Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

Jesus, Fatrick is so Twitter addicted he even sends text messages like there is a character limit.
It's probably a limit by his carrier, and it's done automatically.
I like how Fatrick claims that everything the "stalker" believes to know is a lie, despite there being pretty obvious proofs for pretty much everything. Does he just deny everything on principle, or is he actually deluding himself? How deep does his narcissism go?
 
If there's any legs to this theory, I truly hope a rascal shits out a self published novel onto Amazon that hits all of the plot points fat tits can't stop tweeting out just to muddy the rights a bit
I have an idea for something I can throw together pretty quickly, I'm just not sure if I can use his name and the content of his tweets or if I'd have to do a Fonald Plump thing. If anyone legit knows about this, send me a DM.
 
I have an idea for something I can throw together pretty quickly, I'm just not sure if I can use his name and the content of his tweets or if I'd have to do a Fonald Plump thing. If anyone legit knows about this, send me a DM.
He is using the Dickens characters in his latest one, I cannot see why a person would need to Fonald Plump it
 
He is using the Dickens characters in his latest one, I cannot see why a person would need to Fonald Plump it
Oh no, to use Fatrick as a character in it. The play is to use his name as the character's name so it would come up in Amazon search results, but I don't want the wrath of Brenton and that cute redhead lawyer who just sat there on Zoom.

If I do the dumb make it free the first week and get people to download it so it's a bestseller that'd be ideal.
 
Oh no, to use Fatrick as a character in it. The play is to use his name as the character's name so it would come up in Amazon search results, but I don't want the wrath of Brenton and that cute redhead lawyer who just sat there on Zoom.

If I do the dumb make it free the first week and get people to download it so it's a bestseller that'd be ideal.
"any resemblance to any persons living or dead is purely coincidental"
 
Oh no, to use Fatrick as a character in it. The play is to use his name as the character's name so it would come up in Amazon search results, but I don't want the wrath of Brenton and that cute redhead lawyer who just sat there on Zoom.

If I do the dumb make it free the first week and get people to download it so it's a bestseller that'd be ideal.
Semper fidelis, Piggy Higuera.
 
I have an idea for something I can throw together pretty quickly, I'm just not sure if I can use his name and the content of his tweets or if I'd have to do a Fonald Plump thing. If anyone legit knows about this, send me a DM.
if you're just memeing on the internet and not selling it you can probably do whatever and it counts as satire.
copying his shit verbatim to create commercial competition will not clear the fair use bar afaik. public domain characters mean you can copy dickens, not fatrick.
edit- my point is for trolling you want to be in the legal clear enough that any retarded judge has to dismiss his lawsuit immediately. remember pat has stated repeatedly his lawsuits aren't about winning, they're about doxing thru discovery process to harm ppl irl, because he's psychotic.
 
Last edited:
I have an idea for something I can throw together pretty quickly, I'm just not sure if I can use his name and the content of his tweets or if I'd have to do a Fonald Plump thing. If anyone legit knows about this, send me a DM.

Oh no, to use Fatrick as a character in it. The play is to use his name as the character's name so it would come up in Amazon search results, but I don't want the wrath of Brenton and that cute redhead lawyer who just sat there on Zoom.

If I do the dumb make it free the first week and get people to download it so it's a bestseller that'd be ideal.
I'm not saying that Patrick S. Tomlinson isn't fat and stupid enough to try but there's nothing he can do to stop you from writing and publishing anything about a "character" named Patrick S. Tomlinson based entirely on fat and stupid Patrick S. Tomlinson. After all, it's literally all not true, stalker.

The fat idiot doesn't "own" the content of his tweets to where you can't put it in the mouth of a "character" but I would love to see him and the SWFA try to claim public tweets are copyrighted material that other people can't republish on a whim. They could bitch to Amazon and get it taken down maybe but that's just Amazon's ability to curate what they sell. If this fat faggot wants to go to court to argue that taking the content of his own tweets as literally true to mock him is defamation, and the SWFA wants to take on that burden, then I couldn't imagine anything funnier.

Standard disclaimer that this is not actual legal advice, et al.
 
Last edited:
He is using the Dickens characters in his latest one, I cannot see why a person would need to Fonald Plump it
He is clearly trying to do what Terry Pratchett did with “Dodger”.
Or in a similar fashion, George Macdonald Fraser with Flashman taken from Tom Brown’s schooldays and inserted into historical events.

Even though using established or beloved characters which are freely in the public domain is a bit of a cheap writing trick, Pratchett and Fraser both continue and enhance the characters they used in witty and entertaining ways.

The problem here though is Fatrick lacks the wit and panache of these two esteemed writers.
The only saving grace is that likely no one will read them to have Dickens’s works tainted in their imaginations.
 
Nah, he's the Delphi child killer
I feel sorry for Pat's victims. Imagine the last thing you experience in the world is a Harkonnen-level deathfat leering down at you lustfully, orgasmically crying "sweet baby little CHIIIIIILD," while stroking himself and dragging you to the ominous machine making grinding sounds.
 
I'm not saying that Patrick S. Tomlinson isn't fat and stupid enough to try but there's nothing he can do to stop you from writing and publishing anything about a "character" named Patrick S. Tomlinson based entirely on fat and stupid Patrick S. Tomlinson. After all, it's literally all not true, stalker.

The fat idiot doesn't "own" the content of his tweets to where you can't put it in the mouth of a "character" but I would love to see him and the SWFA try to claim public tweets are copyrighted material that other people can't republish on a whim. They could bitch to Amazon and get it taken down maybe but that's just Amazon's ability to curate what they sell. If this fat faggot wants to go to court to argue that taking the content of his own tweets as literally true to mock him is defamation, and the SWFA wants to take on that burden, then I couldn't imagine anything funnier.

Standard disclaimer that this is not actual legal advice, et al.

Fat would have to prove that a fictional character saying the same words in the same order as one of his tweets is financially damaging him, somehow.


If anyone actually owns the copyright to tweets, it’s probably twitter anyway.
This I am just guessing but I can imagine that it’s somewhere in their terms and conditions.

On an unrelated note, I have been penning a parodic character based on everything Hunter S Thompson wasn’t.

Patrick S l Tomlinson, my fictional character, where Hunter is skinny, Patrick is fat, where Hunter is competent with firearms, Patrick pretends to be good with them, where Hunter is a gonzo journalist who rode with the hells angels and took a rightfully earned beating from them, Patrick is a cowardly bar fly who is more mouth than trousers.

The only common thing is their alcoholism and unpredictable nature.

If this happens to bear any likeness to anyone else named Patrick, well it is a total coincidence.
 
Back