Supreme Court Watch

Status
Not open for further replies.
兄貴 Forevermore said:
It is ironically the inverse of Dred Scott v Sandford. Right "logical" conclusion. Wrong public opinion (for the north, because they think they run this country).
Click to expand...
I just drove 10 hours then drank a lot to kill the caffeine, so forgive the spergery, but why the fuck are Yankees like this? My family has bullshit going on to this day because we supported the union in the south, but modern shit has me wishing the south had won.
Until a few years ago they still got to okay our voting districts, they keep renaming our shit and now we're the only demographic that you can openly shittalk even at work in white collar places.
Can we just split into 2-5 countries? We'd be much better off.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: LurkNoMore, feral cat #6385, Certified_Autist and 3 others
Puff said:
I just drove 10 hours then drank a lot to kill the caffeine, so forgive the spergery, but why the fuck are Yankees like this? My family has bullshit going on to this day because we supported the union in the south, but modern shit has me wishing the south had won.
Until a few years ago they still got to okay our voting districts, they keep renaming our shit and now we're the only demographic that you can openly shittalk even at work in white collar places.
Can we just split into 2-5 countries? We'd be much better off.
Click to expand...
From what I understand in my interactions (I'm from the deep south so probably wrong), it has to do with the face that the northern power players permanently fucked over and suppressed the intellectual elite of the south post war.
I believe there is (was) a law that reconstruction-era states are not allowed to modify voting laws without the consent of the US Congress.

Mind you, part of the reason Andrew Johnson got impeached was because they literally wanted to permanently destroy the south a la Morgenthau Plan and turn it into vassals to the US version of the Ireland-UK relationship.

It is not like the South isn't like this. Rather, the south is more open in its hatred. Go down to small town Texas and act like a nigger, you'll be fixin to get called one like this video:
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Bananadana, Toy Soldier, JohnDoe and 3 others
兄貴 Forevermore said:
From what I understand in my interactions (I'm from the deep south so probably wrong), it has to do with the face that the northern power players permanently fucked over and suppressed the intellectual elite of the south post war.
I believe there is (was) a law that reconstruction-era states are not allowed to modify voting laws without the consent of the US Congress.

Mind you, part of the reason Andrew Johnson got impeached was because they literally wanted to permanently destroy the south a la Morgenthau Plan and turn it into vassals to the US version of the Ireland-UK relationship.

It is not like the South isn't like this. Rather, the south is more open in its hatred. Go down to small town Texas and act like a nigger, you'll be fixin to get called one like this video:
Click to expand...
I only recognize the other Andrew from Tennessee.
 
So first opinion release at 10am. Then every ten minutes after until they are done. Unlikely to be today.

But maybe that makes it likely ooooo who knows. My bet is thursday as a last minute opinion next week looks cucked.
 
Last edited:
Meat Target said:
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health
Click to expand...
Thanks.
We just got an opinion from Breyer, so we're unlikely to see the case today unless they break their usual order. Pack it up, folks.
Edit: unless Roberts decided to take it from Alito
Edit again: done for the day. No opinion.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Norbert the Tiger
Saw this in Seattle on my lunch break.

20220621_112917.jpg
 
  • Informative
  • TMI
Reactions: Basil Julep, Irrational Exuberance, LurkNoMore and 1 other person
If I had a bunch of hilariously controversial(overturning roe, constitutional carry, and limiting the powers of the EPA to regulate carbon emissions, say) judicial opinions/decisions to release, I would probably save them for last too, simply because I could get the fuck out of town real quick afterwards.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hubelublub, LurkNoMore, Puff and 1 other person
兄貴 Forevermore said:
It is ironically the inverse of Dred Scott v Sandford. Right "logical" conclusion. Wrong public opinion (for the north, because they think they run this country).
Click to expand...
I am a little uncertain what you mean by this but I think I agree. Could you please explain? Does that mean you assert Roe has poor legal reasoning, does not base its opinion on sound legal analysis but engages in preposterous reasoning to reach a policy decision they agree with? If so you are spot on.
 
FunPosting101 said:
If I had a bunch of hilariously controversial(overturning roe, constitutional carry, and limiting the powers of the EPA to regulate carbon emissions, say) judicial opinions/decisions to release, I would probably save them for last too, simply because I could get the fuck out of town real quick afterwards.
Click to expand...
They're releasing digitally due to covid. They could already be out of town.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: SCSI, LurkNoMore and FunPosting101
Norbert the Tiger said:
I am a little uncertain what you mean by this but I think I agree. Could you please explain? Does that mean you assert Roe has poor legal reasoning, does not base its opinion on sound legal analysis but engages in preposterous reasoning to reach a policy decision they agree with? If so you are spot on.
Click to expand...
Yes.
Dredd Scott was the logically right decision, but morally wrong (to the north, who won the war and thus wrote history).

Roe on the other hand is the exact opposite. Abortion was never a right codified, a right to privacy (for medical) never existed, and abortion was a crime in most states. But the court decided to conjure something out of thin air that literally did not exist and force it on the state for the sake of appeasing the crowd. So Logically wrong, but "right" in the public opinion (because the left so far dictates history because it has won for now).

Wickard v. Filburn is another decision that is logically wrong, but "right" the public opinion.
Because how the act of not engaging in interstate commerce, is in fact itself interstate commerce, would be so broad and indefinite it would permanently usurp the role of states in the federal system the constitution intended. Only educated fools who have never dealt with practical issues in life could reach such a monstrous absurdity of a conclusion.
@Puff please stop stalking me....
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Puff
FunPosting101 said:
Never say never, although I do agree that shall-issue is more likely.
Click to expand...
so if the supreme court passes federal shall issue? how will reciprocity agreements work afterwords for CCWs? will it be national reciprocity?
if every single state has shall issue ccws, not counting the constitutional carry one's. what's the point of not having reciprocity in every state?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: FunPosting101
Michael Janke said:
so if the supreme court passes federal shall issue? how will reciprocity agreements work afterwords for CCWs? will it be national reciprocity?
if every single state has shall issue ccws, not counting the constitutional carry one's. what's the point of not having reciprocity in every state?
Click to expand...
I wouldn't expect national reciprocity, I think even if every state was to be shall issue they could put some shooting qualification requirements or such, basically something objective as opposed to their extremely subjective current requirement of "tell us why you need a gun and every reason besides being rich and politically connected doesn't count"

As for Roe V. Wade decision, I'm guessing Friday. That way they can drop it and then book it to one of those government bunkers before the pussy hat crowd gets 'em and says that it's totally different from January 6th cause abortion good.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Joshuan Moon, Return of the Freaker, Male Idiot and 5 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back