel like her? Not even the horniest Saudi prince would dare touch that shit with a ten-foot pole. Forget about her beauty, she's proven that she's a sociopath that will destroy your life if given the opportunity.
I dunno, those Saudis are into some weird shit ( bed not included) and wouldn't have a single issue slapping her back in line. She's going to be stuck being D list reality TV fodder at best for a very long time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chester Rigby
Radfem website Ovarit on suicide watch (x)
View attachment 3343183
"Ladies, one day you too will be beat, and nobody will listen"
View attachment 3343184
"Most misogynistic era I have lived through" immortal woman checking in:
View attachment 3343185
Watch out wimmins, Johnny is going to shove a bottle up your fanny in broad daylight:
View attachment 3343186
And my personal favourite:
View attachment 3343187
Thank you for reminding me why I don't read Ovarit despite it being a TERF haven.
 
Back