đť•Ź / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

Mothra1988 said:
Reality.
Click to expand...

As interpreted by who? Basically everything stated here has already come true or is blatantly obvious. You have to actually provide evidence to the contrary when arguing with somebody. If I'm wrong, how am I wrong? People who are in the right actually demonstrate confidence and are able to back up their viewpoints with quantifiable data, they don't sit there and just impotently whine about how right they are while the world turns around them.
 
  • Dislike
  • Dumb
Reactions: George Lucas, Vyse Inglebard, Lone Star and 1 other person
Sanshain said:
As interpreted by who? Basically everything stated here has already come true or is blatantly obvious. You have to actually provide evidence to the contrary when arguing with somebody. If I'm wrong, how am I wrong? People who are in the right actually demonstrate confidence and are able to back up their viewpoints with quantifiable data, they don't sit there and just impotently whine about how right they are while the world turns around them.
Click to expand...
It's not our job to convince you. Hell, you're so busy sperging I don't even know what your position is other than that you disagree with a majority of the thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kiwisee
Puff said:
It's not our job to convince you. Hell, you're so busy sperging I don't even know what your position is other than that you disagree with a majority of the thread.
Click to expand...

I posted videos asking for legitimate arguments against them.

People refused to acknowledge any of the points in them (or even watch them, I'm sure).

Every single one of those points that wasn't based on pure speculation has come true.

If you want to convince me, go watch the videos and tell me where they're wrong, factually and with sources.
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: Mothra1988
Sanshain said:
I posted videos asking for legitimate arguments against them.

People refused to acknowledge any of the points in them (or even watch them, I'm sure).

Every single one of those points that wasn't based on pure speculation has come true.

If you want to convince me, go watch the videos and tell me where they're wrong, factually and with sources.
Click to expand...
Argue for yourself. Nobody is going to watch a video because you asked them. I still have no fucking clue what your stance is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Netizennameless, Kiwisee, m1ddl3m4rch and 2 others
Sanshain said:
I posted videos asking for legitimate arguments against them.

People refused to acknowledge any of the points in them (or even watch them, I'm sure).

Every single one of those points that wasn't based on pure speculation has come true.

If you want to convince me, go watch the videos and tell me where they're wrong, factually and with sources.
Click to expand...
Learn to sneed
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Ukraine is Big Gay, Autistic Joe and Nod Flenders
Sanshain said:
I posted videos asking for legitimate arguments against them.

People refused to acknowledge any of the points in them (or even watch them, I'm sure).

Every single one of those points that wasn't based on pure speculation has come true.

If you want to convince me, go watch the videos and tell me where they're wrong, factually and with sources.
Click to expand...
Watch a video of me fucking your mom.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Ukraine is Big Gay, Autistic Joe, Staffy and 4 others
So I feel a need to bring up something that surprisingly hasn't been talked about, and it's about the DHS's now-infamously-memed-on Disinformation Governance Board.

While the Administration has claimed that this was something that it was working on only now, this is not, in fact, the case, and Representative Grassley successfully got access to quite a few documents regarding this new Board, what its intended purpose was, and perhaps most interestingly to this thread, why it ran aground. I've chosen to give the PDF in this post, and if someone wants the quick-and-dirty version, Matt Christiansen discusses basically every aspect of the board here.

One of the things revealed was that Nina Jancowicz was specifically chosen for the Board because of existing ties to Twitter staff, but the bigger reveal, and the fallout therefrom comes from the fact that this board was both already created and by all accounts, already in operationback in 2021. The leaks included them covering what they were specifically telling Twitter to shut down all conversation of, and surprising exactly no one here, it covers doubting the legitimacy of the 2020 election and questioning the effectiveness of masks and vaccines on COVID.

Banned Topics 1.png

You know, shit that currently is verboten on Social Media, and where saying anything against the grain can get you banhammered (but the WHO can leave up tweets saying masks don't work and that COVID has no person-to-person transmission without consequence). All of that brings us to April of 2022, where the Biden Administration suddenly talked about the need for the DHS setting up this board, despite documents stating it was in operation for at least a year before this. There's a few things of note here, like the DHS Director claiming at this time that the board was to counter Russian disinformation, when all evidence is that it specifically targetted Americans and had done literally nothing but, but the interesting part is that they unveiled its existence (framing it as a pending DHS sub-branch) back in April.

What happened during this time that forced them to bring it out in the open? Simple.

Musk announced he was going to buy Twitter, and then made overtures to do just that.
 

Attachments

  • Informative
  • Like
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Ihascat, Blatant hypocrite, Netizennameless and 26 others
Oxyjen said:
He has now addressed Twitter staff, there’s a long thread on it here (on Twitter)
Click to expand...
Surely, Musk having a lengthy meeting with his employees in which he discusses his plans for Twitter is an elaborate ruse part of a financial conspiracy as galaxy brained @Sanshain has revealed and we must watch an hour long clickbait video from a d-lister YouTuber to understand it all. Don't forget to like, share and subscribe!

 
  • Like
Reactions: Netizennameless, Justa Grata Honoria, 1Tonka_Truck and 4 others
The year is 2030. Elon Musk now has a monopoly over 99.99% of the entire planet thanks to bitcoin shenanigans. Everybody drives a Tesla.
And one day, without warning, a few select cars suddenly stop. Anyone that spends more than a hour per day in social media has their car turn into a miniature rocket. Several thousand spaceships fly into space and head towards the sun. All twitter users scream and flail as the unearthly heat of the sun melts the flesh off their bones.
And just like that, the average worldwide IQ skyrockets. World peace is achieved. Human society heads to a golden age of hope and progress.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Ihascat, Blatant hypocrite, Bafta and 26 others
Maybe no one wants to watch @Sanshain's dumbshit youtuber commentaries because Twitter keeps bending the knee to Elon and Morgan Stanley is not backing off their financing. Here's the data you want, Elon, as per the agreement. Let's just forget the misunderstanding when we were refusing to give it to you. Here Elon, have a video conference with employees. That 25 billion from Morgan Stanley still there, not a peep from them when the entire business media is on the lookout for any leaked scrap they can get re: Musk and Twitter harder than Hunter Biden is on the lookout for crack

Everything happening in the real world and not some aspie's retarded fantasyworld is Elon getting what he wants, being in control
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 1Tonka_Truck, Autistic Joe and George Lucas
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back