Nexpo/YT Horror Channels - Do they all suck

I remember when he coasted on "Abandoned by Disney" (a story I actually do like) for years. He threw a fit when anyone covered it on YouTube, sperged at the something awful forums after they pointed out that he can't copyright a story that is Disney based, then wrote like 8 shitty sequels, bitched when fans didn't like them, then completely abandoned the whole thing in a self righteous huff, AND THEN refused to write stories for months saying his little creative heart was broken. If kiwi farms existed back then, he'd definitely have a thread.
Really liked room zero, corruptus, and a few suggestions. Slimebeast is an annoying person but he does make some good stories sometimes. Like that one about the amusement park
 
I mean he showed off some rifles in his Waco video. How do people not know this?
Because they don't actually watch his content and are only looking for someone to be angry at or because they were told to follow the funny internet dad that talks about rape vomit movies.

Also I find this really funny, not long ago Mista GG did an interview with Wendi and he said out of his Christain beliefs and his views on guns, he said he was surprised that his view on guns was more controversial. It's almost like the stars aligned or something.
 
I mean he showed off some rifles in his Waco video. How do people not know this?
I don't think the fans there for the FNAF and salad fingers breakdown are that interested in his anti-goverment deep dives like the MLK or Waco vids. Because he covers a wide array of topics it wouldn't surprise me if his fanbase is more divided between the creepy pasta fans, true crime fans, and conspiracy fans with some modest overlap.
 
This might not really count here since it's arguably in a different genre, but Chubbyemu's channel is a pretty good place to start if you find medicine to be an interesting subject. The guy who runs it is a doctor, and many of the cases he showcases are ones that he's either personally seen, or are taken directly from current events taking place. Occasionally cases are combined to allow for more information to be shown on the biological processes at work, but everything's sourced and cited as well.
While most of the medical cases discussed are a case of being unlucky, doing something routine that just so happens to end in serious problems because of something the patient wasn't aware of, a significant chunk of the others deal with the results of patent stupidity. It's both shocking and fascinating to see just how quickly the body can get fucked over if you don't treat it with the respect it deserves, such as this moron who decided to consume several times the maximum recommended dose of caffeine at once.
Lmfao zoomer joining the 5% gruppa
 
I don't know if I'm late to the party but this is getting ridiculous with the censoring. The way that it sounds backwards makes it sound like how a parent would make an airplane sound to feed his toddler baby food with the spoon.

Also if he's going to have to do all the work into censoring he might as well just use a substitute for "rape/rapist" (ie violator, defiler, attacker, despoiler, sex criminal, criminal, debaucher, deceiver, seducer, betrayer etc...) Use a fucking thesaurus for fuck sakes!!!
 
Last edited:
I mean, censoring is the best way to avoid having videos removed over dumb reasons. Too bad YT never implemented that "instead of striking, hide the video and tell the author what part needs to be removed using YT studio for it to go public" they said they were going to implement back in 2020 OR were more clear on what is/isn't ok. Yes censoring is cringey, but when the platform is willing to strike a video over 2 seconds of a naked virtual avatar's ass, it's no wonder people censor themselves.
EDIT: as for the "use a thesaurus" comment-YT can still pick up if you are implying something, I mean-Wendigoon's 2nd Mandela video was struck because of suicide being mentioned, even though the word itself was never used.
 
I mean, censoring is the best way to avoid having videos removed over dumb reasons. Too bad YT never implemented that "instead of striking, hide the video and tell the author what part needs to be removed using YT studio for it to go public" they said they were going to implement back in 2020 OR were more clear on what is/isn't ok. Yes censoring is cringey, but when the platform is willing to strike a video over 2 seconds of a naked virtual avatar's ass, it's no wonder people censor themselves.
EDIT: as for the "use a thesaurus" comment-YT can still pick up if you are implying something, I mean-Wendigoon's 2nd Mandela video was struck because of suicide being mentioned, even though the word itself was never used.
Ok but these videos aren't often removed, they're flagged for adult content. Still up just fine only requiring a sign-in to view. I'm sick of these youtubers pretending stuff isn't allowed when it very much is, you just won't make money from it. Youtube doesn't want children stumbling over the content, and doesn't want to incentivize making videos about murder for a living. It sucks,if you're that passionate about it though you'd open a patreon or keep doing it anyway with no revenue.
I realize it is sometimes stupid with what it hits, like history videos, a vast majority of high-profile people bitching are upset about ad revenue disappearing though, not actual unfair removals.
 
Last edited:
I don't know if I'm late to the party but this is getting ridiculous with the censoring. The way that it sounds backwards makes it sound like how a parent would make an airplane sound to feed his toddler baby food with the spoon.

Also if he's going to have to do all the work into censoring he might as well just use a substitute for "rape/rapist" (ie violator, defiler, attacker, despoiler, sex criminal, criminal, debaucher, deceiver, seducer, betrayer etc...) Use a fucking thesaurus for fuck sakes!!!
I couldn't even tell what he was saying tbh.

Anyone see this?
 
Mr.Nightmare has always been re-uploading his videos that get demonitzed, and censors the things that triggers it. I remembered he re uploaded a video because one of the stories he posted had the word “faggot” in it. And his teen Twitter audience got pissed. Also he’s been very strict on people reusing his content even in fair use situations. And he would either strike down the videos or ask the uploader to take them down. A while ago, a channel named Robs Media made a “Mr Nightmare iceberg” video. After a few weeks of it being uploaded. Mr Nightmare asked him to take it down. View attachment 3418336
Being privately and politely asked to take a video down is shady? Wtflmao
 
Ok but these videos aren't often removed, they're flagged for adult content. Still up just fine only requiring a sign-in to view. I'm sick of these youtubers pretending stuff isn't allowed when it very much is, you just won't make money from it. Youtube doesn't want children stumbling over the content, and doesn't want to incentivize making videos about murder for a living. It sucks,if you're that passionate about it though you'd open a patreon or keep doing it anyway with no revenue.
I realize it is sometimes stupid with what it hits, like history videos, a vast majority of high-profile people bitching are upset about ad revenue disappearing though, not actual unfair removals.
Whilst it is just monetization most of the time, YT has tried to take down people using dumb tricks/excuses-case in point: DeepHumor-he covered youtube shenanigans, so they stopped him from uploading by trying to say he was "hacked" for it, you also had Mamamax who had to censor a lot of his IMVU video to get it back up (including names of rooms in IMVU which used words like nazi, unrelated to the "sexual content" they used as their official excuse). Either way, whether it is just monetization or something more-my point is that had YT included the features they said they were going to back in 2020, I honestly wonder how many of these content creators would still censor to the degree they do now.
 
I mean, censoring is the best way to avoid having videos removed over dumb reasons. Too bad YT never implemented that "instead of striking, hide the video and tell the author what part needs to be removed using YT studio for it to go public" they said they were going to implement back in 2020 OR were more clear on what is/isn't ok. Yes censoring is cringey, but when the platform is willing to strike a video over 2 seconds of a naked virtual avatar's ass, it's no wonder people censor themselves.
EDIT: as for the "use a thesaurus" comment-YT can still pick up if you are implying something, I mean-Wendigoon's 2nd Mandela video was struck because of suicide being mentioned, even though the word itself was never used.

Youtube doesn't want children stumbling over the content, and doesn't want to incentivize making videos about murder for a living.
This is really why YouTube should just 18+ to sign up or to watch or if they're going to have all these problems with advertisers then they should just make it so you pay for an account in exchange for uncensored content.

As for the children isn't "YouTube Kids" a thing too?

Being privately and politely asked to take a video down is shady? Wtflmao
I don't understand why "Faggot" is now the "Nigger" of the LGBTQIDGAF Fanny bandits troon club?? I will tell you all personally don't regret saying neither of those words in open public, but I think it's funnier to see people react to such a silly sounding name like Faggot.
 
Last edited:
Back