- Joined
- Sep 16, 2018
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not to sperg out about the minutiae of Constitutional Law, but I really hope he's able to convince the court to push back against Wickard. "Interstate commerce" is defined so fucking broadly that Congress can legislate almost everything under the Commerce Clause. It's almost at the point where the limitation is meaningless, and Congress can legislate anything as long as they write that it affects "interstate commerce" despite having fuck all to do with interstate commerce.Yeah I've read his stance before. But I don't think he'll ever get to marshal the rest of the court to actually go after Wickard. I don't think he even gets to lay the foundation in a majority opinion.
I wish he'd get the chance, but even today's ruling doesn't make it seem more likely. Dobbs doesn't overturn decades of federal regulation, it removes a court-imposed restriction on the states and lets them write their own laws. Alito and company don't seem willing to go as far as what Thomas outlines in his concurrence, which contains the bit all of Twitter is freaking out about (going after Lawrence and similar cases).
>HR departments go on an unified work strike
It would have made no difference, the Freedom of Choice Act would've been blatantly unconstitutional now that the law has been settled.Y'all remember this? Went from this:
"The first thing I'll do as President is sign the Freedom of Choice Act." - Obama, 2008
to this:
"The Freedom of Choice Act is not my highest legislative priority." - Obama, 2009
So how about you have an actual child looking at great success in the future, and then you find you're pregnant with some fucking retard who will do nothing but suck up resources before inevitably dying. You could abort the retard or send your genius kid to college.I'm not. Food prices are the same here but a child's tugboat is $16/month. I still don't understand how a couple in a committed relationship can abort a baby for financial reasons.
Porn itself, of any kind, should be banned IMO, not just because it's immoral (it is) but because regardless of your moral or religious views, it's literal poison to the brain and prolonged usage over the course of many years has been shown very plainly to lead to the atrophy and decay of brain matter in a physical pattern that's almost identical to hard drug addicts. It has absolutely no benefits at all for anyone.Morality matters, gay marriage and abortion should be illegal because they're immoral, a society that's not willing to take a stance on some things for their immortality is a society that's on it's way to a hellish future, even if extinction isn't the threat, a world where everyone is fucking miserable is.
Let's look at say 1960 and what they tolerated that could also be considered immoral, strip clubs and nude photography, I'm not necessarily advocating banning stuff like that, but notice what those two things have in common? Those things can still promote heterosexuality, a guy looking at some T&A might want to go home and fuck his wife which might lead to a baby he couldn't abort.
Hell even the 1800s had burlesque shows, my point is maybe we don't have to dial America all the way back to the 1600s, but a of the changes the 20th century enacted have had negative consequences and need to be changed back.
I said "if"; in other words, how I feel or what I'd do is irrelevant. It's largely a matter of principle and truth rather than something I'm emotionally invested in.So if you couldn't care less why do you insist they are born? It's weird you want them to be born but couldn't give a fuck what happens after.
I like Taylor Lorenz's British chipmunk cheeks. Not sexually but i like to imagine them flapping in the wind like loose tittiesAre there no cute pro-abortion protestors. I feel like despite journos being ideological shills for that side they can't take photos of anyone remotely attractive for some reason, whereas every other anti-abortion protestor photo has cute girls in it.
Lol I always find it funny when troons get mad about abortion shit. Even if someone was willing to fuck them consensually, they basically took a blender to their genitalia so it's not like they're going to be having to worry about getting knocked up.
Don't forget the Diversity & Inclusion departments! What would be of companies without them?>HR departments go on an unified work strike
>Investors realize their companies can run without them and save on millions
>HR departments get dissolved over night
A man can dream![]()
I'm not racist but let me use a racial slur to MAKE A POINT!View attachment 3422454
So just a dumb white woman then, eh?
It's more just troons deliberately eliminating any rights actual women have by forcing their dicks into literally everything.Lol I always find it funny when troons get mad about abortion shit. Even if someone was willing to fuck them consensually, they basically took a blender to their genitalia so it's not like they're going to be having to worry about getting knocked up.
yeah I can agree ftm already fucks their fertility with hormone induced pcos through hrtLol I always find it funny when troons get mad about abortion shit. Even if someone was willing to fuck them consensually, they basically took a blender to their genitalia so it's not like they're going to be having to worry about getting knocked up.
Right threatening politicians over a perceived stolen election: Facsist terroristsImpressive amounts of glowposting is happening today.
View attachment 3422417View attachment 3422418View attachment 3422419View attachment 3422422View attachment 3422449View attachment 3422423View attachment 3422436