Careercow Taylor Lorenz - Crybully "journalist", self-appointed Internet Hall Monitor, professional victim, stalks teenagers for e-clout

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Another good chance to post this picture. Sums up most of the last two years for me.

View attachment 3311107
The funny thing is that this cartoon also represents what Taylor Lorenz thinks she’s doing with this kind of journalism — it’s a very deceptive way of thinking you’re on the right team, when in reality, you’re controlling information through the words and “think tank” of a billionaire owned establishment company.

Case in point:


Taylor wants you to seriously believe that The Libs of Tik Tok was a Russian operative, because she‘s that “honest” about it.
 
Taylor defends a domestic abuser and slanderer.

Screenshot_20220601-144254_DuckDuckGo.jpg
 
Taylor defends a domestic abuser and slanderer.

View attachment 3342983
I like how Taylor and her astroturf #Resistance crew are trying to manufacture this narrative of patriarchal societal woman-hating when a large bulk of the pro-Johnny people that were covering this case at the beginning (long before the trial even started, in some cases) were the mostly female true crime / "tea spilling" YouTube community. Just amazing.
 
I like how Taylor and her astroturf #Resistance crew are trying to manufacture this narrative of patriarchal societal woman-hating when a large bulk of the pro-Johnny people that were covering this case at the beginning (long before the trial even started, in some cases) were the mostly female true crime / "tea spilling" YouTube community. Just amazing.
Eh, that's not inherently inconsistent. It's not like the concept of the self hating woman, like anti-feminist pickmes, is a new one.

Not to say that women can't be critical of modern (or historical) strains of feminism for being retarded. Plenty of them have been. But there's definitely a demographic of women who bend over backwards for dudes in incomprehensible ways. Like the women who stan for gross trannies.

And that's not even counting the women with explicitly sexual fetishes for shitty dudes, like serial killer / school shooter fangirls.
 
Taylor defends a domestic abuser and slanderer.

View attachment 3342983
If she has more evidence than 99.999% of survivors then that's pretty bad for the claims of the #MeToo #Resistance. Heard probably should have brought some of the evidence to court instead of bringing witnesses and her own testimony that contradicted her claims.
 
Taylor just got caught lying about contacting a youtuber over the Johnny Depp/Amber Heard trial.

View attachment 3350350

View attachment 3350351

View attachment 3350352

View attachment 3350353

View attachment 3350354

Not once, but twice:

View attachment 3350358

The always ethically-challenged WaPo stealth-edited out the claim that Taylor contacted them.
Once more, I must repeat myself: Taylor, why does lying come oh-so-naturally to your forked tongue?

This instance also makes no sense, this is an open-and-shut easy hitpiece to manufacture - how do you fuck up on hitting 'Send' on an email??? You'd think with how much shlock the lizard people are having Taylor write up, she would have gotten one right by now lmao
 
You guys just don't understand standard journalistic practices. This was breaking news, there was no time to hold publication for comment or even to ask the people to comment in the first place. Besides these far-right pro-D*pp Gamergate trolls were just going to lie anyway, that's what they're being paid to do.
 
This is incredible and out of everything possible with this thot I never would've thought she would've fabricated something so painfully easy to debunk. So what's the over/under on absolutely nothing happening to her blatantly lying and shitty reporting? How blown out will her asshole be for her to keep her job?
 
This is incredible and out of everything possible with this thot I never would've thought she would've fabricated something so painfully easy to debunk. So what's the over/under on absolutely nothing happening to her blatantly lying and shitty reporting? How blown out will her asshole be for her to keep her job?
I would go in with no expectations, man. We'd all love to see the WaPo bring the smackdown on this bitch, but at this point it's clear where they stand when they pretty much run interference for her shenanigans.
 
At this point, its only a matter of time before she says either says something so clearly and embarrassingly untrue that the paper has to fire her to save face, or she says something to obviously defamatory, they risk a repeat of the UVA/Rolling Stone rape hoax saga. Take your bets regarding which one happens.
WaPo simped for Amber Heard and called an international mass murderer an "austere religious scholar". Why would a lying bint bother their nonexistent consciences?

Everyone at that jizzrag should be in prison.
 
At this point, its only a matter of time before she says either says something so clearly and embarrassingly untrue that the paper has to fire her to save face, or she says something to obviously defamatory, they risk a repeat of the UVA/Rolling Stone rape hoax saga. Take your bets regarding which one happens.
I actually doubt that Taylor could do something like that Rolling Stone story. There was a bunch of actual fraudulent work put into that by someone who is still trying to be a journalist. Taylor's work seems to mostly involve looking at shit online and then asking her friends for quotes. That DHS story was just handed to her, probably mostly pre-written.

Would Taylor Lorenz even continue to exist if she lost internet access?
 
The only way the Washington Post, and by extension Taylor Lorenz, are held accountable for their lies will be by the public refusing to pay for their services or to even read them. Even then Bezos will continue to pump money into it to further his agendas. But the more aware of how full off shit they are the average person becomes the less influence the Post (and Taylor) will have.

She's not going to get fired in some big showy way as a kind of reckoning. She'll outlive her usefulness and be quietly shunted off somewhere else where her presence won't distract from the message the paper is trying to convey. Even then I'd be genuinely surprised if she stops working in her field altogether as someone willing to sign their name to the horrible shit she's done can be very useful to the right people.
 
Back