Worshipping a sand god is the ultimate cuck - No white person on the planet can possibly justify being a christcuck

[Mothra1988]

Yeah, that's what sucks about paganism, it's a dead religion and all you can do is read about what it was probably like.

What is even positive about what it was like? There's literally nothing positive about it beyond the fact that a small group of internet retards are mad at their parents and want an alternative.

 

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

What is even positive about what it was like? There's literally nothing positive about it beyond the fact that a small group of internet retards are mad at their parents and want an alternative.

Because it was an actual faith people of my ethnic group practiced before foreign crusaders and violent governments forced them into believing the cult of a Jewish rabbi who had taken over the Roman Empire. Now I know it's hard for someone like you to understand why a non-Jew might value their ethnic religion, but traditional ethnic religion was a beautiful faith with good morality that produced great works of art and architecture globally for thousands of years. Christians ripped it off before they invented their own art. There was something truly spiritual to how people interpreted their local environment and raised up wonderful stories, morals, and works of art to their gods.

Christianity on the other hand is ultimately a foreign cult with not as good morality. It's a wholly inferior religion for anyone of European, African, Asian, etc. descent to follow. Jesus as God is a ridiculous idea, like you're worshipping a Jewish rabbi who had to one up everyone else (probably because he was a rape baby, his real daddy was a Roman soldier named Tiberius Julius Abdes Pantera) by saying he was God. Muhammad, Buddha, etc. knew the idea of claiming to be God was silly, because God is something far beyond our human comprehension (hence why pagans worshipped aspects of this entity we call "God").

 

[Homophobic white dog]

It's the blood sacrifice of God in human form. This is not hard to understand why it would be so meaningful or powerful.

What, dying just as countless others did? And exactly what makes it necessary in the first place? In fact, why should I even accept that Adam and Eve's sins passed on to me, or would have passed on to me had it not been for Christ's crucifixion? Why is it right that I should inherit someone else's sins instead of only accounting for my own? What kind of just god would work like that?
Look, I get what Original Sin is for, it's a device to explain why we're this fucked up, but as a rationalization of our nature it really isn't very coherent.
Remaining within an Abrahamic context, Muslims or even the Pelagian Christians in late antiquity don't believe in any of this.

There's quotes in the Old Testament prophesying the coming of a new covenant and some others at least alluding to it. I'm not going to spoon feed you, but I'm sure you'll bicker over what those refer to. But irregardless, they are there.

Yeah you're definitely going to spoonfeed me, just as I did with you. Evidence.

Jesus definitely preached to non-Jews. This isn't disputed by anyone and he certainly adjusted to the fact the Jewish leaders rejected to him. Jesus was preforming an exercise to test that Canaanite's woman's faith. He was impressed by her faith and ended up healing her. You're missing the full context and it actually supports the complete opposite of your conclusions.

Jewish leaders rejected Jesus because he called on their hypocrisy, not for preaching to gentiles which he never really did. As a matter of fact, there were countless converts to Judaism and gentiles sympathizing with it, God-fearers as they were called who followed the Seven Laws of Noah. 10% of the early Roman Empire was Jewish, many were converts, you can't chalk this up as an opposition to proselytism among gentiles.
Yeah, you can call Jesus ignoring the Canaanite woman a test of faith if you want, but why is she called a dog eating crumbs? From these words one should get what (who, actually) his priorities were: THE LOST SHEEP OF ISRAEL. Meaning Jewish people, not necessarily its leaders.

Jesus literally talks about making a new covenant during the Last Supper. The actions of the Jewish religious leaders precipitated this. This is, again, not hard to understand. Again read the Parable of the Wicked Husbandmen.

The existence of a new covenant (which, again, has no foundation in the Old Testament, unless you bring some relevant verses) doesn't undo the existence of the old one with the Hebrews, dual covenant theology is a thing. I brought you the evidence, too, Romans 1 (composed in a period in which gentiles were already being proselytized) affirms that the covenant with Israel stands.
And I'm also demonstrating you why the covenant with you is essentially of lesser quality than the one with Israel; because you're dogs eating crumbs.

Jesus's intent is crystal clear that he is the the path to salvation. "I am the door. If anyone enters by me, he will be saved and will go in and out and find pasture." This is fundamental to the religion and not up for debate.

Putting too many things "not up for debate" here, this isn't how... debate, works. Who's 'anyone'?

In Acts, rules regarding gentiles were literally hashed out by Jesus's own brother, Peter and Paul. James the Just was the leader of the Jewish-Christian camp and he sided with Peter and Paul on gentiles. Calling this an afterthought is stupid, considering the fact Jesus personally gave authority to Peter and the other apostles. The holy spirit worked through them in performing miracles, etc. This is not something that was just randomly decided hundreds of years later.

Not centuries, decades, judging by the composition of Acts (late 1st century, maybe three to four decades after Christ's death) but my point stands. You guys were shoehorned inside as an afterthought, basically.

I initially wanted to take you seriously, but yet again, it appears you are driven by irrational juice hatred. Can't wait until this retarded meme ideology burns itself out for good, it's been repeatedly ramming itself into a brick wall for years in total obscurity. Hoping November will help move that process along. You literally can't have a conversation on imageboard-adjacent internet without someone spazzing out about the JUICEEEEEE.

No problem with Jews, my problem with Christianity isn't with Jesus being a Jewish savior or Christianity having a Jewish origin, it's its inconsistency with its own source material, the fact that I have in reality no place in it that doesn't involve myself personally demeaning myself, other than personal disagreement with basic doctrines like monotheism, original sin, covenant on an undebatably ethnic basis and so on.
I can even respect the religion, I do, there is substance to it and not everything revolves around the Jewish aspect of it, there's centuries, millennia of Christian philosophy worth reading about that can't be ignored just because "HAHAHAHAHA JEW CARPENTER", people who really tried to figure out what we're doing here, but I really disagree with it on so many levels and I find it to be based on lies and emotional manipulation. Not because it's Jewish, I can respect Islam that's actually a million times more Jewish, but because it's inconsistent.
I don't have a problem with Christianity's origins, I don't reject it because it's foreign because if it is I'd have to ignore the Indian shit I'm studying that's in fact even more distant geographically and possibly culturally, but I can tell you that my problem with Christianity isn't some blind racialism. I just find it doctrinally wrong, provably so I would say. Where the truth comes from, or you know just a vision of the world I find agreeable anyway since it's hard to 100% prove or disprove any of this, it's why you need faith to believe, isn't my issue.

 

[Mothra1988]

Because it was an actual faith people of my ethnic group practiced before foreign crusaders and violent governments forced them into believing the cult of a Jewish rabbi who had taken over the Roman Empire. Now I know it's hard for someone like you to understand why a non-Jew might value their ethnic religion, but traditional ethnic religion was a beautiful faith with good morality that produced great works of art and architecture globally for thousands of years. Christians ripped it off before they invented their own art. There was something truly spiritual to how people interpreted their local environment and raised up wonderful stories, morals, and works of art to their gods.

Christianity on the other hand is ultimately a foreign cult with not as good morality. It's a wholly inferior religion for anyone of European, African, Asian, etc. descent to follow. Jesus as God is a ridiculous idea, like you're worshipping a Jewish rabbi who had to one up everyone else (probably because he was a rape baby, his real daddy was a Roman soldier named Tiberius Julius Abdes Pantera) by saying he was God. Muhammad, Buddha, etc. knew the idea of claiming to be God was silly, because God is something far beyond our human comprehension (hence why pagans worshipped aspects of this entity we call "God").

I literally proved earlier in the thread that "actual faith" came from India. LOL. It's not indigenous to Europe at all. It literally moved west from further east than any Abrahamic faith did. God, you're such a putz. I knew you would take this bait to and then lock hands with OP who has been mocked ruthlessly for 11 pages. lol You're just another LARPer. Who knows if you're even white. I'm betting not.

I also LOVE how you're talking in complete generalities because you have no substantive argument. But let's go over some of this:

"Raised up their own stories." Everything from their gods to their creation myths were copied from Proto-Indo-European mythology that came form northwest India. LOL.

"Christianity ripped off pagan art." Pagans literally ripped off their gods from groups of foreigners. And I BET a lot of your favorite pieces of "pagan" art were Renaissance pieces literally made by Christians using paganism as a motif. lol

"Architecture." This is not true for the Nords and their primitive huts.

"Christianity is a cult." Paganism was a series of cults gaining a following and then waning in popularity, you dope. Christianity is still here, and your pagan cults are all literally dead.

"Christians were foreign crusaders." What were the Goths and other Germanic groups of savages that literally tried to destroy civilization multiple times like pants shitting retards? Were vikings good people who didn't do nuffin despite all that reputation for conquest and raping?

"Jesus as God is a ridiculous idea." Yet you think Jupiter and Thor are non-ridiculous. LOL.

"Paganism is my ethnic religion." Go to any European country and ask them what their ethnic religion is. It's Christianity, you sad, sad LARPer.

"Christianity has not as good morality." You give NO examples. Zero. Because there is none. Does this great morality of the pagans include Zeus fucking his own kids or Saturn eating them? Further more, you're the kind of autist that goes on rants about how much you hate "degeneracy" in other threads. Pagans loved butt sex probably more than their Marvel superhero-tier gods. So yeah no comments about degeneracy from @Save the Loli in his defense of paganism. LOL.

"Christianity is an inferior religion." It won over all the others and stood the test of time. Paganism, apart from India where it came from, is dead.

"Muhammad. and Buddha" Muhammad literally just repeated gnostic sectarian Chrsitian stuff with his own embelishments to make himself a prophet. Buddhists don't even believe in souls or God at all.

"His daddy was a Roman." You claim to hate Jews, but then you repeat their own libel straight out their writings. Nice job, retard.

 

[Homophobic white dog]

Honestly, not believing in God or the soul isn't a big deal, actually it has its reasons.

The concept of soul assumes an inherent, eternal aspect to ourselves, and that's provably wrong, because we change over time, physically and in character, and prompted by external stimuli not always dependent on our will. The human Self isn't permanent, and neither is the Self of anything, that iceblock is going to melt and turn into liquid water if you heat it enough.
On the basis of this, there's either no Soul, or no eternal one anyway.

God as a creator god has its issues, it opens a huge can of worms like what it was doing before creating the universe. Assuming an eternal, uncreated universe just cuts the bull's head off. It's much easier this way, spares me a headache.

 

[Mothra1988]

Honestly, not believing in God or the soul isn't a big deal, actually it has its reasons.

The concept of soul assumes an inherent, eternal aspect to ourselves, and that's provably wrong, because we change over time, in character, and prompted by external stimuli not always dependent on our will. The human Self isn't permanent, and neither is the Self of anything, that iceblock is going to melt and turn into liquid water if you heat it enough.
On the basis of this, there's either no Soul, or no eternal one anyway.

God as a creator god has its issues, it opens a huge can of worms like what it was doing before creating the universe. Assuming an eternal, uncreated universe just cuts the bull's head off. It's much easier this way.

I say this a lot, but people who don't believe in the human soul have no significant life experience or relationships. You have to be a complete spiritual neophyte to be skeptical of that. This isn't just faith, it's first hand knowledge that is revealed to you by living life. I really pity people that have this nihilistic outlook and lack of meaningful attachments, but whatever. It is what it is. Trying to prove to me there isn't a soul is pretty much like arguing flat-Earth stuff. I'm just going to ignore you, because I know it's wrong point blank. It isn't also my job to convince you either, but keep plodding away rudderless in what you think is a completely pointless existence. I'm sure that will work out well for you.

 

[Homophobic white dog]

I say this a lot, but people who don't believe in the human soul have no significant life experience or relationships. You have to be a complete spiritual neophyte to be skeptical of that. This isn't just faith, it's first hand knowledge that is revealed to you by living life. I really pity people that have this nihilistic outlook and lack of meaningful attachments, but whatever. It is what it is. Trying to prove to me there isn't a soul is pretty much like arguing flat-Earth stuff. I'm just going to ignore you, because I know it's wrong point blank. It isn't also my job to convince you either, but keep plodding away rudderless in what you think is a completely pointless existence. I'm sure that will work out well for you.

Not believing in an eternal or at least permanent soul doesn't mean nihilism, it's just a way to address and remind others the fact that we live, we change and we die. We have our inherent worth, we're living, thinking beings, we can do beautiful shit (and horrific shit, but for the sake of the argument I'm going to focus on the beauty), there's bound to be something 'special', some 'divine spark' in us, I just don't agree with the idea of a soul the way it's articulated by Christians.

I'm the first one to tell nihilists to kill themselves, just for the sake of coherence with their beliefs.

 

[Butterschmalz]

Thats your Varg Vikernes or right wing argument: Jesus is a Jew and Christianity is a death cult. Its ok I guess and I am a fan of Varg except his atheism.
You sir are probably pretty young and neither married nor do you have kids. So life will teach you the very hard way that you too will have to bow in front of the one and only true god. Or you will be just like Varg who never worked a day in his life and just doesnt give a fuck: Dude, cant afford a property? Just move to the country!
There is a lot of death misery and depression needed in order to convince people that life is suffering and that the "dead Jew on the cross" is your only chance to understand that and give some sort of meaning to your existence. Till than it will be a fucking sausage party for you and you will follow one Fuehrer after another. And one Fuehrer after another will disappoint you and make you more and more miserable. Till you break down in tears and confess all your sins to the Lord. But hey who knows maybe just being "white" is enough and "white privilege" will save you...

 

[Mothra1988]

Not believing in an eternal or at least permanent soul doesn't mean nihilism, it's just a way to address and remind others the fact that we live, we change and we die. We have our inherent worth, we're living, thinking beings, we can do beautiful shit (and horrific shit, but for the sake of the argument I'm going to focus on the beauty), there's bound to be something 'special', some 'divine spark' in us, I just don't agree with the idea of a soul the way it's articulated by Christians.

I'm the first one to tell nihilists to kill themselves, just for the sake of coherence with their beliefs.

That's all just cope. You still believe in basic atheist nihilism that it's all meaningless and everyone is just dust in the end. I mean if you're a Buddhist, fine, I can at least respect a Buddhist's devotion to their belief system (that still bucks up against scientism despite what westerners think), but I will never respect this view point among white non-religious zoomers and millennials.

I said this was revealed to me as facts in that I've had personal experiences that prove it to me. I'm sure you'll never believe me though so I won't even bother power-leveling about that, but people like you either have your Road to Damascus moment or you go to the grave remaining spiritually oblivious. Or you have your moment where a loved one's soul reaches out to you and you're so convinced in your Twitter atheist scientism you push it out of your mind and try to bury it in your subconscious to maintain your status quo worldview which is just as sad.

 

[Homophobic white dog]

That's all just cope. You still believe in basic atheist nihilism that it's all meaningless and everyone is just dust in the end. I mean if you're a Buddhist, fine, I can at least respect a Buddhist's devotion to their belief system (that still bucks up against scientism despite what westerners think), but I will never respect this view point among white non-religious zoomers and millennials.

I said this was revealed to me as facts in that I've had personal experiences that prove it to me. I'm sure you'll never believe me though so I won't even bother power-leveling about that, but people like you either have your Road to Damascus moment or you go to the grave remaining spiritually oblivious. Or you have your moment where a loved one's soul reaches out to you and you're so convinced in your Twitter atheist scientism you push it out of your mind and try to bury it in your subconscious to maintain your status quo worldview which is just as sad.

I'm not religious at the moment but I'm trying to, I'm studying Hinduism and Buddhism, trying to figure out which one has the most agreeable view then I'll decide a hundred percent where I fit.
I can tell you, though, I'm neither an atheist nor a nihilist. I mean I'm non-denominational at the moment but far from being not spiritual, I believe in something. I'm only non-denominational because, for lack of enough knowledge, I can't place myself somewhere yet without doing a huge disservice to whatever faith I'd claim to belong to.

It's great you've had your personal experiences and everyone derives different lessons conclusions from them. I one hundred percent believe you, I just disagree with Christianity is all, but compared to the actual twitter atheist scientists whatever differences we might have are basically cosmetic by comparison.
Don't worry, I'll be fine. I went through my atheist period already, and as you can guess it was teenage angst.

 

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

I literally proved earlier in the thread that "actual faith" came from India. LOL. It's not indigenous to Europe at all. It literally moved west from further east than any Abrahamic faith did. God, you're such a putz. I knew you would take this bait to and then lock hands with OP who has been mocked ruthlessly for 11 pages. lol You're just another LARPer. Who knows if you're even white. I'm betting not.

Except you didn't because you have no idea what you're talking about. Believing paganism came from India is a belief on the level of Yaqub inventing whites except instead of black people who believe it, some Pajeets believe it. The Indo-Europeans came from Russia and after the era of the Bactria-Margiana civilization in Central Asia (which was ancestral to ancient Indian people, and Persian people too) had minimal contact with most other Indo-Europeans. They just come from the same source of an ancient Siberian faith.

And you can't use the excuse it was "just the Indo-Europeans" because just like the Hindus and Zoroastrians discovered truths from local people they conquered, so did the Indo-Europeans in Europe. No, the faiths became native to the people who practiced them. Christianity will always be a foreign faith because the Bible commands you worship God in a specific way which is the same no matter what culture you are, because you will do so in heaven. That's some serious globohomo right there.

I also LOVE how you're talking in complete generalities because you have no substantive argument. But let's go over some of this:

"Raised up their own stories." Everything from their gods to their creation myths were copied from Proto-Indo-European mythology that came form northwest India. LOL.

This is the most lazy-ass interpretation of comparative religion I've ever seen, like so intellectually lazy I'm amazed you can even understand the concept that, say, Zeus and Jupiter are related. Cultures worshipped that spiritual entity differently, and that's the point, there's no all-encompassing totalitarian thing like Christianity trying to homogenize cultures in a proto-globohomo thing.

"Christianity ripped off pagan art." Pagans literally ripped off their gods from groups of foreigners. And I BET a lot of your favorite pieces of "pagan" art were Renaissance pieces literally made by Christians using paganism as a motif. lol

Some of the oldest architecture in the world in Egypt and Mesopotamia is pagan, and to this day Indians have incredible temples for their gods. Original basilicas were also stolen from Roman pagan temples, and also secular buildings, weirdly. And don't even get me started on how a bunch of saints and their depictions are literally just pagan stories with the names changed, but that shit isn't even in the Bible so I'll give it a pass. Although Yahweh is just a Semitic storm god after all who some cult decided was the only god, check all the shit he shares with other Canaanite religions.

"Architecture." This is not true for the Nords and their primitive huts.

Where do you think stave churches came from lol, they were literally inspired by a mix of local religious and secular architecture (although technically there was no distinction).

"Christianity is a cult." Paganism was a series of cults gaining a following and then waning in popularity, you dope. Christianity is still here, and your pagan cults are all literally dead.

All religions are cults, Christianity was started by Jews who hated the rise of Rabbinical Judaism (Pharisees and Saducees wrote the Talmud).

"Christians were foreign crusaders." What were the goths and other Germanic groups of savages that literally tried to destroy civilization multiple times like pants shitting retards? Were vikings good people who didn't do nuffin despite all that reputation for conquest and raping?

They didn't try and destroy civilization lol, they were actually mercenaries hired by the Romans who didn't get paid on time, maybe because the Romans were too busy donating their money to the church (hence why the Catholic Church is just the shambling corpse of the Roman Empire) so demanded land instead of fake-ass debased money. Vikings were just a mix of farmers and merchants who sacked cities because people cheated/mistreated them.

"Jesus as God is a ridiculous idea." Yet you think Jupiter and Thor are non-ridiculous. LOL.

I mean you're claiming to understand the divine, but that's not something anyone can do. Claiming to be God is like Jim Jones/David Koresh shit.

"Christianity has not as good morality." You give NO examples. Zero. Because there is none. Does this great morality of the pagans include Zeus fucking his own kids or Saturn eating them? Further more, you're the kind of autist that goes on rants about how much you hate "degeneracy" in other threads. Pagans loved butt sex probably more than their Marvel superhero-tier gods. So yeah no comments about degeneracy from @Save the Loli in his defense of paganism. LOL.

Except they didn't celebrate homosexuality. Taking a bunch of private poetry and erotic artifacts out of context is not how you interpret a culture. And some pagan societies were degenerate, Ancient Athens was one of them, they made everything a lot gayer than it actually was because their leadership got off to it and were basically to degeneracy what Sparta was to militarism.

As I said, Caesar destroyed the druids because they were wicked and Romans who indulged in Greek degeneracy like Nero and his gay marriage to a slave were rightly considered freaks. Ancient Mesopotamian temple prostitution was wiped out in large part by moral people among the Greeks and the Persians. I'm sure if the Romans met the Aztecs, they would've dealt with their obsession with human sacrifice and cannibalism in a most harsh manner.

"Christianity is an inferior religion." It won over all the others and stood the test of time. Paganism, apart from India where it came from, is dead.

It "won" because of political bullshit. Turns out inheriting the corpse of the Roman Empire is actually very good for your religion.

"Muhammad. and Buddha" Muhammad literally just repeated gnostic sectarian Chrsitian stuff with his own embelishments to make himself a prophet. Buddhists don't even believe in souls or God at all.

Buddha probably had some true insight since he came from a very ancient scholarly tradition and was a real innovator. Muhammad admittedly wasn't the most creative (and Islam is also a bunch of Semitic trash), but again, point is you don't just call yourself God because that's like Jim Jones/David Koresh stuff.

"His daddy was a Roman." You claim to hate Jews, but then you repeat their own libel straight out their writings. Nice job, retard.

It was a commonly known fact in Antiquity reported by the Greek writer Celsus and no doubt others whose writing was banned by the church. Why do you think Joseph rarely gets mentioned in the Bible? Because either Pantera was a chad who Mary would rather fuck than her arranged marriage (he was about Mary's age after all), or Pantera was the guy who raped Mary and she became damaged goods and Joseph was the only guy who would marry her.

 

[Mothra1988]

I'm not religious at the moment but I'm trying to, I'm studying Hinduism and Buddhism, trying to figure out which one has the most agreeable view then I'll decide a hundred percent where I fit.
I can tell you, though, I'm neither an atheist nor a nihilist. I mean I'm non-denominational at the moment but far from being not spiritual, I believe in something. I'm only non-denominational because, for lack of enough knowledge, I can't place myself somewhere yet without doing a huge disservice to whatever faith I'd claim to belong to.

It's great you've had your personal experiences and everyone derives different lessons conclusions from them. I one hundred percent believe you, I just disagree with Christianity is all, but compared to the actual twitter atheist scientists whatever differences we might have are basically cosmetic by comparison.
Don't worry, I'll be fine. I went through my atheist period already, and as you can guess it was teenage angst.

Okay, my apologies for jumping to conclusions especially thinking you were another cringey /pol/ autist like @Save the Loli and OP. I don't know if Buddhism or Hinduism will work out for you. I already listed my disagreements with Buddhism, and Hinduism is not only very pagan but it's also probably the most complex and convoluted existent religion in the planet to the point it almost collapses under its own weight. I don't think non-Indians tend to have an easy time with it. At least they believe in the human soul though, which is more than I can say for most Buddhists.

 

[Homophobic white dog]

Okay, my apologies for jumping to conclusions especially thinking you were another cringey /pol/ autist like @Save the Loli and OP. I don't know if Buddhism or Hinduism will work out for you. I already listed my disagreements with Buddhism, and Hinduism is not only very pagan but it's also probably the most complex and convoluted existent religion in the planet to the point it almost collapses under its own weight. I don't think non-Indians tend to have an easy time with it. At least they believe in the human soul though, which is more than I can say for most Buddhists.

They're both very complex with a lot of stuff to study and many schools of thought, which means many bells to hear and many possible answers. It's hard, but with some constancy and humility it can pay off, finding an answer always does.

Buddhism's rejection of the Atman (what we might call a soul) lies in the fact that everything is pervaded by shunyata, or Emptiness, but the term "Emptiness" or "Vacuity" can be deceiving. This isn't nihilism, it's just the idea that nothing permanently stays the same and everyone affects and changes each other, so if that is the case an eternal, unchanging soul or inherent nature of anything, living or otherwise, is rejected, but some Hindu schools have a similar view, they just frame the answer differently.
It's a healthy view because once you accept the idea that things (and, in fact, people) are created, change and then cease to be as you know them, you can learn to enjoy them while they last without going completely crazy when they're gone.
Some Vedantic schools of Hinduism like Vallabha's and Ramanuja's see the Atman as a self-evident fact but because the real constant in Hinduism and Buddhism is that we become something else according to our qualities, both in this life and the next, the conclusion that things are impermanent is really shared by both Hindus and Buddhists, the latter just frame a similar conclusion as rejection of the Atman.
Shankara, though, wins the price for proximity to Buddhism since he also rejects the Atman, and he might also sound a bit schizo if his conclusion is that everything is illusory.

 

[Sarcastic sockpuppet]

God doesn't exist, skip that middleman between you and the universe and kill the worshipper in your heart.
You descend from an ape, and that ape descended from a sea creature who started walking on land, and that sea creature descended from primordial soup.
Worship the mystery of life and the beauty of our animal world. Be free. Nothing matter other than bringing fleeting joy to other creatures in this world and bringing more equality between men. We are only alive for a minute and there's nothing waiting after death.

Life is only on Earth by chance and not for long.

 

[A Welsh Cake]

I think sand is pretty cool and wouldn’t mind animism being more widespread.



Just kidding sand fucking sucks and I’m gonna worship the mushroom spirits.

 

[b0o0pinsn0o0tz]

Note that by Romans 1 it was already established that gentiles would play a part, but judging by Christ's own words in the Gospels themselves, the inclusion of gentiles was an afterthought by the early Christian community to say the least, but even then, the covenant with Israel stands, they only have their part to play, and while the gentiles who reject Christ will burn in Hell, the Israelites who reject him still end up saved IN SPITE of their disbelief. And do you know why?
Because you gentiles are dogs eating crumbs at the table of the master, but I don't want to be a dog eating anyone's crumbs.
By Biblical standards, you Christians, you idolatrous cross-worshippers, are at best second-rate faithful, God still loves the Heebs the most, in spite of their disbelief.
It wouldn't even be the first time he hardens hearts for the sake of making a point, the Pharaoh's heart was hardened just so God could fuck up Egypt and flex on the Jews how much he was on their side, to what extent he could go to save them, if they remained faithful.

Just say Goyim at this point.

 

[Homophobic white dog]

Just say Goyim at this point.

Goyim.

 

[Mothra1988]

It was a commonly known fact in Antiquity reported by the Greek writer Celsus and no doubt others whose writing was banned by the church. Why do you think Joseph rarely gets mentioned in the Bible? Because either Pantera was a chad who Mary would rather fuck than her arranged marriage (he was about Mary's age after all), or Pantera was the guy who raped Mary and she became damaged goods and Joseph was the only guy who would marry her.

Those words of Celsus, which are lost, are from 177 (over 100 years from the destruction of the second temple) and were a response to Justin Martyr's apologetics and not a historical document. They are not contemporaneous to Jesus by any stretch, and no scholar or historian gives this shit, most famously if not only known from the Talmud, any credence whatsoever anywhere unlike the Proto-Indo-European Mythology which debunks your entire view on religion. LOL.

So yeah, you are so butt blasted about Christ you had to scrounge around for polemics from the Talamud. The Talmud, the literal document of rabbinic jews, the people you are most mad at. That's where these ideas were publicized. You have to go to the Jews to attack Christ. Beyond pathetic.

And you can't use the excuse it was "just the Indo-Europeans" because just like the Hindus and Zoroastrians discovered truths from local people they conquered, so did the Indo-Europeans in Europe. No, the faiths became native to the people who practiced them.

Keep rolling around in that hypocrisy like a pig in shit.

Except they didn't celebrate homosexuality. Taking a bunch of private poetry and erotic artifacts out of context is not how you interpret a culture. And some pagan societies were degenerate, Ancient Athens was one of them, they made everything a lot gayer than it actually was because their leadership got off to it and were basically to degeneracy what Sparta was to militarism.

Premium level copium right here. Their gods did the butt sex too, you nut. LOL:

https://www.pride.com/religion/2016/9/10/20-greek-gods-who-had-same-sex-relationships

You like homo culture more than chaste Christian culture. Just admit it. LOL.

Anyways, thanks for embarrassing yourself again. You can scamper off until the next thread now.

 

[The Lawgiver]

When Isaw the title I thought it meant an ACTUAL sand god, instead of a "religion bad because it stems from jews" thing. Shameful clickbait, not even one mention of a god made of literal sand fucking your wife right in the sand hole.

 

[Dagobert]

God doesn't exist, skip that middleman between you and the universe and kill the worshipper in your heart.
You descend from an ape, and that ape descended from a sea creature who started walking on land, and that sea creature descended from primordial soup.
Worship the mystery of life and the beauty of our animal world. Be free. Nothing matter other than bringing fleeting joy to other creatures in this world and bringing more equality between men. We are only alive for a minute and there's nothing waiting after death.

Life is only on Earth by chance and not for long.

If God isn't real, and you could prove it right now, I still won't join you in your yuppie pursuits.

If anything, not having an afterlife would only convince me to try and become an elite so that I can get 7 heart transplants and blood infusions from young men when I get old and prolong my existence.