Plagued Anita Sarkeesian A-Logs - MRA Manchildren and Basement Dwellers

[AngelicArmory]

but does anita even acknowledge him?

Actually yes. It was only once, but she did mention him by name at one speaking engagement if I remember correctly, where she attempted to refute the Hitman misrepresentation argument that was brought up by him and a number of others after one of her background decoration videos. If I manage to find it I'll link it.

 

[José Mourinho]

I finally found the hilarious tweet where MundaneMatt desperately tried to get a PA just to false flag Anita's vids. For those who don't know, it's literally a pathetic campaign to false flag Anita's vids for "spamming" (or "false info"? idk). Anita actually acknowledged him as shown in the vid in the OP, and I think it managed to get one of Anita's vids removed (until it's later restored of course).

https://archive.is/DdMoj

 

[Cynical]

You could have just named this thread "pro-gamergaters"

Based on my own trolling (as in lurking, not the act of antagonizing people) of pro-GG communities, anti-Anita feelings range from the following:

10% just think the only reason Anita has relevance is because she's given any by GamerGaters and totally ignoring her will make her go away.

30% see here as some sort of problem who they feel needs to be countered by taking apart her BS and signalboosting when she does shit like cry to the UN.

20% see her as a major enemy who must be destroyed like Carthage but stop just shy of going full lolcow and instead focus on trying to do stuff like pick apart her finances, expose her past indiscretions to discredit her, basically do the GamerGate version of a Kiwi Farms thread, though this group is usually at high risk of being like the last group, and there is a lot of overlap at times.

10% just see her as someone only worth pointing and laughing at.

The remaining 30% would be the subject of this thread: The types who see Anita as a feminazi who wants to emasculate all men and thus these losers are like NO MA'AM from Married With Children taken to its autistic neckbearded extreme.

 

[chimpburgers]

This is another classic Warcorpse666 video a-logging Sarkeesian. The whole fake apology bit which falls flat on its face with the comedic value and timing. It's so bad.

Really old thread on him here. The guy is still active.

 

[Billy of Hills]

Sarkeesian deserves every ounce of hate she gets. She's a manipulative, conniving, ruthless and above all else stupid fiend of a woman.
Anyone who buys into her conspiracy theories, provides her with ad revenue or voices support for her gets shut down and rightfully so. She's halfway in-between delusional and faking it for money. Feminist Frequency is as biased as Pravda, as credible as The Onion and as clickbaity as Buzzfeed.

 

[Too Many Crooks]

Sarkeesian deserves every ounce of hate she gets. She's a manipulative, conniving, ruthless and above all else stupid fiend of a woman.
Anyone who buys into her conspiracy theories, provides her with ad revenue or voices support for her gets shut down and rightfully so. She's halfway in-between delusional and faking it for money. Feminist Frequency is as biased as Pravda, as credible as The Onion and as clickbaity as Buzzfeed.

LOL calm down. She's just a crappy YouTube commentator.

 

[Billy of Hills]

LOL calm down. She's just a crappy YouTube commentator.

No. Anita represents the rising tide of anti-male, anti-white censorship and oppression. She is the embodiment of third-wave feminism.

 

[ObeseScreamingBlackMan]

I thought Anita was just Jim McIntosh's puppet and just says what he wants her to?

 

[AnOminous]

No. Anita represents the rising tide of anti-male, anti-white censorship and oppression. She is the embodiment of third-wave feminism.

You're just mad that she's a cute girl who people like and they want to make her their tubby wubby social justice waifu.

 

[AngelicArmory]

No. Anita represents the rising tide of anti-male, anti-white censorship and oppression. She is the embodiment of third-wave feminism.

You are, literally, the topic of this thread. Thanks for coming!

 

[Billy of Hills]

You are, literally, the topic of this thread. Thanks for coming!

In the end, the so called "A-Logs" will win. At this point, "A-Log" might as well mean decent human being

 

[AnOminous]

In the end, the so called "A-Logs" will win. At this point, "A-Log" might as well mean decent human being

"In the end, one way or another, the A-Logs are going to win."

 

[Batman VS Tony Danza]

She ripped off a bunch of SJWs who don't care if she delivers or not. It's a victim-less crime.

 

[TiredConlanger]

Anita Sarkeesian's a dumbass and prone to terrible amounts of sampling bias, cherry picking, and so on, kinda like a much less influential Jack Thompson, but blaming games for misogyny/rape/rape culture/whatever instead of mass shootings.

However, a good chunk of her A-Logs are retarded, too. She's really not nearly as influential as they think. By going on and on about just her while also doing the whole weening/A-Log pattern of extreme vitriol, they give her fuel to paint herself as a victim. That vitriol is something you never want to do with SJW-type tards and scammers faking being them. (They use that then to go on about how they're oppressed and shit, so people will give them money out of sympathy/pity/whatever.)

 

[AnOminous]

She ripped off a bunch of SJWs who don't care if she delivers or not. It's a victim-less crime.

Money swindled by Sarkeesian is money not going to pernicious causes, so it's hard to get too mad about the scam. It's sort of like money to Wu in that respect. If you're that fucking retarded, who cares if you get ripped off?

 

[L desu]

Fucking wow, all the cucks in here. Don't you see that Anita and that cuck McIntosh (more like mcincuck, amirite???) are the ones basically ruining the game industry? Those god damn bitch feminists are taking away are games!! #INeedGamergateBecause #Menrightsyo #fukobeme

 

[CatParty]

 

[Mark Corrigan]

However, a good chunk of her A-Logs are retarded, too. She's really not nearly as influential as they think. By going on and on about just her while also doing the whole weening/A-Log pattern of extreme vitriol, they give her fuel to paint herself as a victim. That vitriol is something you never want to do with SJW-type tards and scammers faking being them. (They use that then to go on about how they're oppressed and shit, so people will give them money out of sympathy/pity/whatever.)

Both Anita and her A-Logs only exist on the internet and would not exist without one another. She's truly the opponent they deserve.

 

[DykesDykesChina]

Sorry if this makes me sound like a MRA manchild Sarkeesilog myself, but I had this idea: If Anita had a tiny bit more self-reflexive humour, she would dress up in a 19th century governess costume for her show and wear her hair in a tight bun.

 

[Mark Corrigan]

If Anita had a tiny bit more self-reflexive humour...

Then she wouldn't be who she is. It's like saying "If Chris weren't autistic...". Self-righteousness is something that defines both her and her MRA GG opponents.