- Joined
- May 14, 2019
Well, that's a big chunk of why it never did happen.I think a mass slave revolt in the South could be an interesting timeline, but I don't think it would be an Anglo-Haiti. Even in the most slaving of states, slaves barely outnumbered the whites.
That said, I have no doubt that a mass slave revolt could become a very bloody and very insane war as radicals on the rebels part, and the fire eaters would naturally just escalate it. Such a war could drag on in the swamps and woods of the deep south for a decade or more if it was sufficiently bloody initially.
The south ITTL would probably be a shambling wreck by the end, and OTL racial troubles post-Civil War would look mild compared to the end result ITTL.
There's a good book called "Unfree Labor: American Slavery and Russian Serfdom" that lays out (not as the main point of it, but somewhere in the text) all the reasons slave revolts were ineffective in both places. I think a successful slave revolt looks like a limited war of trying to flee to the Mountains/beyond (if early enough) or to move in to one area and hold it. The Lowcountry is probably swampy and Black enough that it could be a nightmare zone. So could Florida and maybe (?) the Alabaman Appalachians.
I've had an interest in playing with a dystopian Confederate winning setting, because most Confederate timelines are either absurd neo-Confederate wank (Robert E Lee frees the slaves in 1865 and the CSA becomes the USA with a pallette swap but also conquers half the world) or the same shit except with them as the villains (slave markets in 2020 Manhattan). I don't think the CSA would have turned out this way, but I like the idea of a story where the country goes the banana republic and pariah state route and by the 1960s is degenerating into rebellions (mainly of a Pentecostal flavored, Maoist Liberation Theology type, like a very extreme Sandinistas) of both the Blacks and the yeomanry.